ARCHIVED - Order CRTC 2000-1095

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

 

Order CRTC 2000-1095

 

Ottawa, 4 December 2000

  Wightman Telephone Limited - Local rate increases to reduce the reliance on subsidies
 

Reference: Tariff Notices 14 and 14A

 

The Commission approves rate increases to local residential and business services, effective 1 January 2001, in order to bring local rates closer to costs and reduce the independents' reliance on subsidies from toll service providers.

1.

In Review of contribution regime of independent telephone companies in Ontario and Quebec, Telecom Decision CRTC 99-5, dated 21 April 1999, the Commission directed the independent companies whose contribution requirement exceeded 25% of their total revenue requirement to file proposals detailing how they intended to reduce their subsidy requirement to no more than 25% by the year 2002.

2.

On 28 February 2000, Wightman filed its proposal as well as Tariff Notice 14. Wightman filed TN 14A on 14 July 2000. In TN 14A, Wightman requested an increase to monthly residential service rates of $2.50 effective 1 October 2000 in order to reduce its subsidy requirement towards the 25% contribution objective.

3.

Wightman also planned to request additional increases totalling $5 to monthly residential service rates in 2001.

 

Comments

4.

Wightman issued billing inserts informing residential customers of the proposed rate increases. The billing insert notified customers of their right to provide comments on the company's proposal.

5.

All comments received from customers opposed the proposed rate increases. Customers noted that local rates had increased on many occasions in the past few years. Customers also noted that they did not benefit from the same choice of toll providers and toll rate options available to customers in more urban areas.

 

Commission determinations

 

Local rate increases

6.

Decision 99-5 noted that the independents reliance on high levels of toll contribution is generally due to residential and, in some cases, business local access rates that do not recover their costs.

7.

Decision 99-5 stated, among other things, that the independents should consider increasing local rates to bring rates closer to costs and reduce their reliance on contribution subsidies.

8.

To encourage the independents to increase their revenues from sources other than residential local rates, Decision 99-5 capped proposed increases to monthly local residential service rates at $5 in 2000 and an additional $ in 2001.

9.

The Commission is of the view that services that are below costs should share the burden of attaining the contribution objective set out in Decision 99-5.

10.

Wightman did not propose to increase its business rates. Wightman submitted that its business service was compensatory when taking revenues from options, features, and service charges in to consideration.

11.

In order to determine whether a specific service is compensatory or not, the Commission considers that revenues from other services (such as options, features and service charges) should not be included.

12.

Since Wightman does not currently have Phase II costing to compare to service-specific revenues, the Commission considers that average total local and access broad service category Phase III costs, compared to service-specific revenues, are an appropriate means to measure whether or not business service rates are compensatory.

13.

Based on Phase III cost information provided by Wightman, the Commission determines that business service rates are not compensatory. The Commission considers that it would be in the public interest to increase Wightman's business rates by the same amount as residential rates, or up to the level where business rates are compensatory, to recover the cost of providing that service.

14.

The Commission notes that Wightman did not advise its business customers of possible rate increases. The Commission is of the view that business customers should have an opportunity to provide any comments before any increase in business rates are determined on a final basis.

15.

The Commission notes Wightman's proposal to increase monthly rates for residential services by $2.50 in 2000 and a further $5 in 2001. Since only one rate increase will be implemented as a result of Decision 99-5 in 2001 and because the Commission considers that rates should be moved closer to costs, the Commission determines that a $5 increase to monthly residential service rates is appropriate.

16.

The Commission also considers it appropriate that monthly business service rates be increased by $4.45, on an interim basis.

17.

The Commission notes that the proposed effective date for Wightman's proposed rate increase has passed. The Commission is of the view that rate increases should be implemented as soon as practically possible.

18.

The Commission directs Wightman to increase monthly local residential service rates by $5 effective 1 January 2001. In addition, the Commission directs Wightman to increase monthly local business service rates, on an interim basis, by $4.45 effective 1 January 2001.

19.

The Commission directs Wightman to file forthwith revised tariff pages that reflect the determinations made above.

 

Proceeding to finalize business rate increases

20.

Wightman is directed to inform its business customers forthwith, by way of billing insert, of the interim rate increase. The billing insert is to explain the reasons for the interim increase and provide all business customers with a 30-day comment period.

21.

Wightman will then have 10 days to provide reply comments.

 

Changes to the contribution regime

22.

The Commission notes that Changes to the contribution regime, Decision CRTC 2000-745, dated 30 November 2000, changes the subsidy requirement calculation for the small independent telephone companies. Starting in 2002, the subsidy requirement will no longer be calculated on a Phase III basis. Decision 2000-745 will target subsidies to the high-cost serving areas based on Phase II costing principles.

23.

The Commission nevertheless considers that the independents should continue to bring rates closer to cost and reduce their reliance on subsidies.

24.

The Commission will consider what further local rate increases, if any, are needed to reduce subsidy requirements for the independents in the context of the proceeding to implement the new contribution collection regime for such companies.

 

Secretary General

 

This document is available in alternative format upon request and may also be examined at the following Internet site: http://www.crtc.gc.ca 

Date modified: