Search

ARCHIVED -  Telecom Order CRTC 98-806

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.

Telecom Order

Ottawa, 18 August 1998
Telecom Order CRTC 98-806
On 15 April 1998, The New Brunswick Telephone Company, Limited (NBTel) (now NBTel Inc.) filed an application for approval of tariff revisions to General Tariff Item 801.4, Contribution Charges, to recover the Carrier Access Tariff charges associated with an alternate provider of long distance service's competitive traffic which terminates in or originates from independent company territories.
File No.: Tariff Notice 722
1.NBTel further requested that the Commission ratify, under section 25(4) of the Telecommunications Act, the retroactive application of the proposed tariff revisions.
2.By Telecom Order CRTC 98-438, dated 7 May 1998, the Commission granted interim approval to the proposed tariff revisions and deferred consideration of the retroactive application of the revisions.
3.Comments were received from AT&T Canada Long Distance Services Company, dated 17 April 1998, and reply comments were received from Stentor Resource Centre Inc., dated 25 May 1998.
4.Based on the record of this proceeding, the Commission concludes that the retroactive application of the proposed tariff revisions is not justified in this case.
5.The Commission orders that:
a) The proposed tariff revisions are approved on a final basis.
b) The proposed retroactive application of the tariff revisions is denied.
Laura M. Talbot-Allan
Secretary General
This document is available in alternative format upon request.

Date modified: