2006-05-10 - #: 8663-C12-200605587 - Public Notice 2006-6 - Reconsideration of Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol, Telecom Decision 2005-28
File using the On-line Services
|
Activities |
Deadline Dates |
| Notice of intention to participate | 2006-05-23 |
| Comments | 2006-06-05 |
| Reply comments | 2006-06-15 |
| Responses to Commission's interrogatories | 2006-06-15 |
Section 1 - Commission Documents
a) Public Notices, Decisions, etc.
b) List of Interested Parties
c) Correspondence to Parties
d) Interrogatories
Section 4 - Documents from parties
a) Correspondence to the Commission
b) Comments
c) Reply comments
Section 5 - Responses to interrogatories
Section 8 - Miscellaneous Documents
a) Costs
b) Others
Section 1a) Public Notices, Decisions, etc.
2006-11-02 - Telecom Costs Order CRTC 2006-16 The Commission approves the application for costs by ARCH: A Legal Resource for Persons with Disabililities, with respect to its participation in the proceeding initiated by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006‑6. Reference: 8663‑C12‑200605587 and 4754‑273.
2006-11-02 - Telecom Costs Order CRTC 2006-15 The Commission approves the application for costs by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, on behalf of the Consumer Groups, with respect to their participation in the proceeding initiated by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006‑6. Reference: 8663‑C12‑200605587 and 4754‑271.
2006-10-04 - Telecom Costs Order CRTC 2006-12 The Commission approves the application for costs by the British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre with respect to the participation of the British Columbia Old Age Pensioners' Organization et al. in the proceeding initiated Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-6. Reference: 8663-C12-200605587 and 4754-268.
2006-10-04 - Telecom Costs Order CRTC 2006-11 The Commission approves the application for costs by l'Union des consommateurs with respect to its participation in the proceeding initiated by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-6. Reference: 8663-C12-200605587 and 4754-272.
2006-09-01 - Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-12 Proceeding to reassess certain aspects of the local forbearance framework established in Decision 2006-15. Reference: 8663-C12-200610924, 8663-C12-200605587, 8640-C12-200607210 and 8640-C12-200505076.
2006-09-01 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-53 Reconsideration of Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol. Reference: 8663-C12-200605587 and 8663-C12-200402892.
Section 1c) Correspondence to Parties
2006-08-10 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Show cause - Publishing of certain information filed in confidence
2006-07-26 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Shaw Cause - Publishing of certain information filed in confidence
2006-05-31 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Public Notice 2006-6 - Reconsideration of Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol, Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 - Interrogatories
Section 4a) Correspondence to the Commission
2006-08-16 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of a second letter from Commissin staff, dated 10 August 2006, requiring certain paties to show cause why the Commission should not publish on an aggregated basis certain information filed in confidence.
Document: 654790.pdf - 27KB
2006-08-16 - FCI Broadband
Description: FCI Broadband, a division of Futureway Communications Inc. is in receipt of the Commission’s letter dated 10 August 2006, directing the companies who are a party to the above-noted proceeding to show cause by 16 August 2006, why the Commission should not publish certain information filed in confidence by FCI Broadband et al, as part of the Commission’s proceeding initiated by PN 2006-6
Document: 654774.doc - 66KB
2006-08-16 - Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: This letter provides the comments of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada and Télébec, société en commandite ( Télébec ) (collectively, the Companies) on the show cause letter in the above matter, dated 10 August 2006 . Télébec also concurs with the 3 August 2006 response of Bell Aliant and Bell Canada to the Commission's show cause of 26 July 2006
Document: 654758.doc - 80KB
2006-08-16 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) is in receipt of the Commission's letter of August 10, 2006 requesting that it show cause why the Commission should not publish on an aggregated basis certain information filed in confidence
Document: 654730.doc - 81KB
2006-08-16 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS is in receipt of the Commission staff letter dated 10 August 2006 requiring MTS Allstream to show cause, by 16 August 2006, why the Commission should not publish on an aggregated basis certain information filed in confidence.
Document: 654724.pdf - 184KB
2006-08-16 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus) is in receipt of the Commission’s letter, dated 10 August 2006, in which it was requested to show cause why the Commission should not publish on an aggregated basis certain information filed in confidence by parties as part of the PN 2006-6
Document: 654420.doc - 77KB
2006-08-16 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) received your letter, dated 10 August 2006, requiring each of the named parties to show cause why the Commission should not publish, on an aggregated basis, certain information filed in confidence
Document: 654197.doc - 54KB
2006-08-16 - RTS Canada
Description: We acknowledge receipt of the letter dated August 10, 2006 concerning the intention of the CRTC to release on a nationally aggregated basis
Document: 654105.pdf - 19KB
2006-08-15 - James Bay Cree Communications Society
Description: James bay Cree Communications Society supports the nitiative by the CRTC
Document: 654108.htm - 5KB
2006-08-03 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: This letter provides the comments of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) on the show cause letter in the above matter, dated 26 July 2006 .
Document: 652702.doc - 79KB
2006-08-03 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable inc. (Cogeco) is in receipt of your letter, dated 26 July 2006, requiring that each party show cause why the Commission should not publish on an aggregated basis certain information filed in confidence
Document: 651101.doc - 137KB
2006-08-03 - RTS Canada
Description: As party to the hearing regarding PN 2006-6, we have received notice from the CRTC requesting opinions on whether the following information would be presented on a nationally aggregated basis.
Document: 651094.pdf - 34KB
2006-08-03 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) is in receipt of the Commission’s letter of July 26, 2006 requesting that it show cause why the Commission should not publish on an aggregated basis certain information filed in confidence
Document: 651067.doc - 57KB
2006-08-03 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus) is in receipt of the Commission’s letter, dated 26 July 2006, in which it was requested to show cause why the Commission should not publish on an aggregated basis certain information filed in confidence by parties as part of the PN 2006-6
Document: 651058.doc - 76KB
2006-08-03 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of a letter from Commission staff dated 26 July 2006 requiring certain parties to show cause why the Commission should not publish on an aggregated basis certain information filed in confidence.
Document: 651050.pdf - 27KB
2006-08-03 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications hereby responds to the Commission's letter of 26 July 2006 requesting that those interested parties who filed responses to the Commission interrogatories dated 31 May 2006 show cause why the Commission should not publish on an aggregated basis certain information filed in confidence.
Document: 651022.pdf - 69KB
2006-08-03 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MS Allstream is in receipt of the Commission staff letter of 26 July 2006 requiring MTS Allstreamto show cause,by 3 August 2006, why the Commission should not publish on an aggregated basis certain information filed in confidence.
Document: 651002.pdf - 57KB
2006-08-01 - Sasskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) received your letter, dated 26 July 2006, requiring each of the named parties to show cause why the Commission should not publish, on an aggregated basis, certain information filed in confidence, pursuant to Section 39 of the Telecommunications Act, by parties as part of the proceeding initiated by Telecom Public Notice 2006-6.
Document: 650144.doc - 54KB
2006-08-01 - FCI Broadband
Description: FCI is in receipt of the Commission's letter dated 26 July 2006, directing certain companies to show cause by 3 August 2006, why the Commission should not publish certain information filed in confidence by FCI Broadband et al, as part of the Commission's proceeding initiated by PN 2006-6.
Document: 650121.pdf - 43KB
2006-07-19 - Télécommunications Xittel inc.
Description: Le 10 mai 2006, Télécommunications Xittel inc. avisait le Conseil de son entrée en marché en date du 20 juin 2006 à titre de fournisseur de voix sur IP au dossier de suivi à la Décision 2005-61.
Document: 645953.doc - 331KB
2006-07-14 - Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited Partnership, Northwestel, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, NorthernTel, Limited Partnership, Northwestel Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies), are in receipt of an email from ARCH requesting an extension for filing their costs application in this proceeding to 4 August 2006.
Document: 644864.doc - 34KB
2006-07-13 - ARCH
Description: I am writing with respect to the time frames for an Application for Costs in the above proceeding with respect to the Comments filed by ARCH Disability Law Centre on June 5 2006.
Document: 644605.doc - 24KB
Section 4b) Comments
2006-06-22 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Canada wishes to correct the record and is thus filing a revision to the passage in question. The Company regrets any inconvenience which this error may have caused. A revised version of the Company's entire submission is being provided.
Document: 637740.zip - 6606KB
2006-06-08 - Comwave Telecom Inc.
Description: Comwave Telecom herey provides brief comments in relation to the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 633489.pdf - 1013KB
2006-06-05 - Shift Networks Inc.
Description: Shift supports the conditions for local forbearance as determined in CRTC Decision 2006-15, and supports the concept that local VoIP service providers be regulated as local exchange services as determined in CRTC Decision 2005-28.
Document: 632335.doc - 23KB
2006-06-05 - Canadian Cable Systems Alliance Inc. (CCSA)
Description: The CCSA currently represents 94 independent cable operators which serve, in the aggregate, approximately 850,000 Canadian analog television subscribers and a large and rapidly growing number of digital television subscribers.
Document: 632333.zip - 454KB
2006-06-05 - James Bay Cree Communications Society
Description: Please find attached James Bay Cree Communications Society comments in respect of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-6
Document: 632329.doc - 39KB
2006-06-05 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Attached are the submissions of Aliant Telecom Inc. (Aliant), Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, société en commandite (Télébec) (collectively, the Companies) in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 632321.zip - 6539KB
2006-06-05 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in the above-noted public notice, in accordance with Order in Council P.C. 2006-305, 4 May 2006, MTS Allstream Inc. submits the attached comments on the regulatory framework for local IP-based voice services
Document: 632307.zip - 883KB
2006-06-05 - Union des Consommateurs
Description: L’Union des consommateurs dépose le présent document afin de soumettre des observations dans le cadre de l’avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-6.
Document: 633290.doc - 150KB (revised)
2006-06-05 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in Reconsideration of Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol, Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28, 10 May 2006 (PN 06-6), Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus) hereby files its written comments with the Commission.
Document: 632302.doc - 88KB
2006-06-05 - ARCH
Description: ARCH is pleased to submit the attached comments in accordance with the procedures established at paragraph 10 of the above-noted Public Notice.
Document: 632295.zip - 64KB
2006-06-05 - FCI Broadband
Description: FCI Brocband files these comments with the Commission pursuant to the procedures set out in Telecom Public Notice 2006-6.
Document: 632292.pdf - 42KB
2006-06-05 - Quebec Coalition of Internet Service Providers
Description: Find herein enclosed the intervention of the Quebec Coalition of Internet Service Providers pursuant to the procedures set forth in Public Notice 2006-6.
Document: 632285.doc - 992KB
2006-06-05 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) provides the attached Comments pursuant to the procedures established in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-6, Reconsideration of Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol, Telecom Decision 2005-28, 10 May 2006.
Document: 632279.zip - 44KB
2006-06-05 - Nortel
Description: Nortel is pleased to file the attached comments to the Commission in accordance with Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-6 - Reconsideration of Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol, Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28
Document: 632274.pdf - 53KB
2006-06-05 - Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications
Description: These comments are being filed by the Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications (the Coalition) in response to the process initiated by the Commission on May 10, 2006 noted above.
Document: 632270.pdf - 770KB
2006-06-05 - Vonage Canada Corp.
Description: These are the comments of Vonage Canada Corp. (Vonage) in response to Telecom Public Notice 2006-6.
Document: 632257.pdf - 6727KB
2006-06-05 - Yak Communications (Canada) Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in Public Notice 2006-6, Yak Communications (Canada) Inc. submits the attached comments.
Document: 632243.zip - 97KB
2006-06-05 - Cogeco Cable, Quebecor Media Inc. and Rogers Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 10 of Telecom Public Notice 2006-6, Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc. and Rogers Communications Inc. (collectively, the Competitors) hereby file the attached submission.
Document: 632225.zip - 394KB
2006-06-05 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: These Comments are by Shaw Communications Inc. in accordance with the procedures set out at paragraph 10 of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-6
Document: 632218.zip - 74KB
2006-06-05 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) as counsel for the Consumers’ Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization (The Consumer Groups) is pleased to enclose the following final comments on this proceeding.
Document: 632203.zip - 102KB
2006-06-05 - TELUS Communications Company (TCC)
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out by the Commission in PN 2006-6, TELUS Communications Company (TELUS) herein files its Comments in this proceeding.
Document: 632167.zip - 894KB
2006-06-05 - Access Communications Co-operative Limited
Description: Access Communications Co-operative Limited (Access Communications) is hereby providing its comments in the above-referenced proceeding which was initiated by the Commission in response to Order in Council P.C. 2006-305. In that Order in Council, the Commission was directed to reconsider Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol (Decision 2005-28)
Document: 632163.htm - 82KB
2006-06-05 - OneConnect
Description: OneConnect hereby provides the following comments in respect of the above public notice. By way of background, OneConnect was the first non-ILEC service provider to offer hosted Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services to the Canadian business market and is a competitor to the ILECs offering a VoIP based alternative to Centrex services.
Document: 632159.doc - 41KB
2006-06-05 - The City of Calgary
Description: The Commission issued Telecom Public Notice CRTC2004-2 (PN2004-2) on April 7, 2004 to address the regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol (VoIP). In the Public Notice, the Commission provided its preliminary views on the regulatory framework that should apply to VoIP
Document: 632142.doc - 44KB
Section 4c) Reply comments
2006-06-21 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) as counsel for the Consumers’ Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization (The Consumer Groups) is enclosing the following reply comments on this proceeding some six days late, due to inadvertence.
Document: 637368.zip - 105KB
2006-06-19 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Accompanying this letter, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) provides Reply comments pursuant to the procedures established in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-6, Reconsideration of Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol, Telecom Decision 2005-28, 10 May 2006, and Commission staff letter dated 31 May 2006.
Document. 636511.zip - 37KB
2006-06-15 - BC Public Interest Advocacy Centre for British Columbia Old Age Pensioner's Organization (BCOAPO)
Description: These are the Reply Comments files on behalf of BCOAPA et al. In particular, we wish to respond to the Comments files by the Companies, and by TELUS.
Document: 643777.pdf - 323KB
2006-06-15 - Shift Networks Inc.
Description: Shift Networks notes that there were 23 submissions made regarding the issue, and of these 23 submissions, 3 were in favour of complete forbearance while 18 essentially reinforced the Commission current framework by favouring regulation as set out in recent Decision CRTC 2005-28 and 2006-15.
Document: 636494.pdf - 35KB
2006-06-15 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: En accord avec la procédure établie par le Conseil, Télébec, fournit, ci-après, une réplique complémentaire à celle fournie conjointement avec Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) et Télébec (les Companie) et portant plus spécifiquement sur les observations présentées par la James Bay Cree Communications Society (JBCCS)
Document: 636257.pdf - 31KB - 637335.pdf - 48KB (English Version)
2006-06-15 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. submits the attached reply comments on the regulatory framework for local IP-based voice services, in accordance with the procedure set out at paragraph 11 of Public Notice 2006-6
Document: 636251.zip - 1609KB
2006-06-15 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Cybersurf Corp. And it subsidiaries are providing these reply comments pursuant to Telecom Public Notice 2006-6.
Document: 636237.pdf - 51KB
2006-06-15 - Yak Communications (Canada) Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established in Telecom Public Notice 2006-6, Yak Communications (Canada) Inc. Is pleased to submit the following reply comments.
Document: 636219.zip - 40KB
2006-06-15 - Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media and Rogers Communications Inc. (the Competitors)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 11 of Telecom Public Notice 2006-6, the Competitors hereby file the attached reply comments.
Document: 636335.zip - 202KB
2006-06-15 - Quebec Coalition of Internet Service Providers
Description: Find herein enclosed the reply comments of the Quebec Coalition of Internet Service Providers pursuant to the procedures set forth in Public Notice 2006-6.
Document: 636196.doc - 967KB
2006-05-16 - Coalition for Competitive Telecommunications
Description: The Coalition is pleased to provide its reply comments in the proceeding referenced above.
Document: 636193.pdf - 1610KB
2006-06-15 - Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Further to the procedure set out in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-6, Reconsideration of Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol, Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-28 (P.N. 2006-6), Aliant Telecom Inc. (Aliant), Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), and Télébec, société en commandite (Télébec) (collectively, the Companies) submit the following reply comments.
Document: 636187.zip - 387KB
2006-06-15 - Access Communications Co-operative Limited
Description: Access Communications Co-operative Limited (Access Communications) is pleased to provide these comments in response to the first round submissions that were filed in the above-referenced proceeding
Document: 636161.doc - 63KB
2006-06-15 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: These reply comments are submitted by Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) in accordance with the procedures set forth in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-6
Document: 636141.doc - 83KB
2006-06-15 - TELUS Communications Company
Decription: In accordance with the procedures set out by the Commission in PN 2006-6, TELUS Communications Company herein files its reply comments.
Document: 636130.zip - 174KB
2006-06-15 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus) is in receipt of parties’ written comments, dated 5 June 2006, in the context of Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-6, dated 10 May 2006. Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in PN 06-6, Primus hereby files its reply comments
Document: 636126.doc - 95KB
2006-06-15 - Vonage Canada Inc.
Description: These are the reply comments of Vonage Canada Inc. in response to Telecom Public Notice 2006-6.
Document: 635992.pdf - 6232KB
2006-06-15 - James Bay Cree Communications Society
Description: The attached submission is a reply comment provided by James Bay Cree
Communications Society
Document: 635976.pdf - 21KB
2006-06-15 - Yukon Government
Description: The attached Submission of the Yukon Government is filed according to the terms of the above Public Notice, and copies are distributed to the list of interested parties.
Document: 635397.zip - 13KB
2006-06-15 - Rothschild & Co. on behalf of RipNET Limited
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out at paragraph 11 of Telecom PN 2006-6, Rothschild & co (Rithschild) fles the following comments regarding Phase II submissions on behalf of its associated RipNET Limited (RipNET).
Document: 635391.pdf - 126KB
Section 5) Responses to interrogatories
2006-06-20 - Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt for Comwave Telecom Inc.
Description: In a letter dated 31 May 2006, the Commission requested that Comwave Telecom Inc. and other parties file responses to interrogatories with the Commission, serving copies on all other parties.
Document: 637344.zip - 55KB
2006-06-19 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: SaskTel is also submitting responses to interrogatories addressed by the Commission on 31 May 2006
Document: 636511_1.zip - 106KB
2006-06-17 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Attached are the interrogatory responses of Cybersurf Corp. in the proceeding initiated by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-6
Document: 636385.zip - 43KB
2006-06-16 - Yak Communications (Canada) Inc.
Description: In reference to the letter of 31 May 2006 from Fiona Gilfillan, Yak Communications (Canada) Inc. is pleased to provide the attached responses to interrogatories, requested by the Commission.
Document: 636364.zip - 57KB
2006-06-16 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Please find attached the responses of Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus), dated 16 June 2006, to the Commission staff’s interrogatories of 31 May 2006. Primus acknowledges that these responses were to be filed with the Commission on 15 June 2006.
Document: 636339.zip - 54KB (revised)
2006-06-15 - Vonage Canada Inc.
Description: Further to the letter of 31 May 2006 from Fiona Gilfillan, Vonage Canada Inc. is pleased to provide the attached responses to interrogatories, requested by the Commission.
Document: 636198.zip - 394KB
2006-06-15 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: In Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-6 Reconsideration of regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol, the Commission directed Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) to file responses to interrogatories by June 15, 2006
Document: 636148.zip - 51KB
2006-06-15 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the request received from Commission staff on 31 May 2006 with respect to the subject noted above, MTS Allstream Inc. submits the following responses to the requested interrogatories.
Document: 636109.zip - 89KB
2006-06-15 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff’s 31 May 2006 letter, please find attached the responses of Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) to the Commission’s Interrogatories.
Document: 636103.zip - 52KB
2006-06-15 - Bell Canada
Description: Attached are Bell Canada 's responses to the Commission's interrogatories, dated 31 May 2006
Document: 636076.zip - 109KB
2006-06-15 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out by the Commission in PN 2006-6, please find attached TELUS Communications Company responses to interrogatories directed to it by the Commission.
Document: 636014.zip - 111KB
2006-05-15 - Quebecor Media Inc. for Videotron
Description: As directed in the Commission’s letter of 31 May 2006, Quebecor Media Inc. is pleased to provide the enclosed interrogatory responses on behalf of our wholly-owned subsidiary Videotron
Document: 636002.zip - 51KB
2006-06-15 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the CRTC letter dated 31 May 2006, Rogers Communications Inc. is filing herewith its responses to the interrogatories it has received from the CRTC.
Document: 635980.zip - 202KB
2006-06-15 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: Aliant submits the following responses to interrogatories from Commission staff issued on May 31, 2006, in regard to the above noted proceeding.
Document: 635533.zip - 77KB
2006-06-15 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: En accord avec la procédure établie par le Conseil, Télébec dépose, sous-pli, ses réponses aux demandes de renseignemetns du 31 mai 2006.
Document: 635454.zip - 35KB
Section 8a) Costs
2006-08-09 - Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: The Companies are in receipt of an application for costs from ARCH Disability Law Centre (ARCH), dated 4 August 2006, with respect to the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 652698.doc - 71KB
2006-08-09 - Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: The Companies are in receipt of an aplication for costs from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), acting on behalf of Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization, dated 4 August 2006, with respect to the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 652693.doc - 70KB
2006-08-08 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of an application for costs in the above-noted proceeding by ARCH Disability Law Centre datd 4 August 2006.
Document: 652108.pdf - 15KB
2006-08-04 - ARCH
Description: ARCH Disability Law Centre, in accordance with Rule 44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, applies for costs with respect to our participation in the above-noted proceeding. ARCH submits that its participation meets all of the requirements set out in Rule 44
Document: 651524.zip - 213KB
2006-08-03 - Union des consommateurs
Description: Conformément à l’alinéa 44(4) des Règles de procédure du CRTC en matière de télécommunications, l’Union des consommateurs soumet la présente réplique à la réponse soumise, le 25 juillet 2006, par Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications et Télébec, société en commandite (ci-après les Compagnies) relativement à la demande d’adjudication des frais soumise par l’Union des consommateurs
Document: 651115.doc - 166KB
2006-08-03 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS communications is in receipt of an application for costs in the above-noted proceeding by the Pubilc interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) (as counsel for the consumers' Association of Canada and the national Anti-Proverty Organization, the Consumer Groups) datd 3 August 2006.
Document: 651108.pdf - 22KB
2006-08-03 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: As counsel for the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) we have attached the cost claim of the Consumer Groups who we represented in the above-noted hearing
Document: 651920.pdf - 206KB
2006-08-01 - Union des Consommateurs
Description: La présente lettre vise à vous aviser que la demande d’adjudication des frais de l’Union des consommateurs pour sa participation à l’avis public de télécom CRTC 2006-6 Réexamen de la décision Cadre de réglementation régissant les services de communication vocale sur protocole Internet, Décision de télécom CRTC 2005-28, a été transmise à toutes les parties intéressées le 14 juillet 2006 par courriel.
Document: 650539.doc - 86KB (revised)
2006-07-25 - Bell Aliant, Bel Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), Télébec, société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications and Télébec, société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) , are in receipt of an application for costs from L'Union des consommateurs (L'Union) dated 14 July 2006, with respect to the above-noted proceeding
Document: 647915.doc - 73KB
2006-07-21 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of an application for costs in the above-noted proceeding by l'Union des consommateurs dated 14 July 2006.
Document: 646831.pdf - 22KB
2006-07-14 - Union des concommateurs
Description: Conformément à l'article 44 des Règles de procedure du CRTC en matière de télécommunications et à l'avis public 2002-5, l'Union des consommateurs demande l'adjudication de ses frais pour sa participation à l'avis public de télécom 2006-6.
Document: 644644.pdf - 183KB
2006-07-13 - Canadian Cable Systems Alliance Inc. (CCSA)
Description: The CCSA is in receipt of the July 11,2006 TELUS Communications Company response to an application for costs award filed by British Columbia Old Age Pensioners' Organization et al (BCOAPO), June 27, 2006, in respect of the latter's participation in Telecom Public Notice 2006-6.
Document: 644611.pdf - 336KB
2006-07-13 - Bell Aliant, Bell Canada, Sasskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) and Télébec, société en commandite (Télébec) (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of an application for costs in the above noted proceeding by the BC Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the British Columbia Old Age Pensioners Organization (BCOAPO) et al, dated 27 January 2006.
Document: 644598.doc - 43KB
2006-07-11 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS is in receipt of an application for costs in the above-noted proceeding by the BC Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the British Columbia Old Age Pensioner's Organization (BCOAPO) et al. dated 27 January 2006.
Document: 643775.pdf - 19KB
2006-06-27 - BC Public Interest Advocacy Centre for British Columbia Old Age Pensioner's Organization (BCOAPO)
Description: The BC Public Interest Advocacy Centre applies on behalf of the British Columbia Old Age Pensioner's Organization et al. for costs in these proceeding and have enclosed our costs application with this
Document: 641475.pdf - 298KB
Section 8b) Others
No documents
Date Modified: 2006-11-02
- Date modified: