Privacy and Security
Completed Access to Information Requests
Proactive Disclosure
Previous Next Table of Contents
This section provides a statistical comparative perspective of Canada in the context of the international communications landscape, including a global view of pricing, revenues, and other metrics within the communications industry sectors of wireline, wireless, broadband, radio, and television services.
In 2009, revenues from Canadian telecommunications services represented less than 3% of global telecommunications revenues. Canada’s portion of North American telecommunications revenues was just under 10%.
Service pricing – individual services and bundled rates
Service providers from the telecommunications and broadcasting industries continued to offer their traditional core business services, as well as package communications services into various bundled offerings combining fixed-line voice telephony, mobile wireless services, broadband Internet access via both fixed and mobile technologies, and television and video services. Price comparisons between Canada and five selected foreign jurisdictions are contained in Table 6.1.1.
Table 6.1.1 International pricing (average price per month)
| Canada | United States | United Kingdom | France | Australia | Japan | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wireline service | ||||||
| Level 1 (low-volume use) | 31 | 40 | 31 | 36 | 44 | 27 |
| Level 2 (average use) | 51 | 69 | 42 | 63 | 86 | 53 |
| Level 3 (high-volume use) | 61 | 78 | 58 | 73 | 95 | 83 |
| Wireless service | ||||||
| Level 1 (basic user) | 33 | 40 | 21 | 30 | 19 | 24 |
| Level 2 (average user) | 52 | 61 | 33 | 78 | 36 | 44 |
| Level 3 (premium user) | 110 | 124 | 61 | 124 | 92 | 115 |
| Broadband (fixed technology) | ||||||
| Entry-level (˜1.5 Mbps, 2 GB/mon) | 31 | 40 | n/a | n/a | 35 | 40 |
| Mid-level (1.5-9 Mbps, 10 GB/mon) | 48 | 59 | 36 | 50 | 52 | 50 |
| Premium (10-20 Mbps, 25 GB/mon) | 62 | 75 | 41 | 65 | 74 | 72 |
| Mobile Internet (3G technology) | ||||||
| Speed ˜1.5Mbps, data usage 2GB/mon | 54 | 73 | 22 | 52 | 34 | 76 |
| Bundled services | ||||||
| Wireline-Wireless-Broadband | 134 | 165 | 93 | 162 | 132 | 137 |
| Wireline-Broadband-Digital TV | 118 | 165 | 98 | 108 | 131 | 127 |
| Wireline-Wireless-Broadband-DTV | 167 | 211 | 120 | 184 | 165 | 173 |
Note:Prices shown reflect local currencies converted to Canadian dollars and adjusted for purchasing power parity differences across the countries.
Source: Price comparison study conducted for the CRTC in April 2010 by Wall Communications Inc.; see Appendix 4 for a summary of the assumptions and methodologies used.
For fixed broadband, the market has been moving towards providing higher-speed Internet services, with the effect that fewer lower-speed/lower-usage alternatives are available. For instance, none of the service providers surveyed in the United Kingdom and France offered a Level 1 broadband service, while service providers such as Optus in Australia offered a single-speed service (20 Mbps) tied to usage levels. Once the monthly usage cap is reached, the service speed is throttled back to 256 kilobits per second. The average advertised speeds for the premium-level broadband offerings surveyed were as follows: Canada, 12.4 Mbps; the United States, 16.2 Mbps; the United Kingdom, 20 Mbps; France, 60 Mbps; Australia, 25 Mbps; and Japan, 18.5 Mbps.
Figure 6.1.1 Global telecommunications service revenues, 2009
Figure 6.1.2 Communications retail revenues per capita, 2008
Note: Canadian dollars shown have been converted from pounds (£) based on the Bank of Canada 2009 year average currency exchange rate.
Source: Ofcom International Communications Market Report (ICMR) 2009
Figure 6.1.3 Average monthly telecommunications retail revenues, 2008
Note: Canadian dollars shown have been converted from pounds (£) based on the Bank of Canada 2009 year average currency exchange rate.
Source: Ofcom ICMR 2009
Figure 6.1.4 International penetration (2009)
Figure 6.1.5 Fixed broadband connections 2004-2009, year-over-year growth
Table 6.1.2 Broadband market share by connection type, 2009
| Cable | DSL | FTTx | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Globally | 20% | 65% | 12% |
| Canada | 56% | 44% | <0.5% |
| United States | 52% | 38% | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 21% | 79% | <0.5% |
| France | 5% | 93% | 2% |
| Germany | 10% | 90% | <0.5% |
| Japan | 14% | 32% | 54% |
Source: Point Topic
Table 6.1.3 Average* advertised speeds (Mbps), by connection type
| Cable | DSL | FTTH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 25 | 14 | 77 |
| 2008 | 15 | 12 | 66 |
| 2007 | 11 | 9 | 77 |
*across OECD countries.
Source: OECD
Figure 6.1.6 Average measured broadband speeds, 2008 and 2009
Internet access at broadband speeds by wireless devices continues to gain popularity around the world. Computer laptops, notebooks, and netbooks can access mobile Internet service by means of a dongle, modem stick, or data card. Mobile handsets, especially the new generation of smartphones such as the iPhone, BlackBerry, Droid, and Google’s Nexus One, are the predominant devices using mobile broadband data services. A record 54 million smartphones, out of a global total of 337 million mobile phones, were sold in the fourth quarter of 2009, representing growth of 32% over the same period in 2008 (compared to 15% growth in the overall number of mobile handsets shipped worldwide in 2009).13 In Canada, Rogers Communications Inc. reported in early 2010 that 31% of its company’s wireless customer base subscribed to smartphones.14 Handsets are increasingly being designed with mobile Internet service in mind, with bigger screens and easier browsing interfaces. In 2007, 3G wireless networks, which enable mobile Internet access at broadband speeds, were available to 70% of the population in Europe and North America, with coverage in advanced markets such as Japan and South Korea near 99%. By 2008, Canada’s 3G availability extended to 91% of its population, slightly less than 3G reach in the United Kingdom and Italy, while ahead of coverage in the United States and France. Expansion of 3G networks to 4G through LTE technology will continue to facilitate mobile Internet use.15
Figure 6.1.7 Availability of mobile broadband (3G), 2007 and 2008
Table 6.1.4 Mobile broadband subscriptions, by country (millions)
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | Growth 2008-2009 |
CAGR 2006-2009 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 71% | 130% |
| United States | 1.2 | 3.1 | 11.0 | 51.0 | 81.9 | 122.7 | 50% | 123% |
| United Kingdom | 2.6 | 4.6 | 7.8 | 12.5 | 20.7 | 23.4 | 13% | 44% |
| France | 0.1 | 1.3 | 4.2 | 8.5 | 14.6 | 17.8 | 22% | 62% |
| Germany | 0.3 | 2.4 | 4.5 | 12.4 | 17.9 | 26.0 | 45% | 79% |
| Italy | 3.5 | 10.3 | 23.6 | 24.5 | 29.1 | 31.6 | 9% | 10% |
| Japan | 10.9 | 29.2 | 63.2 | 83.3 | 96.1 | 106.2 | 11% | 19% |
| Australia | 0.5 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 6.8 | 11.3 | 14.3 | 26% | 68% |
| Total | 19.0 | 51.7 | 117.6 | 199.7 | 273.2 | 344.5 | 26% | 43% |
Source: ITU
Table 6.1.5 Wireless industry metrics, 2009
|
Number of mobile subscribers (millions) | Wireless penetration (subscribers/ population) | Number of major providers | Market share (by subscribers) of top two providers | ARPU growth (2008-2009) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | 23.8 | 70.9% | 3 | 67% | -3.0% |
| United States | 285.0 | 92.8% | 6 | 61% | -0.7% |
| United Kingdom | 78.4 | 128.5% | 5 | 51% | -5.8% |
| France | 59.1 | 94.2% | 3 | 77% | -2.1% |
| Germany | 110.3 | 134.5% | 4 | 68% | -7.1% |
| Italy | 86.9 | 146.3% | 4 | 70% | 0.9% |
| Japan | 114.1 | 89.5% | 4 | 77% | -9.0% |
| Australia | 25.5 | 116.7% | 3 | 74% | -1.0% |
Source: CRTC data collection, Merrill Lynch Global Wireless Matrix (GWM)
Figure 6.1.8 Wireless ARPU – monthly mobile revenues, including data share (2009)
Note: Canadian dollars shown have been converted from local currencies based on Bank of Canada 2009 year average exchange rates.
Source: Merrill Lynch GWM
Figure 6.1.9 Prepaid share of mobile subscriptions, 2004 and 2009
Source: Merrill Lynch GWM
Broadcasting – Radio industry
Table 6.1.6 Radio industry metrics, 2008
| Total radio industry revenues ($ billions) |
Radio revenues per capita | Number of licensed stations | Listening minutes per day per person |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
Canada |
1.90 | 56 | 1,213 | 157 |
United States |
19.64 | 65 | 14,253 | 159 |
United Kingdom |
2.24 | 37 | 386 | 172 |
France |
2.08 | 32 | 880 | 179 |
Germany |
4.61 | 56 | 350 | 176 |
Italy |
1.90 | 33 | 273 | 179 |
Japan |
3.61 | 28 | 342 | 108 |
Australia |
1.17 | 53 | 688 | 170 |
Note: Canadian dollars shown have been converted based on the Bank of Canada 2009 year average currency exchange rates.
Source: Ofcom ICMR 2009; Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) Communications report 2008-09
Table 6.1.7 Television industry metrics, 2008
| Total television industry revenues ($ billions) | Pay/subscription proportion of TV households (%) | Pay TV revenues per capita ($) |
Digital penetration of TV households (%) | Viewing minutes per day per person | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5.52 | 88 | 53 | 61 | 228 |
| United States | 144.78 | 87 | 243 | 76 | 277 |
| United Kingdom | 18.68 | 51 | 126 | 88 | 225 |
| France | 15.76 | 55 | 120 | 77 | 204 |
| Germany | 18.02 | 65 | 71 | 37 | 207 |
| Italy | 13.32 | 26 | 78 | 63 | 234 |
| Japan | 36.11 | 56 | 97 | 65 | 251 |
| Australia | n/a | 29 | n/a | 47 | 178 |
Note: Canadian dollars shown have been converted based on the Bank of Canada 2009 year average currency exchange rates.
Source: Ofcom ICMR 2009; ACMA Communications report 2008-09; industry data
Figure 6.1.10 Primary television platforms, 2009 (% of TV households)
Source: TV International, 3 November 2009
[13] Source: Strategy Analytics, February 2010
[14] Source: Canadian Press Newswire, 17 February 2010
[15] Source: IDATE Digiworld Yearbook 2009, Ofcom ICMR 2009