ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter - 8640-B54-200807711

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Letter

Ottawa, 25 June 2008   

File No.:   8640-B54-200807711

By email

Mr. Denis E. Henry
Vice-President, Regulatory Affairs
Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
110 O'Connor Street , 14 th Floor
Ottawa , Ontario
K1P 1H1
regulatory@bell.aliant.ca

Dear Mr. Henry :

Re:   Part VII application for forbearance from the regulation of residential local   exchange services in the exchanges of Goderich and Lucknow, Ontario.

On 30 May 2008, the Commission received the above-mentioned Part VII application by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership.

In Service standards for the disposition of telecommunications applications , Telecom Circular CRTC 2006-11, 7 December 2006, the Commission stated that it would categorize Part VII applications into two types:   Type 1 applications that generally do not involve multiple parties or raise significant policy issues and Type 2 applications that do involve multiple parties and/or raise significant policy issues

The Commission also adopted the following service standards for Part VII applications:

•  Type 1 Part VII applications - 90 percent of determinations to be issued on an interim or final basis within four months of the close-of-record; and

•  Type 2 Part VII applications - 85 percent of determinations to be issued on an interim or final basis within eight months of the close-of-record.

The Commission stated that it would inform applicants, by letter, within 10 days of the end of the comment period for applications, whether the application is considered to be a Type 1 or Type 2 application, and the applicable service standard.

Commission staff has assessed the above application and considers it to be a Type 1 application.   Accordingly, the Commission expects to issue an interim or final determination within four months of the close-of-record.

Yours sincerely,

Original signed by

Mario Bertrand
Acting Director, Competition Implementation and Technology
Telecommunications

cc: Kenneth Engelhart, Rogers Communications Inc.
        Ken.engelhart@rci.rogers.com  
        Ted Woodhead, TELUS Communications Company 
        regulatory.affairs@telus.com  
        Glenn R. Grubb, Huron Telecommunications Co-Operative Limited
       grubb@hurontel.on.ca

Date Modified: 2008-06-25
Date modified: