2009-03-16 - #:  8663-B7-200905052 - Bruce Telecom - Implementation plan for local competition - Bruce Telecom/Bragg Communications Inc. (EastLink)

File using the On-line Services


2012-01-24 - Telecom decisions CRTC 2012-35 Bruce Telecom – Implementation of local competition for Bragg Communications Inc., operating as EastLink, and wireless number portability for Rogers Communications, on behalf of Rogers Wireless
File numbers: 8663-B7-200905052 and 8620-B7-200905599


2012-07-06 - Bragg Communications Inc. (Eastlink)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., carrying on business as Eastlink (“Eastlink”), has obtained local competition implementation status reports filed with the Commission by Bruce Telecom, Hay Communications Cooperative, Mornington Communications Cooperative, and Tuckersmith Communications Cooperative. We have reviewed the timelines and we herein provide our comments on those status reports and regarding our status in Wightman Telecom’s territory.
Document: 1735310.pdf - 141KB

2012-06-29 - Bruce Telecom
Description: The following is in response to the Commission’s letter dated 22 June 2012. The dates planned for completion are subject to the arrival of the competitor’s equipment to allow for testing and installation.
Document: 1733987.pdf - 84KB

2012-06-22 - Commission Letter
File #: 8663-B7-200905052 – 8620-B7-2009055998663-G1-200813776 - 8663-H3-200917503 - 8663-M4-2008138418663-M5-200907199 - 8663-S4-2008138338663-T7-2009096408663-W36-200910225
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re : Status of implementation of local competition and wireless number portability in small ILEC territories

2011-11-17 - Bruce Telecom
Description: With reference to Commission’s staff letter dated 8 November 2011, Bruce Telecom hereby files its responses to Commission information requirements associated with the company’s Implementation Plans noted above. As per my telephone conversation with the Commission the filing deadline of 14 November 2011 was not met as I was out of the office during the period that the letter was received and did not return until after the deadline.
Document: 1639028.zip - 105KB

2011-11-08 - Commission Procedural Letter - English Version only - "Hard Copy Document"
File #: 8663-B7-200905052 – 8620-B7-2009055998663-H3-2009175038663-M5-2009071998663-T7-2009096408663-W36-200910225
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re : Local Competition in small ILEC's territories

2011-10-18 - Bragg Communications Inc. operating as Eastlink
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., operating as “EastLink” (EastLink), is in receipt of Bruce Telecom’s responses, dated 12 October 2011, to the Commission’s 6 October 2011 letter
seeking information related to Bruce’s local competition and local number portability implementation plan. Pursuant to the Commission’s 6 October letter, EastLink herein provides our comments on Bruce’s responses.
Document: 1628945.pdf - 45KB

2011-10-12 - Bruce Telecom
Description: Further to the Commission’s letter dated 6 October 2011, Bruce Telecom submits herewith its response to the Request for Information regarding the above noted Implementation Plans for local competition and wireless number portability
Document: 1626015.zip - 170KB

2011-10-06 – Commission Procedural Letter
File #:  8663-B7-200905052 – 8620-B7-2009055998663-H3-2009175038663-M5-2009071998663-T7-2009096408663-W36-200910225
Description:  Letter addressed to Distribution List – Re: Small incumbent local exchange carriers’ competition and wireless number portability implementation plan

2011-09-23 - Bruce Telecom
Description: Bruce Telecom is in receipt of a letter filed with the Commission by EastLink dated 23 September 2011 concerning the above noted implementation plan. In its’ letter EastLink claims that Bruce Telecom’s letter of 22 September 2011 was not filed by the due date and certain contents should not be accepted by the Commission.
Document: 1619166.pdf - 33KB

2011-09-23 - Bragg Communications Inc. (EastLink)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., operating as ”EastLink” (EastLink), is in receipt of Bruce Telecom’s , dated 22 September 2011, in which it addresses EastLink’s answer filed 25 August 2011 and our intervention filed 15 September 2011.
Document: 1619160.pdf - 81KB

2011-09-22 - Bruce Telecom
Description: Bruce Telecom is in receipt of letters from EastLink dated 25 August and 15 September 2011 which were filed with the Commission in response to the above noted implementation plan for local competition.
Document: 1619103.pdf - 41KB

2011-09-15 - Bragg Communications Inc. (EastLink)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., operating as ”EastLink” (EastLink), is in receipt of Bruce Telecom’s tariff notice and response to the Commission’s request for more information, dated 8 September 2011. EastLink herein provides our comments on both the tariff and Bruce’s response.
Document: 1615745.pdf - 85KB

2011-09-08 - Bruce Telecom
Description: Pursuant to Commission’s staff letter dated 11 August 2011, and amended 31 August 2011, Bruce Telecom hereby files its responses to Commission information requirements associated with the company’s Local Competition and Local Number Portability Implementation Plans (the Plan) filed with the Commission on 22 July 2011.
Document: 1613390.zip - 401KB

2011-08-31 – Commission Letter
File #: 8663-B7-200905052 - 8663-H3-200917503 8663-M5-200907199 - 8663-T7-200909640 -  8663-W36-200910225
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Local competition implementation plans – Request for extension to file responses to the Commission’s request for information

2011-08-30 - Bragg Communications Inc. (EastLink)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., operating as ”EastLink” (EastLink), is in receipt from the Commission of Wightman Telecom’s letter dated 26 August 2011, requesting an extension to file responses to the Commission’s request for information of 11 August. Wightman had indicated in its letter that it had copied EastLink but it did not. As a result, EastLink did not receive a copy of the letter until the afternoon of 29 August. EastLink herein provides its comments on Wightman’s request for an extension.
Document: 1609074.pdf - 87KB

2011-08-26 - Wightman Telecom Ltd.
Description: On 11 August 2011, the above referenced small ILECs (the companies) received a letter from the CRTC requesting additional information related to the Local Competition Implementation Plans filed by the companies with the Commission.
Document: 1607512.pdf - 50KB

2011-08-25 - Bragg Communications Inc. (EastLink)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., operating as ”EastLink” (EastLink), is in receipt of Bruce Telecom’s local competition implementation plan, dated 22 July 2011 (the “implementation plan”), regarding EastLink’s request to enter the Port Elgin and Paisley exchanges in Ontario. EastLink herein provides our answer to the implementation plan.
Document: 1607218.pdf - 94KB

2011-08-11 - Commission Procedural Letter
File #: 8663-B7-200905052 - 8620-B7-200905599
Description: Letter addressed to Bruce Telecom - Re: Bruce Telecom’s local competition and wireless number portability implementation plans

2011-07-26 – Commission Procedural Letter
Description:  Letter addressed to EastLink and Bruce Telecom – Re: Bruce Telecom’s localcompetition implementation plan for Eastlink

2011-07-22 - Bruce Telecom
Description: Pursuant to Commission’s staff letter of 5 May 2011, as modified by staff letter dated 10 June 2011, Bruce Telecom hereby files its Local Competition Implementation Plan (the Plan) associated with a request from EastLink confirming the latter’s intent to enter the Company’s operating territory as a Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (CLEC).
Document: 1593839.zip - 266KB

2011-06-24 - Bragg Communications Inc. (EastLink)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., operating as ”EastLink” (EastLink), is in receipt of Bruce Telecom’s letter, dated 22 June 2011, regarding EastLink’s request to enter the Port Elgin and Paisley exchanges. In its letter, Bruce Telecom requested a current five-year forecast of trunks, subscribers by exchange, and porting activity. Bruce Telecom also requested a detailed network diagram showing the proposed method of interconnection, and asked that EastLink confirm that it understands that Bruce Telecom cannot provide certain services.
Document: 1583489.pdf - 81KB

2011-06-14 – Commission Letter
File #: 8663-W36-200910225 - 8663-B7-200905052 - 8663-H3-200917503 8663-M5-200907199 - 8663-T7-200909640
Description: Letter addressed to Wightman Telecom Ltd. – Re: Local competition in small ILEC territories

2011-06-10 – Commission Letter
File #: 8663-B7-200905052 – 8663-M5-2009071998663-T7-2009096408663-W36-2009102258620-B7-200905599
Description:  Letter addressed to Distribution List – Re: Request for extension to file local competition or wireless number portability implementation plans

2011-06-07 - Bragg Communications Inc. (EastLink)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., operating as “EastLink” (EastLink) is in receipt of correspondence dated June 3, 2011 from Bruce Telecom (Bruce Telecom) in relation to EastLink’s request for CLEC entry into Bruce’s small incumbent territories of Port Elgin and Paisley, Ontario. EastLink objects to Bruce Telecom’s request.
Document: 1577823.pdf - 80KB

2011-06-03 - Bruce Telecom
Description: In a letter dated 20 May 2011 Eastlink gave notice confirming their intent to enter Bruce Telecom’s Port Elgin and Paisley territories as a competitive local exchange carrier. On 25 May 2011 a letter was received from the Commission stating that an updated Implementation Plan is to be filed with the Commission no later than 23 June 2011.
Document: 1576674.pdf - 46KB

2011-05-25 –Commission Letter
Description:  Letter addressed to Bruce Telecom – Re: Local competition in small ILEC territories – Implementation plan for Eastlink

2011-05-20 - Bragg Communications Inc. (EastLink)
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision 97-8, Local Competition (Decision 97-8) and the Commission’s correspondence of 5 May 2011, Bragg Communications Inc., carrying on business as “EastLink” hereby submits, as a follow-up to our correspondence of 28 November 2008, confirmation of our intent to enter Bruce Municipal Telephone’s territory as a Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (CLEC).
Document: 1571205.pdf - 147KB

2011-05-05 – Commission Letter
File #: 8663-B7-200905052 – 8663-C41-2008138008663-G1-2008137768663-K1-2008094948663-L2-2008137428663-M5-2009071998663-S4-2008138338663-S6-2008137268663-S7-2008137188663-M4-2008138418663-T7-2009096408663-U2-2008137848663-W36-2009102258620-A2-2009068368620-B7-2009055998620-C141-2009060428620-K1-200905607
Description:  Letter addressed to Distribution List – Re: Local competition and wireless number portability in small ILEC territories

2009-05-13 - Bruce Telecom
Description: Bruce Telecom (the Company) is in receipt of a letter dated April 29, 2009 from Bragg Communications Inc. (EastLink) in which they have raised certain objections to the Company’s proposed Local Competition Implementation Plan (the Plan) as filed with Commission March 16, 2009.
Document: 1128368.pdf - 102KB

2009-04-29 - Bragg Communications Inc. (EastLink)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., carrying on business as EastLink,is in receipt of the Local Competition Implementation Plan filed by Bruce Telecom on March 16, 2009, and we hereby provide our comments in responses to that plan.
Document: 1107164.pdf - 111KB

2009-04-24 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Bruce Telecom - Re: Implementation Plan for Local Competition in the territory of Bruce Telecom

2009-04-03 - Bruce Telecom
Description: Attached please find Bruce Telecom's response to Eastlink's letter dated March 24, 2009 which was copied to you.
Document: 1060058.zip - 441KB

2009-03-16 - Bruce Telecom
Description: Attached for the Commission’s approval is Bruce Telecom’s (the Company) Local Competition Implementation Plan to facilitate competitive entry by EastLink in the Company’s Port Elgin and Paisley local exchanges.
Document: 1043682.zip - 379KB

Date modified: