Communications Research Centre (CRC) Technical Report : Mobile Coverage Metrics

© His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, as represented by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, 2025

Catalogue number BC92-142/2025E-PDF
ISBN 978-0-660-79833-2

Khaledul Islam, Liang Zhang

14th of June 2024

CRC Unique number: 031034-TR-01

Approved for issue as a CRC Technical Report by: Stéphane Gagnon

Abstract

This report presents a literature survey on the quality of service requirements for different types of mobile services, the required data throughput, and the required signal power level at the receivers, based on the analysis and test results conducted by industry and other international regulatory bodies.

This report proposes definitions of mobile service coverage (MSC) in three service levels, the Emergency Mobile Coverage (EMC), Basic Mobile Coverage (BMC), and Advance Mobile Coverage (AMC), based on mobile service types and the respective quality of service (QoS) requirements.

Next, two coverage metrics are proposed for identifying the mobile service coverage areas for the different service levels: data throughput and received signal power. The thresholds for these two metrics are recommended for the three levels of mobile service coverage assessment.

The proposed coverage definitions, metrics and the criteria are used to develop a unified approach to generate the coverage contours for different levels of mobile services that are available to Canadian consumers, based on the latest mobile system deployment status in Canada.

The proposed coverage definitions and metrics consider all cellular technologies, from 2G to the latest deployed 5G systems in the 3.5 GHz band.

Table of Contents

List of Acronyms

5G NR 5G New Radio
AMR-NB Adaptive Multi-rate – Narrow Band
AMR-WB Adaptive Multi-rate – Wide Band
ARCEP Autorité de Régulation des Communications Électroniques, des Postes et de la Distribution de la Presse
BEREC Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications
CPICH Common Pilot Channel
ComReg Commission for Communications Regulation
CRTC Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission
EVS Enhanced Voice Service
FCC Federal Communications Commission
FDD Frequency Division Duplex
GSM Global System for Mobile
GSMA GSM Association
ISED Innovation Science and Economic Development
LTE Long-Term Evolution
Ofcom Office of Communications
OTT Over-The-Top
MNO Mobile Network Operator
QoS Quality of Service
ROHC Robust Header Compression
RSRP Reference Signal Received Power
RSCP Received Signal Code Power
RTP Real-Time Protocol
SINR Signal to Interference and Noise Ratio
RxLev Received signal level
SS RSRP Synchronization Signal Reference Signal Received Power
STS Spectrum and Telecommunications Sector
TDD Time Division Duplex
TTI Transmission Time Interval
UDP User Datagram Protocol
UE User Equipment
UMTS Universal Mobile Telecommunications Service
VoLTE Voice over LTE
VoNR Voice over NR

Introduction

One of the two main objectives of the “High-Speed Access for All: Canada’s Connectivity Strategy” is: “mobile wireless coverage is available where Canadians live and work, and along major road corridors.” [1] The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) collects mobile coverage contours from Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) which allows both CRTC and ISED to publish maps to show the mobile service availability within Canada. However, currently there is a lack of a unified definition of what “mobile coverage” is, and no unified agreed-upon approach to obtain these coverage contours. Therefore, different MNOs characterize the mobile coverage of their own networks based on different criteria, assumptions and coverage prediction models. This raises questions of the accuracy and consistency of mobile service coverage estimation based on these MNO-supplied contours, in particular with regard to the availability of mobile services for emergency applications.

This report first presents a literature survey on the quality requirements for different types of mobile services, the required data throughput, and the required signal power level at the receivers, based on the analyses and test results conducted by industry and other international regulatory bodies.

Based on the literature survey results, this report proposes:

Among the two coverage metrics, it is easier to use data throughput to provide insight or likelihood on the achievable service quality, however, it is more difficult to measure in practice or to simulate.Footnote 1 The received signal power is a more commonly used metric for predicting the achievable mobile performance, since it is much easier to measure in practice and to model in simulation tools. When using this metric, it needs to first be converted into achievable data throughput for mobile service quality assessment. This conversion depends on the wireless technologies, the deployment configurations, and receiver characteristics. For coverage estimation at the cell edge, some general assumptions could be made in the analysis, for specific wireless technologies, that could provide sufficient accuracy.

The proposed coverage definitions, metrics and the criteria can be used to develop a unified approach to generate the coverage contours for different levels of mobile services that are available to Canadian consumers, based on the latest mobile system deployment status in Canada.

The proposed coverage definitions and metrics consider all RF bands applicable to all cellular technologies, from 2G to the latest deployed 5G systems including the 3.5 and 3.8 GHz bands.

Survey of Mobile Service Scenarios and Their Throughput Requirements

This section summarizes the survey of various mobile services and their minimum/recommended data rates from various studies conducted by the providers of associated services/applications, regulatory bodies, and industry consortia.

Voice Call

Starting with 4G Long-Term Evolution (LTE), cellular networks support only packet-switched voice services such as Voice over LTE (VoLTE) calls in 4G LTE network, and Voice over New Radio (VoNR) calls in stand-alone 5G NR network. VoLTE and VoNR calls support various audio codecs such as Adaptive Muti-rate - Narrow Band (AMR-NB), Adaptive Muti-rate - Wide Band (AMR-WB), and Enhanced Voice Service (EVS).

The uplink/downlink (UL/DL) data rate requirements for VoLTE, VoNR, as well as packet-switched voice services provided by various Over-the-Top (OTT) Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) applications are summarized in Table 1. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the United States did not specify a minimum threshold on data throughput for VoIP calls in its guideline on broadband speed requirements ([2]).

Table 1: Data Rate Requirements for One-to-One Voice Call
Type of Voice Call   Minimum/ recommended UL/DL data rate
3GPP Codec Max data rate FCC Broadband ([2]) Zoom ([6]) Skype ([7]) MS Teams ([8])
VoLTE call
  • AMR-NB codec payloadFootnote 2: 4.75-12.2 kbps
  • AMR-WB codec payload: 6.6-23.85 kbps
  • EVS codec payload: 5.9-128 kbps
VoIP < 500/500 kbps - - -
VoNR call
  • AMR-NB codec payload: 4.75-12.2 kbps
  • AMR-WB codec payload: 6.6-23.85 kbps
  • EVS codec payload: 5.9-128 kbps
VoIP < 500/500 kbps - - -
OTT VoIP application - VoIP < 500/500 kbps 60/60-80/80 kbps 30/30 - 100/100 kbps 10/10-58/58 kbps

During VoLTE/VoNR and VoIP calls, the voice codec generates an audio frame every 20 ms. For example, the AMR-WB codec used in a VoLTE/VoNR call generates a vocoded frame of 477 bits every 20 ms when operating at 23.85 kbps that then becomes the payload of the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) layer of the VoIP stack. For efficient usage of the cellular air-interface during VoLTE/VoNR calls, the cellular network typically performs composite header compression, or Robust Header Compression (ROHC), to reduce the size of the aggerated headersFootnote 3 produced by RTP, UDP, and IPv4/IPv6 relative to a small payload. An example of payload at different layers of a modem stack with and without ROHC produced when the vocoder operates at 23.85 kbps is summarized in Table 2.

Table 2: Vocoded Frame to Physical layer payload without ROHC
Vocoded Frame to Physical layer payload without ROHC Vocoded Frame to Physical layer payload with ROHC
Vocoded Frame ~60 bytes Vocoded Frame ~60 bytes
- -
RTP + 12 bytes header Robust Header Compression (ROHC) + ~5 bytes
UDP + 8 bytes header
IPv6 + 40 bytes header
PDCP + 2 bytes header PDCP + 2 bytes header
RLC + 1 byte header RLC + 1 byte header
MAC + 2 bytes header MAC + 2 bytes header
- 125 bytes or 1000 bits every 20 ms - 70 bytes or 560 bits every 20 ms
Physical layer Physical layer

Although a vocoded frame is generated every 20 ms, the transmission of this payload in a packet-switched network typically happens over one physical-layer sub-frame, which has a duration of 1 ms (also known as Transmission Time Interval or TTI in 4G LTE). From a network perspective, this bursty transmission to a single user becomes equivalent to 500 bits/1-ms (or 500 kbps) or 280 bits/1-ms (or 280 kbps), with and without robust header compression respectively, assuming a 50% voice activity factor.

At the cell edge, the uplink transmit power could be the bottleneck for VoLTE call. The cellular network typically instructs the UE to utilize a feature called “TTI bundling” which results in the UE sending the same packet in four consecutive sub-frames (i.e. over a 4-ms interval), each time with a different redundancy version (RV). Different sets of redundant data that are added for different RVs significantly improve the likelihood of successful decoding of audio packet by the network.

Video Call

The data rate requirements for video calls specified by the providers of various popular OTT applications are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3: Data Rate Requirements for Video Call
Quality/type of Video Call Minimum/recommended UL/DL data rate
FCC Broadband ([2]) Zoom ([6]) Skype ([7]) MS Teams ([8]) Google Meets ([9])
1:1 Standard Definition (SD) DL 1 Mbps 600/600 kbps 400/400 kbps – 500/500 kbps 150/150 kbps – 1.5/1.5 Mbps 1/1 Mbps
1:1 High Definition (HD)/Full-HD (FHD) call HD: DL 1.5 Mbps 720p: 1.2/1.2 Mbps
1080p: 3.8/3 Mbps
HD: 1.2/1.2 Mbps -1.5/1.5 Mbps 3.2/2.6 Mbps
Standard Definition (SD) conference Not specified 1 Mbps/600 kbps 2 Mbps/128 kbps/2 – 5 Mbps/512 kbps
(5 participants)
150/200 kbps – 2.5/4 Mbps 1.5/1 Mbps
(5 participants)
High Definition (HD) conference DL: 6 Mbps 720P: 2.6/1.8 Mbps
1080p: 3.8/3 Mbps
- 3.2/3.3 Mbps
(5 participants)

Streaming Video

The data rate requirements for typical streaming video services specified by the providers of various popular OTT applications are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4: Data Rate Requirements for Streaming Video Services
Quality and type of Video Streaming Minimum DL data rate [Mbps]
FCC Broadband ([2]) YouTube ([10]) Apple ([14]) Prime Video ([15]) Netflix ([16]) Disney+ ([17]) Hulu ([18])
SD 360p 3-4 0.7 - 1 - - 1.5
SD 480p 1.1 - - -
HD 5-8 2.5 - 5 ≥ 3 5 3
FHD 5 - ≥ 5 6
4K Ultra HD (UHD) 25 20 25 - ≥ 15 25 16

Service-specific Requirements of Regulatory and Industry Organizations

This section summarizes the survey of mobile services and their minimum/recommended data rates, and the required minimum signal strength for different cellular networks (when available), from studies conducted by the regulatory bodies, and industry consortia.

Ofcom (Office of Communications), UK

For 2G, 3G, and 4G networks, the Office of Communications (Ofcom) in UK defines coverage based on the minimum signal strength required to, at a minimum, deliver a 98% probability of making a 90-second telephone call successfully. In the case of 4G specifically, the definition also includes a 95% chance of achieving a download speed of at least 2 Mbit/s ([12] ,[13]). Ofcom expects that a 4G LTE average Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) threshold of -105 dBm is required to meet these requirements ([12] , [13]). This requirement is for the cellular operators to report their coverage, who generate the coverage contours based on a confidence level of 50%. This RSRP threshold of -105 dBm with 50% confidence level corresponds to a RSRP threshold of -115 dBm with 95% confidence level, based on the “location variability of losses” when using the ITU-R P.1812 propagation model [28].

For 5G networks, Ofcom defines coverage based on the minimum signal strength, in terms of the Synchronization Signal RSRP (SS-RSRP), required for devices to establish a reliable 5G connection ([12]). This definition supports a reporting framework for operators suitable for different variants of 5G NR in low, mid, and high frequency bands, without inferring a typical service and performance. Ofcom provides a view of outdoor 5G coverage availability across a range that provides increasing confidence of a reliable 5G connection, from high confidence (where a signal strength of -110 dBm or higher is predicted) to very high confidence (where a signal strength of -100 dBm or higher is predicted). Ofcom associates the high confidence level with at least an 80% probability of coverage being present in the predicted location, and the very high confidence level with around a 95% probability of the same. Since Ofcom expects operators to supply predictions based on a 50% confidence level of coverage being present, Ofcom has worked back from the on-the ground thresholds typically used as the limit for maintaining a 5G connection in order to establish these higher confidence levels. Ofcom particularly accounts for the overall effectiveness of operators’ 5G predictions (prediction error statistics) and local level variability, as well as the differences in performance between various handsets. Ofcom assumes that the combined standard deviation across these effects amounts to ~12 dB which enables establishing signal strengths at which predictions supplied by operators, on a 50% reliability basis from a reasonable prediction model, are likely to align with the high (-110 dBm @80% availability) and very high confidence (-100dBm @95% availability) of coverage in a given location. Ofcom’s compliance prediction method uses the ITU-R P.1812-4 propagation model ([27]). Details of Ofcom compliance prediction method can be found in the section titled “Overview of Ofcom’s compliance model” in [13].

The signal strength thresholds used by Ofcom ([12] Table 5 ) when estimating coverage are summarized in Table 5.

Table 5: Ofcom Mobile Signal Strength Thresholds ([12])
Service Network Metric Outdoor Indoor and in-car
Voice 2G RxLevFootnote 4 -81 dBm -71 dBm
3G CPICHFootnote 5
RSCPFootnote 6
-100 dBm -90 dBm
4G RSRP -105 dBm -95 dBm
Basic data (< 2 Mbps, latency > 100 ms) 3G CPICH
RSCP
-100 dBm -90 dBm
4G RSRP -115 dBm -105 dBm
Enhanced Data (≥ 2 Mbps DL; latency < 100 ms) and voice 4G RSRP -105 dBm -95 dBm
5G high confidence SS-RSRP -110 dBm -
5G very high confidence SS-RSRP -100 dBm -

Commission for Communications Regulation (ComReg), Ireland

ComReg commissioned a study to provide recommendations for appropriate 5G outdoor mobile coverage thresholds and Plum Consulting published a report ([31]) in 2021. According to [31], ComReg’s mapping tool uses the following 2G, 3G and 4G technical thresholds for coverage categorization:

Coverage Categorization 4G (RSRP in dBm) 3G (C-PICH RSCP in dBm) 2G (RxLev in dBm)
Very good -85 ≤ X -75 ≤ X -71 ≤ X
Good -95 ≤ X < -85 -85 ≤ X < -75 -81 ≤ X < -71
Fair -105 ≤ X < -95 -95 ≤ X < -85 -91 ≤ X < -81
Fringe -115 ≤ X < -105 -105 ≤ x < -95 -101 ≤ X < -91
No coverage X < -115 X < -105 X < -101

The document specifies coverage categorization applicable to 4G as follows:

Plum observes that technology differences between 4G and 5G are important factors to consider in the determination of appropriate 5G outdoor mobile coverage thresholds. Plum’s recommendations for outdoor mobile coverage thresholds for 5G consider, to some extent, the different bandwidth in each band, particularly the higher bandwidth available in 3.5 GHz as well as sub-carrier spacing. Plum’s recommended 5G outdoor coverage thresholds at 90% probability are shown in [31] in terms of minimum 5G SS-RSRP in dBm. Given the maturity level of 5G, Plum recommends to ComReg to indicate that 5G contours “…are intended to give an intuitive indication of 5G coverage.” As for bandwidth, Plum assumes:

Table 6: 5G Coverage Thresholds recommended by Plum to ComReg (Table 6.1 in [31])
Coverage Categorization Description < 1 GHz 1.8 GHz & 2.1 GHz 2.3 GHz & 2.6 GHz 3.5 GHz
Very good Strong signal strength with maximum data speeds ≥ -82.8 ≥ -91.7 ≥ -93.3 ≥ -97.4
Good Strong signal strength with good data speeds ≥ -92.8 ≥ -101.7 ≥ -103.3 ≥ -107.4
Fair Fast and reliable data speeds may be attained but marginal data speeds with data dropouts are possible at weaker signal levels. ≥ -102.8 ≥ -111.7 ≥ -113.3 ≥ -117.4
Fringe Marginal or poor data speeds with data disconnections likely to occur ≥ -112.8 ≥ -121.7 ≥ -123.3 ≥ -127.4
No coverage Signal strength in which no coverage is available to consumers < -112.8 < -121.7 < -123.3 < -127.4

FCC (Federal Communications Commission), US

The FCC provides the following broadband speed guidelines for various usage scenarios ([2]):

Activity Minimum Download Speed (Mbps)
General Usage General Browsing and Email 1
Streaming Online Radio < 0.5
VoIP Calls < 0.5
Student 5-25
Telecommuting 5-25
File Downloading 10
Social Media 1
Watching Video Streaming Standard Definition Video 3-5
Streaming High Definition (HD) Video 5-8
Streaming Ultra HD 4K Video 25
Video Conferencing Standard Personal Video Call (e.g., Skype) 1
HD Personal Video Call (e.g., Skype) 1.5
HD Video Teleconferencing 6
Gaming Game Console Connecting to the Internet 3
Online Multiplayer 4

The FCC specifies mobile coverage maps based on the following criteria with a minimum 90% cell edge probability and minimum 50% cell loading factor ([4]):

The FCC specifies the coverage requirements for different technologies but does not adopt a standardized minimum signal strength value as Ofcom does, such as RSRP. The FCC recognizes in [5] that minimum signal strength requirements depend on a large number of variables that influence the link budget analysis, including frequency band, network design, and device operating capabilities. The FCC sought comments on whether it could establish a minimum signal strength parameter value, or range of values, to accommodate such variation (in [5]); but in the end, the FCC decided in [5] not to adopt a standardized minimum signal strength parameter value.  Instead, the FCC requires providers to submit a set of maps showing RSRP in dBm as measured at the FCC-specified height of 1.5 meters above ground level ([29]) from each active cell site.

As additional information in the context of this document, the FCC performed drive testing of 4G LTE networks in 2019 and reported at the time that a minimum 4G LTE RSRP of -105 dBm was required to achieve a DL data rate of ≥ 5 Mbps 80% of the time ([11]).

ARCEP (Autorité de Régulation des Communications Électroniques, des Postes et de la Distribution de la Presse), France

The ARCEP, the France's Electronic Communications, Postal and Print media distribution Regulatory Authority, defines the following criteria for evaluating performance of following usage scenarios as follows ([20]):

ARCEP publishes the results of its annual audit evaluating the quality of the services provided by the mobile operators. An example is shown Figure 1 for mobile internet performance which is based on more than a million measurements taken of 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G networks in Metropolitan France, between mid-May and mid-August 2023 ([20]).

Figure 1: Mobile Internet Performance by Operators in Rural, Medium and High Density Areas ([20])

Long description
Zone Company >3Mbit/s >8Mbit/s >30Mbit/s
Rural zones Bouygues Telecom 71% 62% 41%
Free Mobile 79% 67% 41%
Orange S.A. 83% 74% 53%
SFR (Société Française du Radiotéléphone) 75% 65% 46%
Intermediate zones Bouygues Telecom 90% 83% 70%
Free Mobile 91% 85% 65%
Orange S.A. 94% 91% 84%
SFR 90% 85% 67%
Dense zones Bouygues Telecom 96% 95% 90%
Free Mobile 93% 88% 71%
Orange S.A. 97% 96% 91%
SFR 94% 92% 85%

Similar to the FCC, ARCEP has not adopted any requirements for minimum signal level thresholds associated with these services.

Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC)

The Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) published a document ([30]) in 2018 that provides a useful summary of existing coverage thresholds (to qualify if there is outdoor coverage or not) adopted in different European countries, which is shown in Table 7.

Table 7: Thresholds used in European Countries (Appendix 2 in [30])
Country Regulatory Organization 2G RxLev Threshold 3G UMTS RSCP Threshold 4G LTE RSRP Threshold
Belgium BIPT Not specified Satisfying -105 dBm, Good -95 dBm,
Very good -85 dBm
Satisfying -115 dBm,
Good -105 dBm,
Very good -95 dBm
Bulgaria CRC ≥ -100 dBm ≥ -105 dBm ≥ -110 dBm
Croatia HAKOM -95 dBm > -114 dBm > -115 dBm
Czech Republic CTU 900 MHz: > -93 dBm,
1800 MHz: > -91 dBm
2100 MHz: > -86 dBm 900 MHz: > -109 dBm
1800 MHz: > -107 dBm
2100 MHz: > -106 dBm
2600 MHz: > -105 dBm
Finland FICORA ≥ -90 dBm ≥ -100 dBm ≥ -110 dBm
Greece EETT > -110 dBm > -115 dBm > -125 dBm
Hungary NMHH >-93 dBm > -96 dBm > -110 dBm
Iceland PTA -75 dBm in town, -95 dBm in rural -85 dBm in town, -100 dBm in rural -85 dBm in town, -100 dBm in rural
Lithuania RRT >-95 dBm >-105 dBm >-115 dBm
Macedonia AEC >-95 dBm >-105 dBm >-110 dBm
Norway NKOM >-90 dBm >-100 dBm >-110 dBm
Portugal ANACOM >-105 dBm >-115 dBm >-125 dBm
Romania ANCOM >-92 dBm >-107 dBm >-112 dBm
Serbia RATEL >-95 dBm >-105 dBm >-110 dBm
Slovenia AKOS >-93 dBm >-96 dBm >-108 dBm
Sweden PTS >-99 dBm >-104 dBm >-111 dBm
Turkey ICTA >-104 dBm >-110 dBm Not specified
UK Ofcom >-81 dBm >-100 dBm >-105 dBm

GSMA (Global System for Mobile Communications Association)

VoLTE Call

The Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a widely used metric for assessing quality of a voice call. Standardized by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU-T), MOS refers to a numerical measure of the human-judged overall quality of voice session; it is judged on a scale from 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent) of the perceived quality of a voice call. ITU-T provides the guidelines for quality measurement of VoLTE calls in [28].

GSMA recommends that the bottom 10% MOS value (10th percentile MOS) be used as a metric to assess the quality of network deployment ([19]). The MOS score during a voice call is affected by the codec, transmission latency, jitter, and packet loss. VoLTE supports various voice codecs such as EVS, AMR-WB, and AMR-NB.  The AMR-WB codec supports a data rate of 6.6-23.85 kbps whereas AMR-NB supports a data rate of 4.75-12.2 kbps. Based on the field test data of 23.85 kbps AMR-WB VoLTE calls on a 4G network, GSMA recommends the following minimum signal levels in a 4G network to achieve a target of 10th percentile MOS score ([19]):

10th Percentile MOS Score LTE RSRP (dBm) SINR (dB)
2.5 -112 -4
3 -108 -3
3.5 -103 2

* MOS Score: 1 – bad, 2 – Poor, 3 – Fair, 4 – Good, 5 – Excellent

Recommendations on Mobile Coverage Definition and Metrics

Mobile Coverage Definitions

To provide a detailed characterization of mobile service coverage, it is proposed to define the geographical coverage areas for three different levels of mobile services for outdoor reception conditions:  

Emergency Service (Voice Call, SMS text, Public Warning System)

For Emergency Service, the coverage is defined as the area where:

Basic Service (emergency service plus voice and video calls, and medium data-rate service)

For Basic Service, the coverage is defined as the area where:

Advanced Service (Basic service plus higher data service)

For Advanced Service, the coverage is defined as the area where:

Metrics to Determine Mobile Coverage

The coverage areas could be determined by two set of metrics: the throughput and the received downlink power level.

Metric-1: Service data throughput with latency requirements

This metric could be given to the operators to comply and provide a response; but it would be difficult for an external organization to generate these contours in order to validate them1. Theoretically, the maximum available throughput for a given RSRP level can be calculated; in which case the contours derived from RSRP and throughput would be equivalent.  However, the actual throughput achieved at any particular time and place will depend on many factors – such as the number of users currently connected to the cell and their distribution in space from the transmitter – making it a more difficult metric to validate. 

Metric-2: Downlink received signal power level

This metric provides a simpler way to predict coverage and is the recommended metric. It is assumed that the downlink and uplink are balanced such that any potential uplink power imbalance issue is addressed by the network via mechanisms such as TTI bundling. As such, the metric being considered is the received signal power level for the downlink. This strategy is similar to the one used by Ofcom and is implicitly tied with an assumption of what services are supported. However, individual services may need to be separately verified for a given signal power level threshold.

The indicators of downlink signal power depend on the underlying radio access technology and are measured as follows:

The following signal level thresholds are recommended for various levels of services:

The reasoning and rationale behind these levels are given in below.

Metric-2 for Emergency Service
Metric-2 for Basic Service
Metric-2 for Advanced Service

The identified metrics with their respective thresholds for the different levels of mobile services are summarized in Table 8. For each service level, some example services are also listed with their UL/DL data rate requirements.

Table 8: Metrics and thresholds for coverage assessment for different levels of mobile services
Service Level Examples of Service Minimum UL/DL rate requirements for example services Metric-1: DL/UL Throughput, Latency Metric-2: Downlink power level
Minimum 4G RSRP (dBm) Minimum 5G SS RSRP (dBm)
Outdoor Indoor Outdoor Indoor
Emergency Emergency Voice (VoLTE/VoNR) with 90% MOS score ≥ 2.5 DL/UL 250 kbps

DL/UL: > 250/250 kbps

latency requirement < 150 ms

-110 -100 -110 -100
Point to point Text messaging (SMS) SMS: max 170 bytes per message
Public Warning System broadcast text messages CBS or CMAS 93 bytes per message and up to 15 concatenated messages (total of 1395 bytes)
Basic Basic Email DL: 1 Mbps

DL/UL:
> 3/1 Mbps

Latency < 150 ms

-105 -95 -105 -95
Social Media Messaging with occasional Images DL: 1 Mbps
Voice with 90% MOS score ≥ 3 (VoLTE/VoNR, OTT VoIP) 500/500 kbps
1:1 SD Video Call 1/1 Mbps
1:1 HD Video call 1.5/1.5 Mbps
Basic Web browsing DL: 3 Mbps DL
Advanced HD Video conference call 4/3 Mbps

DL/UL:
> 10/2 Mbps

Latency < 100 ms

-100 - -100 -
Social Media with occasional Images DL: 5 Mbps
HD/FHD Video Streaming DL: 6 Mbps
4K UHD Streaming DL: 25 Mbps
Telecommuting DL: 25 Mbps

5G considerations

It is assumed that legacy low FDD bands, which have much lower bandwidth compared to the new mid and high TDD bands, are expected to be used for emergency voice and basic services in 4G and 5G networks. Hence, the expectation is that there will not be much difference between 4G and 5G thresholds at the cell edge as long as low FDD bands are used. For advanced services, which require higher throughputs, or to increase capacity, 5G networks can utilize mid bands that have much higher bandwidths compared to legacy low bands. Therefore, 5G thresholds may need to be revisited in the future when adequate field data is available in mid bands.

The high bands, such as mmWave bands, which have very large bandwidth are not considered in this technical report. These bands have yet to be licensed or deployed in Canada.

Conclusions

Based on an extensive review of a wide range of mobile broadband services and their quality characterizations both from the telecommunications industry and international regulators, this report proposes a definition of mobile service coverage comprised of three levels of mobile services:

Two metrics are proposed to identify mobile coverage areas corresponding to these metrics: downlink data throughput and the received signal power levels. CRC recommends using received signal power level as it is relatively easy to calculate and measure in the field. Radio access technology dependent radio signal strength levels are the most commonly used criteria to define mobile coverage at this time. The outcome of the survey by BEREC ([30]) shows that 22 out of 33 national regulatory organizations in Europe define received signal power thresholds for the classification of different levels of mobile coverage.

The proposed definition of mobile service coverage, metrics, and the associated recommended thresholds will be used to develop a unified approach to generate the coverage contours for different levels of mobile services that are available to Canadian consumers, based on the latest mobile system deployment status in Canada.

References

  1. ISED, “Canada’s Connectivity Strategy .” Last accessed: May 09, 2024
  2. FCC Broadband Speed Guide
  3. FCC Household Broadband Guide
  4. FCC Broadband Data Collection BDC System User Guide, March 12, 2024
  5. FCC 21-20, “Establishing the Digital Opportunity Data Collection”
  6. Zoom Bandwidth requirements
  7. Skype bandwidth requirements
  8. Microsoft Teams Bandwidth requirements
  9. Google Meet hardware requirements
  10. System requirements & supported devices for YouTube
  11. FCC GN Docket No. 19-367: “MOBILITY FUND PHASE II COVERAGE MAPS INVESTIGATION STAFF REPORT”, Dec 4, 2019
  12. Ofcom Connected Nations 2023: methodology Index
  13. Ofcom Coverage obligations in the 700 MHz and 3.6-3.8 GHz spectrum award - Ofcom’s approach to verifying compliance
  14. Apple TV 4K Requirements
  15. Live Streams on Prime Video
  16. Netflix Internet connection speed recommendations
  17. Disney+ Internet speed recommendations
  18. Hulu Speed Requirements
  19. GSMA 4G/5G Network Experience Evaluation Guideline
  20. ARCEP Mobile Quality of Service in Metropolitan France, October 26, 2023
  21. A Elnashar, MA El-Saidny, M Mahmoud, “Practical performance analyses of circuit-switched fallback and voice over LTE”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 66 (2), 2017
  22. Jia, Yunhan et al, “Performance Characterization and Call Reliability Diagnosis Support for Voice over LTE”. Mobicom15 .
  23. 3GPP TS 43.022, v9.2.0, “Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Functions related to Mobile Station (MS) in idle mode and group receive mode ”, 2010-10.
  24. 3GPP TS 25.304, v.12.6.0, “UMTS; UE Procedures in Idle Mode and Procedures for Cell Reselection in Connected Mode ”, 2015-07.
  25. 3GPP TS 36.304, v.15.3.0, Release 15, “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); User Equipment (UE) procedures in idle mode ”, 2019-05.
  26. 3GPP TS 38.304, “5G NR; User Equipment (UE) procedures in idle mode and in RRC Inactive state ”, Release 16, 2020-07.
  27. Recommendation ITU-R P.1812-4, “A path-specific propagation prediction method for point-to-area terrestrial services in the VHF and UHF bands, ” July 2015.
  28. ITU-T G.1028, “End-to-end quality of service for voice over 4G mobile networks ”.
  29. FCC Rules & Regulations for Title 47
  30.  BEREC BoR (18) 237, “Common Position on information to consumers on mobile coverage ”, 6 December, 2018.
  31. Plum Consulting Document 21é118a, "Coverage thresholds for 5G Services"

Terminologies

Adaptive Multi-Rate Narrow band (AMR-NB): A speech codec that encodes narrowband (200–3400 Hz) signals at variable bit rates ranging from 4.75 to 12.2 kbit/s (4.75, 5.15, 5.90, 6.70, 7.40, 7.95, 10.2, and 12.2 kbps). AMR was adopted as the standard speech codec by 3GPP in October 1999 and is widely used in GSN, UMTS, and LTE networks.

Adaptive Multi-Rate Wideband (AMR-WB):  A speech codec that utilizes the ACELP® (Algebraic Code Excited Linear Prediction) technology, which is also employed in the AMR narrowband. The AMR-WB speech codec consists of nine bit rates of 6.6, 8.85, 12.65, 14.25, 15.85 18.25, 19.85, 23.05, and 23.85 kbps. It is the first codec to be standardized for both wireless (3GPP) and wireline (ITU-T Recommendation G.722.2) applications. It provides improved speech quality due to a wider speech bandwidth of 50–7000 Hz compared to narrowband speech coders.

Enhanced Voice Services (EVS): EVS is a super wideband (20-20000 Hz) codec provides high robustness against delay jitter and packet losses due to its channel aware coding and improved packet loss concealment. EVS was standardized by 3GPP as a successor of AMR-WB. EVS codec supports operating points from narrow band (5.9-24.4 kbps) to full band (16.4-128 kbps).

Mean Opinion Score:  Usually referred to as MOS Score, has been the most commonly used metric to measure the overall voice call quality for decades. Standardized by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU-T), it is a subjective measurement on a scale usually from 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent). MOS testing for VoIP phone networks is defined in the ITU-T PESQ P.862 standard.

4G Reference Signal Received Power (4G RSRP): The linear average power of the 4G resource elements that carry cell-specific reference signals. RSRP measurements are used by mobile for cell selection/re-selection, power control, beam management, mobility procedure such as handover.

5G Synchronization Signal-Reference Signal Received Power (5G SS-RSRP): average power measured over a single resource element of Secondary Synchronization Signal (SSS). SS-RSRP measurements are used for cell selection/re-selection, power control, beam management, mobility procedure such as handover. Mobile uses the minimum RSRP and the RSRQ thresholds broadcast by the 5G network for initial 5G cell selection and subsequent re-selection.

Date modified:
Top