Telecom Order |
|
|
Ottawa, 31 May 1999 |
|
|
Telecom Order CRTC 99-475 |
|
|
In the matter of the filing of the 1997 Phase III/Split Rate Base (SRB) results by Bell Canada, BC TEL, TELUS Communications Inc., MTS Communications Inc., NBTel Inc. (NBTel), Maritime Tel & Tel Limited (MT&T), Island Telecom Inc. (Island Tel) and NewTel Communications Inc. (the companies). |
|
|
File No.: 8638-C12-01/97 |
|
|
1.In accordance with various Commission decisions, the companies are required to file their Phase III/SRB results by 30 September of the following calendar year. |
|
|
2.The companies were unable to file their 1997 Phase III/SRB results on or before 30 September 1998, because, among other things, the Commission had not disposed of their proposed assignment procedures for costs associated with broadband-capable equipment and facilities, as the record with respect to the issue of transfer prices was not complete. |
|
|
3.These procedures, set out in Implementation of Regulatory Framework - Splitting of the Rate Base and Related Issues, Telecom Decision CRTC 95-21, 31 October 1995 and in Telecom Order CRTC 97-144, 31 January 1997 (Order 97-144), provide that the companies are to assign all costs associated with joint-use broadband-capable equipment and facilities, such as Fibre Optics Transmission Systems (FOTS), to the Competitive segment and to use transfer pricing to reflect usage by the Utility segment. |
|
|
4.In a letter dated 30 October 1998, comments were sought on the appropriateness of using the assignment procedures for costs associated with broadband-capable equipment and facilities approved in Order 97-144 for use in 1996 for purposes of finalizing the companies' 1997 Phase III/SRB results. |
|
|
5.The companies, except MT&T, Island Tel and NBTel, responded that the production of 1997 Phase III/SRB results using the approved 1996 SRB ratios could be accomplished without a material impact on their SRB results and would permit them to file these results without further delay. |
|
|
6.MT&T, Island Tel and NBTel submitted that they would prefer to continue using their proposed inter-segment transfer pricing in the production of their 1997 Phase III/SRB results. |
|
|
7.The Canadian Cable Television Association submitted that there is no reason to finalize the 1997 Phase III/SRB results using inappropriate methodologies and that finalizing the results should be delayed until the correct methodologies, including transfer pricing, are approved and in place. |
|
|
8.Because the record with respect to the determination of the transfer prices remains incomplete, the Commission is concerned that the finalization and filing of the companies' 1997 Phase III/SRB results have been significantly delayed and this delay complicates the companies' administration of the 1998 and 1999 Phase III/SRB results. |
|
|
9.The Commission notes that the launching of new broadband initiatives, as originally envisaged by the companies, has not materialized. |
|
|
10.The Commission further notes that increases in the annual assignment of FOTS costs to the companies' Utility segments for the years 1995 through 1997 have not been material. |
|
|
11.Further, the Commission notes that the companies' 1997 Phase III/SRB results will not be used for contribution rate setting. |
|
|
12.The Commission is satisfied that, with respect to the companies' 1997 Phase III/SRB results, the usage-based cost assignment methodology approved for use in 1995 and 1996 will protect Utility subscribers from bearing any undue costs associated with the deployment of broadband-capable equipment and facilities. |
|
|
13.The Commission further notes that the use of the approved 1996 SRB ratios would permit the timely finalization and filing of the companies' 1997 Phase III/SRB results. |
|
|
14.In light of the above, the Commission directs the companies to: |
|
|
a) use their approved 1996 SRB ratios to produce their 1997 Phase III/SRB results; and |
|
|
b) file their 1997 Phase III/SRB results within 30 days of this Order. |
|
|
Secretary General |
|
|
This document is available in alternative format upon request and may also be viewed at the following Internet site: www.crtc.gc.ca |
|
|
|