Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission
Symbol of the Government of Canada

4.0 Broadcasting

4.4 Broadcasting distribution

 

This pie chart shows the percentage of BDU broadcast distribution revenues as a proportion of all broadcasting revenues. In 2008, these revenues were 50% of all broadcasting revenues.

Overview

This section provides financial and statistical information relating to the distribution of programming service activities208 provided by BDUs. Financial and statistical information relating to non-programming activities, such as Internet and telephony, is discussed in sections 3.1 and 5.3 of this report.

Highlights

  • Programming distribution revenues were $7.0 billion in 2008, an increase of 10.2% from 2007. There were 11.1 million subscribers to these services, a 2.8% increase from 2007.
  • Revenues per subscriber per month209 were approximately $53.36 in 2008, a $3.57, or 7.2%, increase from 2007.
  • Approximately 90% of households subscribed to BDUs for programming services in 2008.
  • The cable BDU footprint encompasses over 12.6 million Canadian households.210
  • The industry EBITDA margin was 25.3% in 2008. Cable and IPTV211 BDUs had a combined 28.1% EBITDA margin in 2008 down from 35.9% in 2004; while DTH and MDS BDUs had a lower margin of 19.0%, a significant improvement from 2.5% in 2004.
  • The top four cable BDUs and the two DTH providers captured 90% of all BDU subscribers in 2008.

The Industry

BDUs provide programming distribution services utilizing cable, satellite, wireless MDS, or IP.212 The industry consists of approximately 224 cable companies213 that operate 1,952 cable BDUs,214 2 national DTH distributors, and 21 MDS operators.215 The industry is dominated by 4 major cable operators with 65% of the BDU programming subscribers and two DTH operators with 25% of the subscribers. The remaining 10% are served by the smaller BDUs.

Sector analysis

BDU programming service revenues increased 10.2% in 2008 to $7.0 billion. Approximately 11.1 million Canadian households subscribed to video services from cable and IPTV BDUs, and from satellite (DTH) and MDS BDUs, a 2.8% increase over the previous year. Although revenues have been increasing over the 2004 to 2008 period at an annual rate of 8.4%, the increase in the number of subscribers was 2.6% over the same period. This has resulted in a 5.5% annual increase in the monthly revenues per subscriber, which has increased from $43.00 in 2004 to $53.36 in 2008. These increases can be attributed to increased subscription fees, greater consumption of pay and pay-per-view services and a movement by consumers to higher-priced digital or high definition (HD) services. DTH and MDS BDUs tended to have higher revenues per subscriber. In 2008, they were approximately 25% higher than those of the cable BDUs.

Cable and IPTV BDUs captured 71% of total revenues and 76% of total subscribers, relatively unchanged in 2008 over the previous year. IPTV BDUs reported significant revenue and subscriber increases but, due to their limited footprint, did not have a significant impact on overall national share. Within their footprint, IPTV providers generally reported progress in their deployment of IPTV. For example, MTS Allstream reported a 34% market share in its deployed areas, up from 32% in 2007.216

Digital service penetration continued to increase as 62% of BDU subscribers received digital services, up from 58% in 2007. Approximately 47% of cable BDU subscribers received digital services compared to 100% for IPTV and DTH. Most MDS systems were digital except for a small number of systems operating in a number of small rural areas.

BDU EBITDA margins have ranged between 21.46% and 26.6% over the 2004 to 2008 period. In 2007, the margins declined to 21.4% from 24.5% in 2006, and increased to 25.3% in 2008.

In 2008, BDUs contributed $323.0 million to Canadian programming and local expression, an increase of 7.9% over the previous year. In 2008, 51.5% of these funds were directed to the Canadian Television Fund (CTF), 12.7% to other eligible independent programming funds and 35.8% to community channel programming. Approximately 139 Class 1 licensees217 reported community channel expenses in 2008.

Total payments to program suppliers under the terms of Program Affiliation Agreements218 were $2.3 billion in 2008, a 9% increase over the previous year. Of these payments, 88% were payments to Canadian affiliates.

In 2008, payments to program suppliers represented 33% of subscriber programming revenues.

Statistical Information - Broadcast distribution undertakings

Table 4.4.1 Broadcast distribution - Basic and non-basic revenues, subscribers, monthly revenues per subscriber, and percent of households subscribing to BDUs (Part 1 of 2)

                      CAGR
  2004   2005   2006   2007   2008   2004-2008
Revenues (millions)                      
   Cable and IPTV 3,404.8   3,522.3   4,008.2   4,333.7 # 4,761.8    
Percent of total 67.6%   66.3%   69.2%   68.7% # 68.5%    
Annual Growth     3.5%   -   8.1% # 9.9%    
   DTH and MDS 1,329.1   1,437.9   1,641.1   1,834.1   2,036.2    
Percent of total 26.4%   27.1%   28.3%   29.1%   29.3%    
Annual Growth     8.2%   -   11.8%   11.0%    
   Reporting BDUs subtotal 4,733.9   4,960.2   5,649.3   6,167.7   6,797.9    
Percent of total 93.9%   93.4%   97.5%   97.8%   97.8%    
Annual Growth     4.8%   -   9.2%   10.2%    
   Non-reporting BDUs 305.5   349.7   142.0   141.5 # 155.5    
Percent of total 6.1%   6.6%   2.5%   2.2%   2.2%    
Annual Growth     14.5%   -   -0.3% # 9.9%    
Total revenues 5,039.4   5,309.9   5,791.3   6,309.3 # 6,953.5   8.4%
Annual Growth     5.4%   9.1%   8.9% # 10.2%    
Subscribers (thousands)                      
   Cable and IPTV 6,856.1   6,862.6   7,484.4   7,691.3 # 7,916.6    
Percent of total 68.7%   67.3%   71.1%   71.6% # 71.6%    
Annual Growth     0.1%   -   2.8% # 2.9%    
   DTH and MDS 2,318.4   2,488.6   2,627.7   2,631.0   2,699.3    
Percent of total 23.2%   24.4%   25.0%   24.5%   24.4%    
Annual Growth     7.3%   -   0.1%   2.6%    
   Reporting BDUs subtotal 9,174.5   9,351.2   10,112.0   10,322.3   10,615.9    
Percent of total 91.9%   91.7%   96.0%   96.0%   96.0%    
Annual Growth     1.9%   -   2.1%   2.8%    
   Non-reporting BDUs and estimates 811.9 841.8 418.2  # 425.6 # 438.1    
Percent of total 8.1%   8.3%  # 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%    
Annual Growth     3.7%   -   1.8%  # 2.9%    
Total subscribers 9,986.5 # 10,193.1 # 10,530.2 # 10,747.9 # 11,054.0   2.6%
Annual Growth     2.1%   3.3%   2.1% # 2.8%    

Table 4.4.1 Broadcast distribution - Basic and non-basic revenues, subscribers, monthly revenues per subscriber and percent of households subscribing to BDUs (Part 2 of 2)

Monthly Revenues/Subscriber 2004   2005   2006   2007   2008   2004-2008
   Cable and IPTV 41.38   42.77   44.63   46.95   50.12   4.9%
Annual Growth     3.4%   4.3%   5.2%   6.8%    
   DTH and MDS 47.77   48.15   52.05   58.09   62.86   7.1%
Annual Growth     0.8%   8.1%   11.6%   8.2%    
   Reporting BDUs subtotal 43.00   44.20   46.56   49.79   53.36   5.5%
Annual Growth     2.8%   5.3%   7.0%   7.2%    
Subscribing households 88.3%   88.0%   89.3%   88.7% # 89.8%    

Notes:

  1. Based on the 12-month period ending 31 August
  2. n/a: not available
  3. n/m: not meaningful
  4. Minor variances are due to rounding.
  5. During the 2002 to 2005 period, pursuant to Broadcasting Decisions CRTC 2002-45, 2002-88 and 2004-382, the Commission exempted a large number of BDU licensees with fewer than 6,000 subscribers. These systems were no longer required to file annual financial returns with the CRTC.
  6. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, licensees began reporting on all systems, including exempted system, held by the licensee. Total revenue and subscriber levels for 2006, 2007, and 2008 are therefore not comparable to the previous years.
  7. Figures may have been restated for 2004-2007

Source:  CRTC data collection, Statistics Canada. Percent of households subscribing to BDUs: Statistics Canada, “Spending Patterns in Canada”, 62-202-X, 2008 for years 2004-2007, with CRTC projection for 2008

Table 4.4.2 Top Canadian distributors and number of subscribers (thousands)

          CAGR
Corporations 2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2005-2009
Rogers Cable Communications Inc 1 2,249   2,260   2,278   2,295   2,312   0.7%
Growth -0.8%   0.5%   0.8%   0.7%   0.7%    
Shaw Communications Inc. 2 2,138   2,179   2,220   2,242   2,274   1.6%
Growth 3.1%   1.9%   1.9%   1.0%   1.4%    
Videotron Ltd.1 1,455   1,520   1,583   1,652   1,729   4.4%
Growth 1.9%   4.5%   4.1%   4.4%   4.7%    
Cogeco Cable Inc2 831   836   855   859   868   1.1%
Growth 0.2%   0.6%   2.2%   0.5%   1.0%    
Subtotal - Cable 6,673   6,795   6,936   7,048   7,183   1.9%
Growth 1.2%   1.8%   2.1%   1.6%   1.9%    
Star Choice Television Network Inc2,3 830   862   873   886   897   1.9%
Growth 2.0%   3.9%   1.3%   1.5%   1.2%    
Bell Canada Enterprises.1,4 1,532   1,739   1,824   1,823   1,864   5.0%
Growth 9.2%   13.5%   4.9%   -0.1%   2.2%    
Subtotal – DTH and IPTV 2,362   2,601   2,697   2,709   2,761   4.0%
Growth 6.5%   10.1%   3.7%   0.4%   1.9%    
Total – Top Canadian distributors 9,035   9,396   9,633   9,757   9,944   2.4%
Growth 2.5%   4.0%   2.5%   1.3%   1.9%    
% of All Subscribers 89.6%   90.7%   90.6%   89.5%   n/a    

Notes:

  1. As of 31 March each year
  2. As of 28 February each year
  3. Star Choice Television Network Inc. is controlled by Shaw Communications Inc.
  4. Bell Canada Enterprises includes Bell ExpressVu LLP DTH and Bell Canada VDSL based IPTV.

Source: Corporate quarterly reports

Table 4.4.3 Number of subscribers receiving digital services (thousands)

    Cable DSL Subtotal DTH MDS Subtotal Total
    Number of Subscribers Percent Growth Number of Subscribers Percent Growth Number of Subscribers Percent Growth Number of Subscribers Percent Growth Number of Subscribers Percent Growth Number of Subscribers Percent Growth Number of Subscribers Percent Growth
   
   
September 2008                            
  English 2,936.4   206.6   3,143.0       13.2          
  French 996.2   4.9   1,001.1       5.0          
  Total 3,932.6 17.5% 211.5 21.9% 4,144.3 17.7% 2,651.8 -1.8% 18.2 -21.8% 2,670.0 -2.0% 6,814.3 9.1%
  Share of:                            
  Digital subscribers 57.7%   3.1%   60.8%   38.9%   0.3%   39.2%   100.0%  
  All subscribers 35.6%   1.9%   37.5%   24.0%   0.2%   24.2%   61.6%  
September 2007                            
  English 2,523.0   171.8   2,694.8       17.1          
  French 825.3   1.8   827.0       6.2          
  Total 3,348.3 12.6% 173.5 34.8% 3,521.9  13.5% 2,700.5 1.6% 23.2 -21.7% 2,723.8 1.3% 6,245.7 7.9%
  Share of:                            
  Digital subscribers 53.6%   2.8%   56.4%   43.2%   0.4%   43.6%   100.0%  
  All subscribers 31.2%   1.6%   32.8%   25.2%   0.2%   25.4%   58.2%  
September 2006                            
  English 2,283.8   128.7   2,412.5       16.7          
  French 689.2       689.2       13.0          
  Total 2,973.0 13.0% 128.7 42.5% 3,101.8  14.0% 2,658.3 5.7% 29.7  -24.6% 2,688.1 5.2% 5,789.9 9.7%
  Share of:                            
  Digital subscribers 51.3%   2.2%   53.6%   45.9%   0.5%   46.4%   100.0%  
  All subscribers 28.2%   1.2%   29.4%   25.2%   0.3%   25.5%   54.9%  
September 2005                            
  English 2,116.8   90.3           26.4          
  French 514.0               13.0          
  Total 2,630.8 28.1% 90.3 87.3% 2,721.4 29.5% 2,514.9 9.3% 39.4 -16.2% 2,554.4 8.8% 5,275.8 18.5%
  Share of:                            
  Digital subscribers 49.9%   1.7%   51.6%   47.7%   0.7%   48.4%   100.0%  
  All subscribers 25.8%   0.9%   26.7%   24.7%   0.4%   25.1%   51.8%  
September 2004                            
  English 1,663.9   48.2   1,712.1       31.7          
  French 390.1       390.1       15.3          
  Total 2,054.0   48.2   2,102.2   2,301.4   47.0   2,348.4   4,450.6  
  Share of:                            
  Digital subscribers 46.2%   1.1%   47.2%   51.7%   1.1%   52.8%   100.0%  
  All subscribers 20.6%   0.5%   21.1%   23.1%   0.5%   23.5%   44.6%  

Note: English- and French-language subscriber estimates for DTH were not provided from 2004 to 2008.
Source: Mediastats

Figure 4.4.1 EBITDA margins achieved from basic and non-basic programming services

This line chart shows the EBITDA margins in percentage of earning before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization achieved from basic and non-basic programming activities by cable and DTH and MDS undertakings during the years 2004 to 2008. Cable: 35.9%, 31.0%, 27.8%, 23.3% and 28.1%; DTH and MDS: 2.5%, 12.0%, 16.5%, 17.1% and 19.0%; Cable, DTH and MDS combined: 26.6%, 25.5%, 24.5%, 21.4% and 25.3%.

Notes:

1. Based on the 12-month period ending 31 August
2. Figures may have been restated for 2004-2007 years.

Figure 4.4.2 Contributions to the CTF, other independent industry funds and expenditures on local expression (community channels) reported by broadcasting distribution undertakings ($ millions)

This line clustered-column on 2 axes chart depicts the BDU contributions to the CTF, other independent industry funds and expenditures on community channels, in millions of dollars for each of 2004 to 2008 broadcast years. Contributions to CTF: 121.5, 127.0, 138.2, 155.3 and 166.3; Contributions to other independent funds: 30.0, 29.9, 33.4, 38.4 and 41.2; Expenditures on community channels: 88.3, 95.4, 104.0, 105.5, and 115.6; Total combined contributions and expenditures: 252.4, 275.6, 299.2 and 323.0.

Notes:

  1. Based on 31 August of each year.
  2. Minor variances are due to rounding.
  3. Broadcast distribution undertakings include contributions reported by class 1 cable, DTH, MDS, as well as satellite relay distribution undertakings (SRDU).

Table 4.4.4 Number of cable undertakings contributing to community channels

This table outlines the number of Class 1 licensees that have reported community channel expenses between 2004 and 2008. The figures do not necessarily represent the actual number of community channels in operation, as some channels are funded by more than one undertaking.

  2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Class 1 137 134 134 131 139

Note: Based on 31 August of each year
Source: CRTC data collection

Table 4.4.5 Affiliation payments made to pay, PPV, VOD, and specialty services (Part 1 of 2)

The following table sets out affiliation payments to Canadian and non-Canadian pay and specialty services reported by BDUs.

($ millions) 2004 % of total 2005 % of total 2006 % of total 2007 % of total 2008 % of total % annual incr. / decr.
  05 06 07 08
 
Payments to Canadian affiliates
Cable                            
Pay 169 87% 202 90% 261 91% 317 92% 342 92% 20% 29% 22% 8%
Specialty 694 88% 693 86% 830 87% 864 84% 963 84% 0% 20% 4% 11%
Total 863 88% 895 87% 1,091 88% 1,182 86% 1,304 86% 4% 22% 8% 10%
DTH and MDS                          
Pay 165 99% 138 100% 154 100% 190 100% 200 98% -17% 12% 24% 5%
Specialty 312 88% 372 91% 415 89% 449 89% 478 89% 19% 11% 8% 6%
Total 477 91% 510 93% 568 92% 639 92% 678 92% 7% 11% 12% 6%
Combined: Cable, DTH, and MDS                      
Pay 334 93% 340 94% 415 94% 507 95% 541 94% 2% 22% 22% 7%
Specialty 1,007 88% 1,066 88% 1,245 87% 1,314 85% 1,441 85% 6% 17% 6% 10%
Total 1,341 89% 1,405 89% 1,659 89% 1,821 88% 1,982 88% 5% 18% 10% 9%
 
Payments to Non-Canadian affiliates
Cable                            
Pay 24 13% 21 10% 24 9% 28 8% 29 8% -13% 15% 14% 5%
Specialty 97 12% 109 14% 127 13% 168 16% 189 16% 12% 17% 32% 13%
Total 122 12% 130 13% 152 12% 196 14% 219 14% 7% 17% 29% 12%
DTH, and MDS                          
Pay 2 1% 0.1 0% 0.2 0% 0.1 0% 3.1 2% -93% 61% -64% 3722%
Specialty 44 12% 37 9% 52 11% 57 11% 60 11% -15% 38% 11% 4%
Total 46 9% 37 7% 52 8% 57 8% 63 8% -18% 38% 11% 9%
Combined: Cable, DTH and MDS                      
Pay 26 7% 21 6% 25 6% 28 5% 32 6% -19% 15% 13% 16%
Specialty 141 12% 146 12% 179 13% 225 15% 249 15% 4% 22% 26% 11%
Total 167 11% 168 11% 204 11% 253 12% 281 12% 1% 21% 24% 11%
 

Table 4.4.5 Affiliation payments made to pay, PPV, VOD, and specialty services (Part 2 of 2)

($ millions) 2004 % of total 2005 % of total 2006 % of total 2007 % of total 2008 % of total % annual incr. / decr.
  05 06 07 08
Total affiliate payments
Cable                            
Pay 193 54% 223 62% 286 65% 345 64% 371 65% 16% 28% 21% 7%
Specialty 792 69% 802 66% 957 67% 1,032 67% 1,152 68% 1% 19% 8% 12%
Total 985 65% 1,026 65% 1,243 67% 1,378 66% 1,523 67% 4% 21% 11% 11%
DTH and MDS                        
Pay 167 46% 138 38% 154 35% 190 36% 203 35% -17% 12% 23% 7%
Specialty 356 31% 410 34% 466 33% 507 33% 538 32% 15% 14% 9% 6%
Total 523 35% 547 35% 620 33% 697 34% 741 33% 5% 13% 12% 6%
Combined: Cable, DTH, and MDS                      
Pay 360 24% 361 23% 439 24% 535 26% 574 25% 0% 22% 22% 7%
Specialty 1,148 76% 1,212 77% 1,424 76% 1,539 74% 1,690 75% 6% 17% 8% 10%
Total 1,508 100% 1,573 100% 1,863 100% 2,074 100% 2,264 100% 4% 18% 11% 9%

Note: Based on 31 August of each year.
Source: CRTC data collection


208 Referred to as basic and non-basic programming services. This includes the distribution of conventional OTA television stations, radio stations, pay audio services, pay, PPV, VOD and specialty television services.  [back]
209 Revenues per subscriber per month were derived by dividing total revenues by the number of subscribers and by the number of months in a year.  [back]
210 Source: Statistics Canada 2008, "Cable, satellite and multipoint distribution systems, 2007", 56-209-X, for the August 2007 period.  [back]
211 Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) refers to the delivery of programming services utilizing Internet Protocol (IP) technology. Although this technology may be utilized over the public Internet, for purposes of this section, IPTV refers to the delivery of television over private non-Internet IP networks.  [back]
212 Currently Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, MTS Allstream, SaskTel and TCC are licensed as Class 1 BDUs to provide service using this technology.  [back]
213 Source : September 2008, Mediastats  [back]
214 This number is comprised of approximately 150 systems with 6,000 subscribers or more and approximately 1,802 systems with fewer than 6,000 subscribers. Most systems with fewer than 6,000 subscribers are eligible for exemption from licensing requirements.  [back]
215 Sources: September 2008, Mediastats for Class 2 and 3 cable and MDS systems; CRTC APP1205 report dated 31 December 2008 for Class 1 cable and DTH systems  [back]
216 Source: MTS Allstream 2008 annual report  [back]
217 Table 4.4.4 outlines the number of Class 1 licensees that reported community channel expenses between 2004 and 2008. The figures do not necessarily represent the actual number of community channels in operation, as some channels are funded by more than one undertaking.  [back]
218 A Program Affiliation Agreement specifies the terms under which a BDU broadcasts the programming of pay or specialty services.  [back]