ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Sent by email: email@example.com
Ottawa, 21 July 2009
Mr. Ted Woodhead
Telecom Policy & Regulatory Affairs
TELUS Communications Company
215 Slater Street
Ottawa ON K1P 0A6
Re: Accessibility of Telecommunications and Broadcasting Services, Regulatory Policy CRTC 2009-430
Dear Mr. Woodhead:
In Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2009-430, the Commission reviewed its relay services policy framework. The Commission extended the existing message relay services requirement to include a requirement to provide IP Relay Service. The Commission also determined that further investigation into the cost of providing Video Relay Service (VRS) in Canada is required. In this regard, the Commission considered that information resulting from the Video Relay initiatives (trials), as approved in Telecom Decision 2008-1, will be vital to determining whether a follow-up proceeding on VRS is warranted.
The Commission notes that as part of the Decision 2008-1 process, TELUS is to file information with the Commission, on an annual basis, on the progress of its VRS initiative.The Commission requests that TELUS provide the following information when submitting its next update on its VRS trial:
• Whether TELUS is providing the VRS directly or through a third-party provider. If using a third-party, provide the name of the third party;
• The number of trial users/participants;
• The number of VRS minutes provided per each month;
• The total amount ($) spent for each month to support the VRS trial;
• The number of ASL and/or LSQ translators required to support the number of users/minutes in the trial;
• The cost of the sign language translators (per minute, hour, or month);
• The cost of the Internet bandwith required to support the trial.
Please contact Martine Vallee ( firstname.lastname@example.org ) at 819-997-9254 should you have any questions in regard to this letter.
Original signed by:
- Date modified: