A report prepared for the CRTC
by Barry Kiefl
Canadian Media Research Inc.
May 2003
This report is available electronically at www.crtc.gc.ca
Ce document est également disponible en français
This report examines recent trends in TV programming and audiences in the U.S., U.K., Australia, France and Italy. The primary objective of the study is to examine changes in the scheduling of different categories of programming, such as drama/entertainment vs. reality shows in the period 1996-2001.
In prime time drama1 has remained the largest and most important program category in Europe, Australia and the U.S. In the past 5-6 years, reality/game shows have had little effect on the amount of drama scheduled by European or Australian broadcasters. In the United States, a substantial percentage of the comedy genre has been replaced by reality/game shows but there has been no effect on other drama. Domestic drama has actually increased or been stable overall in the past five years in Europe, while in Australia domestic drama has decreased. Audiences to prime time drama in all the countries we examined remain strong, although audience fragmentation by new TV channels is beginning to have an effect in almost all countries.
In the period 1996 to 2001, European and U.S. broadcasting networks significantly increased the number of reality/game shows in their schedules and these programs have had major audience successes, especially in their first run. Who Wants To Be a Millionaire? is the most successful of the genre and has run in some 80 countries and met with huge audience success.
While there is a considerable amount of foreign, mostly U.S., drama on European and Australian TV screens, there is also a very substantial and growing domestic component, especially in prime viewing hours--first run domestic fiction programming in 2001 reached its highest level since 1996 in Europe. In countries such as the U.K., France and Germany over 50% of prime time drama is now of domestic origin. One estimate puts the annual value of European domestic drama at more than $4 billion Canadian.
The major European countries differ with regards to the drama formats each produces. In 2001, drama series were the most prevalent category in the U.K. and Spain, while Italy relied heavily on mini-series, and Germany and France had a preponderance of made-for-TV movies. This would seem to indicate that individual national circumstances drive the creative process that develops different program formats within each country.
Foreign channels and foreign programs are viewing staples in several countries in Europe. U.S. drama, including movies and series, remain an important part of most TV schedules, especially private channels and especially outside of prime time. The U.S. currently generates over $9 billion (U.S.) annually from program sales in Europe.
Cable TV is not as popular in Europe as in North America--penetration ranges from the single digits (e.g., Italy, Turkey, Spain) to over 90% in some countries (e.g., Belgium, Lithuania, Netherlands) -- but on average is chosen by a minority of European households. DTH penetration has grown in the most recent past but is still subscribed to by a minority.*
DVD and 16:9 wide screen TVs have become very popular consumer items in the past 12 to 18 months, indicators that the potential for high definition digital TV may soon come to fruition.
Time spent viewing TV has been trending upward during the past 4-5 years in most European countries. Viewing time varies country to country, although even the lowest viewing nations spend considerable time in the average day watching television.
Public television channels compete for audience share and continue to be predominant in most European countries--in most of Europe public TV commands 30% or more of the viewing audience. A limited number of local private stations also capture a large audience share, while specialty channels account for a minority of the audience.
The combined European public and private broadcasting net revenue in 2000 amounted to more than 60 billion euros, many times that of the Canadian broadcasting industry but smaller than the combined industry revenues in the United States (approx. $80 billion U.S.).
Part 1
Statistical Overview - Europe, Australia and the United States
Cable TV Penetration
DTH Satellite Penetration
VCR Penetration
DVD Players
Wide-screen 16:9 TV Sets
Viewing Time
Public TV Audience
Foreign Channel Audience
Net Revenues of European Broadcasters
U.S. Program Sales in Europe
Hollywood's Role in Europe
U.S. Programming on European TV
European Drama Formats
Part 2
United Kingdom - Overview
Italy - Overview
France - Overview
Australia - Overview
United States - Overview
TV is a primary source of facts and information; it informs our opinions about politics, the family, sex, religion and most other areas of life. TV creates and promotes celebrity, fashion and trends of all types, some perhaps not so endearing nor enduring. TV is the primary means that cultures around the world use for story telling. It occupies an immense amount of individuals' time and has played a role, alongside the discovery of electricity and the invention of the computer, in changing the world's economy from a basic commodity market to the polymeric market of the twenty-first century.
This report examines recent trends in TV programming and audiences in the following countries: the U.S., U.K., Australia, France and Italy. The report also touches on a number of other European countries, where data are available. We examine mostly prime time data but in some instances only whole day research information was available. The primary objective of the study is to examine changes in the scheduling of different categories of programming, such as drama/entertainment vs. reality shows in the period 1996-2001. The basic question we address is whether traditional forms of fiction, such as dramatic series, situation comedies, movies, made-for-TV movies, etc. have been replaced by reality shows, such as Big Brother and Survivor and prime time quiz shows, such as Who Wants To Be a Millionaire? and The Weakest Link. [These latter programs have become a worldwide phenomenon and many believe that they have replaced more traditional drama formats on television.]
Big Brother, for example, has been broadcast in North America and at least 10 European countries, with basically the same format; the concept is comprised of watching ordinary people locked up in a house or an apartment 24 hours a day. When first broadcast, the concept was met with harsh criticism by the press and many interest groups everywhere but it has proven to be very successful. When Big Brother was first aired on CBS the VP of audience research cut short his annual vacation for the first time in his long career and returned home to New York just to verify the initial, abnormally high Nielsen numbers. The program has now had as many as three runs in some countries. Similar formats have been developed, for example, Big Diet in the Netherlands and Germany, in which a number of contestants live together in a house for 100-odd days and the one who loses the most weight wins his/her weight in gold.2
Survivor represents a second type of the new reality programming which has features of the game show. It was first launched in Sweden as Expedition Robinson. Contestants work in teams and are challenged to complete assigned tasks until only one contestant remains; the winner takes home a large cash prize. Similar programs include The Mole, Boat of Love and Temptation Island. Popstars, also known as Starmaker, is a third type of reality-game show involving contestants vying to become rock stars. The same concept has been used in a number of countries. In Germany Deine Band was immensely successful and the winning rock group, No Angels, had a number one hit on the German charts.
The more traditional game shows that have emerged in prime time in many countries around the world include Who Wants To Be a Millionaire?, The Weakest Link and Greed. Who Wants To Be a Millionaire? is the most successful of the genre and has run in some 80 countries and met with huge audience success, although like many of these new reality/game shows, the large initial audiences declined after the first season.3 Of late, it has shifted to the fringe of prime time, where game shows have traditionally appeared.
This report documents changes in program schedules in a variety of countries where these new program formats have been introduced in the past 5-6 years. The countries are examined as a group and individually. The report begins with an overview of the TV broadcasting systems and look at the basic statistics relating to TV, including population and TV households, VCR and DVD penetration, cable/satellite penetration, audience trends, TV revenues, etc. Following this, the five countries we have been asked to study are examined in detail, including trends in their TV schedules and audiences.
In undertaking this study, CMRI contacted a number of organizations in broadcasting, production and research:
Advertising Research Foundation
AFMA
AGB Italia
Association of Commercial Television in Europe
Australian Broadcasting Authority
BBC
Canadian Advertising Research Foundation
CBS Research Department
Communication Institute For Online Scholarship
Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel (CSA)
Essential Television Statistics
Eurodata
Eurofiction/Fondazione Hypercampo
European Audiovisual Observatory
European Broadcasting Union
European Commission
European Institute for the Media
European Journalism Center
Eurostat
Gfk
Group of European Audience Researchers
IP, Television 2001
Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media
MPAA
NBC Research Department
Nielsen Media Research/A.C. Nielsen
ORF
Research International
RTL Group
Screen Digest
Taylor Nelson Sofres
World Advertising Research Center
World Federation of Advertisers
YLE
CMRI in particular would like to thank Heikki Kasari (YLE), Dave Poltrack (CBS) and Markus Booms (EAO) for their assistance and advice.
Source: EAO
Statistical Overview - Europe, Australia and the United States
The European Union consists of some 18 member countries. There are an additional 16 European nations that are associated in varying degrees with the EU and which are members of the European Audiovisual Observatory (EAO). The EAO is supported by the governments of the EU and monitors the radio, TV and film industries. The table below shows that these 34 European nations vary substantially in terms of population.
Italy, France and the UK, the three European countries whose programming schedules we will examine in detail, are among the largest European countries, each having a population greater than 50 million. The U.S. with 284 million people has the largest population of all countries listed, while Australia is a relatively small country with about 19 million people.
Cable TV has followed a very different path in Europe and Australia. In the latter country, only 19% of homes currently have what is called Pay TV. In the United States, as in Canada, the large majority of homes subscribe to some level of cable TV service. In the U.S, some 61% of households had cable service as of the end of 2001. In Europe, cable
penetration ranges from the single digits (e.g., Italy, Turkey, Spain) to over 90% in some countries (e.g., Belgium, Lithuania, Netherlands). However, the majority of European countries are well below the subscription levels of the U.S. and Canada.
Direct-to-home satellite TV has increased its penetration in Europe significantly in the past several years. Germany and Austria have the highest DTH penetration, 36% and 44% respectively as of mid-2001. Italy (16%), France (18%) and the UK (22%) also have a substantial proportion of homes receiving television via satellite, as does the U.S. (15%).
The VCR has been widely adopted as an ancillary device to the TV set everywhere in the modern world. In most western European countries, as well as the United States and Australia, at least 75% of homes now have at least one VCR. In eastern Europe, where the broadcasting systems themselves are not as developed, VCR penetration is somewhat lower. For example, in Russia and Hungary less than 40% of homes had a VCR in 2001.
VCR penetration of TV households (1992-2001)
in % of TVHH
| 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | |
| AT | 54.6 | 58.2 | 63.0 | 66.3 | 70.3 | 74.2 | 77.1 | 80.1 | 82.4 | 84.0 |
| BE | 52.1 | 55.5 | 59.3 | 61.5 | 64.7 | 68.1 | 70.8 | 73.4 | 76.1 | 76.1 |
| CH | 60.6 | 63.6 | 66.4 | 69.5 | 72.6 | 74.6 | 76.8 | 75.4 | 80.8 | 82.4 |
| CZ | 30.9 | 36.2 | 41.8 | 48.0 | 53.1 | 57.5 | 61.5 | 65.2 | 68.2 | 71.2 |
| DE | 56.2 | 60.7 | 65.4 | 70.2 | 74.2 | 77.3 | 80.4 | 83.3 | 84.5 | 86.4 |
| DK | 58.5 | 62.3 | 66.6 | 71.3 | 76.2 | 79.0 | 82.3 | 85.2 | 87.8 | 89.9 |
| ES | 51.7 | 54.8 | 58.5 | 60.3 | 63.2 | 66.5 | 70.3 | 71.7 | 73.3 | 74.5 |
| FI | 57.1 | 61.1 | 64.1 | 66.4 | 69.7 | 72.3 | 74.2 | 77.9 | 80.1 | 82.3 |
| FR | 59.5 | 63.7 | 67.4 | 71.1 | 74.4 | 79.0 | 81.9 | 83.5 | 85.6 | 84.6 |
| GB | 73.8 | 76.3 | 79.5 | 82.5 | 84.1 | 85.6 | 86.3 | 88.9 | 90.6 | 92.4 |
| GR | 36.2 | 38.3 | 42.5 | 46.2 | 49.0 | 51.9 | 54.6 | 63.9 | 67.7 | 71.6 |
| HR | 3.6 | 6.7 | 9.8 | 12.2 | 14.5 | 17.1 | 19.9 | 22.8 | 25.9 | 27.8 |
| HU | 21.7 | 24.3 | 25.5 | 26.9 | 28.4 | 31.0 | 32.8 | 34.4 | 36.0 | 37.4 |
| IE | 61.4 | 64.6 | 67.6 | 69.2 | 71.0 | 71.3 | 71.8 | 75.9 | 77.4 | 79.0 |
| IS | 70.7 | 72.1 | 73.3 | 76.7 | 78.8 | 80.9 | 82.7 | 84.1 | 85.2 | 86.6 |
| IT | 39.4 | 44.4 | 48.9 | 52.8 | 56.2 | 59.2 | 62.5 | 65.8 | 67.7 | 69.2 |
| NL | 56.8 | 58.6 | 61.1 | 63.6 | 65.8 | 68.0 | 70.7 | 71.4 | 73.9 | 75.9 |
| NO | 52.0 | 55.6 | 59.4 | 63.5 | 68.2 | 72.1 | 75.7 | 78.9 | 81.7 | 84.2 |
| PL | 26.0 | 32.3 | 37.8 | 43.4 | 48.9 | 53.7 | 58.6 | 63.3 | 68.1 | 72.8 |
| PT | 38.4 | 41.3 | 44.0 | 47.2 | 50.3 | 52.0 | 54.6 | 57.1 | 59.6 | 61.5 |
| RU | 2.1 | 4.6 | 7.7 | 11.1 | 14.6 | 18.0 | 21.3 | 25.2 | 29.0 | 39.5 |
| SE | 60.7 | 64.9 | 68.0 | 70.3 | 72.2 | 77.6 | 79.7 | 83.6 | 85.5 | 87.0 |
| EUR15 | 51.7 | 56.1 | 59.9 | 63.8 | 67.1 | 70.4 | 73.1 | 75.6 | 77.8 | 79.4 |
| US | 71.9 | 73.7 | 69.0 | 71.0 | 73.8 | 75.7 | 76.8 | 77.8 | 78.4 | 78.8 |
| AU | 81.0 | 84.0 | 85.0 | 87.0 | 87.0 | 87.0 | 88.0 |
Source: Screen Digest/AFC
The latest home video technology to gain acceptance is the DVD player and it has been a supplement or a replacement for the VCR in many households in the past year or two. In the United States, the penetration of DVD players grew from less than 2% in 1998 to some 20% in 2001. The 15 largest EU countries have seen the penetration of DVDs grow from less than 1% in 1998 to approximately 10% in 2001.
|
DVD penetration of TV households (1998-2001) |
||||
|
|
1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 |
|
AT |
0.1 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 7.8 |
|
BE |
0.2 | 1.3 | 4.4 | 10.1 |
|
CH |
0.2 | 1.6 | 4.5 | 11.3 |
|
CZ |
0.2 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 4.8 |
|
DE |
0.1 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 8.0 |
|
DK |
0.4 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 7.2 |
|
ES |
0.3 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 6.7 |
|
FI |
0.1 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 5.9 |
|
FR |
0.3 | 1.7 | 5.2 | 12.0 |
|
GB |
0.1 | 1.0 | 4.4 | 12.0 |
|
GR |
0.1 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 4.8 |
|
HR |
0.2 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.2 |
|
HU |
0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 2.5 |
|
IE |
0.1 |
0.7 |
2.2 |
7.5 |
|
IS |
0.5 |
1.7 |
4.0 |
10.2 |
|
IT |
0.1 |
0.4 |
1.4 |
4.1 |
|
NL |
0.2 |
1.0 |
3.1 |
9.7 |
|
NO |
0.1 |
1.2 |
4.3 |
9.7 |
|
PL |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
1.4 |
|
PT |
0.1 |
0.4 |
1.1 |
3.2 |
|
RU |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
|
SE |
0.1 |
0.8 |
2.6 |
8.0 |
|
EUR15 |
0.2 |
1.2 |
3.9 |
10.4 |
|
US |
1.3 |
4.7 |
11.5 |
20.0 |
Source: Screen Digest
DVDs and 16:9 ratio TV sets are leading indicators of the consumer's interest in high definition digital television (HDTV). In most advanced broadcasting systems in Europe, and elsewhere, wide screen sets have been slow to take off. The reasons are numerous, including the fact that TV sets tend to last a very long time and consumers are loath to discard old sets.
The fact that there has been so much uncertainty about the introduction and standards related to HDTV or DTT (Digital Terrestrial Television), as it is called in Europe, has probably also contributed to the slow growth. However, in the past year or so, 16:9 sets have begun to sell in large numbers. In 2000, some 3.5 million wide screen TVs were sold in the major European markets, a 48.8% increase over 1999 sales. Could this be an indicator that there is a growing interest in high definition digital TV?
|
Shipment sales of 16:9 TV sets (1996-2000) In units |
|||||||
|
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
|
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
2000/1999 |
|
AT |
12,000 |
22,000 |
25,000 |
30,000 |
40,000 |
129,000 |
33.3% |
|
BE / LU / NL |
134,000 |
181,000 |
270,000 |
340,000 |
440,000 |
1,365,000 |
29.4% |
|
- BE / LU |
46,000 |
64,000 |
90,000 |
110,000 |
120,000 |
430,000 |
9.1% |
|
- NL |
88,000 |
117,000 |
180,000 |
230,000 |
320,000 |
935,000 |
39.1% |
|
CH |
56,000 |
61,000 |
60,000 |
60,000 |
70,000 |
307,000 |
16.7% |
|
DE |
144,000 |
236,000 |
260,000 |
310,000 |
440,000 |
1,390,000 |
41.9% |
|
ES |
17,000 |
34,000 |
65,000 |
110,000 |
190,000 |
416,000 |
72.7% |
|
FR |
114,000 |
179,000 |
280,000 |
480,000 |
610,000 |
1,663,000 |
27.1% |
|
GB / IE |
23,000 |
86,000 |
320,000 |
850,000 |
1,340,000 |
2,619,000 |
57.6% |
|
GR |
3,000 |
5,000 |
8,000 |
15,000 |
20,000 |
51,000 |
33.3% |
|
IT |
13,000 |
27,000 |
65,000 |
115,000 |
190,000 |
410,000 |
65.2% |
|
PT |
3,000 |
5,000 |
8,000 |
15,000 |
70,000 |
101,000 |
366.7% |
|
SCAN |
12,000 |
30,000 |
55,000 |
120,000 |
210,000 |
427,000 |
75.0% |
|
- DK |
10,000 |
30,000 |
47,000 |
n.c. |
n.c. |
87,000 |
n.c. |
|
- FI |
200 |
n.c. |
n.c. |
n.c. |
n.c. |
200 |
n.c. |
|
- SE |
1,000 |
n.c. |
n.c. |
n.c. |
n.c. |
1,000 |
n.c. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR 15 |
475,000 |
805,000 |
1,356,000 |
2,385,000 |
3,550,000 |
8,571,000 |
48.8% |
Source: EACEM
Time spent viewing TV has been trending upward during the past 4-5 years in most European countries. The chart below reveals that viewing time varies country to country, although even the lowest viewing nations spend considerable time in the average day watching television.
The countries with the highest viewing levels (~4 hours daily) tend to be in eastern Europe (e.g., Estonia, Hungary, Slovakia). The lowest viewing nations (~2.5 hours daily) are countries such as Austria, Sweden and Denmark. The three European nations we have been asked to analyze, France, Italy and the UK, fall in the mid-range of about 3 hours viewing per day. In the United States, Nielsen Media Research pegs daily viewing at about 4 hours daily, whereas in Australia, A.C. Nielsen reports average daily use of TV at a little more than 3 hours per day. The reader should note that some national differences could be as much a function of the different audience measurement systems and sampling methodologies in use in each country as real cultural differences.
Public TV networks compete fiercely for audiences in Europe. As a result, public television has been and continues to be predominant in most European countries, despite the introduction of commercial terrestrial channels almost everywhere and the proliferation of satellite and cable services, many of which are global channels, e.g., CNN and MTV. The number of TV channels available in Europe has gone from about 50 in the mid-1980's to around 1500 today. But availability has not necessarily translated into audience.
In a handful of countries, such as Greece and Turkey, the public TV channels have only single digit audience shares but in most of Europe public TV commands 30% or more of the viewing audience. Austria and Denmark have public TV services that capture more than 50% of the audience. In France, Italy and the U.K., public TV has more than a 40% share of the national audience. Public television plays a minor role in the U.S. (3% share) and is significant but not dominant in Australia (~18% share).
|
Daily audience market share of public television (1997-2001) In % |
|||||
|
|
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
|
AT |
62.4 |
61.7 |
58.5 |
56.6 |
55.5 |
|
BE (CFR) |
20 |
20.8 |
22.2 |
23.2 |
23 |
|
BE (VLG) |
27.8 |
30.3 |
30.6 |
31.7 |
33.5 |
|
BG |
75.1 |
76 |
69.6 |
66.5 |
31.8 |
|
CH (Al.) |
34.3 |
35.4 |
34.6 |
34 |
34.4 |
|
CH (lt.) |
35.6 |
35.2 |
35.7 |
33.7 |
33.7 |
|
CH (Ro.) |
36.5 |
37.7 |
37.3 |
36.3 |
35.2 |
|
CY |
n.a. |
25.0 |
20.5 |
20.4 |
18.9 |
|
CZ |
n.a. |
33.29 |
32.1 |
31.22 |
29.2 |
|
DE |
40.5 |
42.5 |
42.8 |
43.1 |
43.3 |
|
DK |
68.6 |
69 |
66.8 |
67.32 |
64.5 |
|
EE |
n.a. |
22.4 |
18.3 |
16.6 |
17.1 |
|
ES |
51.4 |
51 |
49.4 |
49.3 |
49.6 |
|
FI |
48 |
46 |
43 |
42.3 |
43.3 |
|
FR |
44.1 |
43 |
42.2 |
42.3 |
41.7 |
|
GB |
53 |
51.1 |
49.5 |
48.5 |
48 |
|
GR |
8.2 |
10.0 |
9.5 |
10.6 |
9.5 |
|
HU |
n.a. |
25.5 |
15.6 |
13.6 |
13.2 |
|
IE |
53 |
52 |
49.7 |
47.3 |
43.4 |
|
IT |
48.1 |
48 |
47.6 |
47.29 |
46.94 |
|
LT |
n.a. |
16.3 |
10.3 |
10.2 |
9.1 |
|
LV |
n.a. |
24.9 |
18.3 |
18.2 |
18.1 |
|
NL |
35.1 |
36.5 |
34.5 |
36.4 |
36 |
|
NO |
43.2 |
40.9 |
39.8 |
40.5 |
41 |
|
PL |
57.5 |
52.6 |
51.1 |
46.2 |
45.4 |
|
PT |
38.6 |
37.7 |
32.6 |
29.9 |
25.7 |
|
RO |
n.a. |
46.4 |
39.2 |
40.4 |
35.9 |
|
RU |
65 |
59 |
47.7 |
46.21 |
43.75 |
|
SE |
47.6 |
48.2 |
47.2 |
43.8 |
41.9 |
|
SI |
33 |
32.4 |
32.1 |
32.9 |
34.4 |
|
SK |
27.5 |
24.3 |
18.1 |
18.4 |
20.2 |
|
TR |
n.a. |
2.2 |
5.3 |
5.9 |
6.9 |
|
AU |
|
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
US |
|
|
|
|
3 |
Source: Eurodata - TV / OBS/NMR
Canada is not the only country in which foreign TV channels are watched in great numbers by its citizens. In fact, foreign channels are viewing staples in many countries in Europe. In Belgium and Austria, some 43-44% of the viewing audience went to foreign channels in 2001. In Switzerland approximately two-thirds of the national audience was captured by foreign broadcasters. Some 87% of the audience in Lithuania was accounted for by foreign channels.
|
TV audience market share of foreign channels (2001) In % |
||||
|
|
Foreign public channels |
Foreign channels targeting the market |
Other foreign channels |
Total foreign channels |
|
AT |
10 |
15.8 |
18 |
44 |
|
BE (CFR) |
17.8 |
- |
25 |
43 |
|
BE (VLG) |
9.6 |
6.4 |
13 |
29 |
|
CH (Al.) |
16.5 |
18.7 |
30 |
65 |
|
CH (It.) |
24.3 |
- |
42 |
66 |
|
CH (R.) |
15.8 |
- |
49 |
65 |
|
CY |
2.8 |
- |
35 |
38 |
|
CZ |
n.a. |
- |
n.a. |
<6 |
|
DE |
n.a. |
- |
n.a. |
<7 |
|
DK |
0.9 |
12.5 |
8 |
21 |
|
EE |
19.3 |
- |
20 |
39 |
|
ES |
- |
- |
n.a. |
n.a. |
|
FI |
n.a. |
- |
n.a. |
<6 |
|
FR |
- |
n.a. |
n.a. |
<3 |
|
GB |
- |
n.a. |
n.a. |
<1 |
|
GR |
- |
- |
n.a. |
n.a. |
|
IE |
17.7 |
|
26.4 |
44 |
|
IT |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
<3 |
|
LT |
3.9 |
- |
19 |
23 |
|
LU |
22 |
- |
65 |
87 |
|
LV |
n.a. |
- |
n.a. |
n.a. |
|
NL |
4.3 |
19.4 |
n.a. |
24 |
|
NO |
n.a. |
6.7 |
<10 |
7 |
|
PL |
n.a. |
2.5 |
<14 |
3 |
|
PT |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
|
RO |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
<10 |
|
RU |
- |
- |
n.a. |
n.a. |
|
SI |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
<22 |
|
SK |
2.1 |
- |
<24 |
<26 |
|
TR |
- |
- |
n.a. |
n.a. |
Source: OBS
European public and private broadcasters generate revenue by several different means. The European Audiovisual Observatory estimated that in 2000 European Union public broadcasters, including radio, generated revenue amounting to some 26.3 billion euros ($41.2 billion Canadian), with the majority coming from licence fees (15.2 billion euros). Public broadcasters were also able to generate 8.5 billion euros of commercial revenue in 2000.
|
Breakdown of net revenues of the radio-television sector in the European Union (1996-2000) |
|||||
|
Public companies |
EUR Thousand |
||||
|
|
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Total public income |
14,097,251 |
15,585,559 |
15,718,419 |
16,936,404 |
17,224,355 |
|
- Aids / Grants |
1,439,431 |
1,319,006 |
1,387,225 |
1,465,880 |
1,663,437 |
|
- Licence Fee |
12,459,440 |
14,027,222 |
14,007,514 |
15,124,115 |
15,231,537 |
|
- Taxes on services |
129,393 |
154,143 |
208,285 |
193,000 |
193,000 |
|
- Other public income |
68,987 |
85,188 |
115,395 |
153,409 |
136,381 |
|
Total Commercial income |
5,997,675 |
6,658,044 |
7,043,992 |
7,930,542 |
8,518,599 |
|
- Advertising |
4,105,267 |
4,394,421 |
4,738,291 |
5,185,946 |
5,487,157 |
|
- Sponsorship |
121,463 |
119,170 |
131,662 |
129,213 |
178,166 |
|
- Programmes sales |
498,044 |
574,980 |
521,502 |
636,364 |
732,847 |
|
- Marchan-dising |
278,985 |
418,004 |
370,547 |
460,716 |
489,164 |
|
- Pay-TV |
0 |
22,411 |
20,157 |
65,435 |
111,038 |
|
- Other commercial income |
993,916 |
1,129,058 |
1,261,833 |
1,452,868 |
1,520,227 |
|
Other income |
517,713 |
588,653 |
556,387 |
466,608 |
595,362 |
|
TOTAL INCOME |
20,612,639 |
22,832,256 |
23,318,798 |
25,333,554 |
26,338,316 |
|
Private companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
- Advertising TV |
10,246,644 |
11,979,575 |
13,880,556 |
15,655,989 |
17,045,626 |
|
- Advertising radio (est.) |
1,613,721 |
2,112,162 |
2,456,653 |
2,883,969 |
3,150,000 |
|
- Home Shopping |
152,842 |
384,906 |
490,952 |
755,280 |
920,875 |
|
- Pay-TV |
4,159,169 |
5,768,684 |
6,975,794 |
8,678,183 |
10,608,106 |
|
- Other commercial income |
1,556,430 |
1,815,968 |
2,077,012 |
2,492,323 |
4,233,351 |
|
TOTAL INCOME |
17,728,806 |
22,061,295 |
25,880,967 |
30,465,744 |
35,957,958 |
|
Source: OBS |
|||||
Private broadcasters in the EU, that same year, produced 35.9 billion euros in revenue, with TV advertising accounting for 17.0 billion euros. Ad revenue, as in North America, declined in 2001 and this may affect programming in 2002-03. The combined public and private revenues in 2000 amounted to more than 60 billion euros, many times that of the Canadian broadcasting industry but smaller than the combined industry revenues in the United States (approx. $80 billion U.S.) TV ad revenues alone in the United States accounted for $54 billion in 2001.
The U.S. has a very important, if declining, presence on European movie screens and on television. U.S. television, movie and video program sales in Europe are substantial and dwarf European video sales in the United States. U.S. sales grew from $5.3 billion (U.S.) in 1995 to $9.0 billion (U.S.) in 2000, an increase of about 70%. Meanwhile, European cinema and video sales to North America, while growing, accounted for only $827 million (U.S.) in the year 2000, less than one-tenth U.S. program sales in Europe.
|
Estimates of the trade in audiovisual programmes between the European Union and North America (1995-2000) |
||||||||
|
Millions USD |
||||||||
|
Data in italics are estimates by the European Audiovisual Observatory. |
||||||||
|
Sales of US companies in the European Union market (broad-casters not included) |
|
Sources |
||||||
|
|
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2000/1999 |
|
|
MPA - Theatrical rental |
1,001 |
1,155 |
1,188 |
1,405 |
1,270 |
1,240 |
-2.4% |
OBS |
|
AFMA - Theatrical sales |
177 |
237 |
306 |
329 |
451 |
510 |
13.0% |
AFMA |
|
MPA - TV rental |
1,655 |
2,202 |
2,407 |
2,611 |
2,950 |
3,600 |
22.0% |
OBS |
|
AFMA - TV sales |
407 |
443 |
473 |
576 |
831 |
784 |
-5.7% |
AFMA |
|
MPA - Video rental |
1,930 |
2,026 |
2,030 |
2,034 |
2,124 |
2,570 |
21,0 % |
OBS |
|
AFMA - Video sales |
162 |
198 |
242 |
358 |
416 |
328 |
-21.2% |
AFMA |
|
TOTAL |
5,331 |
6,262 |
6,645 |
7,313 |
8,042 |
9,031 |
12.3% |
OBS |
|
Estimates of European revenues in North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GB revenues |
426 |
499 |
536 |
550 |
705 |
691 |
-2.0% |
ONS |
|
- Film company revenue |
343 |
422 |
343 |
350 |
508 |
511 |
0.5% |
ONS |
|
- TV company revenue |
83 |
77 |
193 |
200 |
197 |
180 |
-8.5% |
ONS |
|
Total revenue for non-British companies |
92 |
115 |
132 |
156 |
148 |
136 |
-8.0% |
OBS |
|
- revenues French films |
10 |
10 |
32 |
6 |
31 |
7 |
-77.6% |
CNC |
|
- revenue for French TV producers (*) |
46 |
84 |
73 |
113 |
87 |
95 |
9.6% |
INA/CNC |
|
- revenue for German film distributors |
16 |
1 |
8 |
13 |
5 |
9 |
86.9% |
BAW |
|
- other European revenues (estimated) |
20 |
20 |
20 |
30 |
25 |
25 |
n.a. |
OBS |
|
TOTAL |
518 |
614 |
668 |
706 |
853 |
827 |
-3.0% |
OBS |
|
Difference in revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Union / North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit (Millions USD) |
-4,813 |
-5,648 |
-5,977 |
-6,607 |
-7,190 |
-8,204 |
14.1% |
OBS |
(*) Including South-America till 1995
http://www.obs.coe.int/db/gavis/00001775.html
Source: OBS
U.S. feature films play an important role in European TV schedules. Blockbuster movies such as Titanic or Men In Black will often be among the top-rated programs in European countries. Interestingly, the major U.S. studios release fewer films each year than do European film producers. Less than 500 films come out of Hollywood, the world's film capital, on an annual basis. By comparison, over 600 feature films were produced by EU countries in 2001.
However, the average production cost of a U.S. movie, just under $50 million in 2001, is many times greater than that of European films (see chart). Film producers in the UK spend more than Italian producers but the average production in the UK still budgets less than $10 million per film.
A surprising amount of U.S. programming, Hollywood movies as well as dramatic series, appears on European TV. Within the category of imported fiction, virtually 2 in 3 programs in the EU are imported from the U.S. (see chart). Note that these U.S. programs are usually dubbed into the local language. No country other than the U.S. has a significant share of imports; Canada accounted for only 1.5% of fiction imports in the year 2000.
Source: Essential Television Statistics
When it comes to fiction programming generally, only in one major EU country, the U.K., is the percentage of U.S. content in the fiction genre less than 50% (see chart). Italy leads all European countries with 64% U.S. fiction, followed by Germany (57%) and France (56%).
However, in prime time the situation is reversed.4 Most countries have over 50% domestically produced drama in the prime viewing hours. France has the highest percentage of domestic fiction in prime time (75%). Australia differs from these European countries. In prime time, Australia's public and private stations schedule about 25% domestic fiction and the rest is mostly from the U.S.
While there is a considerable amount of foreign, mostly U.S., drama on European and Australian TV screens, there is also a very substantial and growing domestic component, especially in prime time viewing hours. Thus, as mentioned, in Europe more than 50% of drama in prime time is domestic, except in Italy where the production industry has been slower to develop.
The recently released Eurofiction 2002 study found that first run domestic fiction programming in 2001 reached its highest level since 1996. The following press release announcing the new data was very upbeat about the trends:
The overall offer of first run domestic fiction programmes in European television in the five biggest European tv markets Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain and France in the year 2001 amounts to 5883 hours. The growth of just over 300 hours represents an increase of 5,7% compared to 2000 and even compensates the drop observed from 1999 to 2000. With respect to 1996, the year of the first Eurofiction study, the presence of first run national fiction programmes (excluding feature films) in the schedules of both, public as well as private channels went up by more than 1700 hours (43%).
However, the Eurofiction study described the 2002 environment in Europe as "turbulent" and explained that reality/game shows have had an effect:
In spite of these figures still in expansion in 2001 the conditions for the fiction production all over Europe have undeniably worsened. This is due to the coincidence of many unfavourable factors. One of the most significant is the establishment of reality and game shows in the European tv schedules. They have become a strategic priority for broadcasters. Broadcasters develop important planning, promotional and fulfilling commitments on these programming genre. In comparison to fiction the reality shows have a double competitive advantage. They imply decisively lower costs than fiction of a medium standard but they can be as successful as these. In addition they allow creative economies and their setting up is often based on tested international formats.
A second unfavourable factor is the weak position of independent tv production in Europe due to well known reasons, such as their unsatisfying financing capacities, no remaining rights on their productions and underdeveloped secondary markets for fiction programmes in Europe.
A combination of slowing ad revenues and the influx of relatively cheap reality/game show programming is blamed for a potential slowdown in domestic drama production. The European trade magazines, like the Eurofiction study, tend to report on domestic fiction with a fairly ominous, almost negative slant, despite the empirical evidence that the industry is growing and assuming a more important role than ever.
The major European countries differ with regards to the drama formats each broadcasts (see chart). In 1999, drama series were the most prevalent category in the U.K. and Spain, while Italy relied heavily on mini-series and Germany and France had a preponderance of made for TV movies. This would seem to indicate that individual national circumstances drive the creative process that develops different program formats within each country.
Two years later, the pattern for the five major EU countries has not changed appreciably. Some variations have occurred, for example, in 2001 series seem to have been reduced slightly at the expense of films in the U.K. In 2001, according to the latest Eurofiction data, several other countries relied slightly more on mini-series but otherwise each country was basically similar to the format pattern of 1999 (see chart below).
The estimated value of European domestic fiction production in the five largest European markets is very telling. In 1999, the Institut National de l'Audiovisuel put the price tag for that year's programming alone at 2.7 billion Euros or more than $4 billion Canadian (see table). This level of expenditure explains at least in part why European broadcasters have been successful at producing domestic drama that attracts audiences.
Comparison between the number of units of national fiction programmes broadcast, the volume broadcast in hours and the financial value of the production |
|||
|
|
Number of |
Volume broadcast in hours |
Production value |
|
Germany |
2,712 |
1,828 |
1,026.3 |
|
Total |
8,745 |
5,786 |
2,743.7 (**) |
(*) A "programme unit" is a single programme (TV movie), an episode of a series or a serial or mini series. To simplify matters, we will from hereon refer to this unit as an "episode".
(**) The total value is estimated after deducting the double inclusion of coproductions involving two or more of the 5 countries in the survey
Source : INA
The United Kingdom is representative of much of Europe in that the public broadcaster, the BBC, is a dominant force; it has always commanded and continues to have a very significant share of the TV viewing audience. In 2001, with a 27.1% share, BBC1was the highest rated TV channel for the first time since 1955, the year that private TV was introduced in that country. BBC2, targeted to a more up-market audience, delivered an additional 11.1% share of the audience. The BBC, having just received a hefty increase it its licence fee and with total revenues in 2001 of over $5 billion euros ($7.5 billion Canadian), has been able to withstand increased competition from terrestrial private broadcasters and cable/DTH services.
ITV, the main private channel which is often called Britain's second public broadcaster, has seen its audience decline in the past 4-5 years, from approximately 33% to about 27%. The private TV industry in the U.K. has suffered from increased fragmentation brought on by cable TV and especially Rupert Murdoch's BSkyB satellite service, which has doubled its subscribers in the past few years and accounted for the increase in the audience share of Others from 11.8% in 1997 to 19.5% in 2001. BBC also operates a number of digital satellite services. Despite the audience share loss, the five terrestrial channels combined still represent approximately 80% of the U.K. audience.
The top 10 U.K. programs in 2000 (see chart above) are representative of recent programming and audience trends. Coronation Street, Eastenders and Emmerdale, all long running series, were all in the top 10 and have been for many years, since 1960 in the case of Coronation Street. Despite the success of these domestic programs, the very exacting critics complain about the lack of innovation in British fiction and refer to a "sclerosis of the schedules."5
Prime time game shows, such as Who Wants To Be a Millionaire, are usually carried by ITV and have made their mark on British schedules, ranking just behind the two most popular soaps in 2000. However, they have not displaced the very popular domestic drama series in the UK.
The production of domestic fiction programming in the U.K. reached an all time high in 2001. The five British terrestrial channels (BBC1, BBC2, ITV and Channels 4 and 5) produced or commissioned almost 1500 hours of original drama in 2001, an increase of 38% over 1996 (see chart).
A primary reason for the increase is provided by the Eurofiction 2002 report:
Alongside the soap operas, returning series have become sedimented (sic) into the UK TV schedules so that there is little scope for renewal in this genre. Programmes like the medical drama Casualty on BBC 1 (and its spin off Holby City).have proved enduring ratings winners and programme controllers have been loathe to remove them from the schedules.
British fiction is very successful, perhaps more so than in any other European country. Domestic broadcasters, public and private, have been able to build on past success and domestic fiction programming has been and continues to be at the core of public and private TV schedules in the UK. This is confirmed in the chart below which depicts the importance of drama in 1997 vs. 2001.
Drama accounted for about one-third of all prime time programming on U.K. broadcasters in 2001, according to an analysis conducted by David Graham & Associates for the ITC (see chart). Drama declined very slightly from 34.1% in 1997 to 32.3% in 2001. Entertainment programming, which includes reality and games shows, increased in this period from 19.3% to 21.6%. In other words, reality and game shows have had a modest effect on the schedules of U.K. broadcasters, with drama maintaining a preeminent position.
Italy's broadcasting history has been turbulent, rocked by scandals and pirate stations in early years of TV in the country. In modern times, the industry is very stable and Italian broadcasters have been all but immune from the effects of audience fragmentation caused by cable TV, DTH or other new technology.
The public broadcaster, RAI, had a combined share of the viewing audience just shy of 50% in 2001, down very slightly from 1997. RAI had operating revenues of 2.6 billion euros in 1999 ($4.1 billion Canadian), a sum which permits RAI to provide a compelling schedule of programs to compete with private terrestrial broadcasters and to stave off viewer interest in cable/DTH. The three private networks, owned by Mediaset, had a combined share of some 43% in 2001, up slightly since 1997. All other TV services, provided mostly by satellite, accounted for only about 10% of the total Italian audience.
In the mid-90's, the Italian TV industry was under-developed by comparison to the UK, Germany and other major EU countries. Since then, Italian broadcasters, public and private, have nurtured the domestic production industry and Italy is now considered one of the most successful producers of indigenous drama. The number of hours of first run domestic fiction was at an all time high in 2001, 761 hours in total.
Italy turned around its production industry by the launch of three daily soaps, Un posto al sole, Ricomincaire and Vivere. All three were launched in 1996 and continue to reach large audiences. RAI and Mediaset, combined, spent 600 million lira ($491 million Canadian) on domestic fiction in 2002 (Source: puntocom 3.7.2002). Prior to 1996, it was thought that Italians would not watch domestic soaps, and daytime fiction was given over almost entirely to U.S. programs. The latter are still very important and, as with Canadian broadcasters, are an economic way for a broadcaster to fill its schedule.
There is often a note of a great triumph but pending crisis in European TV. The Italians refer to it as "ultimi fuochi," which is a term used to describe the final explosion of fireworks, always the brightest but followed by darkness. The fragmentation associated with DTH, the supposed lack of innovation from broadcasting systems often comprised of one major public broadcaster and one major private broadcaster, a downturn in advertising revenue caused by 9/11 and the collapse of the telecommunications sector, have all contributed to a sense that there are major challenges ahead.
Eurofiction 2002 says about Italy:
For the first time in the last six years the seasonal offer (2001-2002) did not show signs of growth compared to the previous one; and although some mini-series have obtained sensational ratings and popularity, the average audience for fiction lost half a million viewers and one point share. It is not just the craze for reality shows (and in some cases the competition from American films) that has weakened the performance of domestic fiction.
Despite the concern, which is perhaps an over-reaction to the slight fragmentation caused by new channels, the ratings for Italian fiction are remarkably strong. The top 20 Italian first run fiction episodes in 2001 had shares of 25-35% and average audiences between 6.4 million and 9.9 million viewers (in a country of about 60 million people.)
An analysis of all Italian broadcasters' schedules by program category was undertaken.
Overall, the prime time program schedules of Italian broadcasters have seen little substantive change in the past 4-5 years (see chart below). In 1997, drama accounted for 44.2% of schedule hours and, in 2001, drama represented almost the same percentage, 43.3%. Light entertainment, including reality/game shows, grew slightly from 17.1% to 18.6%. It seems that the new reality/game shows have displaced other light entertainment programming. Therefore, Italy has followed the same pattern as the U.K., with traditional drama remaining the core building block for Italian broadcasters' schedules.
France differs from many of its European counterparts. It is the only country among the major EU nations that has not increased domestic fiction in the past 5-6 years. Yet, like many European nations, a handful of large TV stations dominate the audience picture. TF1, a former public broadcaster privatized in 1987, has lost audience in the past few years but was still the number one station in 2001 with a 32.7% audience share. The two public stations, France 2 and France 3, have a combined 38.2% share, also down slightly from the mid-90's, but still a formidable presence in audience terms. In North America, only one network has audience shares like this, the TVA network.
Among the top 10 French programs in 2000 were a number of domestic fiction programs. These included the popular series Julie Lescaut and Les Cordier Juge et Flic and no less than four made-for-TV movies. French TV has disdained daily soaps, for the most part, and has been loathe to produce sitcoms but one program that melds both formats and which has been successful since it first went on air in October 1999 on France 2 is Un gars, une fille. The title may sound familiar because France 2, borrowed the concept from Radio-Canada, although here it is a half-hour show, while in France it runs for 7 minutes just before the evening news.
Reality programs have been as influential in French TV schedules as anywhere in the world. Loft Story, an adaptation of Big Brother, aired almost 200 episodes in 10 weeks in 2001 on M6, a channel that cultivates the younger audience. The French were captivated by this series. Even the prestigious Le Monde carried front page stories about the characters and as a result sold more daily copies. Popstars on M6 and Star Academy on TF1 aired the same year but did not meet with the same audience success. Popstars was the focus of a major controversy after regulators classified it as a documentary. Despite the influx of reality programs, the amount of first run domestic fiction in this period has not declined significantly (see chart below).
Finally, an analysis of French TV schedules by program category revealed that the percentage of all fiction, domestic and imported, on the major French TV networks showed no significant decline in 2001 (see chart below). Fiction, which includes movies, series, serials and animation, accounted for about one-third of French TV schedules in both 1997 and 2001. Light entertainment as a category grew from 13.2% to 15.4%. Again, it seems that the new reality/game shows have displaced other light entertainment programming. France, like Italy and the U.K., has seen many reality/game shows introduced but they have not displaced traditional drama in program schedules.
Australia's three commercial and two government-owned non-commercial free-to-air television networks dominate the Australian TV system. They have performed well financially throughout most of the past 10 years, despite a number of challenges which included:
the introduction of pay TV in 1995
computer games and online services were widely adopted; and
substantial budget cuts were imposed upon the major public broadcaster, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) in the latter half of the decade
Despite the budget cuts, the two public broadcasting services in Australia, ABC and SBS, have increased their audiences in the past 5-6 years. However, the two public broadcasters have relatively small audience shares compared to most European public broadcasters. Rather, in Australia we find that the private networks Nine and Seven have had dominant audience shares, hovering in the 30% range, for the past 20 years. Channel Ten, a third private channel, has traditionally accounted for a slightly more modest share of the audience, approximately 20%.
Source: AFC(ACN)
The Australian top 10 in 2000 included the omnipresent prime time game show, Who Wants To Be a Millionaire?, as well as Popstars, which is categorized as a music program in Australia. If one looks only at drama programming in the same year, Australia had 5 domestic fiction programs in the top 20 drama series. The 15 foreign dramas included Friends, E.R. and many other titles familiar to Canadian audiences.
2000 |
||
Title |
Station |
Rating |
| Friends | 9 | 18.2 |
| Spin City | 9 | 15.9 |
| E.R. | 9 | 15 |
| Blue Heelers | 7 | 13.7 |
| Seachange | ABC | 13.7 |
| The Drew Carey Show | 9 | 11.9 |
| Monarch of the Glen | ABC | 11.8 |
| The Bill | ABC | 11.4 |
| All Saints | 7 | 11.2 |
| Dharma and Greg | 7 | 11.1 |
| Ally McBeal | 7 | 10.9 |
| Home and Away | 7 | 10.9 |
| Ballykissangel | ABC | 10.7 |
| JAG | 7 | 10.7 |
| 3rd Rock from the Sun | 7 | 10.7 |
| The Practice | 7 | 10.1 |
| Will and Grace | 7 | 10.1 |
| Water Rats | 9 | 9.4 |
| Stargate SG-1 | 7 | 9.3 |
| Cold Feet | 7 | 9.1 |
Source: ACNielsen, TV Trends 1999, 2000, 2001
Hollywood movies generally dominate the top rated films on Australian TV. Feature films can have very large audiences. For example, in 2000, the top rated films had ratings that ranged from 21.7% to 33.4%. A rating point is equal to 1 percent of the population. This means that 1 in 3 people watched The Castle on Channel 9, which was the number one rated film in Melbourne in 2000. Coincidentally, it was the only Australian film in the top 10.
Sydney television |
||
Film |
Station |
Rating |
| Air Force One | 7 | 30.4 |
| My Best Friend's Wedding | 10 | 28.6 |
| Con Air | 7 | 26.2 |
| Men in Black | 10 | 24.9 |
| Pretty Woman | 7 | 24.0 |
| Conspiracy Theory | 9 | 24.4 |
| As Good as It Gets | 10 | 24.3 |
| The Rainmaker | 7 | 23.8 |
| In & Out | 9 | 21.9 |
| One Fine Day | 7 | 21.7 |
|
||
Film |
Station |
Rating |
| The Castle | 9 | 33.4 |
| Con Air | 7 | 32.3 |
| My Best Friend's Wedding | 10 | 31.2 |
| Air Force One | 7 | 28.5 |
| Good Will Hunting | 9 | 26.8 |
| As Good as It Gets | 10 | 26.5 |
| The Negotiator | 9 | 25.9 |
| In & Out | 9 | 25.9 |
| Liar Liar | 10 | 25.7 |
| Conspiracy Theory | 9 | 25.4 |
Source: ACNielsen; compiled by the Australian Film Commission
The Australian Broadcasting Authority (ABA) began a major review of Australian Content regulations in 1999. The final report was due before the end of 2002. For the review, the ABA issued comprehensive data on the schedules and audiences of all broadcasters, especially the dominant private broadcasters.
There has been a long term decline in the amount of domestic drama programming aired by private Australian broadcasters. The decrease is the primary factor that lead the ABA to conduct the review of its TV program policies. Note that while the private broadcasters have reduced domestic drama, ABC, the public network, has increased domestic drama in its schedule.6
The presence of foreign drama on the private networks is a major public policy issue in Australia. We have seen that U.S. programming occupies a significant part of daytime schedules in Europe but in Australia this is also the case in prime time, as the following chart depicts.
Annual spending on foreign drama had been increasing until a downturn in the Australian economy affected all program spending in 1999-00. Expenditures on foreign drama are currently about triple the expenditures on domestic drama. However, it is noteworthy that the expenditures of the three private Australian networks on domestic drama ($91 million in 1999-00) were about double the expenditures on Canadian drama by private English-language Canadian broadcasters in the same period (Source: CRTC Monitoring Report).
The total annual cost of procuring foreign, mostly U.S, drama amounted to some $250 million Australian in 1999-00, which was about 29% of all program expenditures by the major private broadcasters.
| Program origin and genre |
$m |
Per cent |
|
| Australian programs | Drama | 91 | 10.5 |
| Children's drama | 11.9 | 1.4 | |
| Children's other | 7.2 | 0.8 | |
| News and current affairs | 153.2 | 17.7 | |
| Documentaries | 3.4 | 0.4 | |
| Sport | 187.3 | 21.7 | |
| Light entertainment variety | 48.6 | 5.6 | |
| Light entertainment other | 71.2 | 8.2 | |
| Other programming | 22.6 | 2.6 | |
| Total Australian program expenditure | 596.6 | 69.1 | |
| Foreign programs | Foreign drama | 250.7 | 29.0 |
| Foreign other | 16.5 | 1.9 | |
| Total overseas program expenditure | 267.3 | 30.9 | |
| Total program expenditure | 863.9 | 100.0 | |
Source: ABA Broadcasting Financial Results 1999-00
The ABA wanted to determine in its content review whether the decline in Australian drama was the result of an overall decline in the scheduling of drama:
The ABA has attempted to identify whether drama has remained a popular form of programming during this period, or whether the decline in hours of Australian drama might be related to a fall in the broadcast of the drama genre generally. Although data is not available for every year, information presented in the ABT/ABA publication Broadcasting in Australia appears to indicate higher levels of prime time drama in the late 1980s and early 1990s on commercial television, than the ABA has identified for the period 1998 to 2000.8
However, the ABA also concluded that in the period since the mid-1990's, the period we are examining, the percentage of drama in Australian schedules has not declined, as shown in the following table:
Year |
Drama programs
|
| 1996 | 28 |
| 1997 | 30 |
| 1998 | 27 |
| 1999 | 29 |
| 2000 | 30 |
Source: ACNielsen TV Trends, 1997-01 editions
Note: Drama includes movies, comedy and serials
Drama has held steady at about 30% of the private networks' whole day schedules. A more focussed analysis of the key prime time period revealed that drama was even more important in prime time, although the analysis clearly showed the preponderance of foreign drama in Australian TV.
Year |
Total drama programs (% of total programming) |
Australian drama programs (% of total programming) |
Foreign drama programs (% of total programming) |
| 1998 | 41.26 | 10.69 | 30.58 |
| 1999 | 40.91 | 10.39 | 30.52 |
| 2000 | 39.39 | 9.69 | 29.7 |
Source: ABA, 2001
In prime time, drama accounted for approximately 40% of the prime time schedules of private networks in the late 1990's and in the year 2000. The small decrease in drama over the past 2-3 years occurred in both domestic and foreign drama, although in proportional terms the decrease is larger in domestic drama.
Coupled with the decrease in domestic fiction production, there has been a proportional shift away from serials to program series. The chart below, derived from the ABA's background issues paper, provides a breakdown of drama by format on the three private Australian networks.
Meanwhile, the major public broadcaster, ABC, has increased both the amount of drama and entertainment programming in its schedule over the past 5 years. Drama has increased from 6.8% of total broadcast hours in 1996-97 to 8.1% in 2000-01 (see table). Entertainment programming has increased from 9.4% to 11.9% in the same period. It is worth noting that the foreign content of the ABC has remained stable at about 42-43% in the past 5 years, much higher than the foreign content on its Canadian equivalent, the CBC. Three program categories account for most of the foreign content. In 2000-01 foreign children's programming represented 14.7% of ABC's total schedule; foreign movies, 8.8% and foreign drama, 4.0%.
| 1996/97 | 1997/98 | |||||
| Local | Import. | Total | Local | Import. | Total | |
| Arts | 5.70% | 2.30% | 8.00% | 0.90% | 1.90% | 2.80% |
| Children's | 5.40% | 12.50% | 17.90% | 5.10% | 14.20% | 19.30% |
| Comedy | 0.70% | 2.50% | 3.20% | 1.20% | 2.00% | 3.20% |
| Documentaries | 1.40% | 2.50% | 3.90% | 1.90% | 4.10% | 6.00% |
| Drama | 3.10% | 3.70% | 6.80% | 2.30% | 5.60% | 7.90% |
| Education | 9.80% | 9.00% | 18.80% | 9.40% | 8.20% | 17.60% |
| Entertainment | 8.30% | 1.10% | 9.40% | 11.20% | 0.60% | 11.80% |
| Features | 1.90% | 0.00% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 0.20% | 2.20% |
| Indigenous | ||||||
| Movies | 0.00% | 8.20% | 8.20% | 0.00% | 5.20% | 5.20% |
| News | 5.90% | 0.00% | 5.90% | 6.60% | 0.10% | 6.70% |
| Current affairs | 9.30% | 0.30% | 9.60% | 9.20% | 0.00% | 9.20% |
| Religious | 0.50% | 0.60% | 1.10% | 0.40% | 1.00% | 1.40% |
| Science & talks | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sport | 4.50% | 0.70% | 5.20% | 5.60% | 0.80% | 6.40% |
| Total | 56.50% | 43.50% | 100.0%6 | 5.00% | 44.00% | 100.0% |
| 1998/99 | 1999/00 | |||||
| Local | Import. | Total | Local | Import. | Total | |
| Arts | 0.90% | 2.30% | 3.20% | 2.10% | 2.30% | 4.40% |
| Children's | 6.10% | 14.40% | 20.50% | 5.40% | 15.70% | 21.10% |
| Comedy | 0.70% | 2.40% | 3.10% | 1.50% | 1.30% | 2.80% |
| Documentaries | 2.30% | 4.20% | 6.50% | 2.20% | 3.60% | 5.80% |
| Drama | 1.90% | 5.60? | 7.50% | 1.70% | 5.70% | 7.40% |
| Education | 9.60% | 7.20% | 16.80% | 10.20% | 5.90% | 16.10% |
| Entertainment | 11.70% | 0.60% | 12.30% | 11.10% | 0.70% | 11.80% |
| Features | 1.80% | 0.30% | 2.10% | 2.30% | 0.20% | 2.50% |
| Indigenous | ||||||
| Movies | 0.00% | 5.60% | 5.60% | 0.00% | 6.40% | 6.40% |
| News | 5.70% | 0.00% | 5.70% | 4.30% | 0.00% | 4.30% |
| Current affairs | 9.40% | 0.00% | 9.40% | 9.50% | 0.00% | 9.50% |
| Religious | 0.30% | 0.80% | 1.10% | 0.40% | 0.90% | 1.30% |
| Science & talks | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.20% |
| Sport | 6.00% | 0.10% | 6.10% | 6.30% | 0.00% | 6.30% |
| Total | 56.50% | 43.50% | 100.0% | 57.30% | 42.70% | 100.0% |
| 2000/01 | ||||||
| Local | Import. | Total | ||||
| Arts | 1.50% | 2.20% | 3.70% | |||
| Children's | 5.90% | 14.70% | 20.60% | |||
| Comedy | 1.00% | 2.10% | 3.10% | |||
| Documentaries | 2.70% | 3.90% | 6.60% | |||
| Drama | 4.10% | 4.00% | 8.10% | |||
| Education | 9.40% | 4.30% | 13.70% | |||
| Entertainment | 11.70% | 0.20% | 11.90% | |||
| Features | 2.50% | 0.30% | 2.80% | |||
| Indigenous | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.10% | |||
| Movies | 0.10% | 8.80% | 8.90% | |||
| News | 3.40% | 0.00% | 3.40% | |||
| Current affairs | 9.70% | 0.00% | 9.70% | |||
| Religious | 0.40% | 0.80% | 1.20% | |||
| Science & talks | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.20% | |||
| Sport | 4.90% | 1.00% | 5.90% | |||
| Total | 57.60% | 42.40% | 100.0% | |||
Source: ABC
To some degree, the public broadcaster has made up for the reduction in drama programming on the private Australian networks. Thus, the private and public Australian broadcasters, when taken together, have not altered the basic proportions of drama vs. other entertainment programming in their program schedules to any significant degree. However, the long term decline in the amount of Australian drama on the more popular private networks remains a concern.
The United States is the only market in the rest of the world that resembles Canadian English television. Like Canada, numerous terrestrial networks and stations were established decades ago and cable TV, with its many specialty channels, was introduced and has had a major influence on the TV marketplace since the 1970's. Those people in areas without cable have recently gained access to many more traditional networks and specialty channels via DTH. As a result, the American audience is divided among many dozens of stations.
The largest networks, ABC, NBC and CBS, have a prime time audience share of 12-13% each. On a whole day basis, the original big three networks have closer to 10% shares each. Fox, which became the fourth major network during the 1990's presently accounts for about a 9% audience share, while UPN and WB, the newest networks, have about 3-4%. The remaining 50% of the audience is accounted for by the hundreds of specialized channels in the U.S.
The American system is almost completely dominated by private broadcasting; PBS, the loose network of public TV stations, captures about 3% of all TV viewing. The public broadcasting service has some British and a little Canadian programming and there are foreign-language channels available by satellite for various ethnic groups but their audience is basically not measurable. Domestic Spanish-language TV is the only non-English television that captures significant audiences.
In 2000 the top 10 programs on U.S. TV had more reality/game shows than in the other countries we have examined. Big Brother, Survivor and Who Wants To Be a Millionaire? all achieved top 10 status on American TV. But, as discussed below, these programs have not displaced drama in U.S. network schedules. It should also be noted that U.S. broadcasters, for the most part adopted the reality/game show genres a year or two later than Europe or Australia. Only in the last year or two are the U.S. networks beginning to experience the lower audiences that reality/game shows garner in their second or third run.
We have seen the major influence that American TV has on the rest of the world. Therefore, it is not surprising to find that there is very little foreign programming on U.S. TV. There is so little foreign content that studies such as Eurofiction, which is now conducted annually, or the many Canadian commissions, task forces, etc. that have examined domestic content issues, are non-existent in the history of U.S. public policy.
In the period 1996 to 2001, the six major U.S. broadcasting networks significantly increased the number of reality/game shows in their schedules, as depicted in the chart below:
The six broadcast networks increased the percentage of reality/game shows in their schedules from 3% to 12% over this five year period. Such a dramatic shift in scheduling practices is probably unprecedented. Our analysis shows that in other countries reality/game shows, while important, were not incorporated into schedules to this degree. However, the reality/game show phenomenon was probably hitting its peak in the U.S. during the 2001-02 TV season.
Interestingly, the increase in reality/game shows came not at the expense of drama programming but comedy. In the U.S., comedy includes sitcoms, which in Canada would be classified as drama. Comedy fell from 32% to 21% of all prime time programming. Drama actually increased slightly to 42%, maintaining its position as the single largest category of programming.
What impact has this had on audience behaviour in the U.S., which may have more in common with Canada than Europe or Australia?
The CBS Research department provided data for this study that reveal that audiences have declined for all types of prime time network programs in the past 5 years, including reality/game shows. The ratings for comedy declined the most (32%), while the ratings for drama and reality/game shows fell about equally, 21% and 19% respectively. Dave Poltrack of CBS Research reported to CMRI that the "number of channels available to the average U.S. household doubled over the past five years, from 45 to 90." As a result, the network ratings have declined overall by some 20%, i.e., exactly the decline in drama and reality/game shows.
It is worth noting that the average rating for reality/game shows (4.7%) in 2001-02 was slightly lower than the average rating for either comedy (5.0%) or drama programming (5.8%). However, the lower production costs of reality/game shows, coupled with the higher chance of finding a hit show, make the genre very appealing for the networks.
The audience shares of the various program categories on U.S. network TV have declined in step with the decline in ratings, as shown below:
TV is a very accessible medium. Television has a video (and audio) 'language' and grammar which viewers relate to instinctively, especially for story telling formats such as drama.
TV programming results from a complex process of cultivation in which studios, distributors, networks, and stations weed out the lesser talent and only the very best programs actually make it to air and survive for any period of time. At every level in the cultivation process, programs and the daily program schedule are being constantly evaluated and changed, to improve and to compete for viewers. Around the world, billions of dollars are spent annually on the research and development of programs, accompanied by billions more on production, distribution and promotion.
It is clear, given its sheer size, why the United States is the world's foremost producer of films and television. However, one thing that emerged from this study about Europe and Australia is the deep-seated commitment to produce domestic dramatic TV programming. The need to compete with or complement U.S. drama programs is so fundamental, one does not find any expressed rationale for it in these countries, it is just part of basic culture. TV drama, like film, is considered an art, equal in stature to popular literature.
The European mediascape varies significantly from country to country. Local circumstances determine the penetration of cable and satellite and the audience for local channels (see chart next page).
All Europeans consume a considerable amount of TV, ranging from 2.5 to 4 hours daily on a per capita basis. For the most part, the audience in Europe (and Australia to a lesser degree) is still loyal to the public broadcaster, as well as one or two private TV stations, rather than the many specialty channels that have captured a large share of the North American audience. European and Australian public broadcasters openly compete for audience share and the ratings are clearly the most important measure of performance for public broadcasters throughout Europe. Specialty channels are now widely available in Europe but the number of households choosing to subscribe to cable/DTH is limited and therefore their impact has yet to be felt on local broadcasters. Public broadcasters in Europe and their private counterparts tend to be extremely well funded by Canadian standards and this has probably been the major factor forestalling the penetration of cable, DTH and specialty channels.
Source: Outlook of the development of technologies and markets for the European Audio-visual sector up to 2010, Anderson Consulting, June 2002
U.S. programming plays a very significant role in the schedules of all European countries, as well as Australia. Especially in the hours outside of prime time, U.S. fiction programming is a building block in the schedules of public and private broadcasters. U.S. producers currently sell approximately $9 billion worth of programming in Europe on an annual basis.
In the past five years, the program schedules of the broadcasters/countries we have studied absorbed many new reality/game shows, however, the effects on traditional drama programming appear to have been minimal. Every country reports that prime time reality/game shows became an important part of prime time schedules, especially on private channels. In virtually every case, these were not imports but program concepts adapted for the local market, in the language and customs of the local audience. The new reality/game shows seem to have replaced other entertainment programming in Europe. In the United States, reality/game shows increased fourfold in the period 1996 to 2001 and the available data suggest that a similar, if not so intense, phenomenon has occurred in Europe and Australia.
However, in the European countries we have studied and in Australia, the new reality/game shows did not replace drama programming. The data show that prime time drama has remained by far the largest and most important program category in Europe and Australia. In the U.S., a substantial percentage of the comedy genre has been replaced by reality/game shows but drama has not been affected at all. In other countries, domestic drama has actually increased in the past five years, with the exception of Australia (and France, where domestic drama production has been stable).
1 Drama in most countries and in this study includes feature films, made-for-TV movies, mini-series, series, serials (soaps) and anthology drama; in the U.S., sitcoms are considered a category in themselves. [back]
2 Television 2001: European Key facts, IP/RTL Group, p. 51. [back]
3 Television 2001: European Key facts, IP/RTL Group, p. 55. [back]
4 Prime time is defined as follows in each country: Germany 20:00-22:30; France and Italy 20:30-22:30; the United Kingdom 19:00-22:00; Spain 20:30-23:00; Australia 17:00-24:00. [back]
5 Eurofiction 2002, p.99 [back]
6 Australian Film Commission [back]
7 This was the question the ABA asked verbatim in its November 2001 Issues Paper. [back]
8 ABA, Issues Paper, November 2001, p.25. [back]
Date Modified: 2003-05-23