Privacy and Security
Completed Access to Information Requests
Proactive Disclosure
THE FUTURE ENVIRONMENT FACING THE CANADIAN BROADCASTING SYSTEM
a report prepared pursuant to
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table of content |
Paragraph |
|
| Introduction | 1 | |
| Section I: Evolution of technologies | 11 | |
| A. Broadcasting services' current state and predicted evolution | 11 | |
|
1. Audio |
12 | |
|
a) Licensed radio services |
12 | |
|
b) Financial data |
16 | |
|
i. Advertising revenue by media ($ million) |
16 | |
|
ii. Revenues of private commercial radio - 2000 to 2005 |
17 | |
|
c) Transition to digital radio |
23 | |
|
d) Other than over-the-air |
26 | |
|
i. Specialty audio services |
26 | |
|
ii. Pay audio programming services |
26 | |
|
iii. Satellite subscription radio programming undertakings |
28 | |
|
2. Video |
29 | |
|
a) Licensed television services |
29 | |
|
b. Financial data |
31 | |
|
c) Transition to digital over-the-air television |
33 | |
|
d) High Definition Television |
38 | |
|
e) Distribution technologies |
43 | |
|
i. Over-the-air (OTA) |
46 | |
|
ii. Cable distribution |
49 | |
|
iii. Direct-to-home distribution (DTH) |
55 | |
|
iv. Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) |
59 | |
|
f) On-demand technologies |
60 | |
|
i. Video-on-demand (VOD) |
60 | |
|
ii. Personal video recorders (PVRs) |
64 | |
|
g) Other Technologies |
67 | |
|
i. Broadband Internet |
67 | |
|
ii. Audio over the Internet |
69 | |
|
iii. Enabling technology |
70 | |
|
iv. Mobile wireless |
73 | |
|
v. Mobile television |
75 | |
|
3. Audio-visual technologies' predicted evolution over the coming years |
77 | |
|
Section II: Usage of audio-visual technologies by Canadians |
81 | |
|
A. Changes in the usage of audio-visual technologies by Canadians since 1 January 2000 |
81 | |
|
1. Changes to audience tuning to radio and television |
93 | |
|
a) Audience tuning data - radio |
93 | |
|
i. Decline for the 12-34-year-old demographic |
94 | |
|
ii. AM to FM |
96 | |
|
b) Audience tuning date - television |
102 | |
|
2. Change in usage of other audio-visual technologies |
106 | |
|
a) Personal computers and Internet |
106 | |
|
b) Personal digital devices |
116 | |
|
B. Changes in the demand for various types of programming and programming services since 1 January 2000 |
123 | |
|
1. Radio |
123 | |
|
2. Television |
127 | |
|
C. How Canadians of different generations use various audio-visual technologies, and the impact that these different uses will have on the broadcasting system |
139 | |
|
1. Audio |
139 | |
|
a) Radio |
139 | |
|
b) Music players |
145 | |
|
c) Music downloads |
146 | |
|
d) Music buying |
147 | |
|
e) Podcasts |
148 | |
|
2. Video |
149 | |
|
a) Television |
149 | |
|
b) Other television-related technologies |
155 | |
|
3. Other audio-visual technologies |
158 | |
|
a) Personal computers and the Internet |
158 | |
|
b) Laptop computers (laptops) |
166 | |
|
c) Cellular telephones (cell phones) |
168 | |
|
d) Video (television) downloads |
171 | |
|
e) Adaptation to technology |
173 | |
|
D. A comparison between Canada and other countries of adoption rates for technologies |
186 | |
|
1. Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) |
186 | |
|
2. Broadband/Internet |
212 | |
|
3. Digital TV (DTV) |
218 | |
|
4. Television viewing |
225 | |
|
5. Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) |
226 | |
|
6. Online music |
227 | |
|
7. Satellite Radio |
228 | |
|
8. Wireless/Cellular telephone |
229 | |
|
9. Personal Video Recorders (PVRs) |
232 | |
|
10. Digital consumer technologies |
233 | |
|
E. Demand for various types of programming and programming services by the Canadian population, taking into account the full diversity of Canadian society |
234 | |
|
F. How future generations will consume or access content, programming, and programming services |
247 | |
|
G. Impact of the evolution of audio-visual technologies on content and programming choices available to Canadians |
253 | |
| Section III: Impact on the broadcasting system | 260 | |
|
A. Adoption of technologies by broadcasting undertakings since 1 January 2000 |
260 | |
|
B. The economic and regulatory impact of new technologies on the broadcasting system |
267 | |
|
1. Fragmentation and the erosion of borders |
269 | |
|
2. Copyright challenges |
272 | |
|
3. Downward pressure on unit costs in fragmented markets |
273 | |
|
4. Changes in audience measurement and media buying |
274 | |
|
5. Pressure on traditional concepts of scheduling and bundling |
276 | |
|
C. The types of content delivered through the regulated and non-regulated systems, and how they are delivered |
281 | |
|
D. Methods by which local, regional and national programming can continue to be provided |
293 | |
|
1. Community channels |
296 | |
|
E. The predicted economic impact of new technologies on broadcasting undertakings |
303 | |
|
F. Adoption of new technologies by the independent production sector and the impact of them |
319 | |
| Section IV - Concluding observations | 328 | |
| A. Introduction | 328 | |
| B. Appropriateness of current legislation | 332 | |
|
C. The impact of new audio-visual technologies on the objectives of the Broadcasting Act |
338 | |
| D. The evolution and impact of new audio-visual technologies | 358 | |
|
E. Monitoring the impact and contribution of audio-visual technologies |
369 | |
|
F. Addressing the impact of new audio-visual technologies on existing broadcasting undertakings |
376 | |
| G. Regulatory oversight of new audio-visual technologies | 385 | |
| H. The need for non-regulatory public policy action | 400 | |
| I. Timing and choices | 404 | |
|
J. The Commission's perspective on the policy issues raised by parties to this process |
408 | |
|
i. The Broadcasting Act and its objectives |
410 | |
|
ii. Regulatory symmetry |
417 | |
|
iii. Choosing between conflicting policy objectives |
421 | |
|
iv. Monitoring |
429 | |
|
v. When to act |
432 | |
|
vi. Approaches and/or legislative reform outside the Broadcasting Act |
435 | |
| K. The Commission's approach | 437 | |
| Appendix 1 - An overview of the various technologies used for the transmission and distribution of broadcast services | ||
| Appendix 2 - Order in Council by the Governor in Council | ||
| Appendix 3 - List of parties that responded to the call for comments - Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2006-72, 12 June 2006 |
|
|
Introduction |
|
1. |
On 8 June 2006, the Governor in Council issued Order in Council P.C. 2006-519 (the OIC), pursuant to section 15 of the Broadcasting Act (the Act). The OIC, a copy of which is appended in Appendix II of this report, requested that the Commission provide a factual report on the future environment facing the whole broadcasting system. |
|
2. |
In the OIC, the Governor in Council: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
For these reasons, the Governor in Council requested that the Commission provide a factual report on the future environment facing the Canadian broadcasting system. |
|
4. |
To fulfil the request set out in the OIC, the Commission issued Call for comments on a request by the Governor in Council pursuant to section 15 of the Broadcasting Act to prepare a report examining the future environment facing the Canadian broadcasting system, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2006-72, 12 June 2006 (Public Notice 2006-72). The purpose of the call for comments was to gather information from the public addressing the points set out in the OIC. This information would then be used to inform the Government of Canada's policy determinations with respect to the future of broadcasting in Canada, as well as the Commission's review of certain aspects of its regulatory framework for over-the-air television. |
|
5. |
The Commission received 52 submissions from individuals, consumer groups, broadcasters, distributors and industry associations, all of which form part of this proceeding's public record. The Commission reviewed the submissions in detail and considers them an integral part of this report. The Commission thanks all of the parties of record for their valuable contribution to this process. |
|
6. |
To assist in the process, the Commission also commissioned the following three independent research studies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
All three reports form part of this proceeding's public record. The Commission also used in-house information that it acquires in the normal course of its regulatory mandate including its Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Reports and the Statistics Canada financial and operational annual returns that licensees file with the Commission. |
|
8. |
All of the submissions by the parties of record and the three studies commissioned by the Commission for this proceeding may be found at the following Internet site: www.crtc.gc.ca. |
|
9. |
In structuring the report, the Commission followed the order of the points as set out in the OIC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Section IV contains the Concluding Observations. | |
|
10. |
In preparing the report, the Commission focused on the information in the submissions that specifically addressed the points set out in the OIC and attempted to include as many different positions of parties as possible. However, given the volume of material received, the Commission, in the interest of brevity, consolidated common points-of-view amongst the various interested parties. |
Section I: Evolution of technologies |
|
A. Broadcasting services' current state and predicted evolution |
|
|
11. |
This section examines the current state of the audio, video and distribution broadcasting services available to Canadians, including the number of services, advertising revenues and profitability, technical features and the predicted evolution of those broadcasting technologies in the coming years. |
1. Audio |
|
a) Licensed radio services |
|
|
12. |
The number of each type of licensed Canadian radio and audio service, as of 21 November 2006, is set out in the following table. The numbers in brackets indicate the number of each corresponding undertaking in the 2002 broadcast year. |
| Table 1 Canadian radio and audio services | ||||
|
English language (1) |
French language (2) |
Third language |
Total |
|
| Over-the-air radio services | ||||
| National public broadcaster | ||||
| CBC: Radio One / Première chaîne |
36 (36) |
20 (20) |
- - |
56 (56) |
| CBC: Radio Two / Espace musique |
14 (14) |
12 (10) |
- - |
26 (24) |
| CBC network licences |
2 (2) |
2 (2) |
- - |
4 (4) |
| CBC digital: Radio One / Première chaîne |
5 (4) |
4 (3) |
- - |
9 (7) |
| CBC digital: Radio Two / Espace musique |
5 (4) |
4 (3) |
- - |
9 (7) |
| Private commercial | ||||
| AM stations |
158 (189) |
19 (17) |
12 (9) |
189 (215) |
| FM stations |
380 (216) |
88 (65) |
9 (6) |
477 (287) |
| AM and FM network licences |
27 (n/a) |
9 (n/a) |
- - |
36 (n/a) |
| Digital radio (stand-alone and transitional) |
42 (35) |
9 (4) |
7 (3) |
58 (42) |
| Community | ||||
| Type A stations (3) |
11 (9) |
34 (27) |
- - |
45 (36) |
| Type B stations |
22 (13) |
26 (19) |
1 - |
49 (32) |
| Developmental |
8 (n/a) |
- (n/a) |
- - |
8 (n/a) |
| Campus | ||||
| Community-based |
36 (33) |
5 (5) |
- - |
41 (38) |
| Instructional |
9 (8) |
- (1) |
- - |
9 (9) |
| Developmental |
1 (n/a) |
1 (n/a) |
- - |
2 (n/a) |
| Aboriginal - Type B stations (3) |
41 (32) |
12 (5) |
- - |
53 (37) |
| Religious (spoken word and/or music) |
41 (4) |
25 (20) |
1 - |
67 (24) |
| Other (tourist/traffic; Environment Canada. special event, etc.) |
96 (n/a) |
13 (n/a) |
1 - |
110 (n/a) |
| Total number of over-the-air Canadian radio services |
934 |
283 |
31 |
1,248 |
| Multi-channel subscription radio services | ||||
| Satellite |
2 - |
- - |
- - |
2 - |
| Terrestrial (4) |
1 - |
- - |
- - |
1 - |
| Audio services delivered by BDUs | ||||
| Specialty audio (commercial / Non-profit, regional / national) |
5 - |
- - |
4 - |
9 - |
| Pay audio (English and French national services) |
2 - |
- - |
- - |
2 - |
| Total number of Canadian radio and audio services |
944 |
283 |
35 |
1,262 |
|
(1) Includes bilingual (English and French) and native services. (2) Includes French-native services. (3) Includes network licences. (4) Authorised not yet licensed. Excludes rebroadcasters and exempt radio services. Sources: CRTC APP 1205 report (21 November 2006), CRTC Decisions |
||||
|
13. |
Between 1 September 2002 and 21 November 2006, the number of English-language commercial FM radio stations increased to 380 while the number of AM stations declined to 158. The number of French-language FM stations increased to 88 while the number of AM stations declined to 19. |
|
14. |
The following table sets out, by language and type of station, the number of radio applications approved by the Commission from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005. |
| Table 2 Number of new over-the-air radio stations approved from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005 | ||||
|
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Total |
|
| Total number of new AM & FM stations approved: |
68 |
49 |
44 |
161 |
| English-language stations |
51 |
43 |
38 |
132 |
| French-language stations |
12 |
5 |
4 |
21 |
| Ethnic-language stations |
5 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
| Type of radio stations approved: | ||||
| Commercial |
32 |
25 |
33 |
90 |
| Community |
11 |
10 |
8 |
29 |
| Campus |
4 |
2 |
- |
6 |
| Native |
7 |
2 |
- |
9 |
| Other |
14 |
10 |
3 |
27 |
|
Notes: Includes AM to FM conversions (often referred to as flips). Excludes digital transitional radio. "Other" includes not for profit, CBC/SRC, tourist, Environment Canada, etc., radio stations Sources: CRTC APP 1100 report and CRTC Decisions issued from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005 |
||||
|
15. |
Of the 90 commercial radio stations approved, approximately 50% were conversions of AM stations to the FM band. The majority of approvals were for undertakings in Ontario, followed by Alberta. Most of the conversions occurred in Ontario, followed by Quebec. |
|
|
i. Advertising revenue by media ($ million) |
|
|
16. |
As set out in the table below, radio is doing well in comparison to other media. Between 2000 and 2005, radio's share of media advertising rose from 13.9% to 14.7%. Although in their infancy, Internet revenues garnered 1.5% in 2000, increasing to 5.8% in 2005. |
| Table 3 Advertising revenue by media ($ millions) | ||||||
| Media |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
| Television |
2,454 |
2,547 |
2,595 |
2,821 |
2,939 |
3,013 |
| Daily Newspaper |
1,731 |
1,678 |
1,684 |
1,696 |
1,751 |
1,784 |
| Radio |
1,001 |
1,048 |
1,080 |
1,171 |
1,209 |
1,310 |
| Magazine |
805 |
845 |
900 |
950 |
994 |
1,028 |
| Weekly Newspaper |
820 |
836 |
849 |
862 |
875 |
883 |
| Billboard |
293 |
310 |
321 |
338 |
356 |
404 |
| Internet |
110 |
97 |
117 |
237 |
364 |
519 |
| Total |
7,214 |
7,361 |
7,546 |
8,075 |
8,488 |
8,941 |
| % Radio |
13.9% |
14.2% |
14.3% |
14.5% |
14.2% |
14.7% |
Note: Daily newspaper revenues exclude classified ads
Source: Carat Expert, May 2006
|
ii. Revenues of private commercial radio - 2000 to 2005 |
|
|
17. |
As shown in Table 4, the revenues of conventional AM and FM stations, including those of ethnic stations, grew by 30% between 2000 and 2005. Of this, combined English- and French-language AM revenues dropped by 5.0%. Individually, English-language AM dropped by 2.2% and French-language AM dropped by 33.4%, the latter to a five-year low of $17.8 million. |
| Table 4 Revenues - Private commercial radio ($ 000) - Broadcast year ending 31 August | ||||||
|
Radio type |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
|
English AM |
270,599 |
263,608 |
253,029 |
259,804 |
259,506 |
264,730 |
|
English FM |
563,274 |
607,066 |
641,676 |
701,416 |
740,698 |
825,222 |
|
Total - English |
873,872 |
870,674 |
894,705 |
961,220 |
1,000,204 |
1,089,952 |
|
French AM |
26,721 |
24,899 |
24,996 |
26,067 |
22,668 |
17,784 |
|
French FM |
137,691 |
146,123 |
155,042 |
172,882 |
172,577 |
191,219 |
|
Total - French |
164,412 |
171,022 |
180,038 |
198,949 |
195,245 |
209,003 |
|
Ethnic AM |
17,798 |
18,280 |
18,705 |
19,602 |
20,321 |
21,326 |
|
Ethnic FM |
9,418 |
9,629 |
9,284 |
9,834 |
10,551 |
13,085 |
|
Total - Ethnic |
27,216 |
27,909 |
27,989 |
29,436 |
30,872 |
34,411 |
|
Total AM |
315,118 |
306,787 |
296,730 |
305,473 |
302,495 |
303,840 |
|
Total FM |
710,383 |
762,818 |
806,002 |
884,132 |
923,826 |
1,029,526 |
|
Total Canada |
1,025,501 |
1,069,605 |
1,102,732 |
1,189,605 |
1,226,321 |
1,333,366 |
Note: Includes network results
Source: CRTC Financial database
|
18. |
The combined revenues of English- and French-language FM stations increased by 45% between 2002 and 2005. Individually, English-language FM revenues increased by 46.5% while French-language FM revenues increased by 38.9%. This growth in the FM segment more than offset the contraction in the AM industry segment during this same period. Revenues for both AM and FM ethnic radio stations rose by 19.8% and 38.9%, respectively, over the same period. Currently, there are 21 private commercial, over-the-air ethnic radio stations authorised to serve the following markets: Vancouver (5), Edmonton, Calgary and Winnipeg (1 each), Toronto (8), Montreal (4) and Ottawa (1). |
|
19. |
In considering these statistics, it should be noted that, as shown in Table 2, between 2002 and May 2006, the number of AM stations declined by 29 to 186 as some licensees converted their AM stations to FM. However, as over 80% of these conversions involved English-language stations, this would suggest that French-language AM radio is experiencing some difficulty. English-language AM stations are faring slightly better; while their revenues fell by 5% over the period, they showed a modest gain of 2.0% in 2005. |
|
20. |
Table 5 below, illustrates that, overall, English-language AM stations reported negative to marginally positive profit before interest and taxes (PBIT) margins between 2000 and 2004. While reporting a PBIT increase to 6.5% in 2005, this figure represents only one year and cannot be considered an indication of a turn-around as yet. French-language AM stations have reported negative PBIT's in all years, culminating in a low of -37.4% in 2005. |
| Table 5 Profit before interest and taxes (PBIT) margins - Private commercial radio | ||||||
| Radio type |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
|
English AM |
-4.8 % |
-6.1 % |
-7.7 % |
1.08% |
1.9 % |
6.5 % |
|
English FM |
27.3 % |
26.7 % |
25.9 % |
27.6 % |
25.9 % |
28.2 % |
|
Total - English |
16.9 % |
16.80 % |
16.4 % |
20.4 % |
19.7 % |
22.9 % |
|
French AM |
-12.6 % |
-8.2 % |
-7.5 % |
-9.9 % |
-20.9 % |
-37.4 % |
|
French FM |
20.1 % |
17.6 % |
18.9 % |
19.5 % |
16.2 % |
15.7 % |
|
Total - French |
14.7 % |
13.8 % |
15.3 % |
15.6 % |
11.8 % |
11.14 % |
|
Ethnic AM |
7.8 % |
5.9 % |
7.6 % |
9.5 % |
15.6 % |
12.8 % |
|
Ethnic FM |
4.1 % |
2.08 % |
-3.1 % |
3.4 % |
4.3 % |
7.0 % |
|
Total - Ethnic |
6.5 % |
4.6 % |
4.0 % |
7.4 % |
11.7 % |
10.6 % |
|
Total AM |
-4.8 % |
-5.5 % |
-6.7 % |
0.7 % |
1.1 % |
4.4 % |
|
Total FM |
25.6 % |
24.7 % |
24.2 % |
25.7 % |
23.9 % |
25.6 % |
|
Total - Canada |
16.3 % |
16.0 % |
15.9 % |
19.3 % |
18.3 % |
20.8 % |
Source: CRTC Financial database
|
21. |
In comparison, both English- and French-language FM stations are doing considerably better than AM, although the PBIT margins for French-language FM declined annually from a high of 20.1% in 2000 to a low of 15.7% in 2005. English-language FM PBIT margins basically remained steady, fluctuating within the 26% to 28% range and closing at a high of 28.2% in 2005. |
|
22. |
Contrary to English- and French-language AM/FM performance, ethnic AM radio is doing noticeably better than ethnic FM radio. The PBIT margins for AM and FM ethnic stations are up by 5 and 2.9 percentage points, respectively. |
c) Transition to digital radio |
|
|
23. |
As of 1 October 2006, the Commission has authorised 76 transitional digital radio programming undertakings. Of these, 57 are authorised to operate in association with existing commercial radio stations, 18 are authorised to operate in association with existing Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) radio stations, and one is authorised to operate as a stand-alone ethnic radio station. The table below sets out, by location, the number of transitional digital radio stations that have been approved by the Commission. |
| Table 6 Markets in Canada(1) with transitional digital radio stations (2) | ||||||||
| Market/Province |
Commercial |
CBC English |
CBC French |
Total | ||||
| English | Franch | Ethnic |
Radio One |
Radio Two |
Première chaîne | Espace musique | ||
| Montréal |
2 |
6 |
- |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
| Ottawa/Gatineau |
8 |
3 |
- |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
15 |
| Toronto |
17 |
- |
7 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
28 |
| Vancouver |
9 |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
| Victoria |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
| Windsor |
4 |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
6 |
|
All Canada |
42 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 76 |
| 58 | 18 | 76 | ||||||
Based on BBM Radio Markets
Number of stations approved but not necessarily on-air
Source: CRTC Decisions
|
24. |
Digital radio's roll-out has apparently stalled. According to the CBC, consumers do not want to buy receivers until they are convinced that there is unique new content available to justify the purchase while, broadcasters have been unwilling to create the required content until there are adequate audiences to justify the programming expenditures. |
|
25. |
Moreover, because digital radio has as yet to take hold while other services such as Internet audio streaming, downloading of music and subscription-based satellite radio have since come to the market, some parties in the industry are of the opinion that, it is doubtful whether digital radio, as originally conceived and planned, will become an integral part of the Canadian radio broadcasting system in the foreseeable future. Instead, the industry is considering different uses of the existing digital radio spectrum, technology and infrastructure for new and innovative multimedia mobile wireless services. |
d) Other than over-the-air |
|
|
26. |
Over the last five to ten years, consumers have been able to choose new platforms to access audio content including satellite radio, specialty audio services and pay audio, as well as unlicensed platforms such as Internet radio, podcasting and downloading of music files from the Internet. These new technologies give consumers access to a much greater variety of music, more choice in the medium they choose to access that music from, and flexibility and control over when they listen to it. The unlicensed platforms are discussed later in this report while the licensed technologies are discussed below. |
i. Specialty audio services |
|
|
|
|
|
ii. Pay audio programming services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Table 7 Usage of Pay Audio Services in Canada | ||||
|
Anglophones 18+ |
Francophones 18+ |
|||
|
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
|
|
Past Month Usage |
19% |
21% |
16% |
21% |
Source: MTM (CBC / Radio-Canada, page 14)
|
27. |
Because they rely on BDU distribution for delivery of their programming, the pay audio services lack the portability and convenience of wireless services and would face significant challenges in the future if satellite subscription radio (SSR) programming services sought to expand their reach through new channels, such as mobile wireless services. In addition, if the SSR programming services were successful in obtaining carriage on BDUs, they would certainly provide direct competition to pay audio for its target audience. |
|
28. |
The CBC predicts that the pay audio service providers may need to partner with wireless operators in the future in order to provide their niche-type programming over the latter's wireless networks and retain their subscribers in a "mobile" world. |
iii. Satellite subscription radio programming undertakings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Video |
|
a) Licensed television services |
|
|
29. |
The number of each type of licensed Canadian television service, as of 21 November 2006, is set out in the following table. The numbers in brackets indicate the number of each corresponding undertaking in the 2002 broadcast year. |
| Table 8 Diversity of television services available in Canada | ||||
|
English |
French language |
Third language |
Total |
|
| Canadian conventional (over-the-air) (2) | ||||
|
National public broadcaster (CBC) - Owned and operated |
15 (15) |
8 (8) |
- |
23 (23) |
| - Transitional digital (3) |
4 (-) |
4 (-) |
- |
8 (-) |
| Private commercial (4) |
77 (60) |
23 (18) |
4 (3) |
104 (81) |
| Religious |
5 (5) |
- (-) |
- |
5 (5) |
| Educational |
4 (4) |
3 (3) |
- |
7 (7) |
| Aboriginal |
9 (10) |
- (-) |
- |
9 (10) |
| Transitional digital (3) |
10 (-) |
3 (-) |
2 (-) |
15 (14) |
| Canadian specialty, pay, pay-per-view (PPV) and video-on-demand (VOD) | ||||
| Analog specialty services |
30 (30) |
14 (16) |
5 (5) |
49 (51) |
| Category 1 digital specialty services (5) |
15 (16) |
3 (-) |
- |
18 (19) |
| Category 2 digital specialty services (5) |
49 (31) |
3 (-) |
26 (10) |
78 (41) |
| Pay television services (6) |
5 (6) |
2 (1) |
5 (-) |
12 (7) |
| PPV services (direct-to-home (DTH) and terrestrial) (6) |
9 (10) |
2 (2) |
- (1) |
11 (13) |
| VOD services (6) |
14 (3) |
- (1) |
- |
14 (4) |
| Other Canadian services | ||||
| Community channels (7) |
133 (197) |
33 (47) |
- |
166 (244) |
| Community programming services |
11 (-) |
1 (-) |
- |
12 (12) |
|
House of Commons - Cable Public Affairs Channel (CPAC) |
1 (1) |
1 (1) |
- |
2 (2) |
| Non-Canadian services (8) | ||||
|
Non-Canadian satellite services authorised for distribution in Canada |
83 (77) |
6 (8) |
45 (8) |
134 (93) |
| Total number of television services |
474 (484) |
106 (109) |
87 (27) |
667 (603) |
|
Excludes rebroadcasters and exempt television services. Also excludes some network licences. (1) Includes bilingual (English and French) and native services.
(2) Includes satellite to cable services. |
||||
|
30. |
Currently: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. Financial data |
| Table 9 Revenues of English-language and French-language private conventional television and pay, pay-per-view & specialty services, by language ($ 000,000) | ||||||
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
|
| English-language | ||||||
| Private Conventional |
1,519 |
1,538 |
1,515 |
1,684 |
1,693 |
1,764 |
| Pay, PPV and Specialty - Analog |
1,006 |
1,183 |
1,312 |
1,399 |
1,521 |
1,618 |
| Pay, PPV and Specialty - Digital |
48 |
100 |
116 |
143 |
||
| Pay, PPV and Specialty - Total |
1,006 |
1,183 |
1,360 |
1,499 |
1,637 |
1,761 |
| French-language | ||||||
| Private Conventional |
361 |
366 |
378 |
409 |
422 |
434 |
| Pay, PPV and Specialty - Total |
230 |
272 |
301 |
338 |
363 |
366 |
| Ethnic & Third-language | ||||||
| Pay, PPV and Specialty - Analog |
34 |
36 |
40 |
42 |
48 |
50 |
| Pay, PPV and Specialty - Digital |
1 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
||
| Pay, PPV and Specialty - Total |
34 |
36 |
41 |
44 |
51 |
57 |
Note: English-language private conventional television includes revenues from ethnic conventional television stations as a significant portion of their revenues are derived from English-language programs.
Note: Bilingual services are combined with English-language pay, PPV and specialty services.
Source: Charts 3.12, 3.15 and 3.18 from the 2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report
|
31. |
From the Statistic Canada financial and operational annual returns (the annual returns) that licensees file with the Commission, and the Commission's financial database: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Table 10 Aggregate PBIT(1) margins of English-language and French-language private conventional television & pay, pay-per-view and analog specialty services | ||||||
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
|
| English-language | ||||||
| Private Conventional |
14% |
13% |
9% |
14% |
11% |
11% |
| Pay, PPV and Specialty - Analog |
18% |
19% |
21% |
21% |
25% |
31% |
| French-language | ||||||
| Private Conventional |
12% |
10% |
11% |
14% |
12% |
11% |
| Pay, PPV and Specialty - Analog |
17% |
16% |
17% |
21% |
21% |
25% |
| Ethnic & Third-language | ||||||
| Pay, PPV and Specialty - Analog |
16% |
14% |
17% |
17% |
26% |
24% |
Note: English-language private conventional television includes ethnic conventional television stations, as a significant portion of their revenues are derived from English-language programming.
Note: Bilingual services are combined with English-language pay, PPV and specialty services.
Source: Charts 3.14, 3.17 and 3.19 from the 2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report
|
32. |
From the annual returns that licensees file with the Commission, and the Commission's database: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c) Transition to digital over-the-air television |
|
|
33. |
In A licensing policy to oversee the transition from analog to digital, over-the-air television broadcasting, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2002-31, 12 June 2002 (Public Notice 2002-31), the Commission set out a policy framework to oversee the transition of analog over-the-air television services to digital television (DTV) services. The policy framework is based on a voluntary, market-driven transition model, without mandated deadlines. |
|
34. |
Transitional DTV licensees are allowed to broadcast a maximum of 14 hours per week of high definition (HD) programming that is not duplicated on the analog version of the service. A minimum of 50% of this unduplicated HD programming must be Canadian and all of the unduplicated programming must be in HD television (HDTV) format. In Public Notice 2002-31, the Commission encouraged transitional DTV licensees to ensure that two-thirds of their schedules would be available in HDTV format by 31 December 2007. |
|
35. |
In The regulatory framework for the distribution of digital television signals, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2003-61, 11 November 2003 (Public Notice 2003-61), the Commission determined that a cable BDU may apply to be relieved of the obligation to distribute analog signals, once 85% of its subscribers have the ability to receive digital services by means of DTV receivers or set-top boxes. |
|
36. |
Currently, 22 originating television stations and four rebroadcasters are authorised to operate transitional DTV undertakings. The following table lists the transitional DTV undertakings that have been approved, although not all are implemented. |
| Table 11 Over-the-air transitional digital television(1) | |||||
| Market |
Language |
Source station |
Actual or planned |
||
| Montréal |
F |
CFJP | TQS |
- |
|
|
F |
CBFT | SRC |
March 2005 |
||
|
F |
CIVM | Télé-Québec (educational and cultural service) |
September 2007 |
||
|
F |
CFTM | TVA |
- |
||
|
E |
CBMT | CBC |
March 2005 |
||
| Québec |
F |
CBVT | SRC |
January 2006 |
|
| Ottawa |
F |
CBOFT | SRC |
September 2006 |
|
|
E |
CBOT | CBC |
September 2006 |
||
| R |
O/E |
OMNI 1 | Rogers (ethnic station) |
July 2007 |
|
| R |
O/E |
OMNI 2 | Rogers (ethnic station) |
July 2007 |
|
| Toronto |
F |
CBLFT | SRC |
March 2005 |
|
| R |
F |
CBOFT | SRC (Ottawa station) |
September 2006 |
|
|
E |
CBLT | CBC |
March 2005 |
||
|
E |
CFTO | CTV |
July 2005 |
||
|
E |
CIII | Global |
November 2004 |
||
|
E |
CITS | Crossroads (religious programming) |
- |
||
|
E |
CITY | CHUM |
January 2003 |
||
|
E |
CKXT | Quebecor |
February 2004 |
||
|
O/E |
OMNI 1 | Rogers (ethnic station) |
October 2006 |
||
|
O/E |
OMNI 2 | Rogers (ethnic station) |
October 2006 |
||
| Hamilton |
E |
CHCH | Global |
- |
|
| R |
E |
CKXT | Quebecor |
February 2004 |
|
| Vancouver |
E |
CBUT | CBC |
January 2006 |
|
|
E |
CHAN | Global |
- |
||
|
E |
CIVT | CTV |
July 2005 |
||
|
O/E |
CHNM | Multivan (ethnic station) |
- |
||
(1) Number of stations approved but not necessarily in operation
E: English; F: French; O/E: Multi/English; R: Rebroadcaster
Source: CRTC APP 1205 (3 May 2006) and licensees
|
37. |
As part of this proceeding, Michael McEwen, Broadcast Consultant, was commissioned to provide a report on the digital transition strategies in a number of different countries (the "McEwen Report"). In relation to Canada's transition, Mr. McEwen concludes that: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d) High Definition Television |
|
|
38. |
In Regulatory framework for the licensing and distribution of high definition pay and specialty services, Broadcasting Public Notice CRTC 2006-74, 15 June 2006 (Public Notice 2006-74), the Commission announced its regulatory framework for the licensing and distribution of HD pay and specialty services. As of May 2006, the Commission has approved licence amendments for four analog specialty, two pay and ten Category 2 specialty services, authorizing their distribution in the HD format. It is estimated that, as of Spring 2006, there were at least 321,393 subscribers to discretionary HD services(2) in Canada. |
|
39. |
The following tables indicate the number of HD services currently available from Canadian BDUs and the average hours of Canadian HD programming they offer in each week. |
| Table 12 Number of high definition services offered by BDUs | |||
|
Canadian services |
Foreign services |
Total |
|
| Cogeco |
10 |
9 |
19 |
| Rogers |
16 |
10 |
26 |
| Shaw |
5 |
5 |
10 |
| Videotron |
8 |
5 |
13 |
| Bell ExpressVu |
16 |
11 |
27 |
| Star Choice |
6 |
8 |
14 |
Source: Table 3.12 from the 2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report
| Table 13 High definition offering of Canadian programming | ||
|
Weekly average of HD hours |
Original |
|
| Conventional television | ||
| CBC |
8.25 |
100% |
| CHUM |
11.5 |
17% |
| CTV |
2.3 |
57% |
| Global |
10 |
55% |
| SRC |
6 |
100% |
| Pay and specialty services | ||
| Discovery HD |
75 |
0% |
| Movie Central |
42 |
7% |
| Movie Pix |
11 |
9% |
| Raptors |
25 |
100% |
| TMN |
53 |
4% |
| TSN |
10 |
60% |
Source: Table 3.13 from the 2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report
|
40. |
As noted in the Introduction, the Commission commissioned Solutions Research to Group (SRG) to provide a trend analysis on the topics raised by the OIC. With respect of HDTV services, SRG canvassed Canadians' interest in HDTV. The findings in the SRG report are set out below. |
Chart 1 - Interest in HDTV |
Source: Page 21, Fast Forward TM Trend Analysis prepared by Solutions Research Group for CRTC - August 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41. |
High Fidelity HDTV Inc. (High Fidelity), an independent Canadian broadcaster and content producer, concurred that HD penetration in Canada has stalled between television ownership (17%) and HD distribution (3%). In High Fidelity's view, however, the mandate of the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will drive the HDTV shift in Canada. Accordingly, HDTV unit sales for Canada are forecast to increase in the coming years. High Fidelity projected that the number of Canadian households with HDTV sets will rise to 22.6% in 2006, 31% in 2007, 40.6% in 2008, 51.7% in 2009 and 63.5% in 2010. |
|
42. |
The Canadian Association of Broadcasters' (CAB) research indicated that while HDTV television ownership has reached 15% of Anglophones and 9% of Francophones overall, a minority of these televisions are actually connected to a source of HDTV programming such as a digital set-top box. As a result, only about 6% of Anglophones and just over 2% of Francophones are capable of receiving and viewing HDTV programming. |
e) Distribution technologies |
|
|
43. |
There are four broadcast distribution technologies available for television programming: conventional over-the-air (OTA) transmission, cable distribution, DTH satellite distribution and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). |
|
44. |
All DTH subscribers receive digital signals whereas cable subscribers may receive either analog or digital signals, or a combination of the two. While a significant portion of cable subscribers continue to rely on analog service, the shift to digital cable has accelerated significantly in recent years and is expected to continue to grow rapidly as analog cable subscribers recognize the benefits of digital service. The CBC predicts almost four of five Canadian households will subscribe to some form of DTV distribution service by 2010. |
|
45. |
From the annual returns that licensees file with the Commission: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i. Over-the-air (OTA) |
|
|
46. |
SRG estimated that, of the just over 12 million households in Canada in 2006: |
|
|
|
47. |
SRG's figure of 13% of higher than the figure contained in the report entitled A Review of research data on the Canadian television industry, prepared by the Canadian Media Research Inc. (CMRI) and included in the submission by Bell Canada (Bell), MTS Allstream Inc. (Allstream), Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and TELUS Communications Inc. (TELUS). The CMRI report indicated that the combined penetration of cable and DTH was 89.8% in 2005, meaning that only 10.2% of Canadians depend on OTA reception for their television programming. In 2000, the number that depended on OTA reception was 16.4%. In comparison, according to the annual returns filed with the Commission by BDUs, two million of the 12 million Canadians (16%) receive their television signals OTA (see table 14 below) while Nielsen Media Research (Nielsen) reports that approximately 13% receive their signals OTA. Given these differences in estimates, it would appear that anywhere between 10% and 16% of Canadians receive their television signals OTA. What is key however is that the percentage is declining. |
|
48. |
As part of its ongoing initiative to implement more efficient network technologies, the Aboriginal Peoples Television Network (APTN) engaged Environics Research Groups to canvas participants in APTN's annual North of 60° study regarding their preferred method for receiving their broadcast services. The results of the 2006 survey, which was conducted in May and June of that year, showed that 48% of respondents preferred satellite, 25% preferred analog cable and 13% preferred digital cable. Only 6% of respondents with televisions indicated OTA as their preferred method for receiving television programming. |
ii. Cable distribution |
|
|
49. |
According to the annual returns filed with the Commission by BDUs, over 10 million of the approximately 12 million Canadian households receive their television signals from a licensed BDU, either a cable undertaking or a satellite DTH undertaking. The two million or so remaining households receive their television signals either from OTA television undertakings or from non-Canadian black and grey market satellite services. |
Table 14 Number of basic subscribers (000)
|
Cable, class 1 (1) |
DTH |
MDS & STV |
Total |
|||||
| 2001 |
6,857 |
81.0% |
1,520 |
18.0% |
87 |
1.0% |
8,465 |
100% |
| 2005 |
6,617 |
72.4% |
2,486 |
27.2% |
32 |
0.4% |
9,135 |
100% |
(1) Class 1 cable BDUs include Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) results. As part of the Commission's streamlining process, a few Class 1 cable systems have been exempted from reporting requirements. Total results also exclude the approximately one million cable subscribers of systems, other than Class 1s, that are not required to report their results to the Commission ie. exempt cable systems.
Source: CRTC financial database
|
|
|
|
|
50. |
According to Rogers Cable Communications Inc. (Rogers), the shift from analog to digital technology has been one of the most significant changes for distribution networks. Most cable operators have launched digital services and are near completing their transition to an all-digital platform. DTH providers have always offered all-digital services as have telephone companies. Also according to Rogers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chart 2 - Digital subscribers in Canada |
Source: p. 19 of Rogers' submission
|
51. |
In its submission, the Ontario Media Development Corporation (OMDC) stated that Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PWC) predicts there will be 9.3 million digital households by 2010, representing nearly three-quarters of all Canadian households that have televisions. |
|
52. |
Quebecor stated that, in 2006, nearly one-half of Videotron Ltd.'s (Videotron) subscribers will be served by digital and nearly 70% will have a digital terminal in their home within three years. Televisions will incorporate a digital terminal and a cable modem will permit the Internet to be provided by the distributor's private network, resulting in the convergence of television and computer screens. |
|
53. |
SRG's research suggested that most of the consumers who have the greatest interest in digital television have already switched. Accordingly, SRG is projecting that the combined penetration rate of Canadian households by digital cable and DTH will reach a ceiling of 58% to 60% by 2011. |
|
54. |
The CAB's research indicated that, while 90% of Anglophones and 83% of Francophones subscribe to a licensed BDU, those who subscribe to a digital BDU service are still in the minority. Specifically, 44% of Anglophones and 42% of Francophones subscribe to digital cable or DTH, while the other digital service providers (telecommunications distributors and "wireless" cable) serve less than 1% each. Thus a majority of Canadian consumers continue to rely on analog BDU and OTA reception. |
iii. Direct-to-home distribution (DTH) |
|
|
55. |
There are two licensed DTH service providers: Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership (ExpressVu) and Star Choice. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56. |
With HDTV's increasing popularity, ExpressVu has been testing and investing in a new transport modulation scheme to accommodate the need for more new, true HD signals. According to ExpressVu, however, this testings' results show that, even with the limited deployment of these techniques on satellite transponders used only for HD, there will still be a need for more satellite capacity to accommodate Canadian broadcasters' transition to HD. |
|
57. |
ExpressVu also noted that, in June 2006, the Department of Industry (the Department) issued a call for applications for new satellites to employ as-yet unused frequencies at the orbital locations used by both ExpressVu and Star Choice and by Canadian Satellite Communications Inc.'s satellite relay distribution undertaking. One new satellite has an estimated capacity for as many as 150 true HD channels. According to ExpressVu, however, the business risk associated with satellites is high given the significant operating and capital costs of deploying this technology. ExpressVu also submitted that it is unclear when satellite capacity will be required, and whether the HD services will generate sufficient incremental revenue to provide an appropriate financial return. ExpressVu added that the $300 million cost of each new single-frequency-band satellite must be amortized over its life of about 12 years. |
|
58. |
The Communications Research Centre (CRC) also referred to the Department's call for applications for 29 satellite licences, of which ten would be for new broadcasting satellite services. The CRC submitted that these satellite licences would provide an impressive increase in Canadian capacity, which could respond to the need for more local television and HDTV programming. The CRC further noted the trend to offer mobile, fixed and broadcast satellite services by satellite in various frequency bands as the technology evolves. The CRC maintained that any review or development of regulatory regimes and policies should take this trend into account. |
iv. Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) |
|
|
59. |
In their respective submissions, Bell and Rogers addressed the current state of IP / Digital subscriber line (DSL) technology for broadcasting distribution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
more flexibility and more applications are sure to come, from more suppliers. But a day is coming when the capabilities we call IPTV today become a feature-set of something bigger and hopefully, able to fulfill the broader needs of subscribers and service providers alike.(8) |
|
|
|
|
Whether it is channel programming, language selection, presentation customization, automating content selection for "my-channel" delivery, mixing personal content for delivery in a close community, or gaming or sharing within groups, these services illustrate the key benefits of IPTV: interactivity and communications capabilities available through the NGN (Next Generation Network) application plane. IPTV would benefit from open application-level standards for content management, application creation, and user control of their IPTV experience.(9) |
|
|
|
|
|
f) On-demand technologies |
|
i. Video-on-demand (VOD) |
|
|
60. |
VOD is similar to PPV but differs in that subscribers choose their selections from a content library as opposed to a broadcasting schedule. The selection is played at the time of the subscriber's choosing rather than being broadcast according to a predetermined schedule. |
|
61. |
According to the OMDC, digital cable's increased penetration has also led to an increase in VOD's popularity. OMDC stated that the percentage of digital cable subscribers that use VOD has grown from less than 10% in 2002 to nearly 36% in 2005, and that these subscribers spent $83 million on VOD services. Based on these take-up rates and the experience of video cassete recorder (VCR) and DVD penetration, PWC predicts that total VOD spending will reach $356 million by 2010, representing 61% of digital cable households. |
|
62. |
Rogers reported that approximately 50% of its digital cable subscribers use VOD at some time each month. |
|
63. |
In its research, SRG noted that: |
|
|
|
|
ii. Personal video recorders (PVRs) |
|
|
64. |
Personal video recorders (PVRs), or digital video recorders as they are also known, record video content in a digitized format to a hard disk storage medium such as a PC's hard disk. PVRs perform many of the same functions as a VCR but have a number of advantages over them, including the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
65. |
In its research, SRG found the following with regard to PVRs' penetration rate and consumer attitudes toward these devices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66. |
Submissions to this proceeding provided the following additional comments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g) Other Technologies |
|
i. Broadband Internet |
|
|
67. |
As activities such as streaming video over the Internet or downloading audio files require more bandwidth, consumer demand for high speed broadband Internet continues to increase in Canada. The following chart compares the growth in high-speed Internet access to the decline in dial-up access over the last five years. As of 2006, 81% of homes with Internet access employed high-speed while only 19% used dial-up. |
| Table 15 Dial-up vs. high-speed Internet access at home | ||||
|
CyberTRENDS |
SRG |
|||
|
High-speed |
Dial-up |
High-speed |
Dial-up |
|
|
2001 |
30% |
70% |
- |
|
|
2002 |
40% |
60% |
- |
- |
|
2003 |
50% |
50% |
61% |
39% |
|
2004 |
65% |
35% |
68% |
32% |
|
2005 |
74% |
26% |
79% |
21% |
|
2006 |
- |
- |
81% |
19% |
Sources: 2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report, CyberTRENDS, ComQUEST Research, Research Dimensions: March 2001, 2002 and 2003, and December 2004 and 2005 editions; SRG, Fast forward Trend Analysis
|
68. |
According to Rogers' research, Canada has consistently been in the lead among G7 countries for broadband penetration. Further, forecasts of Canadian households with broadband Internet suggest that, by 2010, subscriber levels could reach ten to eleven million households, equal to a penetration rate of up to 80%. |
ii. Audio over the Internet |
|
|
69. |
Audio content can currently be accessed from the Internet in basically three ways: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iii. Enabling technology |
|
|
70. |
Peer-to-peer (P2P) networks are generally used for sharing files as one user links with another to enable the transfer of information and files (e.g. Napster, Limewire, MP3s, videos, images, games and other software) through the use of a common P2P client. The only requirement is that the files be digital. |
|
71. |
Place-and-time shifting provides consumers with the ability to store and view archived or real-time content on media devices such as PCs, mobile phones or other Internet-connected devices. An example is the SlingBox, which enables a subscriber with access to a high-speed connection to access his or her digital set-top box at home from anywhere in the world to view whatever programming is available with that set-top. Consumer use of this technology will certainly become much more common as it is perfected. Currently, however, the video quality is poor because the upstream bandwidth is limited. |
|
72. |
User-generated content allows individual consumers to become their own content producers as they create video content and distribute it over the Internet. An example is "YouTube." According to recent reports, both American and Canadian broadcasters are supplying Web sites with programs, promos and trailers in an attempt to attract Internet "surfers" back to conventional television to view the entire program. |
iv. Mobile wireless |
|
|
73. |
All three of Canada's largest wireless carriers have introduced wireless music options to their portfolio of subscriber services. These music services currently rely on MP3-enabled phones, which combine wireless phone communications with MP3 playback capabilities. Music can be downloaded and purchased over the wireless network in MP3 or other audio file formats. |
|
74. |
According to the CBC study, the on-demand character of these mobile wireless services distinguishes them from conventional radio, as well as from new platforms such as satellite radio, which provide scheduled audio content. As with music downloading, mobile wireless music services are more like traditional music purchases than broadcasting. The availability of such services is likely to have an effect on audio broadcasting services, if only as a form of displacement. |
v. Mobile television |
|
|
75. |
Mobile television is a relatively new wireless technology that allows consumers to view real-time video over a mobile device. In explaining the technology, the CRC stated the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76. |
As to the future, Bell Mobility Inc. (Bell Mobility) predicts that wireless mobile video will complement rather than compete with regular viewing. In the short term, mobile operators such as Bell Mobility will have limited bandwidth to devote to video applications, resulting in lower picture capability (low refresh rate on a small screen). To date, current audio-visual choices have been somewhat limited by rights holders. The handset battery and premium pricing will limit consumers' usage levels. Accordingly, for the foreseeable future, mobile streaming video will in no way be comparable to viewing quality or entertainment choices available on conventional television. However, many mobile subscribers will find the ability to receive live or recorded audio visual transmissions regardless of their location to be of value, and therefore the market is expected to grow. |
3. Audio-visual technologies' predicted evolution over the coming years |
|
|
77. |
In addition to the predictions included in the comments in the previous section of this report, SRG predicts that: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78. |
Cocego, whose position is representative of the views presented in a number of submissions, maintains that audio-visual technologies' evolution in the near to medium term will be influenced mainly by improvements to already existing digital reproduction, transmission, conditional access, reception and storage technologies, as opposed to new breakthrough technologies. |
|
79. |
Quebecor/Videotron (QMI), for its part, added that the future lies in new broadcast platforms being deployed everywhere by all the major stakeholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80. |
Shaw identified five enabling technologies - video streaming, digital music, IPTV, advanced game consoles and multimedia mobile telephones - all of which have emerged since 2000 and are now being used by new entrants to offer services which compete with the Canadian broadcasting system. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section II: Usage of audio-visual technologies by Canadians |
A. Changes in the usage of audio-visual technologies by Canadians since 1 January 2000 |
|
|
81. |
Over the last five to ten years, the number of new technologies that have become available to Canadians, and the speed at which Canadians have adopted them, have increased significantly. As illustrated by the chart below, there has been a marked change in Canada's technology landscape: |
Chart 3 - Percentage of Canadian households with selected technologies, 1996 and estimates for 2006 |
Sources: Statistics Canada; Communications Management Inc.; Industry sources
(Figure ES-1, located on page 2 of Technology and broadcasting: Implications for public policy, Communications Management Inc., 1 September, 2006, prepared for CanWest MediaWorks Inc. and CHUM Limited. This chart also reflects revised 1996 percentage of the households with cable/satellite from roughly 60% to 74%: Figure 7 (revised) 17 November 2006.)
|
82. |
The key changes in usage of audio-visual technologies by Canadians relate, on the one hand, to the off-air reception of television signals and, on the other hand, to the transition from analog to digital television signal. |
|
83. |
There has been a continuing decline in off-air reception of conventional television signals over the last ten years, as illustrated in Chart 4 below, provided by CMRI: |
Chart 4 - Percentage of Canadians With Cable/DTH vs Off-Air Reception, All Canada, Persons 2+, Fall 1995 - Fall 2005 |
Source: CMRI (BBM)
(page 29 of Television Industry, Television, the Internet and New Technologies in 2006, CMRI, August 2006, prepared for TELUS, SaskTel, MTS Allstream and Bell Canada)
|
84. |
According to the above chart, only one in ten Canadians (10%) received their television signals off-air in 2005, down from more than one in six (16%) just five years ago. |
|
85. |
These changes have not, however, been consistent between Canada's two official language communities. The table below presents satellite, cable and off-air penetration rates for English Canada (Canada excluding Quebec) and Quebec: |
| Table 16 Satellite, Cable and Off-air Penetration Rates % | ||||||
|
Canada Excluding Quebec |
Francophone Quebec |
|||||
|
Satellite |
Cable |
Off-Air |
Satellite |
Cable |
Off-Air |
|
|
Area Population |
||||||
|
1,000,000 + |
14% |
77% |
8% |
18% |
59% |
23% |
|
100,000 - 1,000,000 |
22% |
67% |
10% |
19% |
69% |
12% |
|
50,000 - 100,000 |
39% |
52% |
9% |
31% |
60% |
9% |
|
< 50,000 |
50% |
37% |
13% |
40% |
50% |
10% |
|
Source: BBM Fall 05 / Spring 06, Nielsen 05-06
(CBC / Radio-Canada, page 41) |
||||||
|
86. |
In English Canada, off-air penetration is quite low in all areas, regardless of population size. In Quebec, the off-air penetration rate is comparable to that of similar-sized urban areas in English Canada, with the exception of the larger urban areas, where it is much higher. |
|
87. |
Although the current off-air reception rate of 23% (almost 1 in 4) in the large markets in Quebec is down from the 30% of five years ago, it is nevertheless much higher than the 8% off-air penetration rate in comparable sized areas of English Canada. |
|
88. |
The distribution of television signals in Canada via BDUs has continued to grow in recent years, as is illustrated in the following table: |
| Table 17 Penetration of over-the-air (off air) and broadcasting distribution undertakings (BDUs) among Canadian households | ||||||
|
1999-00 |
2000-01 |
2001-02 |
2002-03 |
2003-04 |
2004-05 |
|
| Anglophones | ||||||
| Off-Air |
22.4 |
21.2 |
19.4 |
12.6 |
13.1 |
12.8 |
| Cable/Satellite |
77.6 |
78.8 |
80.6 |
87.5 |
86.9 |
87.2 |
| Analog |
- |
- |
61.5 |
58.7 |
52.7 |
50.0 |
| Digital |
- |
- |
8.2 |
13.4 |
14.5 |
16.2 |
| Satellite |
- |
- |
10.9 |
15.4 |
19.7 |
21.0 |
| Francophones | ||||||
| Off-Air |
30.0 |
29.7 |
29.9 |
22.8 |
20.9 |
20.4 |
| Cable/Satellite |
70.0 |
70.3 |
70.1 |
77.2 |
79.2 |
79.6 |
| Analog |
- |
- |
56.2 |
53.8 |
47.7 |
46.8 |
| Digital |
- |
- |
4.7 |
6.7 |
10.9 |
12.4 |
| Satellite |
- |
- |
9.2 |
16.7 |
20.6 |
20.4 |
|
Source: Nielsen (CBC / Radio-Canada, page 42) |
||||||
|
89. |
In 2000-2001, less than 79% of Anglophone households in Canada received their television signals via BDUs, whereas in 2004-2005, more than 87% received their television signals in this manner. As for Francophone households, in 2000-2001, only about 70% received their television signals via BDUs, whereas in 2004-2005, almost 80% did. |
|
90. |
Regarding the transition from analog to digital television-signals, cable subscribers receive a combination of both types. While the delivery of analog signals across Canada has declined, digital signal penetration has increased. Digital cable subscriptions increased significantly between 2001-2002 and 2004-2005, almost doubling to 16.2% of Anglophone households and almost tripling to 12.4% of Francophone households. |
|
91. |
As noted in the previous section, DTH providers (satellite) have always provided all-digital services. Although satellite penetration is roughly equal in both the Anglophone and Francophone markets, combining digital cable and satellite penetration rates shows that 37.2% of Anglophone subscribers in 2004-2005 received digital service, compared to 19.1% in 2001-2002, whereas 32.8% of Francophone subscribers in 2004-2005 received digital service, compared to 14.1% in 2001-2002. |
|
92. |
The following sections look at changes that have occurred in Canadian audience tuning to both radio and television, and at changes that have occurred in the use of different audio-visual technologies by Canadians. |
1. Changes to audience tuning to radio and television |
|
a) Audience tuning data - radio |
|
|
93. |
Overall radio tuning habits in Canada have remained relatively stable over the last five years, with two exceptions: (i) the 12-34-year-old demographic has experienced the greatest general decline in radio tuning, and (ii) there has been a noticeable shift in tuning from AM radio to FM radio. |
i. Decline for the 12-34-year-old demographic |
| Table 18 Per capita listening hours by age group | ||||||||
|
Average weekly hours tuned per capita |
||||||||
|
BBM Fall 2000 - 2005 - all persons 12+, Monday to Sunday, 5 a.m. to 1 a.m. |
||||||||
|
All persons 12+ |
Teens 12-17 |
Adults |
||||||
| 18-24 | 25-34 | 35-49 | 50-54 | 55-64 | 65+ | |||
| 2000 |
20.3 |
10.5 |
18.1 |
20.6 |
21.8 |
21.9 |
22.8 |
22.4 |
| 2001 |
20.1 |
10.1 |
17.3 |
20.5 |
21.6 |
21.6 |
22.7 |
22.3 |
| 2002 |
20.2 |
9.4 |
16.7 |
20.1 |
21.7 |
22.3 |
23.1 |
22.8 |
| 2003 |
19.5 |
8.5 |
16.3 |
19.3 |
21.3 |
21.8 |
21.9 |
22.3 |
| 2004 |
19.5 |
8.5 |
15.7 |
19.3 |
21.5 |
21.6 |
22.1 |
22.3 |
| 2005 |
19.1 |
8.6 |
15.2 |
18.1 |
21.0 |
21.5 |
21.9 |
21.6 |
|
Growth(1)
2000 to 2005 |
-1.2 |
-1.9 |
-2.9 |
-2.5 |
-0.8 |
-0.4 |
-0.9 |
-0.8 |
* In average hours
Source: 2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report, Table 2.1
|
94. |
The above table shows that from 2000 to 2005, per capita radio listening declined by approximately one hour and fifteen minutes per week, which suggests a downward trend in radio listenership. |
|
95. |
As noted above, this decline is most notable for the 12-34 demographic (and especially the 18-24 demographic), the primary users of new emerging audio-visual technologies, and is relatively minimal for the 35-65+ demographic. As for the teen (12-17) demographic specifically, it has always recorded the lowest radio tuning levels. Whether this means that, unlike their parents, the three age groups within the 12-34 demographic will continue to stay away from radio as they grow older remains to be seen. |
ii. AM to FM |
|
|
96. |
The following table sets out the average hours that Canadian English-language and French-language AM and FM radio stations were tuned to over an average week during the BBM fall surveys that were administered from 2000 to 2005. |
| Table 19 Radio listening in an average week | |||||||
|
BBM Fall - all persons 12+, Monday to Sunday, 5 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. |
|||||||
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Increase/ |
|
| AM English |
126.6 |
126.2 |
122.2 |
117.6 |
114.1 |
111.2 |
-12.1 |
| AM French |
15.9 |
15.4 |
14.6 |
12.7 |
11.3 |
10.1 |
-36.5 |
| FM English |
267.5 |
267.0 |
276.2 |
275.9 |
283.5 |
280.2 |
4.7 |
| FM French |
92.5 |
94.5 |
99.5 |
97.4 |
101.2 |
100.3 |
8.4 |
| Other |
29.3 |
29.8 |
28.0 |
26.0 |
28.0 |
29.8 |
1.7 |
| Total average weekly hours (000,000) |
531.8 |
532.9 |
540.5 |
529.6 |
538.1 |
531.6 |
-0.04 |
Source: Calculated from the 2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report, Table 2.2. Note: Minor variances are due to rounding.
|
97. |
The following table sets out the percentage of hours that Canadian English-language and French-language AM and FM radio stations were tuned to over an average week during the same BBM Fall surveys. |
| Table 20 Radio tuning share in an average week | |||||||
|
BBM Fall - all persons 12+, Monday to Sunday, 5 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. |
|||||||
| Percentage (%) of hours tuned |
Increase/ decrease 00 to 05 |
||||||
| 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | ||
| AM English |
23.8 |
23.7 |
22.6 |
22.2 |
21.2 |
21.0 |
-11.8 |
| AM French |
3.0 |
2.9 |
2.7 |
2.4 |
2.1 |
1.9 |
-36.7 |
| FM English |
50.3 |
50.1 |
51.1 |
52.1 |
52.7 |
52.7 |
4.8 |
| FM French |
17.4 |
17.7 |
18.4 |
18.4 |
18.8 |
18.9 |
8.6 |
| Other |
5.5 |
5.6 |
5.2 |
4.9 |
5.2 |
5.6 |
-1.8 |
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
| Total average weekly hours (000,000) |
531.8 |
532.9 |
540.5 |
529.6 |
538.1 |
531.6 |
-0.04 |
Source: BBM Television Databook 2005-2006
(2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report, Table 2.2)
|
98. |
As the tables above show, in terms of the number of hours radio was tuned to and in terms of radio tuning share, both over an average week, while tuning to English- and French-language FM radio posted marginal increases, tuning to English- and French-language AM radio posted marked declines from 2000 to 2005. |
|
99. |
In its submission, the CBC noted that it identified such trends in radio listening several years ago and responded by strengthening both its local content and its connection with local communities. The CBC also undertook a major repositioning of its radio services, revamping its programming so as to better meet the tastes and needs of all listeners, including younger audiences. The CBC noted that, as a result of these forward-looking initiatives, its reach and market share in conventional radio has increased significantly in recent years, as shown in the following chart. |
Chart 5 - Full coverage reach and share of CBC English-language radio station |
(CBC / Radio-Canada, page 23)
Chart 6 - Full coverage reach and share of CBC French-language radio station |
(CBC / Radio-Canada, page 23)
|
100. |
Based on this data and its own experience, the CBC suggested that while conventional radio faces serious challenges, those challenges can be met if the needs and expectations of listeners are identified and addressed. Thus, the CBC stated that conventional radio - and CBC services in particular - should continue to have an important role to play in the audio world for the foreseeable future. |
|
101. |
In section I of this document, it was noted that satellite radio, among other new platforms from which to access audio content, have become available to Canadian consumers. Along with the other new technologies, satellite radio provides consumers with access to a greater volume and choice of music as well as greater flexibility and control over when they can listen to this music. To date, two satellite radio undertakings have recently gone to air. From the information available at the time of writing this report, CSR reports 120,000 subscribers while Sirius reports 200,000 subscribers. |
b) Audience tuning date - television |
|
|
102. |
The following tables provide the average weekly viewing hours by age group for the 2001-2002 to 2004-2005 broadcast years, using BBM national metered data for all persons 2+, Monday to Sunday, 2 a.m. to 2 a.m. |
| Table 21 Per viewer(15) average weekly viewing hours by age group | |||||||
| Broadcast year |
All persons 2+ |
Children 2-11 |
Teens 12-17 |
Adults | |||
| 18+ | 18-34 | 18-49 | 25-54 | ||||
|
2001/02 |
28.7 |
19.3 |
20.9 |
30.9 |
25.0 |
26.5 |
27.7 |
|
2002/03 |
28.6 |
18.8 |
21.1 |
30.6 |
24.4 |
25.9 |
27.3 |
|
2003/04 |
28.6 |
19.3 |
21.3 |
30.7 |
24.6 |
26.0 |
27.5 |
|
2004/05 |
28.1 |
20.5 |
21.3 |
29.9 |
23.3 |
25.0 |
26.5 |
Source: BBM Television Databook 2005-2006
(2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report, Table 3.1)
| Table 22 Per capita(16) average weekly viewing hours by age group | |||||||
| Broadcast year |
All persons 2+ |
Children 2-11 |
Teens 12-17 |
Adults | |||
| 18+ | 18-34 | 18-49 | 25-54 | ||||
|
2001/02 |
23.7 | 16.3 | 16.4 | 25.7 | 19.8 | 21.4 | 22.8 |
|
2002/03 |
23.4 | 15.5 | 16.0 | 25.4 | 19.3 | 20.8 | 22.4 |
|
2003/04 |
24.7 | 17.5 | 17.9 | 26.5 | 20.7 | 22.0 | 23.3 |
|
2004/05 |
25.1 | 19.2 | 18.6 | 26.6 | 20.4 | 22.0 | 23.2 |
|
103. |
According to Neilsen data, the Canadian per capita average weekly viewing hours for all persons 2+ in 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 were 26.5 and 25.7 respectively, which reflect the BBM findings in the above tables. |
| Table 23 Viewing hours of Canadian and non-Canadian services by language and type of service | ||||||||
|
BBM Metered data |
||||||||
| Quebec | All regions excluding Quebec | |||||||
| 02-03 | 03-04 | 04-05 |
Inc./Dec %. |
02-03 | 03-04 | 04-05 |
Inc./Dec %. |
|
| CBC & affiliates |
2.0 |
2.4 |
2.2 |
10.0 |
30.6 |
38.1 |
30.1 |
-16.3 |
| Private conventional |
8.2 |
9.0 |
9.4 |
14.6 |
147.8 |
152.8 |
161.0 |
8.9 |
| Pay & specialty |
7.3 |
8.8 |
8.4 |
15.1 |
155.8 |
184.3 |
191.1 |
22.7 |
| Digital pay & specialty |
1.0 |
1.3 |
0.4 |
-60.0 |
9.0 |
11.4 |
14.8 |
64.4 |
| Total English-language |
18.5 |
21.4 |
20.4 |
10.3 |
342.7 |
385.1 |
396.5 |
15.7 |
| SRC & affiliates |
19.5 |
21.3 |
27.3 |
40.0 |
0.5 |
1.1 |
0.5 |
- |
| Private conventional |
67.5 |
72.4 |
75.9 |
12.4 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
50.0 |
| Télé-Québec |
4.5 |
4.8 |
7.5 |
66.7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
| Pay & specialty |
44.8 |
53.4 |
60.2 |
34.3 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
0.5 |
50.0 |
| Digital pay & specialty |
0 |
0 |
0.8 |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
| Total French-language |
136.3 |
150.4 |
171.8 |
26.0 |
2.5 |
2.7 |
1.0 |
-60.0 |
| Private conventional |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
60.0 |
5.5 |
6.5 |
7.1 |
29.1 |
| Pay & specialty |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
- |
2.5 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
32.0 |
| Digital pay & specialty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
| Total Other languages |
0.7 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
66.7 |
8.0 |
10.3 |
10.4 |
15.6 |
| APTN |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
- |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
- |
| Total Canadian services |
155.6 |
172.7 |
193.2 |
24.2 |
353.7 |
398.6 |
409.1 |
15.7 |
| US conventional |
6.0 |
6.1 |
5.7 |
-5.0 |
56.6 |
57.1 |
50.9 |
-10.1 |
| PBS |
0.8 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
25.0 |
8.0 |
8.2 |
7.7 |
-3.8 |
| Pay & specialty |
3.7 |
3.5 |
2.9 |
-21.6 |
66.6 |
62.0 |
61.9 |
-7.1 |
| TOTAL non-Canadian services |
10.4 |
10.1 |
9.6 |
-7.7 |
131.3 |
127.2 |
120.5 |
-8.2 |
| VCR(2) |
7.8 |
6.3 |
0.6 |
-90.6 |
23.5 |
19.6 |
17.0 |
-27.7 |
| Other(3) |
0.8 |
0.9 |
1.2 |
50.0 |
12.0 |
13.6 |
14.2 |
18.3 |
| Total hours (000,000) |
167.0 |
184.1 |
204.0 |
22.2 |
501.0 |
543.8 |
547.7 |
9.3 |
Note: Minor variances are due to rounding
(1) Broadcast years: 2002/03: September 1, 2002 to August 31 2003; 2003/04: September 1, 2003 to August 29, 2004; 2004/05: August 30, 2004 to August 28, 2005.
(2) A change in methodology occurred as of August 30, 2004, when the wireless, passive Portable People Meter (PPM) technology replaced existing wired meter service (PMT) for Quebec (Franco), and diaries for the Montreal (Franco) market. Please note that when analyzing the 2004-2005 data for Quebec (Franco), VCR was not measured.
(3) Includes cable services such as CPAC, real estate, TV Guide, The Shopping Channel, Shaw Community Cable, CPAC-F, Télé-Annonce, provincial services such as Access, Knowledge, Ontario Legislature, SCN, TVO, Assemblée nationale and TFO.
Source: InfoSys, BBM metered data, calculated from the data in Table 24 below.
(2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report, Table 3.3)
|
104. |
According to the above table: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Table 24 Viewing share of Canadian and non-Canadian services by language and type of service | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BBM Metered data - 2002-03, 2003-04 and |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Viewing share % |
All Canada |
Quebec |
All regions excluding Quebec |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 02/03 | 03/04 | 04/05 |
Inc./ |
02/03 | 03/04 | 04/05 |
Inc./ |
02/03 | 03/04 | 04/05 |
Inc./ |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Canadian services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| English-language | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CBC & affiliates |
4.9 |
5.6 |
4.3 |
-0.6 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
-0.1 |
6.1 |
7.0 |
5.5 |
-0.6 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Private conventional |
23.2 |
22.0 |
22.7 |
-0.5 |
4.9 |
4.9 |
4.6 |
-0.3 |
29.5 |
28.1 |
29.4 |
-0.1 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Pay & specialty |
24.3 |
26.7 |
27.1 |
2.8 |
4.4 |
4.8 |
4.1 |
-0.3 |
31.1 |
33.9 |
34.9 |
3.9 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Digital pay & specialty |
1.4 |
1.7 |
2.0 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.2 |
-0.4 |
1.8 |
2.1 |
2.7 |
0.9 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Total English-language |
53.8 |
56.0 |
56.1 |
2.3 |
11.1 |
11.6 |
10 |
-1.1 |
68.4 |
70.9 |
72.4 |
4.1 |
||||||||||||||||||
| French-language | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SRC & affiliates |
3.0 |
2.8 |
3.6 |
0.6 |
11.7 |
10.9 |
13.4 |
1.7 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
-0.1 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Private conventional |
10.2 |
9.9 |
9.8 |
-0.4 |
40.4 |
39.3 |
37.2 |
-3.3 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
-0.2 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Télé-Québec |
0.7 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
0.3 |
2.7 |
2.6 |
3.7 |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Pay & specialty |
6.9 |
7.4 |
7.7 |
0.8 |
26.8 |
29.0 |
29.5 |
2.8 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
-0.1 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Digital pay & specialty |
0 |
0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0 |
0 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Total French-language |
20.8 |
20.8 |
22.2 |
1.4 |
81.6 |
81.7 |
84.2 |
2.6 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
-0.3 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Other-languages | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Private conventional |
0.9 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
0.2 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Pay & specialty |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.1 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Digital pay & specialty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Total Other-languages |
1.3 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
1.6 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
0.3 |
||||||||||||||||||
| APTN |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0 |
0 |
0.1 |
0 |
-0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Total Canadian services |
76.0 |
78.4 |
79.9 |
3.9 |
93.2 |
93.8 |
94.7 |
1.5 |
70.6 |
73.3 |
74.7 |
4.1 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Non-Canadian services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| US conventional |
9.4 |
8.6 |
7.7 |
-1.7 |
3.6 |
3.3 |
2.8 |
-0.8 |
11.3 |
10.5 |
9.3 |
-2.1 |
||||||||||||||||||
| PBS |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
-0.1 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
-0.1 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Pay & specialty |
10.5 |
9.0 |
8.7 |
-1.8 |
2.2 |
1.9 |
1.4 |
-0.7 |
13.3 |
11.4 |
11.3 |
-1.9 |
||||||||||||||||||
| TOTAL non-Canadian services |
21.2 |
18.8 |
17.6 |
-3.6 |
6.2 |
5.5 |
4.7 |
-1.5 |
26.2 |
23.4 |
22.0 |
-4.1 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Other services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| VCR(3) |
4.9 |
3.6 |
2.4 |
-2.5 |
4.7 |
3.4 |
0.3 |
-4.4 |
4.7 |
3.6 |
3.1 |
-1.6 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Other(2) |
1.9 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
2.6 |
0.2 |
||||||||||||||||||
| Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Total hours (000,000) |
667.9 |
727.9 |
751.7 |
83.7 |
167.0 |
184.1 |
204.0 |
37.0 |
501.0 |
543.8 |
547.7 |
46.7 |
||||||||||||||||||
Note: Minor variances are due to rounding.
(1) Broadcast years: 2002/03: September 1, 2002 to August 31 2003; 2003/04: September 1, 2003 to August 29, 2004; 2004/05: August 30, 2004 to August 28, 2005.
(2) A change in methodology occurred as of August 30, 2004, when the wireless, passive Portable People Meter (PPM) technology replaced existing wired meter service (PMT) for Quebec (Franco), and diaries for the Montreal (Franco) market. Please note that when analyzing the 2004-2005 data for Quebec (Franco), VCR was not measured.
(3) Includes cable services such as CPAC, real estate, TV Guide, The Shopping Channel, Shaw Community Cable, CPAC-F, Télé-Annonce, provincial services such as Access, Knowledge, Ontario Legislature, SCN, TVO, Assemblée nationale and TFO.
Source: InfoSys, BBM metered data
(2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report, Table 3.3)
|
105. |
According to the above table: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Change in usage of other audio-visual technologies |
|
a) Personal computers and Internet |
| Table 25 Personal computer ownership rates of Canadian households | |||||||||||
|
1996 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004(17) |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|
| CyberTRENDS |
- |
49% |
53% |
55% |
63% |
64% |
64% |
68% |
71% |
74% |
- |
| SRG |
48% |
53% |
- |
62% |
- |
- |
69% |
- |
- |
78% |
80% |
Sources: CyberTRENDS, ComQUEST Research, Research Dimensions: March 1998 to 2004 and December 2004 to 2005 editions (2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report, Table 6.1); page 28 from Fast Forward TM Trend Analysis prepared by SRG for CRTC - August 2006
|
106. |
The above table shows that overall PC ownership rates increased by approximately 17 percentage points, between December 2000 and December 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Chart 7 - Overall Internet access and Internet access by location |
(1) Such as BlackBerry, cell phone or PDA
(2) Sometimes referred to as Hotspots
Source: CyberTRENDS, ComQUEST Research, Research Dimensions: March 2003 and 2004, and December 2004 and 2005 editions
(2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report, Chart 6.1)
|
107. |
According to the above chart, the percentage of Canadians accessing (using) the Internet increased to 76% in March 2004 from 68% in March 2003; however, by the end of December 2005, Internet use had only increased a further two percentage points, to 78%. |
|
108. |
Again, according to CyberTRENDS and ComQUEST Research, Research Dimensions, the percentage of Canadians having access to the Internet in 2005 was the highest in Ontario and British Columbia at 83%, while in Quebec and Atlantic Canada it was 71%. This compares to 2003 when Quebec had the lowest rate of access at 54%, while British Columbia had the highest at 77%. The percentage of Canadians using the Internet weekly (i.e., at least once in a given week) increased from 40% in 2000 to 60% in 2005. |
Chart 8 - Usage of the Internet by Canadians, in terms of amount of time spent per week |
Source: CyberTRENDS, ComQUEST Research, Research Dimensions: March 2003 and 2004, and December 2004 and 2005 editions
(2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report, Chart 6.5)
|
109. |
The percentage of Canadians using the Internet for less than 1 hour per week remained relatively constant at 10-12% from 2002 to 2005. |
|
110. |
During this same period, there was a decline, from 31% to 20%, in users who reported spending 1 to 3 hours per week on the Internet, while the percentage of users who reported spending 4 to 10 hours per week on the Internet remained relatively stable. |
|
111. |
There appears to be a trend, however, towards a general increase amongst heavier users of the Internet, as those who reported spending more than 25 hours per week on the Internet jumped from 14% to 22% between 2002 and 2005. |
|
112. |
In its submission, Bell referred to a recent Statistics Canada study entitled The Internet: Is it Changing the Way Canadians Spend their Time? This study found little in the way of significant differences among Internet users - including heavy Internet users - and non-users in terms of the amount of time they spend watching television. Bell considers this to be an important finding, as it calls into question the suggestion that the Canadian broadcasting system is under an immediate threat from the Internet. |
| Table 26 On-line activities of high-speed users vs. dial-up users | ||||||||
|
% of Canadian adults who connected to the Internet at least once a month most or some of the time |
||||||||
|
High-speed |
Dial-up | |||||||
|
Activity |
March | December | March | December | ||||
| 2003 | 2004 | 2004 | 2005 | 2003 | 2004 | 2004 | 2005 | |
| Download / Listen to music |
53 |
32 |
41 |
37 |
32 |
21 |
25 |
18 |
| Downloading files or software |
54 |
41 |
46 |
40 |
46 |
37 |
35 |
35 |
| Chat |
26 |
20 |
17 |
14 |
16 |
15 |
11 |
14 |
| Watch video |
29 |
27 |
27 |
29 |
17 |
11 |
13 |
13 |
| Listen to radio |
20 |
23 |
30 |
26 |
12 |
13 |
16 |
11 |
| Shop on-line |
25 |
28 |
32 |
30 |
16 |
21 |
26 |
27 |
| Download movies |
- |
- |
7 |
4 |
- |
- |
3 |
2 |
| Download TV programs |
- |
- |
5 |
5 |
- |
- |
2 |
1 |
Source: CyberTRENDS, ComQUEST Research, Research Dimensions: March 2003 to 2004 and December 2004 to 2005 editions
(2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report, Table 6.6)
|
113. |
The above table shows that high-speed Internet users spend a greater percentage of their time than dial-up Internet users on bandwidth-intensive activities such as downloading large files, which may be related to the faster data transfer rates that characterize high-speed Internet. |
|
114. |
The table also shows that the use of the Internet to download music and files/software declined significantly from 2003 to 2005, for both high-speed and dial-up Internet service, whereas the use of the Internet to listen to radio, shop online and download movies and television programs increased over this same period. |
| Table 27 Listening to radio via the Internet | ||
|
Fall survey |
Total hours tuned via |
Share of total |
|
2000 |
454 |
0.1 |
|
2001 |
634 |
0.1 |
|
2002 |
942 |
0.2 |
|
2003 |
778 |
0.1 |
|
2004 |
1,285 |
0.2 |
|
2005 |
1,728 |
0.3 |
Source: MicroBBM, Fall 1997 to Fall 2005, All Canada, Persons 12+
(2006 Broadcasting Policy and Monitoring Report, Table 6.7)
|
115. |
The table above shows that the amount of tuning to Canadian radio using the Internet increased steadily between 2000 and 2005, although the share of tuning to Canadian radio using the Internet was relatively minimal when compared to other means of accessing radio programming. |
b) Personal digital devices |
| Table 28 Percentage of Canadians who reported using various digital audio-visual devices in December 2005 and how they used these devices | |||
|
Devices |
% of device users who are | ||
| Male | Female | ||
| Cell phones |
59% |
52 |
48 |
| BlackBerry |
3% |
75 |
25 |
| PDA |
7% |
66 |
34 |
| MP3 Player |
12% |
60 |
34 |
| iPod |
4% |
70 |
30 |
| Webcam |
8% |
60 |
40 |
| Percentage of cell phone, BlackBerry or PDA owners who used these devices to: | |||
| Watch television |
2% |
72 |
28 |
| Take pictures / record video |
3% |
75 |
25 |
| Obtain news or weather |
7% |
72 |
28 |
| Obtain sports scores |
4% |
97 |
3 |
Notes:
PDA is a pocket-sized device that combines computing, telephone/fax, Internet, and networking features used as a personal organizer.
iPod and MP3 players are also referred to as digital music players.
Webcam is a video camera, usually attached directly to a computer, which sends periodic images or continuous frames to a Web site.
Source: CyberTRENDS, ComQUEST Research, Research Dimensions: December 2005 edition
(2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report, Table 6.8)
|
116. |
Noting that none of the above devices, with the exception of cell phones, was available prior to 2000, it is clear that the audio-visual devices listed in the above table are finding their place in Canada's technological landscape. It is also worth noting that men are by far the dominant users of all of these technologies, particularly with regard to the uses listed in the lower portion of the table. |
| Table 29 Change in ownership of digital players by Canadians, in term of sex and age, 2003-2006 | ||||
|
2003 % |
2004 % |
2005 % |
2006 % |
|
|
Canada |
11 |
16 |
19 |
27 |
|
Male |
14 |
19 |
22 |
29 |
|
Female |
8 |
14 |
16 |
25 |
|
12-14 |
15 |
25 |
42 |
62 |
|
15-19 |
19 |
30 |
53 |
63 |
Source: Page 40 of the Fast Forward TM Trend Analysis prepared by SRG for CRTC - August 2006
|
117. |
The above table shows that ownership of digital music players (such as iPods and MP3 players) has increased dramatically, from 11% in 2003 to a projected 27% in 2006. Also, men have generally shown a greater increase in ownership of these devices than women have, and 12-19-year-olds have shown a greater increase in ownership than have older Canadians. |
|
118. |
According to the SRG study, about one in three (30%) of Canadian Internet users will have actively downloaded content in 2006, which is more than doubled (73%) by Canadians in the 15-19-year-old age group. Moreover, 29% of Canadian Internet users will have downloaded music in 2006, up from 20% in 2000; 8% will have downloaded a podcast in 2006, up from 5% in 2000; and 6-8% will have downloaded large files such as full-length movies or television shows in 2006, up from 5% in 2005. Regarding this final point, one-in-six (about 16%) Canadian Internet users in the 15-19 age group have downloaded a television show from the Internet. |
|
119. |
Today, visual technology presents itself predominantly through three ubiquitous screens: the television screen, the computer screen and the mobile phone screen. The following chart provides an interesting and useful depiction of the change in the amount of time spent with each of these three screen types, over the 2-3 years preceding mid-2005. |
Chart 9 - Change in time spent with three screens versus 2-3 years ago, as of mid-2005, Canadians 15-34 |
Note: In the above chart the sequence from "much less" runs from bottom to top
Source: Motorola Canada Ltd. News Release, "Canadian Youth Blazing the Trail for Third Screen Adoption," October 19, 2005; Research Strategy Group, survey conducted for Motorola Canada ltd, June 2005 (October 2005)
(Page 29 of Technology and broadcasting: Implications for public policy, Communications Management Inc.,
1 September 2006, prepared for CanWest MediaWorks Inc. and CHUM Limited)
|
120. |
From this chart, it is interesting to note the relative increases in those who spend a "little more" time and "much more" time with both the mobile phone and the home computer, as compared to the same categories for television. |
|
121. |
Finally, as noted in Table 29, ownership of digital music players such as iPods and MP3 players has more than doubled since 2003. The table below shows how the change in ownership rates of digital music players from 2003 to 2006 compares with the change in rates of ownership of digital cameras and digital video cameras over this same period. |
| Table 30 Change in rates of ownership of three digital devices | ||||
|
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|
| Digital Music Player |
11% |
16% |
19% |
27% |
| Digital Camera |
21% |
33% |
47% |
60% |
| Digital Video Camera |
- |
- |
25% |
27% |
Note: Digital Music Player includes iPods and MP3 players.
Source: Page 38 from the Fast Forward TM Trend Analysis prepared by SRG for CRTC - August 2006
|
122. |
Assuming that ownership equates directly to usage, the use of these devices has increased dramatically over this period. The greatest increase in ownership (and usage) has been with digital cameras, most of which are capable of allowing consumers to create their own digital videos, which can then be uploaded to various Internet sites. |
B. Changes in the demand for various types of programming and programming services since 1 January 2000 |
|
1. Radio |
|
|
123. |
As shown in Table 18 of the previous section, the demand for conventional radio tuning declined from 20.3 hours per week in 2000 to 19.1 hours in 2005. The biggest decline occurred among the 18-34-year-olds, which is consistent with this group also being those who tend to adopt any new emerging media platform the earliest and to the greatest degree. |
|
124. |
With the advent, over the last five years, of new ways to access audio content, such as iPods, MP3 players, CD burners and Internet radio, Canadians are getting used to the idea of being able to choose the type of music programming they want to hear, the programming service on which they want to hear it, and the time and place at which they want to hear it. The data in the following table is taken from the MTM study provided in the CBC's submission: |
| Table 31 Rates of music player ownership and three types of Internet activity for Canadian Anglophones and Francophones 18 and over, 2005 , in the month preceding the survey | ||||||||
|
Anglophones 18+ |
Francophones 18+ |
|||||||
|
18-34 |
35-49 |
50-64 |
65+ |
18-34 |
35-49 |
50-64 |
65+ |
|
| iPod/MP3 Player penetration |
42% |
24% |
13% |
3% |
23% |
16% |
7% |
2% |
| Past month download podcast |
12% |
9% |
4% |
1% |
5% |
2% |
2% |
0% |
| Past month audio streaming |
38% |
25% |
14% |
6% |
28% |
17% |
10% |
3% |
| Past month music downloading |
41% |
18% |
3% |
3% |
26% |
11% |
4% |
2% |
|
Source: CBC/Radio-Canada MTM, 2005 (CBC / Radio-Canada, page 51) |
||||||||
|
125. |
This table shows that 42% of Canadian Anglophones in the 18-34-year-old demographic owned an iPod and/or an MP3 player in 2005. This percentage was significantly higher than that of any other demographic. The fact that both iPods and MP3 players both require digital content explains how 41% of these individuals came to download music, and 12% came to download a podcast within the month preceding the survey. Given that 38% of these individuals also reported streaming music on the Internet during this same period, these technologies have certainly created a demand for this type of programming and the programming service, whether it is from P2P or from an on-line music service. |
|
126. |
These trends in accessing audio content are comparable for Francophone Canadians 18 and over, although usage is generally lower for this linguistic group. |
2. Television |
|
|
127. |
As set out in Tables 27 and 24 above: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128. |
The following chart illustrates the change in demand for Canadian and non-Canadian English-language programming by genre, from 2003-2004 to 2004-2005: |
Chart 10 - Viewing of Canadian and non-Canadian programs distributed by English-language Canadian television services by program origin and genre - BBM metered data - 2003/04 and 2004/05 broadcast years - 2 a.m. to 2 a.m. - persons 2+ - average weekly hours (000,000) |
Based on Canadian services with available program level data that incorporates country of origin and program genre
(2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report, Chart 3.2)
|
129. |
According to this chart, average weekly viewing to all genres of Canadian and non-Canadian English-language television programs increased by 2.1% in 2004-2005. However, viewing to all genres of Canadian English-language programs, when compared to total viewing to both Canadian and non-Canadian English-language programming combined, decreased from 45% in 2003-2004 to 42% in 2004-2005. Data for pre-2004 is available but has not been prepared on a basis consistent with the above and, therefore, is not comparable. |
|
130. |
Drama/comedy continued to represent the most viewed English-language program category. The total number of hours viewed increased by 7.4% from 2003-2004 to 2004-2005, while the percentage that viewing to drama/comedy represented of the total hours of programming viewed increased to 44.7% in 2004-2005, from 42.5% in 2003-2004. Moreover, average weekly viewing hours to Canadian drama/comedy, as a percentage of the average weekly viewing hours to all drama/comedy (both Canadian and non-Canadian), remained constant at 23%, while the number of actual hours of Canadian drama/comedy viewed increased by 7.4%. |
|
131. |
The following chart illustrates the change in demand for Canadian and non-Canadian French-language programming by genre, from 2003-2004 to 2004-2005: |
Chart 11 - Viewing of Canadian and non-Canadian programs distributed by French-language Canadian television services by program origin and genre - BBM metered data - 2003/04 and 2004/05 broadcast years - 2 a.m. to 2 a.m. - persons 2+ - average weekly hours (000,000) |
Based on Canadian services with available program level data that incorporates country of origin and program genre
(2006 Broadcasting Policy Monitoring Report, Chart 3.6)
|
132. |
According to this chart, average weekly viewing to all genres of Canadian and non-Canadian French-language television programs increased by 11.7% in 2004-2005. However, viewing to all genres of Canadian French-language programs, when compared to total viewing to both Canadian and non-Canadian French-language programming combined, decreased from 67% in 2003-2004 to 65% in 2004-2005. As was the case for English-language programming, data for pre-2004 is available but has not been prepared on a basis comparable with the above. |
|
133. |
As was also the case for English-language television, drama/comedy continued to represent the most viewed French-language program category. The total number of hours viewed increased by 18.6% in 2004-2005, while the percentage that viewing to drama/comedy represented of the total hours of programming viewed increased to 43.9% in 2004-2005, from 41.3% in 2003-2004. Moreover, average weekly viewing hours to Canadian drama/comedy, as a percentage of the average weekly viewing hours to all drama/comedy (both Canadian and non-Canadian), remained constant at 35%, while the number of actual hours of Canadian drama/comedy viewed increased by 6.5%. |
|
134. |
The data in the following table shows that viewing to conventional television is on the decline while the demand for specialty and pay services is on the rise, as viewers look for the more specialised, niche programming that these latter services offer. |
| Table 32 Distribution of English TV viewing by station group | |||||||||||
|
Prime Time |
1994-95 |
1995-96 |
1996-97(1) |
1997-98 |
1998-99 |
1999-00 |
2000-01 |
2001-02 |
2002-03 |
2003-04 |
2004-05 |
|
All English TV Viewing |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
Cdn. Conventional |
56.4 |
56.0 |
55.2 |
51.7 |
48.4 |
48.2 |
47.1 |
44.5 |
42.4 |
44.0 |
43.2 |
|
US Conventional |
25.5 |
24.8 |
23.9 |
20.6 |
19.8 |
19.0 |
17.1 |
15.3 |
14.0 |
13.2 |
13.2 |
|
Total Conventional |
81.9 |
80.8 |
79.0 |
72.3 |
68.2 |
67.2 |
64.2 |
59.8 |
56.4 |
57.2 |
56.4 |
|
Cdn. Specialty |
8.7 |
10.3 |
11.1 |
15.8 |
18.5 |
19.3 |
21.5 |
24.5 |
26.2 |
27.3 |
28.5 |
|
Foreign Specialty |
5.8 |
5.8 |
6.7 |
9.5 |
10.9 |
11.0 |
11.2 |
11.8 |
12.5 |
11.2 |
11.6 |
|
Pay TV |
3.5 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
3.1 |
3.8 |
4.9 |
4.3 |
3.7 |
|
Total Specialty/Pay |
18.0 |
19.2 |
21.0 |
27.7 | |||||||