Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission
Symbol of the Government of Canada

Common menu bar links

Home > Consumers > Telemarketing > Telemarketing Compliance and Enforcement > 2011

Decisions related to administrative monetary penalties (AMPs): 2011

 

The CRTC may impose an AMP (fine) when a telemarketer is found to be in violation of Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules.

  • Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-628 Green Shield Windows and Doors Ltd. – Violations of the Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules
    File numbers: PDR 9174-888 and 9174-95

  • Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-582 Les Distributions Triple A Inc. – Violations of the Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules
    File numbers: PDR 9174-820 and 9174-996
  • Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-391 2160983 Ontario Inc., carrying on business as Ontario Choice Window and Door – Violations of the Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules
    File number: PDR 9174-930
  • Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-382 TopClass Home Services Inc. – Application to review and vary Telecom Decision 2010-817 regarding violations of the Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules
    File number: 8662-T139-201019159
  • Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-305 1716878 Ontario Inc., carrying on business as Direct to Home Groceries – Violations of the Unsolicited Telecommunications Rules
    File numbers: PDR 9174-749, 9174-810, 9174-834, and 9174-910
Date Modified: 2011-09-28

Top of Page
Important Notices