
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE
THE CANADIAN RADIO‑TELEVISION AND
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
TRANSCRIPTION
DES AUDIENCES DEVANT
LE
CONSEIL DE LA RADIODIFFUSION
ET
DES TÉLÉCOMMUNICATIONS CANADIENNES
SUBJECT
/ SUJET:
Harmony Broadcasting Corporation called to a Public Hearing /
Convocation de Harmony Broadcasting Corporation à
une audience publique
HELD AT: TENUE À:
Provencher Room Salle Provencher
The Fort Garry Hotel The Fort Garry Hotel
222 Broadway Avenue 222, avenue Broadway
Winnipeg, Manitoba Winnipeg (Manitoba)
June 4, 2008 Le 4 juin 2008
Transcripts
In order to meet the requirements of the Official Languages
Act, transcripts of proceedings before the Commission will be
bilingual as to their covers, the listing of the CRTC members
and staff attending the public hearings, and the Table of
Contents.
However, the aforementioned publication is the recorded
verbatim transcript and, as such, is taped and transcribed in
either of the official languages, depending on the language
spoken by the participant at the public hearing.
Transcription
Afin de rencontrer les exigences de la Loi sur
les langues
officielles, les procès‑verbaux pour le
Conseil seront
bilingues en ce qui a trait à la page
couverture, la liste des
membres et du personnel du CRTC participant à
l'audience
publique ainsi que la table des matières.
Toutefois, la publication susmentionnée est un
compte rendu
textuel des délibérations et, en tant que tel,
est enregistrée
et transcrite dans l'une ou l'autre des deux
langues
officielles, compte tenu de la langue utilisée
par le
participant à l'audience publique.
Canadian
Radio‑television and
Telecommunications
Commission
Conseil
de la radiodiffusion et des
télécommunications canadiennes
Transcript / Transcription
Harmony Broadcasting Corporation called to a Public Hearing /
Convocation de Harmony Broadcasting Corporation à
une audience publique
BEFORE / DEVANT:
Len Katz Chairperson
/ Président
Peter Menzies Commissioner
/ Conseiller
Marc Patrone Commissioner
/ Conseiller
ALSO PRESENT / AUSSI PRÉSENTS:
Cheryl Grossi Secretary / Sécretaire
Michael Craig Hearing Manager /
Gérant de l'audience
Peter McCallum Legal
Counsel
Conseiller
Juridique
HELD AT: TENUE À:
Provencher Room Salle Provencher
The Fort Garry Hotel The Fort Garry Hotel
222 Broadway Avenue 222, avenue Broadway
Winnipeg, Manitoba Winnipeg (Manitoba)
June 4, 2008 Le 4 juin 2008
- iv -
TABLE
DES MATIÈRES / TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE / PARA
PHASE I
PRESENTATION BY / PRÉSENTATION PAR:
Harmony Broadcasting Corporation 39 / 250
PHASE II
INTERVENTION BY / INTERVENTION PAR:
Devol Dryden 205 / 1484
Manjit Blake, Robert Blake, Peter Bjorklund, 228 / 1649
David Kovnats, Chris Knight & Chris Oliver
PHASE III
No reply / Aucune réplique
Questions by the Commission 326 / 2279
Winnipeg,
Manitoba / Winnipeg (Manitoba)
‑‑‑ Upon
commencing on Wednesday, June 4, 2008
at 1306 /
L'audience débute le mercredi 4 juin 2008
à 1306
1 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Good afternoon, ladies and
gentlemen, and welcome to this Public Hearing.
2 Je m'appelle Len
Katz et je suis vice‑président des télécommunications au CRTC. Je présiderai cette audience en compagnie de
mes collègues, Peter Menzies, conseiller, et Marc Patrone, conseiller national.
3 The Commission
team assisting us today are Hearing Manager Michael Craig, who is also senior
radio analyst, Peter McCallum, senior legal counsel and Cheryl Grossi, Hearing
Secretary.
4 Please speak with
Ms Grossi if you have any questions with regard to hearing procedures.
5 In January, 2007
the Commission issued mandatory orders requiring the licensee of radio station
CJWV FM Winnipeg, the Harmony Broadcasting Corporation, to comply at all times
with sections 2.2 subsection (8) and (9) of the Radio Regulations and with the
station's Conditions of Licence.
6 Harmony
subsequently failed to provide logger tapes as requested by the Commission on
two separate occasions.
7 This represented
an alleged breach of one mandatory order, while also preventing the Commission
from verifying if the licensee was in compliance with the other mandatory
orders, the Regulations, its Conditions of Licence and the Campus Radio Policy.
8 The station ceased
its operations in October, 2007 and the entity known as Harmony Broadcasting
Corporation was dissolved.
9 It has since been
revived with an entity with an entirely new Board of Directors and a new sole
member representing an apparent change of control effected without the
Commission's prior approval.
10 The Commission has
called Harmony to this Public Hearing to show cause as to why additional
mandatory orders requiring the licensee to conform to the Regulations and to
its Conditions of Licence should not be issued, why the Commission should not
suspend or revoke Harmony's licence under sections 9 and 24 of the Broadcasting
Act, and why prior Commission approval for the apparent change of control is
not required.
11 In the event that
prior approval is required, the licensee is expected to show cause as to why
the Commission should grant its approval to the change in control and why
further measures, such as suspension or revocation of Harmony's licence, are
not warranted.
12 I will now invite
the Hearing Secretary, Cheryl Grossi, to explain the procedures we will be
following.
13 THE
SECRETARY: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
14 We will now
proceed with the presentation by Harmony Broadcasting Corporation.
15 The Commission is
gravely concerned that Harmony has again apparently failed to comply with the
very basic and fundamental requirements of the Regulations and a consequent
uncertainty concerning its adherence to broadcasting mandatory orders CRTC‑2007‑3
through 2007‑6 and its Conditions of Licence.
16 Appearing for
Harmony Broadcasting Corporation is David Asper. Please introduce your colleagues and you will
then have 20 minutes to make your presentation.
17 MR. KOVNATS: Mr. Chairman, my name is David Kovnats. I'm with the law firm of Murray and Kovnats.
18 I am here with a
few preliminary objections that I would like for the record.
19 First of all, the
people set out as representing Harmony Broadcasting Corporation are not the
proper people and the Board should not be having presentation made on behalf of
Harmony by anyone other than Peter Bjorklund, Paula Bjorlund and Manjit Blake.
20 Secondly, I asked
for subpoenas from the Commission counsel in order to subpoena Mr. Don Douglas
who is with the law firm of Thompson, Dorfin, Sweatman, and Mr. Shane
Lasker. I am adding to that list. I would like to also subpoena Rita Tully.
21 I asked for those
subpoenas on Monday night. Mr. Lasker I
understand is still in his office today, Mr. Douglas left the city yesterday, I
spoke to him. I would have been able to
subpoena him yesterday because he didn't leave the city until this morning.
22 Thirdly, although
this is not an objection I guess, not all the interveners were listed on the
Agenda, but a number of interveners are now going to be added.
23 I believe that in
order for the Commission to have a full and complete understanding of the
situation, the proper board of Harmony should be represented and the issue of
that should be determined long before we get anywhere else.
24 And, in order to
do that, I think it is crucial to have Mr. Don Douglas present by subpoena and
it is crucial to have Mr. Shane Lasker who is a government employee present by
subpoena and I also would like to have Ms Rita Tully present by subpoena.
25 Without that, I
don't think the Commission can get to the truth, and it cannot understand the
history of Harmony, nor its proper ownership and its proper directors.
26 In fact, the
actions of some of the employees of the Commission have presumed, and have
worked to the detriment of the true Board of Directors, the volunteer Board,
and they had not been corresponded with until April of this year, and any of
the orders that were given in any of the correspondence that went to other
parties prior to this year were improper.
27 I respectfully
submit that the Commission should order the subpoenas and give a reasonable
time before reconvening a hearing in order to hear from these people properly,
in order for the Commission to make an adequate and proper determination, with
all of the facts before it.
28 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Counsel?
29 MR. McCALLUM: With respect to the subpoenas that you are
requesting, what is it that you want these people to say?
30 What is the issue
that you wish them to address?
31 MR. KOVNATS: The issue that I wish to address through Mr.
Douglas ‑‑ in fact, through all of them, is the true Board of
Harmony Broadcasting Corporation, who the proper parties are to deal with, and
who should be dealing with the matters involved.
32 Mr. Douglas was
retained by the Board of Harmony Broadcasting, and I understand that his firm
is also representing Mr. Asper's organization.
33 And I am not going
to get into that issue, but as far as ownership is concerned, I think that Mr.
Douglas is absolutely key, because he made sure ‑‑ first,
there were meetings that may or may not have been held properly, but then he
made sure that all meetings were held properly, and that the appropriate Board
was confirmed.
34 Secondly, I
believe that Mr. Lasker will be able to give testimony, specifically, as to how
the operations of our Corporations Branch works, and how one has to look at the
register in a different way to understand what it really means.
35 And, Ms Tully, the
same sort of information, plus financial.
She has other information, as well, as to the ownership.
36 Without those
people present and giving evidence, I think there is an issue.
37 I feel that the
Commission should have them here, and I think that it wouldn't have been hard
to issue the subpoenas yesterday. I
could have had them here, but now we have to get them, and it will have to be
at a later date, obviously.
38 But the ownership
of Harmony ‑‑ and when you call it ownership ‑‑
the Harmony Broadcasting Corporation is a not‑profit ‑‑
a non‑share corporation in Manitoba.
39 It's not called a
not‑profit, it's called a non‑share corporation in Manitoba, and
its proper directors have been sidestepped by members of the Commission, who
knew of their existence, who talked with them, who met with them, and who had
some correspondence with them prior, and they did not follow what they were
supposed to.
40 So for this
Commission to go ahead ‑‑ and I am not casting any aspersions
on anyone. It didn't happen. I believe that the Commission should, very
definitely, hear from those witnesses on the issue of ownership and control of
Harmony Broadcasting long before you deal with any other issues. I think it's absolutely crucial.
41 MR. McCALLUM: For the record, who is Ms Tully?
42 MR. KOVNATS: Ms Tully was an accountant employed at
Harmony Broadcasting.
43 MR. McCALLUM: Why is her testimony needed, in your view?
44 MR. KOVNATS: My understanding of her testimony is that she
will be able to confirm the improper attempts to change directors.
45 The new
Board ‑‑ there has been no new Board. The Board since, I think, 2004 or 2005 has
been Manjit Blake, Paula Bjorklund and Peter Bjorklund.
46 No other
memberships have been granted. People's
names have been put on registers.
47 There will be
further testimony, by other people, who are here, and who will come again, as
to how their names were put on without their consent as being on the Board, and
I believe this is something that should be dealt with. The full and complete information should be
before the Commission.
48 MR. McCALLUM: There was a document included in the rather
extensive package ‑‑ in the intervention package that Mr. and
Mrs. Blake filed, which appears to be an agreement of, I think, January 29,
2004.
49 Was Mr. Douglas
retained to draft documents resulting from that meeting?
50 MR. KOVNATS: Not only from that meeting, but from further
meetings in December of 2004, and, I believe, January or February of 2005.
51 He would have the
knowledge. I don't want to say a date,
because I don't have it right in front of me, but it was the early part of
2005.
52 I believe that he
should be here. If anyone should be here
who can explain it in its entirety, it's Don.
53 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Just so I understand, you
mentioned someone's name who could address the issue of improper attempts to
change directors.
54 MR. KOVNATS: Yes.
55 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Which means that the
directors have not changed as of this moment, although there were
attempts ‑‑
56 MR. KOVNATS: That's right.
57 THE CHAIRPERSON:
‑‑ improper attempts to do that.
58 MR. KOVNATS: That's right.
The directors of the corporation, I submit, are Peter Bjorklund, Paula
Bjorklund and Manjit Blake.
59 THE
CHAIRPERSON: I am still confused.
60 You are submitting
that, but are you saying that there were improper attempts to remove them, or
that there were improper attempts to not put them on the Board?
61 MR. KOVNATS: No, improper attempts to remove them.
62 They were put on
the Board, it was filed with the Corporations Branch of Manitoba, and a copy
was given to the CRTC.
63 The documents were
filed in 2004, and a copy of the annual return showing them as directors was
given to the CRTC in January of 2005.
64 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Most of us in this room
weren't there then.
65 There was a
preceding hearing that took place two years ago.
66 MR. KOVNATS: Yes.
67 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Were they principals and Board
members at that time?
68 MR. KOVNATS: Yes, and they had no notification.
69 That's what this
is going to boil down to. They had no
notification of the hearing, absolutely none.
70 They are
directors; they had no knowledge of this.
71 That is why, I
believe, it is imperative that you hear the testimony of Mr. Douglas as to
their directorship, as to their membership in the corporation, amongst
others ‑‑ Mr. Lasker, on how the operation of our Corporations
Branch works, and then hear from people whose names were put forward
wrongfully.
72 There were
attempts to put people's names at the Corporations Branch that were totally
improper, and I have the party present who will say that he was never a
director, even though someone put his name down. He never attended a meeting.
73 Nothing has been
done properly since the 2005 filings by Mr. Douglas.
74 THE
CHAIRPERSON: I want to come back to
something you said. You said that they
had no knowledge of the public hearing.
75 MR. KOVNATS: That's correct.
76 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Did the CRTC not put out a
Public Notice and publicize the hearing?
77 MR. KOVNATS: They did not see the notice.
78 This is a
volunteer Board. They were unaware of
the hearing.
79 There was a Public
Notice, but the letter went to the wrong party.
So the letter that they would have thought they were getting if
something was going on never reached them.
80 And the CRTC knew
of them, knew of their directorship, and should have notified them the same way
they notified other people who were improperly notified.
81 I believe this is
very important, and I think this is why you should hear all of the evidence,
and that's why I think you should have Mr. Douglas present to testify, Mr.
Lasker present to testify, and Ms Tully present to testify.
82 I will admit that
I only asked for two subpoenas. I am not
in any way suggesting that I asked for more.
83 MR. McCALLUM: Can you advise what litigation is going on
between the parties to settle these issues?
84 MR. KOVNATS: None.
85 MR. McCALLUM: So no litigation has ever been taken.
86 MR. KOVNATS: None.
87 MR. ASPER: Mr. Chair, I wonder ‑‑ my
name is David Asper, for the record.
88 Mark Lewis, who is
regulatory counsel for us, is prepared to respond to what Mr. Kovnats has
said. I am not sure if that's
appropriate now, but you might want to hear a response on behalf of us.
89 THE
CHAIRPERSON: I'm in the hands of my
counsel on this one, so I will look to him for advice and guidance.
90 MR. McCALLUM: We may have further questions of Mr. Kovnats,
but I think it would be appropriate to hear from Mr. Lewis.
91 MR. LEWIS: Thank you.
Good afternoon.
92 Section 31 of the
Rules of Procedure is clear ‑‑ and I quote:
"The Secretary may, on behalf
of, and as authorized by the Commission, issue subpoenas in the form set out in
Schedule 2 to compel the attendance of any person at a hearing as a
witness." (As read)
93 Intervenors, in
our view, have no right, pursuant to section 31, or any other section of the
rules, to request the Secretary to subpoena a witness in a broadcast
proceeding. There is no precedent that
we know of where this has happened before.
94 The Blakes are
intervenors, plain and simple.
95 At the 2006
hearing, the matter of ownership of the radio station, and the matter of the
Blakes, was discussed with Mr. Capozzolo and his counsel. The transcript of that proceeding, which we
have here, is clear, and we can quote the paragraphs verbatim.
96 Notwithstanding
the allegations made by the intervenors at the 2006 hearing, the Commission
found that Harmony, and specifically the sole member of the corporation, Mr.
Capozzolo, was responsible for the operation of the broadcasting undertaking
and issued the mandatory orders that we are speaking of today.
97 The rules of
procedure in the Broadcasting Act provide for an appeal of the decision, either
by way of an appeal to the Governor in Council or the Federal Court. The Blakes had ample opportunity to challenge
the decision issued in January 2007, but took no such action.
98 What they are
asserting today is that the proceeding in 2006, and the decision that followed
in January 2007, was improper, and the mandatory order accrued or attached to
the wrong parties.
99 If the Blakes were
in control of the undertaking, or disputed the Commission's finding of facts as
a result of the 2006 hearing, they should have come forward. There was ample publication of that decision,
not just the Public Notice of the hearing, and associates of theirs attended at
that hearing in 2006.
100 There were legal
remedies available to them, and they did not avail themselves of them at that
time.
101 When the Notice of
Public Hearing was issued for this proceeding a few months ago, they
intervened ‑‑ and, I repeat, intervened ‑‑
and they didn't file any response to the matter of regulatory issues before the
Commission. They did not properly put a
case before the Commission, and the issues they are raising today, or
attempting to raise today, weren't properly raised in the appropriate process
of the intervention.
102 So, to purport to
have the opportunity to do so today, in our view, is not permitted under the
rules.
103 What they are
attempting to do, with due respect, is to hijack the hearing. If there are civil issues as between the
parties, those issues should be resolved in the courts.
104 The Commission has
the ability to bring clarity to these matters.
Mr. Capozzolo is here voluntarily in the room. We have had no notice of whom the Blakes,
until moments ago, or their counsel wish to compel to attend under subpoena.
105 I understand that
one of the parties they wish to subpoena is a solicitor, and he is probably
bound by solicitor/client privilege, as well.
106 I just want to go
back to the Broadcasting Act.
107 The Broadcasting
Act and the Regulations, also, do not allow opposing counsel of intervenors to
cross‑examine witnesses. Section
33 is very clear:
"No evidence may be introduced
at a public hearing, except in support of statements contained in an
application, intervention, or reply, as the case may be, or in support of
documents or material filed in support thereof." (As read)
108 To be brief, Mr.
Chair, the time has past. Earlier in May
was the time that they could have brought all of these matters before the
Commission.
109 I have one other
comment, and it is on a comment that Mr. Kovnats made regarding the record of
the Commission in this matter.
110 The record is
clear. We understand that there is a
body of documentation in the possession of the Commission, provided by the
Blakes long ago, prior to the issuance of the Public Notice for this hearing,
regarding their allegations of putative ownership of this radio station.
111 The Commission
properly reviewed the material, and from our examination of the public file,
made previous determinations that they were not the putative owners of the
radio station, or the undertaking, and had no standing to apply for transfer of
ownership for the non‑share corporation, which is the licensee.
112 So today, after
repeated determinations, they should not be permitted to hijack the hearing.
113 I have one last
comment, that is, directors are responsible in law for the operations and
actions of the corporation, and if they have been directors, they have been
absent for a very, very long time.
114 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Kovnats, do you want to
respond?
115 MR. McCALLUM: I'm sorry, could I put a question to Mr.
Lewis?
116 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Yes.
117 MR. McCALLUM: Would you address what value the proposed
witnesses could bring to this hearing?
118 Mr. Kovnats has
suggested that they would bring some value to this hearing. What would you say to that?
119 MR. LEWIS: It appears that the only clarity they might
bring is in the determination of the civil matter which is outstanding, and we
were going to reply in intervention to the nature of the civil matter, which
may be looming, and the discussions that have taken place.
120 I could address
that now, if you wish.
121 The other issue
that I wanted to raise ‑‑ I'm sorry, I should have raised it a
moment ago ‑‑ is that the parties ‑‑ Mr.
Kovnats' clients could have brought a complaint pursuant to section 9 of the
Rules of Procedure, in writing, at any time in the last two years or three
years, because he is alleging that these matters go back to 2005, regarding the
putative ownership of the undertaking, and the Commission could have, at that
time, investigated, called a hearing, et cetera.
122 He has basically
ambushed the Commission today on this matter, and we think that's improper.
123 We see no clarity
that can be brought. We think that our
presentation today will bring great clarity to the situation.
124 MR. McCALLUM: I wonder if you could elaborate on what you
mean by the determination of the civil matter.
125 MR. LEWIS: Perhaps Ms Stiver could make comment.
126 MS STIVER: Good afternoon. For the record, it's Lisa Stiver.
127 What I believe Mr.
Lewis was referring to is that there are some matters, as Mr. Kovnats has also
alluded to ‑‑ issues that go back to 2004, I believe was the
date, about some of the material that you have also seen, which they filed in
their intervention ‑‑ the Blakes' intervention.
128 We believe that
those matters are of a contractual nature.
There may be an issue over what transpired and what documents were
executed ‑‑ authorized ‑‑ at that time.
129 Again, that is not
related to the regulatory matters, at this point, which Harmony is being asked
to deal with today.
130 MR. McCALLUM: I would like you to explain the latter one,
"not related to the regulatory matters".
131 MR. ASPER: Counsel, there may be civil claims. There may be contractual claims that Mr.
Blake may assert against Harmony Broadcasting regarding ordinary course
business dealings that may or may not have occurred back in 2004. He can go to court and fill his boots, but
that's not a matter for the CRTC.
132 MR. McCALLUM: What about the points of the other two
witnesses?
133 I think you were
addressing, principally, Mr. Douglas.
What about the other two witnesses that Mr. Kovnats has suggested?
134 MR. ASPER: I think it is a little awkward to try to
particularize what the applicant seeks from a witness.
135 These are
employees of the Corporations Branch of Manitoba. It is a little awkward for us to try to
anticipate the particulars of a request for a subpoena.
136 MR. McCALLUM: Ms Tully is an employee of the Corporations
Branch?
137 MR. ASPER: I'm sorry, no, she is an accountant.
138 I'm sorry, Mr.
Lasker is. Ms Tully was the former
accountant and, as you will hear from our presentation, we have actually had to
retrieve from her all of the documents relating to Harmony, such that we can,
almost on a forensic level, recreate the financial affairs of the company and,
as part of getting back into compliance, file the annual returns.
139 Again, I can't
particularize or anticipate what Mr. Kovnats thinks Ms Tully will say.
140 MR. McCALLUM: Would you also elaborate, Mr. Lewis, on what
you meant by opposing counsel cannot or should not ask questions?
141 MR. LEWIS: In a Commission hearing, with the exception
of the telecom hearings and regulations under the Telecom Act, there is no
provision for intervenors' counsel to cross‑examine witnesses. It doesn't exist in the rules. It's not specified. It is very clearly specified in the telecom
rules ‑‑ in the Telecommunications Act.
142 Our position is
that, absent very specific direction in the rules in the Broadcasting Act, that
is not a remedy available to an intervenor's counsel at a hearing.
143 MR. McCALLUM: If the Commission were to allow Mr. Kovnats
to ask questions, what would be the repercussions for the group that is in
front of the Commission?
144 Would this group
be seeking other remedies, or rights?
145 MR. LEWIS: I think that the Commission's procedures are
quite clear. There is a procedure for
filing materials prior to a public hearing.
There were directions in the Public Notice. There were dates specified. Those have been complied with, as far as I
can see. I have seen no miscarriage of
justice with respect to the filing of materials.
146 Our concern is
that Mr. Kovnats may very well bring in new documents that should have been
filed either by way of, number one, a complaint under section 9, or prior to
the date fixed for interventions in this matter, or under some other procedure
at some time in the past.
147 As I alluded to,
perhaps he should have challenged ‑‑ or his clients should
have challenged the decision in January 2007, on January 29th.
148 MR. ASPER: Counsel, if I may also add, I think the
consequences to this panel may be less than the potential consequences to the
operation of the Commission and the operation of the rules.
149 What Mr. Kovnats
is essentially trying to do is convert this into an adversarial proceeding.
150 Any questions that
he wanted to ask, or wanted the Commission members to be aware of from these
witnesses, he could have written them a letter and asked them to answer the
questions, and filed it.
151 He could have done
that for the past three years, or however long this claim has ‑‑
four years. However long this has been
simmering.
152 What I fear is
being attempted here is to take a regulatory proceeding and convert it into a
civil litigation forum, and I think that the consequence to the Commission is
potentially ‑‑ and how this Commission functions is very
serious.
153 MR. McCALLUM: To be specific, though, if Mr. Kovnats were
permitted to ask questions, would you seek the right to ask question as well?
154 MR. ASPER: Well, now we need a different kind of lawyer
on the panel.
155 Yes, I would
assume so.
156 If that door
opens, then, I think, the door opens.
157 I would certainly
want to reserve our right to do so.
158 MR. McCALLUM: Would you seek to address responding
materials?
159 MR. ASPER: Our position is that they are irrelevant.
160 If the Commission
determines that they are relevant, then we will respond.
161 MR. McCALLUM: It may be appropriate to hear Mr. Kovnats in
reply.
162 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Kovnats?
163 MR. KOVNATS: Mr. Chairman, there is no attempt by me to
hijack anything, and I don't like language used in that way. I do not use pejorative language, and I will
not have it used about me.
164 Number one, I had
to take over representation of this client at the last minute because Don
Douglas, who is a lawyer with Thompson Dorfman Sweatman, had been their lawyer,
who should have taken care of this in the past.
165 Number two, we are
not intervenors. We were forced to be
intervenors by the operation of the Commission staff.
166 My clients are not
just "The Blakes", my clients, as I indicated, are Peter Bjorklund,
Paula Bjorklund and Manjit Blake, for the purposes of the
"ownership", or operation, or control of Harmony Broadcasting
Corporation.
167 I have represented
Mr. Blake in what could be considered a civil way, dealing with contractual
matters, but that is a separate issue at this moment.
168 I am here on
behalf of the true directors of Harmony Broadcasting Corporation, who had to
file papers as intervenors, and shouldn't have had to file as intervenors, but
should have been, indeed, the applicant ‑‑ or the respondent.
169 So we are in a
conundrum and the Commission staff has taken ‑‑ and I am not
questioning them. They have taken a
position in their actions that have put us sort of in a set of rules that don't
necessarily apply.
170 Now, there was a
letter sent by my office which was declined.
It was returned to me and I was told it had to be filed as
intervenors. And I think that should be
brought to your attention.
171 I am not trying to
interrupt you. I didn't mean to cut you
off but I did want you to know that I had written on behalf of the directors to
the CRTC and they said, "No, you must file as intervenors". So procedural or not, it would be a denial of
natural justice not to have the full matter with all information put before you
in a proper fashion. I'm not trying to
hijack your hearing.
172 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Can you explain to us how
acting as an intervenor will not allow you to put whatever information you seek
to put on the record and have it fully aired and considered by the Commission?
173 MR. KOVNATS: I can do it from the intervenor chair, so to
speak, but I need the power to subpoena people to bring forward evidence
because they won't come forward voluntarily.
And I need that evidence before the Commission. It is absolutely crucial to have that evidence
before you in order to respond and to put forward the intervenor's position, if
you call them intervenors.
174 I believe they
should be the true respondents but for the purpose of this discussion I will
call them the intervenors, just for identification purposes only.
175 And the
intervenors need ‑‑ and the intervention and the public needs
to have the full knowledge, the full facts put forward completely so that you
can make an informed decision. And in
order to do that I absolutely need Mr. Douglas.
I need Ms Tully and I need Mr. Lasker.
176 Mr. Lasker will
not come voluntarily and I am, quite frankly, embarrassed in some ways because
I am cordial with both Mr. Douglas who I consider a friend; I'm cordial with Ms
Stiver. I think their firm is the
conflict; they don't. That's up to
them. My clients relied on their firm.
177 I think you need
to have the full facts before you. In
order to do that you need Mr. Douglas to come forward and tell you exactly what
happened and when, and without that I don't think you are going to get to the
bottom of it the way you should. My
clients can give you a layman's version but you need a proper version and the
person who can do it best is Mr. Don Douglas.
178 Mr. Lewis kept
referring to the Blakes. I represent in
this capacity Mrs. Blake as a board member, Mr. Bjorklund and Mrs.
Bjorklund. They were the proper board
members of Harmony Broadcasting Corporation, and I can't stress that strongly
enough.
179 MR. McCALLUM: If I may, Mr. Chair?
180 THE CHAIRPERSON: Sure.
181 MR. McCALLUM: In bringing in the witnesses that you are
proposing to bring in, you would ask them questions would you?
182 MR. KOVNATS: I would ask them just to tell exactly what
happened.
183 MR. McCALLUM: So you would be ‑‑ you would
be asking for the right to ask questions; is that correct?
184 MR. KOVNATS: That is correct.
185 MR. McCALLUM: You would be asking them to bring a document,
would you?
186 MR. KOVNATS: I don't think that ‑‑ I
think most of the documents have been filed with you. The only person who might have to bring
documents I believe would be Ms Tully. I
believe you have the documents that Mr. Douglas can explain and document and I
believe you have documents that were registered in the corporation's branch for
Mr. Lasker.
187 I did not prepare
the packages that were dropped off to your office and I have seen various
copies and I believe you have them. I
looked upstairs in the file and I think you have most of them.
188 MR. ASPER: Counsel ‑‑ sorry, David
Asper for the record.
189 Just on that point
with respect to documents, Mr. Kovnats is on notice from us that we would be
seeking to apply in the event that there is any documentary evidence considered
that the best evidence rule apply and that originals be produced.
190 MR. McCALLUM: So as I understand it, you would have no new
documents except from Ms Tully ‑‑
191 MR. KOVNATS: I don't know if the others would have
documents that I am not aware of. I
would ask them to bring their files so I could compare the documents, yes.
192 MR. McCALLUM: So you would be issuing a subpoena duches
tecum, bring your whole file and then it would have to be examined once it's
received here.
193 MR. KOVNATS: Yes, to make sure that the documents that
I ‑‑ there is no other documents other than what I have seen
here before. I'm not ‑‑
because I have not seen their files I can't tell you.
194 MR. McCALLUM: So in other words there may be documents?
195 MR. KOVNATS: Yes.
196 MR. McCALLUM: Okay.
197 MR. KOVNATS: There may be that I can't ‑‑
that I'm aware of.
198 MR. McCALLUM: Right.
199 MR. KOVNATS: And there would certainly be some information
as to telephone calls.
200 And I don't know
where I received notice from anybody. I
would appreciate seeing where I received notice. I'm not saying what other people did or
didn't do. I never received any notice
to produce original documents for the purpose of this hearing. I was asked to produce some original receipts;
that's it. That's a separate issue. I was not asked by anyone.
201 MR. ASPER: Yes, actually, counsel, Mr. Kovnats was asked
to produce a particularly contentious original version of the documents because
they are not the same, I believe, dated January 24th, 2000 and January 29th.
202 MR. KOVNATS: If you are talking contractual documents I'm
talking corporate ownership documents.
There is a big difference. I said
for the purpose of this hearing. I was
very clear, Mr. Asper, in what I said.
203 And you know
what? I don't want to go on that
contract issue. I am here dealing with
the ownership issue, with the control issue; with who should be notified, with
who shouldn't be notified.
204 MR. McCALLUM: You said earlier that Mr. Lasker would not
come voluntarily. Can you explain what
you mean by that?
205 MR. KOVNATS: If you want to subpoena him he will come in a
moment but I have tried with Shane before on things. You have to give him a subpoena. He is a government employee.
206 MR. McCALLUM: Have you received any indication that there
would be a challenge of that subpoena by anyone?
207 MR. KOVNATS: No, none.
I don't think he would challenge it.
208 And as to
solicitor‑client ‑‑
209 MR. McCALLUM: Sorry, he is a provincial government
employee, right?
210 MR. KOVNATS: Yes.
211 MR. McCALLUM: He would presumably have to report to his
superiors and his superiors would presumably make a decision whether or not to
challenge the subpoena; is that not correct?
212 MR. KOVNATS: I don't know, sir. I have never had a situation where I have had
to subpoena someone for the provincial government but they declined to show
up. And I have only done it twice in my
life so ‑‑ I'm not normally doing litigation. I would anticipate that in his capacity he
would show up with whatever documents he was supposed to and answer questions. I don't think Mr. Lasker would hold
back. But I could be surprised. I'm not saying it can't happen but I would be
surprised.
213 Mr. Douglas ‑‑
and I want to address the issue of solicitor‑client privilege. The solicitor‑client privilege that Mr.
Douglas would be under would be to the people who retained him, who were Mr.
Bjorklund, Mrs. Bjorklund and Manjit Blake.
So I would imagine he would be more than happy ‑‑ if
they say to speak, that he would speak.
I can't imagine him not being willing to speak.
214 MR. McCALLUM: Just for the record, have your clients made
any applications to the Commission?
215 MR. KOVNATS: The Commission through Mr. Crushin had asked
them to start an application and to start a new company to make a different
corporation. I was involved in
incorporating that new company and then Mr. Crushin said, no, no, it has to be
a full application and that wasn't what we had understood at the beginning so
they did not proceed with the application.
The application was done at Mr. Crushin's request because he didn't want
to have to deal with the dispute with respect to Mr. Capozzolo, Manjit Blake, Peter Bjorklund and Paula
Bjorklund.
216 I would also point
out to you that Mr. Capozzolo's:
"No individual can be the
'owner or controller' of a non‑share corporation in Manitoba." (As read)
217 MR. ASPER: Counsel, I think if you ‑‑
Commission, I think if you played back the last portion of the transcript you
have out of counsel's mouth the concession that they got direction from Mr.
Crushin as to what needed to happen and chose not to proceed, that is in fact
what happened and that is in fact how the CRTC proceeded in 2006 and 2007.
218 MR. KOVNATS: With due respect, Mr. Crushin said one thing
one day and another thing the next, which is why we didn't proceed. I wasn't going to attack Mr. Crushin. He is not here to defend himself.
219 MR. ASPER: The point is ‑‑
220 MR. KOVNATS: Information that Mr. Crushin gave us that
caused us to initiate something then changed so we didn't proceed because Mr.
Crushin said, "If you are going to go this method you also have to do A,
B, C". When he told us originally
just go this method and it will happen, that's different.
221 So there was no
sense in making an application or a further application in any way because it
was not as was presented to my clients, all right?
222 MR. McCALLUM: Was the name of the company that you
incorporated Winnipeg Technical Centre Inc.?
223 MR. KOVNATS: No ‑‑ well, yes, I think I
did that as well but I also did Earhole.
I think they were the people who were going to make it. I'm not sure.
I don't ‑‑ that was irrelevant for the purpose of this.
224 What happened at
that time ‑‑
225 MR. McCALLUM: Sorry, there is a document:
"Winnipeg Technical Centre
Inc., a for profit corporation established under this Canada Business
Corporations Act." (As read)
226 MR. McCALLUM: It's on the record. Should the Commission take notice of it or is
it irrelevant?
227 MR. KOVNATS: Was it relevant or not?
228 MR.
BJORKLUND: No, it was relevant because
that was the for profit for the purpose of training students. Earhole was the non‑profit side to take
over the licence per se because of all the bad vibes and past history with
Harmony Broadcasting and as the current directors we were not wanting that, you
know, to follow us.
229 MR. ASPER: Sorry, sir, for the record could you say your
name, please?
230 UNIDENTIFIED
SPEAKER: Peter Bjorklund.
231 MR.
BJORKLUND: I'm Peter Bjorklund. I am a board member of Harmony Broadcasting.
232 MR. KOVNATS: I didn't want this to go sort of all over the
map. The purpose of this and the reason
I felt that I was approaching this the way I was, and I will continue to do in my
own slow style, is I felt the Commission should hear all the facts from the
people who can best give them and I need Mr. Douglas present to do that. I think he has a professional obligation when
he comes and I don't think Don would walk away from it.
233 Number two, I
believe Mr. Shane Lasker will be able to come.
I also think Shane would answer questions.
234 And number three,
I don't know Rita Tully but from what I am told and what I have heard that she
testified at another matter, I think it is absolutely crucial for the
Commission to hear these three people.
235 I strongly request
that you allow the subpoenas to be issued and to reconvene with these people
present so that you can hear the whole situation from soup to nuts. Otherwise, you are not going to get the full
story properly. You are going to get
people's versions. These are the people
who know the best and let it come out.
That's what I am asking.
236 THE
CHAIRPERSON: I believe we have two
issues in front of us. The first one is
who is the rightful party to appear pursuant to the call today to deal with the
non‑compliance in the mandatory order and the second is the issue as to
whether we will or we will not accept the proposal to issue subpoenas.
237 In the absence of
counsel having other questions I would like to recommend that the panel here
adjourn for 15 minutes or whatever period of time it takes for us to deal with
these issues.
238 MR. McCALLUM: Thank you, Mr. Chair.
‑‑‑ Upon recessing
at 1448 / Suspension à 1448
‑‑‑ Upon resuming
at 1543 / Reprise à 1543
239 THE
SECRETARY: Please be seated. We will now
resume.
240 Mr. Chairman.
241 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you.
242 The Commission has
received an unusual request to determine, as between two competing groups,
which group should be the one that is the respondent to the call to the present
hearing set out in Public Notice CRTC 2008‑4 of April 3, 2008.
243 The Commission has
heard arguments from the two competing groups and rules as follows. The group that includes Mr. Capozzolo is
directed to act as respondent to the present process and the group that includes
Mr. and Mrs. Eddie and Manjit Blake to be designated as interveners in the
present process.
244 This ruling is
based on the fact that Mr. Capozzolo appears from the renewal to be the sole
member of Harmony Broadcasting Corporation.
Mr. Capozzolo was responsible for running CJWV‑FM station during
the last several years and it was Mr. Capozzolo who appeared on behalf of
Harmony at the September, 2006 public hearing which resulted in the mandatory
orders attached to Decision 2007‑27.
He is the only party running the station that can be asked to address
the past non‑compliance and his notice at public hearing states a main
purpose of this hearing is to deal with and address past non‑compliance.
245 In argument Mr.
Kovnats acknowledged that he would be given an opportunity to deal with the
issues during the intervention phase.
246 The group
designated as interveners will have a full opportunity to present their views
and material during the intervention phase in support of the extensive
materials they have filed and is on the record.
247 On the issue of
the request for subpoenas, the Commission is still investigating the matter and
will make a decision at the earliest possible time.
248 With that said, we
will proceed with the Phase I presentation.
249 THE
SECRETARY: We will now hear from Harmony
Broadcasting Corporation. Mr. Asper,
please introduce your colleagues, and you will then have 20 minutes to make
your presentation.
PRESENTATION / PRÉSENTATION
250 MR. ASPER: Thank you.
251 We will begin with
Mr. Wortley please.
252 MR. WORTLEY: Mr. Chair, Commission members, for the
record, my name is Brian Wortley and I appear here today on behalf of Harmony
Broadcasting Corporation.
253 With me today are
Franc Capozzolo, the former sole member of Harmony Broadcasting; David Asper,
who is the sole member of Harmony; Lisa Stiver, legal counsel of the law firm
Thompson Dorfman Sweatman LLP, Ms Stiver is also a Harmony board member; Ken
Penner, President of Robertson College, Mr. Penner is also a member of Harmony's
board; Louise Nebbs, who is CFO of YO Radio Management; Mr. David Dubnicoff,
who was formerly with Moffat Communications, Mr. Dubnicoff is a retired
Chartered Accountant who was formerly the Controller with the Radio and
Television Division of Moffat Communications; Mr. Lewis, Regulatory Counsel
from the law firm of Lewis Birnberg Hanet LLP.
254 And seated in the
room today are the board members of Harmony:
Tanis Kircher, Medical Technician Student at Robertson College; Michelle
Norris, Human Resources Officer for Manitoba Lotteries Corporation; and Travis
De Koning, Chartered Accountant for Book & Partners accounting firm.
255 Prior to the
hearing and the issuance of broadcasting notice of public hearing a number of
documents were filed with the Commission which we will reference in this
presentation.
256 Mr. Franc
Capozzolo will speak to the matters pertaining to the operation of CJWV‑FM
from the period following the issuance of the mandatory order in January,
2007.
257 Franc.
258 MR. CAPOZZOLO: Good afternoon., Mr. Chair and members of the
Commission.
259 In 2007 the
Commission issued mandatory orders.
Prior to the public hearing in September, 2006 I had negotiated an
agreement with Robertson College.
However, around the time of issuance of Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2007‑37
Robertson College withdrew from the agreement due to the negative press that
the station was and had received.
260 I immediately
contacted a number of educational institutions and concluded that no one was
prepared to enter into agreement with the station due to the regulatory status
of the station.
261 I met with Gary
Krushen of the Commission and was given to understand that I would be given
time to come into compliance. I
determined that I would have to apply to the Manitoba Private Vocational
Institute for accreditation of the broadcasting curriculum which I had created.
262 However, over a
period of time it became apparent that neither I nor Harmony would be
accredited as a private vocational institute.
During the period of January 29, 2007 to October 15, 2007 the financial
situation of the station continued to worsen.
263 Due to the dire
financial situation in mid‑August, 2007 Harmony was evicted from the
premises used for the broadcast studios. In accordance with the mandatory order
a number of reports were to be submitted as of September 30, 2007.
264 On the date the
reports were due to be filed, that would be September 30, I was in a situation
where I had just moved from the studio space and I attempted to continue
broadcasting from a very small apartment with a lack of financial and/or human
resources.
265 Exactly two weeks
following the date when the reports were due to be filed with the Commission
transmission lines were terminated by the telephone company and the
transmissions were disrupted.
266 The letter notices
from the Commission requesting additional logger tapes had been sent to a
location that I could no longer access.
When I received the notice sometime later via email I was informed that
I had less than 48 hours to satisfy the request. The technician who handled the retrieval of
logger material was out of the country at that time. And in haste to comply with the Commission's
request during the short 48 hour period I reproduced the wrong recordings from
the files, which were from the prior year.
I admit that I provided those recordings in error, in error, to the
Commission.
267 The second request
for air‑check tapes for the weeks of September 7 to 13 of October, 2007
was made in October. The notification
was received following the closure of the station.
268 I did everything
in my powers to enter into agreement with an educational institution and get
the institutional programming on the air and I attempted to right the financial
situation. Likewise, the failure to file
the financial returns was exacerbated by the lack of funds to retain
professional accounting services.
269 I was a one‑man
show that could no longer pull it together.
I had no intentions of being out of compliance or of misleading the
Commission at anytime.
270 Everyday I woke‑up
hoping that something would happen to right the situation, but I realized that
I could only fool myself for so long. I
realized that I was way over my head and that I had reached the end of the
road. And I determined in October, 2007
that it was the end of the road with respect to the continued operation of the
station under my management.
271 I want to state
that I regret the series of events which resulted in the closure of the station
and the circumstances which brought us to this hearing here today.
272 Shortly after the
station went off the air, I received a call from Mr. Wortley and over the
course of a few weeks I was put in touch with Mr. Asper and his team.
273 MR. ASPER: Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, last
fall when Mr. Capozzolo voluntarily suspended broadcast operations for CJWV‑FM
we both made an approach and were approached to determine whether there was any
potential for us to assist in rescuing this community resource and whether we
could assist in restoring financial viability.
274 As you are aware
from the discussion yesterday, I do have a passion for radio and I was aware of
this station because my children listened to that station for rap and hip hop
music, which was not otherwise readily available as a consistent format in this
market.
275 I accepted that
the proposition was worth a look. And,
as I said yesterday, this was the first involvement that we had prior to the
application for the new commercial FM.
And I accepted the proposition was worth a look and asked Brian Wortley
to assemble a team of professionals, which includes the team you see here
today, to determine whether a rescue could actually be undertaken.
276 We held a number
of meetings with CRTC staff, both the staff based here in Winnipeg and staff
located in Gatineau. This included a
number of telephone consultations and fact‑to‑face meetings. It became clear in the course of those
meetings that there was reoccurring managerial and, more particularly, record keeping
problems which had occurred over time resulting in regularly noncompliance.
277 We were fully
conversant with the problems that Mr. Capozzolo had faced in the operation and
management of the station and the regulatory history of the station, including
the outstanding mandatory orders as well as the decisions and factual
conclusions made by the CRTC, as discussed in the context of the motion and the
objection that we discussed earlier today.
278 I want to be clear
and candid with the Commission. We are
sitting before you today and have undertaken board management changes on the
advice and counsel of Commission staff.
We believe that we have been forthright in providing documentation and a
clear plan of action, vis à vis addressing the outstanding regulatory issues,
and we will speak to those in a moment.
279 It was very clear
to us after consultation with Ms Lynne Renaud in the CRTC ownership group that
a transfer of the licence to a new corporation, which would be unencumbered by
the past debts and sins of Harmony, would require a full public hearing and,
further, a regulatory process which could take upwards of six to nine months to
facilitate.
280 We discussed with
the Commission staff the need to get the station back on the air and the need to
involve incoming broadcasting students in the current academic year in the
operation of the station. In the course
of those discussions, the counsel which we received from the Commission was to
provide in great detail an action plan and a proposal to reinstate broadcasts
rather than to change the ownership or effective control of the licensee.
281 In those
consultations with the Commission we discussed the constitution of a new board
of directors for Harmony drawn from the community and in full compliance with
the requirements under the Campus and Community Radio Policy of 1992.
282 I personally
became involved in the search committee to seek out members of our community
who would not only serve on a board of directors, but who would also be a
resource for this radio station. As you
are aware, we have found very highly qualified individuals, drawn from the
legal community, academia and so on.
283 And while I always
understood that there would be some financial risk in attempting to revive the
station, the extent to which funds have now been expended on obtain proper
corporate and regulatory counsel, as well as with regard to reconstructing the
financial affairs of Harmony so as to be in a position to file annual returns
and address several outstanding matters with Canada Revenue Agency, is
substantial.
284 I say this not to
seek your sympathy, but as evidence of our bona fides that we are serious and
committed to making this endeavour work.
We have done everything asked of us and are here today to say that
whatever problems existed in the past are not going to be problems in the
future. We are here today to ask that
you give us the green light to put this station back on the air.
285 One of the issues
that seems to have arisen is whether there has been a change of control. The terms of previous board members had
lapsed, hence there was a necessity to appoint new board members. We met all legal requirements under Manitoba
law in order to constitute and appoint the board. There was no effective change of control of
the programming undertaking.
286 I will now turn to
Ms Stiver to provide you with additional background concerning Manitoba legal
requirements and a corporate governance of Harmony Broadcasting relative to its
conditions of licence and the radio regulations.
287 Lisa.
288 MS STIVER: Thanks, David.
289 As David
explained, over the past few months Harmony underwent a reorganization of the
board of directors and a change in its membership. Both of these changes are the same type of
changes to Harmony's governance that have occurred various times throughout its
corporate existence, from 1993 to the present time.
290 At this time,
however, the correspondence from the CRTC suggests that there was a change of
control which is contrary to Section 11(4) of the Radio Regulations. As I am sure you are all aware, this section
speaks specifically to a change in share ownership and a change in voting
interest.
291 Harmony is a not‑for‑profit
corporation, which it must remain as a condition of its licence. Harmony is incorporated under the Corporation
Act of Manitoba and is referred to as a non‑share corporation, as
contemplated under Sections 267 and 277 of the Act. No shares can be issued in a non‑share
corporation. Accordingly, no change in
share ownership can occur.
292 Specifically these
sections provide that:
"Firstly, the articles of a non‑share
corporation shall restrict its undertakings to endeavours that are of an
artistic, educational, charitable nature, et cetera.
Secondly, that upon dissolution of a
non‑share corporation, unless otherwise provided for in the articles, all
assets and property must be distributed to another non‑share not‑for‑profit
undertaking, which is charitable or beneficial to the community." (As
Read)
293 Accordingly, the
licence and property and assets of Harmony have no value to its members. There cannot be a sale of its shares for
there are no shares, nor a distribution of its assets, one of which is a
licence upon dissolution.
294 In summary, change
of control of a non‑share corporation is arguably analogous to a change
of its directors. But there is no
requirement to obtain prior approval of a change of directors for broadcasting
undertakings either pursuant to the provisions of the Radio Regulations or
circulars issued by the Commission.
295 I have brought
with me, and I believe we handed to the Secretary beforehand, a detailed legal
memorandum which may be of assistance to the Commission in reviewing the
Manitoba law pertaining to not‑for‑profit corporations. I have filed the memorandum with the hearing
Secretary and Commission counsel
296 Brian Wortley will
now address the safeguards put in place to ensure regulatory compliance.
297 MR. WORTLEY: Thank you, Lisa.
298 Earlier this year,
several months prior to the notice of public hearing, we put into place a
number of policies and safeguards to ensure compliance. Bear in mind there were no broadcasts taking
place and all of this was done in full consultation with the Commission prior
to undertaking a single broadcast.
299 In January,
February and early March we provided the Commission with comprehensive details
of these initiatives including draft agreements with Robertson College. A
meeting was held in Winnipeg on January 24, 2008 with Commission staff. With respect to Robertson College, Mr. Penner
is in attendance today.
300 The completion of
the negotiation of the agreement and provisions of an executed copy of that
agreement to the Commission, along with the provisions of full curriculum and
course materials and further arrangements undertaken for the first intake of
students, resolves a longstanding problem pertaining to the operation of the
radio station as an institutional licensee.
301 Further, Robertson
has resolved outstanding administrative issues and has obtained full
certification of the course from the private vocational institute, thus, the
course will fully qualify under the Manitoba Government vocational
institutional requirements.
302 We have also
undertaken to search for qualified staff who can assist in the practicum
portion of the course and integrate the work of students into the programming
of the radio stations.
303 We have
simultaneously been in discussion with the members of the Winnipeg community at
large and have identified individuals who wish to become involved in the
production of high‑quality spoken‑word programming, programming I
might add that would be alternative to the programming currently available on
mainstream commercial radio stations which serve Winnipeg.
304 We have also worked
to create a weekly schedule of programming including required news, talk shows,
specialty music programming which meet the licence criteria and should allow
the station to perform at or, in fact, over‑perform relative to the
conditions of licence and the requirements of the radio policy.
305 We undertook to
provide a double logger system with a failsafe program so that a duplicate
recording would be made and retained off premises. In the course of our discussions and
communications with the Commission we became apprised of the fact that the
station's former management was in default of filing annual returns to the
Commission.
306 We retained Mr.
Dave Dubnicoff who, as you have heard, was formerly with Moffat
Communications. Mr. Dubnicoff is
independent of YO Radio Management and Harmony Broadcasting. Working with Ms Nebbs and our company staff
we obtained financial records of Harmony and prepared annual filings for the
years 2004 through 2007. Those returns
have been prepared in the format required by the Commission and have been filed
with the Commission, as we had undertaken prior to this hearing.
307 We believe the
licensee has therefore complied with the requirements under the
regulations. Further, we have
voluntarily undertaken to bring the company into compliance with CRA relating
to GST, payroll withholdings and the annual filings. We also brought the company into compliance
into compliance with respect to filings with the Province of Manitoba, including
annual corporate returns.
308 We entered into an
agreement with Mr. Capozzolo to facilitate financial arrangements with
Harmony's creditors. We have prepared
business plan and cash flow analysis which, with the support of YO Radio
Management, would facilitate the restart of broadcast operations by Harmony.
309 I want to be
clear. The financial plan is
multifaceted, but Harmony will be operated as a not‑for‑profit
radio station. The modest advertising
revenue, in conformity with the institutional radio policy, would allow for
payment of transmission costs and a modest professional staff.
310 That brings us to
the involvement of YO Radio Management.
We have assessed reoccurring problems with Harmony which apparently have
been occurring for nearly 13 years, back to the first licence term of the
station under NIB. It is clear that this
community‑supported station cannot depend on the human resources of a
single person, nor can a community‑based institutional radio station
operate successfully without professional, legal accounting and allied
services.
311 YO Radio
Management has undertaken to provide clearly defined services provided by
qualified professionals who are knowledgeable of the regulatory requirements of
the licensee and radio operations. YO
Radio will provide these services on a contracted basis. I will be the key contact in the provisions
of these services.
312 As you heard
yesterday, in the event that YO Radio Management is granted the licence for
106.3 FM there would be very limited synergies between the two stations. Those synergies primarily relate to the
provision of professional services. But
I want to be clear. The provisions of
this service to Harmony is not dependent upon licensing 106.3 FM. And further, this is not an LMA agreement.
313 Programming
decisions at CJWV will be made by a program director who will report to the
Harmony board of directors. There will
be full transparency of the two radio station operations. YO Radio will have its own news staff,
editorial voice and newsroom which will not be operated in common with
Harmony. 106.3 FM is proposed as a full‑fledged
local commercial radio service and is not an institutional radio station.
314 We expect that Mr.
Kowalson, formerly employed by Harmony, will return as news director of
Harmony. Mr. Kowalson will be
responsible for the news and editorial direction of the radio service.
315 That brings us to
the matter of Mr. Capozzolo and his continuing involvement in Harmony. He would be retained to host the morning
program. He will not have day to day
managerial duties in the station. We
believe that it was the one‑man operation which consistently lead to
regulatory and operational problems.
316 With assistance
from YO Radio's professional staff day to day operations with Harmony will run
smoothly and Mr. Capozzolo's role will be to use his creative skills to provide
Winnipeggers with locally‑focused spoken‑word programming.
317 In our view he is
a talented broadcaster and the topics covered on his talk shows are broader and
that commercial radio stations have had been more involved in the community
events at the grassroots level. He will
also work with the students mentoring them in their practicum segment of their
broadcasting course.
318 The programming of
the station will continue to provide very low duplication of the music
broadcast by Winnipeg commercial stations.
We have provided with our presentation a block program schedule which
illustrates scheduling of special interest Category 3 music. There will be Category 3 music in the overall
mix throughout the broadcast day. This
will be complimented by an urban music format which will be unique in the
Winnipeg area.
319 There is a great
affinity between the musical interests of the broadcast students and other
younger listeners with this music genre. The music will also conform to the
hits restriction imposed on institutional stations.
320 And last, and of
key importance, is the role of students enrolled at Robertson College. They will be involved in all facets of the
operation of CJWV. They will provide
spoken‑word content, educational content, assist in preparation and
presentation of news programs, will provide voices for commercial messages,
will act as program hosts, interviewers and announcers and assist in news
gathering.
321 The Robertson
College course is based on semester system with multiple intakes of students
each year. So at any given time students
enrolled in the course will be at different stages of their radio development. Students will be involved in all aspects of
radio programming, including audio production, copyrighting, sales, traffic and
music selection.
322 As we have noted,
the program director will report to the Harmony board of directors, will
oversee the programming orientation of the station and regulatory compliance in
terms of spoken word, news, Category 3 and Canadian music commitments.
323 To conclude, we
believe that the root of regulatory problems of this station have been resolved
and the station has the human, financial and managerial resources in place which
are necessary to resume broadcasting.
The radio service has been off the air since operations were suspended
in the fall of 2007.
324 It would take
approximately four weeks to relocate broadcasting equipment and resume
broadcast operations. It is imperative,
however, that the broadcasts commence in advance of the fall semester, because
the arrangements with Robertson College necessitate on‑air promotion of
the broadcasting course in order to attract enrolees.
325 Further, it is
imperative that the radio station be operational so that students can obtain
their practicum experience as per the curriculum, which was approved by the
Private Vocational Institute and the Provincial Department of Education. The curriculum of the broadcasting course
dovetails with the broadcasting operations.
326 The continued
registration of the broadcasting course with the government ministry is
dependent upon the operation of this station.
Therefore, in order to fulfil enrolment it would be necessary for this
station to resume operations by the month of July. And that is what we seek the authority for
the station to resume broadcast operations.
327 We will be pleased
to answer your questions.
328 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you very much.
329 I note in your
final conclusion that the radio station is currently off the air, is that
correct?
330 MR. WORTLEY: That is correct.
331 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Where is the infrastructure
currently located for this station?
332 MR. WORTLEY: There is some equipment in Mr. Capozzolo's
apartment.
333 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay. And that is all there is right now?
334 MR. WORTLEY: And there is also equipment in storage.
335 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Has any equipment been
purchased in anticipation of this?
336 MR. WORTLEY: Yes, we have purchased computers.
337 THE
CHAIRPERSON: And how much money has been
invested so far in the purchase of all this?
338 MR. WORTLEY: About $2,000.
339 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay. I want to start I think with the comment that
was made in here on page 5, where you say:
"We are here today to ask that
you give us the green light to put the station back on the air." (As Read)
340 As I said when we
made our ruling earlier, the primary reason we are here is to see whether the
Commission should either an additional mandatory order, suspend or revoke the
licence of Harmony based on its past operations.
341 Subsequent to
that, you are making an application to transfer the ownership and to create a
different entity. But the primary reason
that this hearing was called was to deal with the transgressions that were made
pursuant to a mandatory order in 2007 and that is what I look to Mr. Capozzolo
to respond to as we go through this.
342 You indicate, Mr.
Capozzolo, that you had difficulty getting approval from Robertson College when
you approached them.
343 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: No, actually, with the
hearing in September of 2006 we had reached a final and comprehensive agreement
with Robertson College and that was finalized in May of 2006.
344 In July of 2007
the practicum for the radio program was approved by PBI. Shortly after the approval I received a
notice to appear at the hearing in September of 2006. Subsequent to the hearing and just prior to
the release of the Notice 2006‑37 I received notice from Robertson
College that they wished to terminate our agreement.
345 I spoke with Mr.
Penner and he felt concerned that the negative press that the radio station was
receiving due to the compliance issues and issues with the regulatory body that
it would probably cast his institution in a pall light and decided to withdraw.
346 I immediately
searched for someone new.
347 After about the
third school that I spoke to, the individual was very frank with me, very
candid, and he said: No one will touch
you with a 10‑foot pole. Good luck
with getting accredited because you have issues with your regulatory
agency. PVI is a regulatory agency, and
they probably will have a difficult time granting you an accreditation. If they do, it will probably take two to
three years.
348 At this point I
have no money. I have very limited ‑‑
I was counting on January ‑‑ I believe the course was supposed
to start in January, and I was looking forward to enrolment and the much needed
dollars to be able to put things properly in place. I was, truly, a one‑man show. I was the only radio person in the whole
building.
349 The people that I
had on the air were people that I had trained myself, basically.
350 THE
CHAIRPERSON: And the principal that you
were talking with at Robertson College back then, was that Mr. Penner?
351 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Yes, it was.
352 THE
CHAIRPERSON: And Mr. Penner is in the
room here today?
353 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Yes, he is.
354 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Penner, can you provide
us with some insight as to why you felt compelled to withdraw the agreement,
because that, obviously, was one of the critical factors in the ongoing
approval process for Harmony. That is
number one.
355 The second
question is: Are you comfortable today
with the arrangement that you have struck with the principals, I guess here
today, and the fact that the plan, as I heard it this afternoon, is that Mr.
Capozzolo will be retained by Harmony ‑‑ by the new owners of
Harmony ‑‑ to operate the morning show?
356 You have three
questions there.
357 MR. PENNER: Thank you, Mr. Chair.
358 With respect to
the first question, why we withdrew, it was not a light decision. We chatted a fair bit internally. We talked to the Department of Education. The Private Vocational Institutions Branch,
we conferred with them. At the end of
the day, we decided that the reputation of the program, of the school, was at
risk, and we decided not to proceed.
359 With respect to
the second question, do I feel comfortable today? Yes, I do.
360 The people that I
have worked with, Brian and the others so far, we met again with the Director
of PVI, the Department of Education, in a meeting with the members here, as
well as myself, and they got their blessing to move ahead. They are supportive of this, so we feel comfortable
moving ahead.
361 With regard to
Frank's role in the future, as I understand it, as a morning host, we have no
objection to that. We would feel
comfortable with that.
362 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Did you, at any time, have
any contact with the CRTC during the 2006‑2007 period?
363 MR. PENNER: I did not.
364 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Capozzolo, you stated
here that you woke up hoping that something would happen to right the
situation.
365 Did you ever
contact the CRTC formally to indicate the situation you were in?
366 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: I did speak to Mr. Krushen
when I spoke to the third school, and I believe that was CDI ‑‑
367 Actually, it was
someone that Mr. Penner had suggested that might be interested, and he came
straight out and said: Based on the
transcript from the hearings alone, I can't jeopardize the time and sweat that
I have put into my school, and I suggest that you would probably have a
difficult time getting any accredited school in the province to piggyback with
you.
368 THE
CHAIRPERSON: But you were already, at
that time, operating under the initial mandatory order by the CRTC.
369 You state here
that your transmission lines were terminated, you were disrupted, you moved,
your mailing address ‑‑ your Post Office couldn't deliver
information to you.
370 Did you ever think
of contacting the CRTC to let them know?
371 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Again, it was a one‑man
operation, and to be totally honest, I had allegators at my throat. I felt that the allegators in Ottawa, with
all due respect, were not as urgent.
372 I was evicted from
the premises that we had been in for four years.
373 Things were dire.
374 And I didn't know
what to do at that point. I didn't have
legal counsel. I didn't have anything.
375 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Your discussions with Mr.
Krushen were on a casual basis, you are saying?
376 There was nothing
official?
377 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: I went to the office and
spoke to him in person, and I said, "I don't know if you have heard, but
the college has withdrawn," and he said, "Yes, I was aware of
that."
378 I was rather
upset. I was bitter. I felt that ‑‑ and I am just
being honest here ‑‑ I felt that the Commission had put me
into a position where now I was kicked out of compliance by the Commission
efforts to keep me in compliance, which was an odd situation, but one of those
situations ‑‑ a Catch‑22 situation.
379 THE
CHAIRPERSON: But that is no different
from any other obligation. One has to
pay taxes, right‑of‑ways ‑‑ whatever. You have an obligation. You were given a licence with certain terms
and conditions and ‑‑
380 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Right.
381 THE CHAIRPERSON:
‑‑ if you couldn't meet them, there are processes in place to
provide extensions, deferrals ‑‑
382 You were already
under a mandatory order, to start with.
This was a second mandatory order that you were given, with major, major
repercussions, and you chose not to even contact us and let us know that you
have gone dark, you can't provide the information that is being sought.
383 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: I believe that in
October ‑‑ now, keep in mind that it was a nine or ten‑month
period from the time that Robertson College withdrew from our agreement to the
time that I went dark. That was a nine‑month
period.
384 It took some time
to come to understand that I was on the edge of the precipice, as it were.
385 I should have done
things differently perhaps, but at the time it was a desperate situation.
386 THE
CHAIRPERSON: So during this desperate
situation we asked you for some logger tapes, and we found you somewhere, and
you pulled off logger tapes that were a year old.
387 So, obviously,
there was contact between the Commission and yourself.
388 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Yes, there was.
389 And I also know
that the local office was going through some changes, and in the past, any time
that I communicated with the Commission, Mr. Krushen would send me advance
notice.
390 Now, because I had
moved from the premises where we had been for close to four years ‑‑
or a little over four years ‑‑ all of a sudden the mail is a
different situation. There was a paid‑for
mailbox.
391 With the first
request, I actually discovered that the request was sitting in the mailbox two
days before the tapes and documentation were due. So it was a mad dash.
392 I can't even begin
to explain what it would be like to be in a 700‑square foot apartment
with 4,000 square feet worth of junk, and the logger machine is sitting on top
of boxes somewhere, and you are up there, risking life and limb, trying to pull
this thing off.
393 I am looking for
dates. I am looking for the 23rd to the
27th, or whatever it was at the time.
394 Actually, that day
Ms Grossi was kind enough ‑‑ I called her and I said: Look, I'm having problems getting this onto a
disk. Would you be kind enough to give
me a few extra minutes to get down to the office?
395 In fact, she
waited, and was kind enough to stay an hour late, in order for me to fill in
the last few pieces of documentation.
396 And, then, that
was the end of it. That would have been
somewhere in and around October ‑‑
397 I don't know. I think it was October 12th or 10th or 7th,
or something along those lines.
398 On October 15th,
MTS cut off the transmission lines, and at this point I had serious pause for
reflection. I had exhausted all of my
money, a bunch of other people's money, and I was in deep debt, and was just sitting
there going, "Okay, what do I do now?"
399 Sometime in
November I was contacted by Ms Grossi, by e‑mail, saying, "Frank,
there has been another request for tapes which you didn't provide," and I
said, "I wasn't even aware of that."
400 Then I received,
through an e‑mail, the request asking for tapes in November, and again
later on ‑‑ again in November.
401 At that
point ‑‑ and I will be totally honest ‑‑ I
was upset. I felt that it was a done
thing, and I felt that it was a moot point to pull logger tapes down if I
wasn't going to proceed.
402 I had some
preliminary discussions with Mr. Wortley.
At the time it seemed like, yes, he might have been interested. "Well, we're just kind of looking
around."
403 So I figured,
okay, he was just another tire kicker, and this would never really amount to
much.
404 Then it became
serious, and Brian introduced me to Mr. Asper.
405 I should also like
to add to this that this is a not for profit organization. There aren't a lot of people walking this
country that are willing to invest the kind of dollars that Mr. Asper has
invested and we're not even close to being on the air.
406 I mean, this is a
philanthropic thing as far as that goes.
You know, I don't know anybody who's willing to drop a few hundred
thousand dollars into a not for profit situation unless it's someone who's
interested in the community.
407 THE
CHAIRPERSON: I believe it was Ms
Stiver's piece here on page 6 where she indicates that:
"The licence and property of
Harmony has no value to its members, there cannot be a sale of shares, as there
are no shares, nor a distribution of its assets, one of which is the licence
upon dissolution." (As read)
408 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Mr. Capozzolo, is there a
change of money flowing between yourself and YO with regard to this
transaction?
409 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Harmony Broadcasting owes me
something in the neighbourhood of $590,000.
Mr. Asper said he wouldn't be interested in providing that, he wouldn't
be interested in discussing that, it's way out of his league in terms of
wanting to do that.
410 But he was
impressed with my on‑air work and would be interested in keeping me on as
an on‑air personality and I said sure.
411 THE
CHAIRPERSON: And for that there is a
contractual obligation to pay you for a period of time, to compensate you for
the equivalent of that $590,000?
412 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: No.
413 MR. ASPER: No, Mr. Commissioner, if I may jump in.
414 There is a
contract with ‑‑ there would be a contract with Mr. Capozzolo
to provide broadcast services for the morning show for which he would be
compensated by way of salary.
415 THE
CHAIRPERSON: And that salary would be at
market rates going forward?
416 MR. ASPER: Or lower.
417 MR. WORTLEY: Lower.
418 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Lower.
419 MR. WORTLEY: Yeah.
420 THE CHAIRPERSON: And aside from that there is no exchange of
funds at all in this transaction?
421 MR. WORTLEY: The only funds that are going to be forwarded
will be satisfy outstanding creditors.
422 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Can you expand upon that?
423 MR. WORTLEY: Well, there were a number of loans that were
made to the company.
424 THE
CHAIRPERSON: From...?
425 MR. ASPER: I wonder if I ‑‑ maybe Ms
Nebbs or Mr. Dubnicoff who have been reconstructing the finances can explain it
to you in detail.
426 THE CHAIRPERSON: Well, no, Mr. Wortley is doing a good
job. I don't need the fine detail, I
just want to understand the principles behind it and we can get into the finer
details later on.
427 MR. ASPER: Okay.
428 MR. WORTLEY: There were outstanding loans, there was
service providers that were owed money and statutory remittances with Canada
Revenue Agency that had to be satisfied and that's where those funds were
going.
429 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Were there loans from
principals such as Mr. Capozzolo himself?
430 MR. WORTLEY: No.
Mr. Capozzolo was owed money ‑‑ Mr. Capozzolo basically
worked for nothing for four years. He
took very little out of the company and I guess I could tell you just the way
it is, and he had a contract with Harmony as the manager, but he did not take
any money out per se and I think at one point he may have made $15,000 in that
neighbourhood
431 However, he did
invest a fairly large sum of money into the company starting out, along with
other investors.
432 THE
CHAIRPERSON: And is he getting anything
out for that investment?
433 MR. WORTLEY: No, he's not.
What we're prepared to offer Franc, and only because of the kind of
announcer he is, you know, he's a very talented announcer, not that great on
the administrative side. We want him to be
involved in the morning show because we feel that he can bring something to the
table for our students and he can ‑‑ some of his shows were
very informal, informative and did a lot for the community that wasn't noted in
past documentation or correspondence.
434 So, what we're
paying him is far under market value for a morning host and Mr. Capozzolo will
do a morning show for three hours Monday to Friday.
435 MR. ASPER: I think, sir, we should be very precise on
this question and I'm going to ask, if you don't mind, Louise Nebbs to explain
exactly the structure.
436 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Sure.
437 MS NEBBS: When Mr. Asper first became the sole member of Harmony Broadcasting, we
understand what it means to be the sole member and to be a director and the
obligations involved.
438 The first thing
that we did was attempt to get control of the financial records and reconstruct
the financial records, and particularly in
this situation I was most interested in what the liabilities of the
company were.
439 And since that
time we have been on a meticulous basis going through and satisfying the
liabilities of the company.
440 And the
liabilities included debts to CRA as well as to Mr. Capozzolo. The debts to Mr. Capozzolo were made up of
cash advances that he had put into the company, as well accrued but unpaid
wages.
441 THE
CHAIRPERSON: So, Mr. Capozzolo has
already ‑‑ I won't say been made whole ‑‑ but
been compensated for the past debts and the outstanding wages?
442 MS NEBBS: No, he has not. Mr. Asper agreed that he would pay Mr.
Capozzolo a partial settlement for those amounts due to him, but funds have not
been advanced at this time.
443 THE
CHAIRPERSON: I'm probably going to come
back for some more questions later on, but I will allow my co‑Commissioners
here to ask some questions.
444 Commissioner
Menzies.
445 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Maybe we could just finish on
that point then.
446 Mr. Capozzolo,
what was the management ‑‑ what was the compensation, what was
the contract between you and Harmony, what were the management fees that you
charged?
447 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: $150,000 a year.
448 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. And that was for how long?
449 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: And that was ‑‑
I believe it was the year 2003 into 2007.
No, it was 2002 when I started to negotiate with the previous licence
holder and I put it all together.
450 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: And how much of that are you
still owed?
451 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: How much of that money?
452 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Yes. How much of it was actually paid to you?
453 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: There was money given to me
to help, for example, I had friends pay for my rent, cigarettes, food for the
last seven or eight months. They were
people locally who lent me money to ‑‑
454 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: No, sorry. Just to be clear, between 2002 and 2007, how
much did Harmony pay you ‑‑
455 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Oh, how did it pay me or owe
me?
456 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: How much did it ‑‑
I understand that for six years, 2002, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7.
457 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: No, I didn't actually ‑‑
you know, I started putting up money in 2002.
The licence wasn't actually signed over until ‑‑
458 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: But your contract, your
management fees contract with Harmony is what ‑‑
459 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Yeah, yeah, we'll go back to
2002, yes.
460 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. So that was for six years was to pay you
$150,000 each year?
461 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Yeah.
462 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: So, that's $900,000.
463 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Yeah, but the first year it
was more of a ‑‑ because I sat down with the accountant and we
went over the numbers because I put it together in terms of, you know, finding
the location and buying the furniture and contacting the people, I mean.
464 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: How much did it pay you?
465 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Basically at the end of 2007
it owed me $590,000.
466 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: So, it paid you $310,000?
467 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: No, it paid me somewhere in
the neighbourhood of ‑‑ over the last six years, maybe 45 in
total.
468 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: So, if you had a management
contract with them for $900,000 over a six‑year period and you're still
owed $590,000, where did the rest ‑‑
469 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: No, no, no, no, no. No.
470 In total ‑‑
the only money that I took out of this company over five years is $45,000.
471 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. I'm trying to establish how come you're only
owed $590,000 when you had a six‑year contract for $150,000.
472 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Because ‑‑
473 MS NEBBS: Could I correct the numbers for Mr.
Capozzolo.
474 I have had the opportunity
to review the financial statements and as at August, 2007 the financial
statements show a liability of $896,000 to Mr. Capozzolo.
475 Going through the
records, we've only been able to find evidence of a payment of $10,000 to him
in return for management fees.
476 He has had some
cash advances being repaying of cash advances he made to the company.
477 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: And how much in expenses did
he ‑‑ were claimed?
478 MS NEBBS: These numbers were include expenses claimed.
479 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Those numbers would include
expenses claimed?
480 MS NEBBS: Yes.
481 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: So, in six years he claimed
$10,000 worth of expenses or $10,000 worth of management fees?
482 MS NEBBS: The evidence that we found was that the company
paid about $10,000 of the management fees that were accrued to him.
483 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. What is the amount of expenses claimed by Mr.
Capozzolo from Harmony between 2002 and 2007?
484 MS NEBBS: I don't think I found any detail on
that. We found from time to time
expenses paid by the company, but they were charged against Mr. Capozzolo, they
were charged as a repayment of his debt.
485 So, where we found
evidence of that, the company had accounted for it correctly.
486 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. So, the correct figure then of what Harmony
owes Mr. Capozzolo is $890,000 not 500?
487 MS NEBBS: $896,000 ‑‑ 896,206.
488 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: And Mr. Capozzolo, how do you
intend to get repaid that amount of money?
489 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Well, until Mr. Asper came
along I didn't expect to get anything.
490 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. So, how much are you getting now?
491 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Well, I asked Mr. Asper to
take care of debts that ‑‑ from family and friends that I
borrowed and it's somewhere in the neighbourhood of $200,000.
492 And Mr. Asper
offered me a $60,000 a year job, and that's it.
493 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. What is the ‑‑ is that job a
contract or is that an employee job?
494 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: That is a contract.
495 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: And what's the length of the
contract?
496 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: It is a three‑year ‑‑
497 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Guaranteed contract?
498 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Not guaranteed, but it's a
three‑year contract.
499 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: It's a three‑year
contract.
500 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Yeah.
501 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: For $60,000 a year?
502 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Yeah.
503 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Any expenses involved, any
automobiles, any rent, anything in addition to that?
504 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Maybe a cell phone.
505 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: That's it? Okay.
506 MR. ASPER: Commissioner Menzies, just ‑‑
I hope you can appreciate, Members of the Panel, that we are and Louise and
Dave Dubnicoff and others have done service in actually reconstructing the
financial records of the corporation as best as we can. It's by far complete, however.
507 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Sure. Thank you.
508 Mr. Capozzolo, are
you in control of Harmony?
509 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: In what way? Now?
510 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Now.
511 MR. CAPOZZOLO: No.
512 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: When were you last in control
of Harmony?
513 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: I think it was January where
we signed off. You know, I should also
add that the Board of Directors were more than happy to jump off because in the
end they would responsible for outstanding debts, not to me, however, but...
514 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: End of January you said?
515 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: I believe January was when we
signed things across.
516 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. Now, in your comments, in our preliminary
comments and that, in going through this and it seemed there are a number of
people that you had difficulties with and I want to give you an opportunity to
address this.
517 It seems that some
of your problems arose from the CRTC, some of your problems arose from negative
media, MTS was a problem ‑‑
518 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: CRA, the Labour Board and
PBI.
519 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Yes. I mean, did it ever cross your mind that
maybe they weren't the problem?
520 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: I'm sorry, one more time?
521 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Did it ever cross your mind
maybe they weren't the problem, that maybe your actions were the problem?
522 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Certainly my actions. I'm an intelligent person, I want you to know
that and I don't apologize for that. I
created a nine‑month curriculum with a one‑month practicum.
523 I've been in this
industry for over 30 years. I've trained
the new broadcasters out of so‑called broadcasting schools all the way
through and I ‑‑ you know, what happens is we have a group of
people like we have here today, every single one of the interveners today are
the exact same interveners from the previous hearing.
524 They have maligned
me, assassinated my character with PBI, with CRA, with the Labour Board. They've made outrageous allegations that have
been posted willingly and openly by the CRTC and I'm upset about that.
525 You know, I put
five years of myself into this and, do you know what, I'm more than happy to
pull away. All I've been done is been
shot at, I've been threatened physically, mortally. I've gone to the police. I can't begin to tell you what I've been
through over the six years.
526 And, you know, I
look back, I've certainly had a lot of time for reflection over the last eight
months. And I think, you know, if I had
to do it again, I'm down a family. I
didn't have a place to live for nine months, you know, and I'm being treated
like I'm some kind of villain here.
527 We've got people
in this room who, I assure you, should be behind bars and they are making me to
look to be this evil character who's trying to pull the wool over the
Commission's eyes.
528 I've been in this
business for 30 years, why on earth would I do that?
529 I'm sorry, you
know, and I'm sorry if I get a little hot, I'm getting a little
instruction ‑‑
530 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: No.
531 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: But it's been a long time.
532 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: I wasn't trying to cast
aspersions on your stellar broadcasting career, I was just trying to establish
where you feel the accountability for your current circumstances truly lays.
533 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: It lays with me, I mean ‑‑
534 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Thank you.
535 Now, Mr.
Capozzolo, the Campus Radio Policy defines a campus station as a not for profit
organization associated with an educational institution.
536 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Right.
537 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: That has not always been the
case with Harmony; has it?
538 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: No.
539 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Mr. Wortley, what written
policies and procedures do you have in place to address that shortcoming?
540 MR. WORTLEY: The agreements with the post‑secondary
education?
541 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: No, with ‑‑
yes.
542 MR. WORTLEY: Well, we have now a signed agreement with
Robertson, Krushen, Mr. Ken Penner ‑‑
543 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: And I believe that's been
completed filed with us now?
544 MR. WORTLEY: It has been filed with the Commission, yes,
sir.
545 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Mr. Capozzolo, the Campus Radio
Policy defines a campus station as one that its primary role is to be a
training ground for students in broadcasting courses.
546 That has not
always been the case with Harmony; has it?
547 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: No.
548 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Mr. Wortley, what written
documentation do you have for us in terms of the ‑‑ do you
have, for instance, do you have any students registered for the course yet?
549 MR. WORTLEY: We don't.
550 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay.
551 When is
registration to take place for the course.
552 MR. WORTLEY: Right now.
And perhaps, if you wouldn't mind, Commissioner Menzies, I would like to
ask Mr. Penner just ‑‑
553 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: I'll come back to that okay.
554 MR. WORTLEY: Okay.
555 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: And if I don't remind me, all
right.
556 MR. WORTLEY: Okay, thank you.
557 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. Mr. Capozzolo, the Campus Radio Policy
defines a campus station as one that provides listeners with alternative music,
especially Canadian not normally based on commercial radio.
558 Has that always
been the case?
559 MR. CAPOZZOLO: Not initially, not always the case.
560 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: I'm sorry, I beg your pardon?
561 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Not initially. I had difficulty finding artists that ‑‑
because I was unfamiliar with this brand of music, so it took me some time to
identify who those artists were, but as soon as I did they were on and I
believe that a great part of the success
of the radio station, if we can call anything a success with this radio
station, was the fact that I was so involved with the local hip hop and R&B
community.
562 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. And, Mr. Capozzolo, despite many requests,
have consistently refused or been incapable of proving to the Commission that
you have been in compliance with the Policy.
563 Is that not the
case?
564 MR. CAPOZZOLO: Yes.
565 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Mr. Wortley, on those items,
what policies and procedures do you have in place to address those
shortcomings?
566 MR. WORTLEY: What items would you want me to refer to,
sir?
567 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: That would be the provision of
alternative music, especially Canadian not normally heard on commercial radio
to be in compliance with the Campus Radio Policy.
568 MR. WORTLEY: Right.
We have an operating system in place now and all loggers are approved by
me weekly, I have to check all loggers.
Our program director will be responsible that all music is in compliance
on a day‑to‑day basis, on a weekly basis that would be put through
me to sign off on and authorize the fact that it is in compliance with...
569 COMMISSIONER MENZIES: Do you have written policies and procedures
on that?
570 MR. WORTLEY: Yes, we do.
571 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. Have they been filed with us?
572 MR. ASPER: Moreover, sir, if I can just add, from a
governance perspective, because this is a very serious, see it's the core of
the issue here or part of it, we will construct and have committed to construct
a program advisory committee of the board so that the board will constantly
monitor Mr. Wortley to ensure management compliance.
573 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: And have you ‑‑
do you have written policies and procedures on that that you can ‑‑
574 MR. WORTLEY: We submitted to the Commission on February
the 15th our policies on programming with regards to CAT 3 and logger tapes and
Canadian content.
575 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Does it have procedures and do
we know what procedures you have, your checks and balances? As Mr. Asper said, it's a very ‑‑
576 MR. WORTLEY: Yes, yes, it does.
577 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: ‑‑ serious matter, so it has all that. Okay.
Thank you.
578 And does that
apply to your spoken word programming as well?
579 MR. WORTLEY: It does.
580 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. Thank you.
581 Mr. Capozzolo, do
you have any documentation that you can provide or have provided to the Commission
to show that CJWV has provided listeners with educational programming?
582 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: You want documentation?
583 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Yes.
584 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: I don't understand. Wouldn't that be logs; is that what you're
asking for?
585 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Right. I mean, there's space in your programming
where it says educational.
586 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Right.
587 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: But do you have anything to
prove that what was scheduled actually went on the air or what went on the air?
588 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Well, I mean, you know, I
could ‑‑ I do but I don't.
I could give you documentation ‑‑ what I did was, we'd
have educational guests on and we'd record it and then we'd cut it up and run
it gain on the weekend.
589 I was out of compliance
initially when there were a bunch of people who were upset with me, complained
as a way of getting back at me.
590 And at that point,
you know, there were things that I didn't know because I came from a commercial
broadcasting world, I didn't realize that news about artists didn't count as
news. I think that perhaps that's a
little different today.
591 I didn't know that
sports didn't count as news, I didn't know that weather didn't count as
news. So, my news was way out and I
thought that I was in place.
592 There was never
any issue with regards to the level of spoken word, we always over delivered on
the spoken word.
593 Once I came to
understand things, I put things into place.
594 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: So, is the answer yes or no?
595 MR. CAPOZZOLO: I can't.
I mean, what ‑‑
596 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: I'll take that as a no for now.
597 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Okay.
598 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Mr. Wortley, what policies and
procedures do you have in place to address this shortcoming?
599 MR. WORTLEY: Of the spoken word?
600 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: That would be the educational
programming?
601 MR. WORTLEY: Of the educational programming?
602 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Yes.
603 MR. WORTLEY: Well, it's part of the logger ‑‑
like of our operating system, so there has to be spoken word inserted into our
operating system and we have also submitted a programming grid ‑‑
604 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Specifically educational
programming.
605 MR. WORTLEY: Right.
606 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Is that all in there for us?
607 MR. WORTLEY: It is.
608 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. And what's the content going to be of it?
609 MR. WORTLEY: The content can vary from a number of
topics. It could go from the green gas
effects on the economy, it could ‑‑ or on the environment, it
could go with regards to the pollution in the water and run‑offs, the
pork problem we're having now with the big barns.
610 It will vary from
week to week.
611 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: And what sort of people would
be offering the educational programming?
612 MR. WORTLEY: Students.
613 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Is this ‑‑
614 MR. WORTLEY: Part of their curriculum is to research ‑‑
615 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: So, students would be teaching
students...
616 MR. WORTLEY: No.
The instructor ‑‑ the head instructor of our course
will teach the students, but these will be assignments that the students will
have to create educational programming for the station.
617 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. And what sort of people would they be ‑‑
would they be interviewing experts in these areas?
618 MR. WORTLEY: Absolutely.
Yes.
619 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: So they would be drawing on
people from the academic field, professional field, that sort of thing.
620 MR. WORTLEY: Right.
Yes.
621 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: So the students listening would
be able to benefit from that voice.
622 Is that what's
happening?
623 MR. WORTLEY: That's right.
624 That's essentially
how the curriculum has been developed, was those are assignments that students
would be responsible for.
625 MR. ASPER: Commissioner, one of the philosophies here
and one of the unique attributes of the license is that in that particular
strand of programming it provides an outstanding opportunity, educational
opportunity, because this has to be a very significantly diverse voice and
something that is not on the commercial radio stations, is to take an approach
to issues and to educational matters that is counter to the mainstream and to
try to force people into that mind‑set is part of the philosophy of what
we are trying to achieve here.
626 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Do you want to expand on that
bit?
627 MR. ASPER: Well, critical thinking. It's critical thinking. And it would be our hope that part of the
learning experience at Robertson College and through Harmony Broadcasting will
be to use that strand to critically evaluate and to communicate things of
interest, things maybe not of interest, things that maybe should be of
interest.
628 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Maybe what we would call
contrarian points of view?
629 MR. ASPER: I would hope so.
630 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: I wonder where they got that
idea?
‑‑‑ Laughter /
Rires
631 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Are there any other agreements,
Mr. Capozzolo, between ‑‑ do you own any other companies that
might have any agreements or have had any agreements with Harmony?
632 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: No.
633 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. Does anybody else at the table own any other
companies that might have any agreements or arrangements with Harmony?
634 MR. ASPER: No.
635 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Mr. Capozzolo, how many
students were involved with the station in 2006 and 2007 before you went dark?
636 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: None.
637 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Mr. Wortley, how many
students will be involved under your watch if you were to be granted it?
638 MR. WORTLEY: Our business plan was developed based on a
minimum of 10 students per intake.
Because it's a trimester intake, every quarter there will be another
intake of students.
639 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: So 10 students per
quarter ‑‑
640 MR. WORTLEY: Yes.
641 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: ‑‑ flowing through?
642 MR. WORTLEY: Yes.
643 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: What do they do?
644 MR. WORTLEY: I'm sorry?
645 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: What do they do?
646 MR. WORTLEY: They learn the radio business.
647 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay, but how? I mean do they learn sales, are they on air,
are they copywriters, are they producers?
648 MR. WORTLEY: Well, maybe what would be best is the
architect of the course could explain to you how it would flow.
649 Would that be all
right?
650 MR. ASPER: And also, everybody has seen the
curriculum. We have looked at the
production kits that have been provided.
And the Board has actually evaluated this. So this is not sizzle, there is steak to
this.
651 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Yes, it's not the
curriculum that I'm so much worried about in this specific question, it is
exactly their roles at the station.
652 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Can I answer
that question?
653 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Sure.
654 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: The course was designed to
appease or satiate the requirements of the campus radio license, so the
students begin with a general overview.
Almost immediately the students will be on the morning show, which will
lessen our requirement for ‑‑ it will give us fodder for picking
on somebody and getting them to know how to become the second banana.
655 The talk has been
placed on the morning show. Anybody can
read a liner after a week and a half, but personality radio is, if not dead is
certainly dying in our country. There
are no more places where we are growing future talent.
656 Therefore, these
kids will come on right away and they will provide traffic or they will
provide ‑‑ interview guests or subjects, whatever, and that is
almost immediately. We will introduce
them and we will rotate through them.
657 We might have
Billy and Susie and Billy will be taking care of this and he is a knucklehead
and Susie is hot so were going to be nice to her, that kind of thing. This is just hypothetical.
658 And then, within,
I would say within a couple of weeks, they will be editing to fulfil our talk
commitment. The morning show, which is
basically a three‑hour talk show, quite often a name, quite often quite
interesting and engaging.
659 We have had Dr.
Suzuki live in the studio with us. He
came in one day for 15 minutes. He ended
up staying over an hour. He said
"Are you sure this is a hip‑hop station? This is a lot of quality talk for a hip‑hop
station." I said "Hey,
whatever works." And he continued
to stay.
660 So what happens
is, we will take that interview, we will chop it up, we will run it on the
weekend. David Suzuki would be an
educational guest.
661 We have had the
Manitoba Museum. We have had each of
their departments and they were a regular guest, we have had the geology
department on, we have the astronomy division on, all kinds of things like
that. We have homeless, blah, blah,
blah, blah, local issues.
662 So this stuff will
be edited and they will learn editing and producing as they learn writing
skills with regards to commercials and newsgathering and presenting.
663 And within two
months they will be voicetracking the rest of the shifts. There are only two shifts that are going to
be filled, that is the morning show ‑‑
664 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Are you responsible for the
management of the students?
665 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: No.
‑‑‑ Laughter /
Rires
666 MR. ASPER: Commissioner, the course is divided up
into specific modules. I think your
question is: What are the students
actually going to do.
667 Is that where you
were headed?
668 The course is
divided up into specific modules with a subject matter per module and resources
are applied as each module is taught.
They are quite intensive. So
there is of course a production module, but there is also a sales module, and
admin module and all the way through, marketing, branding, you know.
669 There is a
classroom and they sit in the classroom and there are instructors and they get
taught. And part of why we recruited the
board that we did was because we are all interested in interacting with the
students, in providing the expertise that we can provide, and they move through
the program.
670 It is a phenomenal
idea, because it is a 10‑month program that respects the fact that some
people don't have many years, 2, 3, 4 years to go through a formal university
program, but this gives them the broadest possible exposure and makes them
ready the day they walk out the door to come in at an entry‑level to
anything that is going on in a radio station.
It is quite a phenomenal program.
671 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. Who manages those students?
672 MR. WORTLEY: Those students will be managed by a lead
instructor.
673 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: A yet to be identified person?
674 MR. WORTLEY: Correct.
675 COMMISSIONER MENZIES: Okay.
Thanks.
676 MR. WORTLEY: We have had a couple of resumes of people who
are interested, primarily ex‑announcers who found out that we were
involved in the school. We haven't hired
anyone yet.
677 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. Who manages Mr. Capozzolo?
678 MR. WORTLEY: Mr. Capozzolo will be managed by me and the
Program Director.
679 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: You will be responsible for
him?
680 MR. WORTLEY: I will.
681 MR. ASPER: I think you need to know also about the
instructor, that this is not isolated or disaggregated from Robertson. Mr. Penner and his people will have to be
approving in order for the accreditation process any instructors that are
brought in to program.
682 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. What will happen to your association with
Robertson College ‑‑ and I would like Mr. Penner's comments on
this as well ‑‑ if the Commission suspends the CJWV licence or
revokes it ‑‑ well, suspends it. Change the question, please.
683 MR. ASPER: What will happen to the program, to the broadcast
program?
684 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: What will happen to the
association with Robertson if there is a suspension of the licence?
685 MR. ASPER: Well, I think Mr. Penner could tell you
sort of the practical implication of that and that I can pick up from there.
686 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay.
687 MR. PENNER: Well, we likely would not be proceeding.
688 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. Thank you.
689 Mr. Asper...?
690 MR. ASPER: I think we will have to evaluate that in
the circumstances as they present themselves.
‑‑‑ Pause
691 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: My apologies, I'm pretty sure I
asked this before, but there has been no money deposited by any students for
this course at this time?
692 MR. WORTLEY: No.
693 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Thank you.
694 Mr. Capozzolo,
CJWV has frequently operated in noncompliance with the Campus Radio Policy and
terms of the structure of its Board, has it not?
695 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Yes.
696 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: I will leave the board
questions to Commissioner Petrone.
697 A radio licensee
has the privilege of using radio frequencies that are public property. This means that licensees are accountable to
the public and, Mr. Capozzolo, this hasn't always been the case with
Harmony, has it?
698 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: No, it hasn't.
699 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay.
700 Mr. Capozzolo and
Mr. Wortley, who handles your complaints if and when you get them? What is your procedures on that?
701 MR. WORTLEY: From the Commission?
702 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: No, not your complaints from
us.
703 MR. WORTLEY: From the general public, oh.
704 MR. ASPER: There aren't going to be any more complaints
from the Commission.
705 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
‑‑‑ Laughter /
Rires
706 MR. WORTLEY: I will.
707 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: You will get ‑‑
somehow yes.
708 Sorry, who
will? You will?
709 MR. WORTLEY: Yes.
710 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: What is the process you
have developed for the handling of public complaints?
711 MR. WORTLEY: From the public?
712 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Yes. I'm not talking about public institutions,
I'm talking about from your listeners, audience. They hear something, they don't like it ‑‑
713 MR. WORTLEY: Right.
714 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: ‑‑ somebody goes over the edge, somebody says
something, they think there is an imbalance in programming, they don't
like one of the contrarian point of view, anything like that ‑‑
715 MR. WORTLEY: Right.
716 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: ‑‑ the sort of things that people phone up and say
"I have a complaint, I don't like what you did, when he going to do about
it?" Accountability to the
public. You are holding ‑‑
you are holding a public property.
717 MR. WORTLEY: Right.
718 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: How are you going to manage
your relationship with the public and any complaints it has with you?
719 MR. WORTLEY: Well, I think I can just pull from my
experience as a General Manager, whenever we had complaints from a commercial
station ‑‑ and I don't differentiate between a complaint from
a listener on a commercial station or a not‑for‑profit
station. I look at them as the same.
720 I would listen to
the listener, I would invite them to write in, if they wish, to me, and
then I would look into the complaint
internally with our staff.
721 If I felt that
there was a valid complaint, then I would take the necessary action.
722 If I felt that
perhaps the listener might have exaggerated ‑‑ at times when
they do ‑‑ I would respond by letter of what I did in terms of
their complaint and follow through and "Here's what I have done" or
"Here's what I haven't done".
If they wish to take it further they also have the opportunity to.
723 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. Is it just you are is there ‑‑
I mean do you have an advisory committee or a similar structure to oversee the
handling of the complaints?
724 MR. WORTLEY: Well, what we are looking at
implementing ‑‑
725 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: What happens if you get hit by
a truck?
726 MR. WORTLEY:
‑‑ is a program advisor.
This essentially takes the place of a program director. The program advisor would have two members
from the Board of Directors with him to oversee the programming of CJWV. They would report directly to the Board of
Directors. So yes, there is someone in
place.
727 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: So your Programming Advisory
Committee would also be your public complaints?
728 MR. ASPER: That's a committee of the board,
Commissioner Menzies. It is a committee
of the board and we expect that the public reaction, public interaction be part
of an ongoing reporting by Mr. Wortley to the board.
729 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. Do you have a written policies or written
procedures in place like that that you could provide us with in terms of ‑‑
730 MR. WORTLEY: I don't.
731 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: ‑‑ specifically in terms of your handling of your
public complaints
732 MR. ASPER: We can provide you with ‑‑
733 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Your public complaints
procedures.
734 MR. ASPER: Sure.
Absolutely.
735 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Thank you.
‑‑‑ Pause
736 MR. McCALLUM: Could we set a date on that undertaking?
737 MR. ASPER: Seven days.
738 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: What is the total outstanding
debts of Harmony?
739 MR. ASPER: That is a great question.
740 MS NEBBS: In a situation like this there are what is
recorded on the financial statements and then there is the unrecorded
liabilities. I probably do not know
right now the total unrecorded liabilities.
What is recorded on the financial statements, however, is a total of
$981,206. What is not recorded in
that number were some of the debts to CRA.
741 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Do you have any idea what that
is?
742 MS NEBBS: To date we paid that additional assessment
relating to GST of approximately $10,000.
Upon completing the calculations an amount of about $3,500 was paid. We had an assessment relating to payroll
withholdings, as we investigated and discussed that matter with CRA. I think we believe that there will be an
amount of about $1,500 due and owing at the end of those discussions.
743 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Sorry, it was $980,000?
744 MS NEBBS: The total recorded liabilities are $981,206.
745 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: And $890,000 of that is to Mr.
Capozzolo?
746 MS NEBBS: Pardon me?
747 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: $890,000 of that is to Mr.
Capozzolo?
748 MS NEBBS: The vast majority of that is to Mr.
Capozzolo.
749 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Mr. Capozzolo, you
mentioned that Mr. Asper had offered to clear off about $200,000 in debts
to your families and friends. So that's
money that is owed in addition to the $890,000.
750 Is that money owed
that is in addition to this money that's on the books?
751 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: No. You know what, to be honest, I was never a
money guy. It never really ‑‑
you know ‑‑
752 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Really.
753 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Yes, money is important,
don't get me wrong, I have habits, but however it wasn't my driving force. As long as I had enough to get by it really
didn't matter.
754 But there were
people, people in this room who put in a serious amount of money. My parents took a mortgage out on their house,
my sister did, my brother lent me $3,000 to $10,000 at a time as I needed it
along the way, be it for rent or whatever.
There were local friends that would lend me $5,000 at a time when I
needed it.
755 I should also
mention that I do a lot of freelance work and I was taking that money and
putting it into helping pay the bills.
756 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Where do you freelance?
757 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: I do voiceover work for local
and national advertisers.
758 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Is that how you have lived for
the last six years?
759 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Mostly borrowing money here
it
760 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Mostly borrowing money.
761 How many people
are not going to get repaid at the end of this?
762 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Including myself?
763 COMMISSIONER MENZIES: No, I'm not worried about you in this
question.
764 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Okay. I think that everybody will get pretty close
to what they put in, if not a little extra.
765 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Is there any procedure set up
for handling that?
766 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: I'm going to give them the
names of the people that get the money and they are going to make the cheques
out to those people.
767 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Is that correct, Mr. Asper?
768 MR. ASPER: Generally, yes.
769 We have taken
concrete steps in several specific directions.
A couple of our ‑‑ a couple remain outstanding and a
couple remain to be quantified, but yes.
770 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay.
771 Can you give me
examples of other community radio stations that pay their morning man $60,000 a
year, or campus radio stations that do that?
772 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: This one.
773 MR. ASPER: I can't offhand, no.
774 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: What would be the average
pay for a morning announcer at a campus radio station?
775 MR. WORTLEY: I can't ‑‑ I'm not
sure of that.
776 The challenge with
this license is, unlike other campus licences, it is not housed inside a
university or a college.
777 I can give you a
great example. Red River Community
College here in Winnipeg has a campus licensed radio station. Their station is housed in their
building. Red River Community College
picks up all the bills of the radio station, with the exception of the General
Manager, which I believe his salary is somewhere around $50,000 or
$60,000. That is the only cost, direct
cost that the radio station is responsible for.
The rest of those expenditures are covered by the community college.
778 Because this
licence sits outside of a campus they are responsible ‑‑ it is
responsible for all its bills. I
wouldn't know what a morning man on a campus radio station ‑‑
I can tell you what a morning man in commercial radio might make and it's a lot
more than that here in Winnipeg.
779 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Well, I'm just wondering,
because I look at a lot of radio applications and quite often their operating
expenses for an entire year in a commercial relatively small market might be
$600,000 or $700,000 and their on‑air talent, a lot of it is making
$30,000 a year.
780 Put it this
way: How much more ‑‑
is the amount Mr. Capozzolo is being paid as part of this arrangement
for his talent ‑‑ and I'm not getting into whether it is
deserved or undeserved or market value ‑‑ an extraordinarily
high amount within the campus radio world?
781 Yes or no?
782 MR. ASPER: Let me answer that, if I can.
783 That really never
factored into it. We tried to evaluate
what was basically available in this market at what rates and the value that we
thought we could derive from Mr. Capozzolo's talent in terms of the teachers, the
teaching and mentoring skill that he can do in the course of that program.
784 What
Mr. Capozzolo does ‑‑ and I have to tell you, I listened
and I kept wondering why I was listening to his program in the morning, except
I kept listening, because he is actually very engaging. So there is a subjectivity to this, not a
scale, and we made a choice.
785 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: I'm not saying that
it's ‑‑ I mean it's your choice, I just need to get an answer
as to whether it ‑‑ Mr. Capozzolo, said no there isn't
another campus radio station doing that.
786 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: There are ‑‑
787 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: I'm not getting into whether or
not it is justified, I just need for the record the fact that it is exceptional
or not exceptional.
788 MR. ASPER: I'm not sure how you want us to answer
that ‑‑
789 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Yes or no.
790 MR. ASPER: Because I don't know if it's exceptional or
not.
791 MR. WORTLEY: And I have to be honest with you, I'm not
familiar with the other campus licences in Canada so I wouldn't know what they
would pay a morning show, to be honest with you. I look at it as it's ‑‑ I
felt it was low on the scale.
792 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Mr. Capozzolo, how much
would people typically pay a campus radio station host?
793 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: I don't know that with
regards to this kind of licence.
794 I mean, you are
going to have your ‑‑ you see, the radio station is the
marketing tool for the school. To hire
somebody with my abilities, capabilities, talents, whatever you want to call
that, experience, not only is there the possibility of garnering advertising
revenue from a captivating program, but you are also the marketing tool for the
school. If someone enjoys listening to
my program and loves listening to me, as sometimes listeners do, I would want
to go to that course before any other course.
Therefore, $60,000 would be ‑‑
795 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Gentlemen, like I said, I'm not
saying that the circumstances and the job description ‑‑
796 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Oh, you are just saying ‑‑
797 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: ‑‑ teacher, mentor, guru, broadcaster, whatever,
that is multifaceted enough to justify the $60,000, I just need to know, is
this somewhat unique within the campus radio world?
798 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: I don't necessarily think so,
no.
799 MR. ASPER: We can endeavour to try to find
out. I'm not sure that that is easily
obtainable information.
800 I think the other
thing we have to look at is total on‑air professional paid compensation
for campus radio stations as opposed to an individual, because you may
have ‑‑ if you follow what I'm saying.
801 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay.
802 MR. ASPER: I mean, we can endeavour to try. I'm not sure how we can answer.
803 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Let me try one more time
this way.
804 Mr. Wortley, what
would be the average market rate in a market the size of Winnipeg for a
commercial morning radio host in terms of compensation?
805 MR. WORTLEY: Your range would probably be anywhere from
$80,000 to $120,000 a year.
806 COMMISSIONER
MENZIES: Okay. Thank you.
807 Those are my
questions for now.
808 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you.
809 Commissioner
Petrone...?
810 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: Thank you, Mr. Chair.
811 Good
afternoon. I have some questions around
corporate governance, specifically effective control of Harmony
Broadcasting. When I look at the
document that was handed to me today, the statement, it lists Franc Capozzolo
as the former sole member of Harmony, David Asper as the sole member of Harmony
currently.
812 On page 5 you say
that there was no change of effective control.
813 I need you to walk
me through this because as the sole member of Harmony, Mr. Asper, would
you not in effect be in control of this undertaking at this point?
814 MR. ASPER: I'm going to dodge this, but Lisa can explain
that I think comprehensively, because I know that it kind of feels like it.
815 COMMISSIONER
PETRONE: Yes.
816 MR. ASPER: But there is actually law around this that
explains it.
817 COMMISSIONER
PETRONE: Okay.
818 MR. ASPER: So let
me pass it over to Lisa.
819 MS STIVER: Thank you
820 I just wanted to
clarify, at the beginning of your question you said ‑‑ I think
we had listed in here that there was no change of control, and what I mean by
that is that there is no change of control as it is defined in your Radio Regulation
or as it appears on the Notice.
821 In other words,
what I'm trying to say is that we have not effectively had a change of control
the way that it would I guess traditionally be defined or how it is defined in
the Regulations.
822 So is your question
just to walk you through it?
823 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: My question is how is Mr. Asper
both the sole member of Harmony and yet not in effective control of Harmony?
824 How do you square
that? How do you reconcile those two
points?
825 MS STIVER: Okay.
Where should I start?
826 In the memorandum
that I handed out to you ‑‑ I don't think you have had a
chance to look at it, or if you have ‑‑ I didn't read it
through for everyone because it's boring, but it's a memo that we presented to
the Board ‑‑
827 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: Feel free to bore me,
because ‑‑
828 MS STIVER: Okay.
And basically it discusses the specific sections of the Corporations Act
of Manitoba that speak non‑share capital corporations. That was in regard to the fact that then there
are no shares so there could be no transfer of share ownership, which is part
of what is defined as a change of control under the Regulations.
829 So there is no
change of share ownership, so therefore there is no change of control in that
respect.
830 Now, if you look
at Mr. Asper now being the member, and you asked the question how is there
no change of control, in a campus instructional station, of which this
undertaking is one, under the license it has actually been discussed by the
CRTC in Public Notice 2000‑12 that ‑‑ and I quote it in
the memorandum. I won't quote the whole
piece, but what is said is that:
"There was a range of opinions
expressed by certain licensees of campus stations relating to how the Board of
Directors of a campus station should be structured." (As read)
831 And the CRTC goes
on to say:
"The extent of the interest in
this particular issue stems from the fact that it is with the Board of
Directors of a campus station that effective control of the station
resides." (As read)
832 That supports our
contention as well that three is no change of control because there is no
change of shares.
833 What we would like
to say, then, is there may have been a change of control under that definition
in the Board of Directors, but the Board of Directors changes continuously with
this undertaking, as with any other undertakings, and there is no requirement
to approve a change of Board of Directors.
834 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: I guess the word that jumps out at me is "effective control"
of this undertaking.
835 So my question
remains, Mr. Asper, are you not ‑‑
836 MS STIVER: No.
837 COMMISSIONER
PETRONE: ‑‑ in effect in control of Harmony broadcasting and
has therefore, not been a change in effective control of this entity?
838 MR. ASPER: No. At the end of the day the governance
of this non‑share capital corporation occurs at the Board of Directors
and I do not control the Board of Directors.
839 MS STIVER: He is one of seven Board of Directors at
this point and conceivably 8 or 9 or 10 if we can add more, as we hope to
do. So in this case he wouldn't in any
way control the Board or the company.
840 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: Correct me if I'm wrong, Mr.
Capozzolo, you do not sit on the Board?
You are no longer a Board Member?
841 MR. CAPOZZOLO: First I want to say that it's an excellent
pronunciation of the last name, as my parents would say.
842 No, I don't sit on
the Board and, if I can give my two cents, sole member basically to me means
the guy who you guys call up and say "What's going on over there",
like you were doing with me, now you do it with David.
843 David's name is on
the licence. Harmony Broadcasting is the
licensee, but there has to be someone who answers. Like a board doesn't answer to the
Commission, it would be an individual, and the individual's name appears on the
licence. I believe in the grand scheme
of things that is what a sole member is.
844 For the Red River
College licence for example, somebody's name has to be on the licence. When that individual retires or moves to
another institution, somebody else's name has to be put on the licence because
they are the person that is contacted if you need logger tapes, if whatever.
845 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: Were you, in effect, in control
of Harmony Broadcasting before Mr. Asper and his group came along?
846 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: For the most part, yes. Yes.
847 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: And now you are not?
848 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Not at all.
849 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: So logic would dictate to me
that there has been a change.
850 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: I'm still involved, but we
have to say ‑‑
851 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: But you are no longer in
effective control though.
852 Is that correct?
853 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: In effective control only
because I don't have as much money as Mr. Asper, and the few dollars that
I had, I didn't have Board of Directors that were professionals. There were decent local individuals, but not
experts in the field of law or accounting or any of that stuff.
854 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: But, Mr. Capozzolo, you
just told me a minute ago that you were in effective control of Harmony
Broadcasting and now you no longer are.
855 Did I not hear you
correctly?
856 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: And I don't mean it ‑‑
and I think that ‑‑
‑‑‑ Pause
857 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: Okay. This is a legal question.
858 MR. ASPER: Commissioner, the record has to be clear and
Mr. Capozzolo's response is on the record.
859 But there is a
line, there is a very technical legal line ‑‑ that I'm not
sure Mr. Capozzolo completely appreciates ‑‑ about where the
control ultimately resides.
860 In all of the
discussions leading up to this hearing with Mr. Capozzolo, his conception of
the corporate law is actually not the way it actually is, not the way the law
is actually constructed as to how the concept of corporate control resides.
861 So again, if I can
pass it over to Lisa, but the fundamental issue is that once you
appoint the board, the board is in control of the corporation.
862 MR. LEWIS: If I could just ‑‑
863 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: Sorry, did you want to say something,
sir?
864 MR. LEWIS: Yes, please.
865 If I could just add something, the fundamental problem
that we assessed over the last few months as we were trying to make things
right and go forward and consult with the Commission, is the fact that ‑‑
and getting back to the central compliance issue ‑‑ there
probably was at times no effective control by board because the Board Members
were either (a) inactive, some of their memberships had lapsed, and weren't
being apprised of the operating problems.
866 So we came at is
as to what does Manitoba law say, first of all, vis‑à‑vis the
effective control. We went back to
the source of the Campus Radio Policy, the Commission's circulars, the
Ownership Policy, and in putting this new board together we attempted to make
it right and conform to the Regulations.
867 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: Counsel may have something to
say at this point.
868 MR. McCALLUM: Could I ask a few questions in this area, Mr.
Chair?
869 THE
CHAIRPERSON: I want to go first, if you
don't mind.
870 MR. ASPER: Can I just add one thing on there?
‑‑‑ Laughter /
Rires
871 MR. ASPER: Everybody wants ‑‑ if I can
just add one other part to this, and you may want to raise this in due course,
we hope to incorporate this actually as part of the course itself.
872 Being a Director,
being a member of the Board of Directors, whether it's this company or another
company, brings with it a duty of due diligence and a duty of inquiry and a
duty to know what is going on with the corporation for which you may personally
be held liable. That wasn't happening.
873 If you bisect the
issue before the Commission today, if you accept Mr. Blake's position, or
Mr. Kovnats' position, there was absolutely no corporate governance or due
diligence. Zero. None.
Didn't even know what was going on, by their own words.
874 If you accept our
position you are pretty close to the same thing. And what we have come to you today is to say
we have fixed it and we have proper corporate governance. I don't control the board. We have a capable, credible board that
understands the obligations of corporate governance.
875 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: And yet we are here to examine
whether or not, among other things, there has been a change in control. You yourself said you believe that it appears
that there has been and when you examine Mr. Capozzolo's role under this new
arrangement, he is being put in the function of mentoring and training students
and, as far as I can see, he is your main on‑air talent.
876 Is that correct?
877 MR. ASPER: I think that's true. But bear in mind ‑‑
and everybody focuses on the on‑air part because it's the public
part. I think that's maybe two or
possibly three of 10 modules that will be taught in this program.
878 You know, Mr.
Capozzolo will not be involved in broadcast sales, teaching or admin or traffic
or production, or the other parts. I
mean there is a discrete area.
879 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: I know our Chairman wants to
weigh in as well as our legal counsel, so I'm going to allow them to do this at
this point.
880 Thank you.
881 I have more
questions afterwards.
882 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you. Thank you for letting me interrupt as well.
883 I have always been
taught to follow the money and after sitting on the BCE hearing as well control
and effective control, it begs the question ‑‑ and
Ms Stiver may be talking about the legal Act in the Province of Manitoba
that I'm not cognizant of, and I know our counsel will get involved as
well ‑‑ but do you want us to believe, Mr. Asper, that Tannis
Kircher, Travis DeKoning and Michelle Norris, notwithstanding their excellent
credentials, have as much power and authority to hire and fire Mr. Wortley
as you do?
884 MR. ASPER: I will tell you, Mr. Chairman, that just
before we resumed the hearing this afternoon I collected the board to consider
a very important urgent matter and was given specific direction by that group
and took it on a very serious issue that touches on the very hearing today.
885 So yes, I do
believe that and I am prepared to abide by the direction of the board.
886 THE
CHAIRPERSON: Okay.
887 Counsel...?
888 MR. McCALLUM: Yes, thank you.
889 Just a couple of
questions about the legal control. I
appreciate the opinion that was attached by Ms Stiver.
890 Do you have the
Radio Regulations section 11 open by any chance?
891 MS STIVER: Yes, we do.
892 MR. McCALLUM: You did 11(4) which talks about:
"a change by whatever means of
the effective control of (an) undertaking."
893 And you also spoke
of 4(b) and following which deals with share corporations.
894 Is that right so
far?
895 MS STIVER: Yes, I believe so. We are just trying to find it. Sorry.
896 MR. McCALLUM: Sorry.
It's in the green book, it's not in the red book. Sorry about that, but it is the same and the
other regulations.
897 This is for the
benefit of Mr. Lewis. If you look
up for example the Broadcasting Distribution Regulations you will find a
provision that is similar.
898 MR. LEWIS: Okay.
‑‑‑ Pause
899 MR. McCALLUM: You will find it at pages 142 and 143 of
the green book, Mr. Lewis.
900 MR. LEWIS: Right.
901 MS STIVER: Thank you.
‑‑‑ Pause
902 MR. LEWIS: Yes...?
903 MR. McCALLUM: So (b) and following deal with share
corporations, but:
"(a) a change by whatever means
of the effective control of its undertaking"
904 ‑‑
does not address whether it's a share corporation or a membership corporation.
905 Is that correct?
906 MS STIVER: Yes.
907 MR. McCALLUM: Okay.
908 Effective control
of a licensee is defined in 11(3).
Right?
909 MR. LEWIS: Yes.
910 MR. McCALLUM: And it has two or three possible
definitions. One is:
"a person controls, directly or
indirectly, other than by way of security only, a majority of the voting
interests of a licensee;
(b) a person has the ability to
cause the licensee or its board of directors to undertake a course of action;
(c) the Commission, after a public
hearing of an application for a licence, or in respect of an existing licence
determines that a person has effective control and sets out that determination
in a decision or public notice."
911 MS STIVER: Yes.
912 MR. McCALLUM: Okay.
913 In (a) the words
"voting interest" is then defined in the previous subsection, which
is (2).
914 Is that correct?
915 MR. LEWIS: Yes.
916 MS STIVER: Yes.
917 MR. McCALLUM: 2(a) says:
"the person is, directly or
indirectly, the beneficial owner of the voting interest; or
(b) the person, by means of an
arrangement, a contract, and understanding or an agreement, determines the
manner in which the interest is voted..."
918 It excludes
solicitation of proxies.
919 That's correct so
far?
920 MR. LEWIS: Yes.
921 MS STIVER: Yes.
922 MR. McCALLUM: Okay.
923 And then voting
interest is a term that itself is defined, correct, in 11.1(1)?
924 MS STIVER: Yes.
925 MR. LEWIS: Yes.
926 MR. McCALLUM: And (b) says:
"a corporation without share
capital, means an interest that entitles the owner to voting rights similar to
those enjoyed by the owner of a voting chair."
927 MS STIVER: Yes.
928 MR. McCALLUM: And (d) says ‑‑ I will read
(d):
"a not‑for‑profit
partnership, trust, association or joint venture, means a right that entitles
the owner to participate directly in the management of it or to vote on the
election of the person to be entrusted with the power and responsibility to
manage it..."
929 MS STIVER: Yes.
930 MR. McCALLUM: Okay.
931 So explain why the
provisions do not apply in the case of a membership corporation.
‑‑‑ Pause
932 MR. LEWIS: Well, you have to read the effective control
provision ‑‑ I lost my way.
‑‑‑ Pause
933 MR. LEWIS: You have to read it in concert with (3)(b):
"a person has the ability to
cause the licensee or its board of directors to undertake a course of action or
determines that the person has such effective control..." (As read)
934 I'm sorry. I'm sorry:
"...a person has the ability to
cause the licensee or its board of directors to undertake a course of
action..."
935 Mr. Asper does not
have that ability with this Board of Directors.
He may be the sole member, but he doesn't have the power ‑‑
936 MR. McCALLUM: He has the power to name all the Directors
because he is the member ‑‑ he is the sole member. So if it goes from one sole member who has
the power to name the entire Board of Directors to another sole member that has
the power to name the entire Board of Directors, how is that not a change of
effective control?
937 MS STIVER: What we did in this case is we have the board
changed before the sole member had changed.
The board was appoint ‑‑ I don't want to call it a
vacuum, but there were virtually no board members. So first we constituted the board. The board then held meetings and approved
further board members and then the membership was changed.
938 MR. McCALLUM: But it remained a sole member corporation all
the time. Right?
939 MS STIVER: All the time as in the operative time period,
for the last few months.
940 MR. McCALLUM: I'm sorry, it still remained a sole member
board.
941 MS STIVER: Sorry, yes.
It was not always just a sole member, but for the operative time we are
talking about, yes.
942 MR. McCALLUM: So your view is that the naming of board
members by the sole member prior to the change of the sole membership from Mr.
Capozzolo to Mr. Asper is sufficient to not engage our regulations.
943 Is that your view?
944 MS STIVER: I would believe so, yes, as it has been
done in the past with this same undertaking.
945 MR. LEWIS: And with other community radio
stations. That's the policy, the Campus
Radio Policy.
946 Certainly it is
very well defined in the policy as to how board members must be replaced, the
nature and the qualification of the board members, but nowhere in the policy or
in this Regulation does it say that in the campus stations does prior approval
have to be made ‑‑ obtained from the Commission in electing or
appointing new members of the board.
947 MR. McCALLUM: Well, I think that's an issue the Commission
is going to decide, so I think we will leave it at that and my perhaps let you
resume questions.
948 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: Thank you, counsel.
949 Relative to that,
how are new members going to be appointed going forward?
950 Will you, Mr.
Capozzolo, be continuing to do that function as you did before YO Radio
came along?
951 MR.
CAPOZZOLO: No. I have absolved myself of any administrative,
board or any responsibility. I just want
to be a talent now.
952 MR. ASPER: And I made it clear, Commissioner Petrone,
that when we first initiated discussions with the Commission and this issue
arose ‑‑ and I will just be straight up.
953 The idea was to
try to rescue and to try to get some stability quickly and to try to move
forward and resume its operations and do all the other things that we had to
do. And I said to Commission staff of
the time that ‑‑ although I don't want to trigger another
hearing, but I'm happy to expand the membership and I'm happy to ‑‑
you know, once we get on our feet, if you give us the opportunity to do that,
to make this maybe look and feel a little bit more like what you want but, you
know, the house was on fire.
954 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: I can appreciate that. And as long as we are being straight up, it
sounds like you have done contortions to try and get around this stipulation in
order to change control without having to say that you have changed control.
955 MR. ASPER: Well, we started by going and asking the
Commission about what to do here and it was part of our due diligence as to
whether we were going to wind up with a change of control hearing versus
whether there was a mechanism of survivorship, organic survivorship. That's what we hoped we were trying to
achieve.
956 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: I'm going to ‑‑
957 MR. LEWIS: I'm sorry, if I may jump in?
958 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: I'm sorry, please continue.
959 MR. LEWIS: Well before this hearing was called we
apprised the Commission ‑‑ we wrote to the Commission and
apprised them specifically of the Board change, the methodology being used.
960 The one thing we
were very careful of was ‑‑ and this was in discussions with
Commission staff ‑‑ not to resume broadcasting until there had
been consideration of these changes.
961 But we were very
clear that these were the things that were being put into place because
directors, former directors who are apprised of their potential financial and
other liability, did not want to be directors and were dropping off. Directors' terms had expired as well. So in order to resuscitate the corporate
structure in line with the Act, these were undertaken.
962 But we also wrote
to the Commission and there is a letter on file from myself to the Secretary
General advising that in other situations where there had been a collapse ‑‑
and I cited a number of cases, specifically the Dancy Broadcasting case a
number of years ago, where in that particular case the sole shareholder had
died and on his deathbed he had transferred he shares to other family members,
and because he was gone, passed away, and this couldn't be undone, the
Commission looked at it and approved it after the fact through an expedited
process.
963 What we did here
was we wrote to the Commission and said these of the things that are being put
in place in trying to become ready to, in the dialogue with the Commission,
resume broadcasting. And if it suited
the Commission we believed, in our opinion that we sent to the Commission, that
this could be done on an expedited basis similar to the Dancy case.
964 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: I'm just curious, given what
you had to go through in order to try to meet stipulations before your radio
could initiate this process how you are going to go forward in cases where
there are changes in the board or reappointments or that sort of thing.
965 Have you figured
that part out yet?
966 MR. LEWIS: Well, from a governance point of view I think
Ms Stiver can comment on that.
967 But going forward
the Board Members will ‑‑ there will be elections on a regular
basis. We anticipate that in the future,
because there are, with campus community radio, specific categories of people
that must be on the board. For example,
a student. What will happen in the
future ‑‑ and this happens with all campus community
stations ‑‑ students graduate and they are no longer eligible
under the policy, under the 1992 policy, to serve on the board. At that point the stations don't back to the
Commission. A search committee of the
board or the people within the stations seek out someone to replace them and
they are elected for a fixed term.
That's how it works.
968 I think, as I say,
the '92 policy is pretty clear on that.
I know in '91 and '92 there was a series of Public Notices because
people were coming to grips with the fact that changes were coming down in the
policies as to the composition of these boards and the mechanics are not
simple.
969 I'm sorry to go on
for so long.
970 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: That's okay.
971 Further to the
composition of the board, and the Chairman alluded to this earlier with respect
to your stature, Mr. Asper ‑‑ I know that you say earlier
today as a matter of fact there was an issue brought before to your attention
by the members of the board and so forth.
But with all due respect, you would be the elephant in the room,
wouldn't you, as far as your stature, as far as your background.
972 What guarantees
does the CRTC have that board members will be given the leeway to
express themselves and vote based on their beliefs, experience and values
rather than by pressures to ratify decisions made by yourself?
973 MR. ASPER: I want to be careful in this answer because
if ‑‑ there is some idea that because I walk into a room
people clam up or people won't say what they think, and it's just false. I encourage you, I encourage everybody ‑‑
Mr. Menzies knows this ‑‑ come into my life and feel the
dissent.
‑‑‑ Laughter /
Rires
974 MR. ASPER: That's all I get in my life, and nobody seems
to shy about giving it to me.
975 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: I'm feeling a little bit of it
now.
976 MR. ASPER: Yes.
You haven't heard it yet.
977 I think that you
can't underestimate the intelligence and the willingness of the people
that we have recruited. I don't
want you to underestimate my enjoyment of a good solid debate and
discussion. I can't force people how to
vote, they are independent‑minded people.
978 And I'm telling
you, there was a serious issue today where Ms Kircher and Ms Norris spoke
most vociferously and told me exactly what I was going to do, and I did, and I
value the advice.
979 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: That allowed you to have
something to speak to before this Commission.
980 MR. ASPER: It was coincidental, but it's a good example.
981 And I can tell you
that the issue, how it was resolved, was contrary to my commercial
interest.
982 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: As sole member, what powers
does that titled give you, either over the board or any other aspects of
involving Harmony?
983 MR. ASPER: To be honest, once the board is constituted I
guess ‑‑ I'm not sure what it gets me. I'm not sure what it gets me, because the
board then is ‑‑ the idea is the board will regenerate and
create its own election and nomination process.
984 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: Could you endeavour to find out
what that entails and inform our staff?
985 MR. ASPER: Do you know?
986 MS STIVER: One thing I think, and Franc spoke to it
earlier, is I believe then David would be the person responsible for what
I'm told there won't be any future CRTC issues. But he would be named likely as the member in
those circumstances. But beyond that we
can put something together and look at it.
987 Really, we have
focused much more on the composition of the Board of Directors and that has
been our focus, but we can look into this.
988 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: How many students are on the
board right now?
989 I'm sorry if you
have already answered that, but do you have any?
990 MR. ASPER: We asked Mr. Penner to nominate one
until we have got through this process to determine whether we were
actually going to be an ongoing licensee.
And if that becomes the case, we intend to bring broadcast program
students more onto the board.
991 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: That would be one out of seven?
992 MR. ASPER: More than that. I think more.
993 COMMISSIONER
PATRONE: No, I mean currently.