2009-05-08 - #: 8663-C12-200907321 - Notice of Consultation 2009-261 - Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

File using the On-line Services


Reference files: 8661-C122-200904286 and 8638-C12-200905010


Notice of Consultation 2009-261 Schedule

Activities Deadline Dates
Notice of intention to participate 2010-01-15
Public Hearing 2010-05-31
Submissions 2010-02-08
Interrogatories 2009-07-17
Additional interrogatories 2010-03-01
Responses to interrogatories 2010-04-01 (revised)
Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure 2010-04-09 (revised)
Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure 2010-04-16 (revised)
Request to appear 2010-04-09
Information to be filed pursuant to determination 2010-05-03 (revised)
Comments regarding Usage-based billing 2010-05-25
Final Submissions and comments 2010-06-21

 

List of Related Documents

Section 1 - Commission Documents
a) Notices of Consultation, Decisions, etc.
b) List of Interested Parties
c) Correspondence to Parties
d) Interrogatories

Section 2 - Documents from ILECs, the cable carriers, CISP, Cybersurf, Distributel, OneConnect Canada, and Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
a) Correspondence to the Commission
b) Submissions
c) Interrogatories
d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure
e) Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure    (see Section 5)
f) Request to appear
g) Comments regarding Usage-based billing
h) Finals submissions and comments

Section 4 - Documents from parties
a) Correspondence to the Commission
b) Submissions
c) Interrogatories
d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure
e) Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure    (see Section 5)
f) Comments
g) Finals submissions and comments
h) Request to appear
i) Comments regarding Usage-based billing

Section 5 - Responses to interrogatories

Section 6 - Responses to undertakings

Section 7 - Transcripts

Section 8 - Miscellaneous Documents
a) Costs
b) Others


Section 1a) Notices of Consultation, Decisions, etc.

2011-03-11 - Telecom order CRTC 2011-179 Determination of costs award with respect to the participation of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre in the proceeding leading to Telecom Decision 2010-632
File numbers: 8663-C12-200907321 and 4754-371

2010-11-10 - Telecom Order CRTC 2010-841 Determination of Cost Award Determination of costs award with respect to the participation of Vaxination Informatique in the proceeding leading to Telecom Regulatory Policy 2010-632
File numbers: 8663-C12-200907321 and 4754-370

2010-08-30 - Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-632 Wholesale high-speed access services proceeding
File numbers: 8663-C12-200907321, 8661-C122-200904286, and
8638-C12-200905010

2010-03-12 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-8 Notice of Hearing
Expansion of proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261
Changes to procedure
File numbers: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010, and 8661-C122-200904286

2009-12-23 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7 Notice of hearing
31 May 2010
Gatineau, Quebec
Expansion of proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261
Changes of date of the public hearing
Date of hearing: 31 May 2010
Registration date for parties who have not already registered: 15 January 2010
File numbers: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010 and
8661-C122-200904286

2009-10-27 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-6 Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services
Changes to procedure
File numbers: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010, and 8661-C122-200904286

2009-10-02 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-5 Notice of hearing
11 January 2010 Gatineau, Quebec
Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high‑speed access services
Change of date of the public hearing and changes to procedure
Date of hearing: 11 January 2010
File number: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010 and 8661-C122-200904286

2009-09-02 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-4 Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services
Changes to procedure
File number: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010 and 8661-C122-200904286

2009-08-12 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-3 Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services
Changes to procedure
File number: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010 and 8661-C122-200904286

2009-08-11 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-2 Notice of hearing
7 December 2009 Gatineau, Quebec
Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

Change of date of the public hearing and changes to procedure
Date of hearing: 7 December 2009
File number: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010 and 8661-C122-200904286

2009-08-04 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1 Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services
Changes to procedure
File number: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010 and 8661-C122-200904286


Section 1c) Correspondence to Parties

2011-06-08 - Commission Letter - English Version only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Rogers Communications - RE: Telecom Order CRTC 2011-179 - Determination of costs award with respect to the participation of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre in the proceeding leading to Telecom Decision 2010-632

2010-05-28 – Commission Letter
Description:  Letter addressed to the Distribution List – Re:  Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, High-speed access hearing, Teksavvy’s request for change in process

2010-05-13 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Interested Parties to High Speed Access Proceeding, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, as amended - Re:  Usage-based billing on Third Party Internet Access Service

2010-04-23 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re:  Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the   appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services – Request for disclosure of information filed in confidence and for further responses

2010-04-21 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Interested Parties to High Speed Access Proceeding, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 - Re: Organization and conduct of the oral hearing

2010-03-12 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2010-01-20 - Commission Letter
Description : Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-12-15 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-12-09 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services - Re:  Organization and conduct of the oral hearing

2009-11-20- Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-11-10 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-11-05 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-11-04 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-10-23 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution list - Subject: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 , Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-10-13 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 - Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-10-07 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re:  Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 - Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-10-02 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution list - Re:  Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-09-03 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution list - Subject: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 - Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-08-04 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution list - Subject: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services - Revised process

2009-06-19 - Commission letter
À Description: Letter addressed to Bell Aliant Regional Communications, L.P. - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-06-03 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to MTS Allstream Inc. - Subject: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-06-03 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to SaskTel - Subject: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services


Section 1d) Interrogatories

2010-03-01 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-11-09 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services - Interrogatories - Erratum

2009-11-06 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services - Interrogatories

2009-07-24 - Commission Letter

Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Subject: Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services - Corrections

2009-07-22 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Subject: Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services - Interrogatories


Section 2a) - Correspondence to the Commission

2010-06-04 - Primus Telecommunications Inc.
Description: Oral rebuttal argument
Document: 1402826.doc - 50KB

2010-06-04 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Oral rebuttal argument
Document: 1402803.doc - 67KB

2010-06-03 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Oral rebuttal argument
Document: 1402786.doc - 27KB

2010-06-03 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Oral rebuttal argument
Document: 1402782.doc - 44KB

2010-06-03 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Oral rebuttal argument
Document: 1402774.doc - 49KB

2010-06-03 -MTS Allstream Inc.
Description : Oral rebuttal argument
Document : 1402144.pdf - 336KB

2010-06-03 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers)
Description : Oral rebuttal argumeny
Document : 1402138.pdf - 135KB

2010-06-02 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description : Oral presentation
Document: 1401266.zip - 43KB

2010-06-02 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description : Oral presentation
Document: 1401261.doc - 426KB

2010-06-02 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers)
Description : Oral presentation
Document: 1401103.doc - 92KB

2010-06-01 - Bell Canada
Description: Further to the discussion at the High-Speed Access Proceeding oral hearing on 31 May 2010, attached is a copy of Bell Canada's letter to the Berkman Center for Internet & Society dated
27 May 2010.
Document: 1402583.zip - 279KB

2010-06-01 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description : Oral presentation
Document: 1400749.pdf - 1625KB

2010-06-01 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1400715.doc - 95KB

2010-06-01 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)
Description : Oral presentation
Document: 1400851.pdf - 954KB

2010-05-31 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description : Oral presentation
Document: 1400863.pdf - 641KB

2010-05-31 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description :Oral presentation
Document: 1400874.pdf - 900KB

2010-05-31 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1400689.pdf - 127KB

2010-03-04 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec, Société en commandite and TELUS Communications Company (the ILECs)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec, Société en commandite and TELUS Communications Company (collectively, the ILECs) are seeking a 10-day extension to provide responses to interrogatories until 1 April 2010, an extension which they propose should apply equally to all parties to this proceeding.
Document: 1366683.doc - 234KB

2009-12-04 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) hereby requests the opportunity to participate in the oral hearing component of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services.
Document: 1330137.pdf - 22KB

2009-11-05 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Distributel Communications Limited has received a number of letters from parties to TNC 2009-261 regarding the scope of this proceeding, as well as a letter from the Commission, dated 23 October 2009, and a letter from Commission staff dated 4 November 2009.
Document: 1317388.pdf - 2128KB

2009-11-03 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of a Teksavvy Solutions Inc. (“Teksavvy”) letter, dated 2 November 2009, requesting that the Commission grant Teksavvy and other interested parties the right to pose interrogatories to incumbent local exchange carriers that did not file second round submissions on 30 October 2009.  Primus is also in receipt of the Commission’s notice, dated 2 November 2009, requesting that parties file comments on Teksavvy’s letter by 3 November. Primus hereby files its comments in support of Teksavvy’s request.
Document: 1314377.pdf – 23KB

2009-11-03 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is in receipt of a letter, dated 2 November 2009, from TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) requesting that the Commission revise (for the seventh time) the procedure outlined in the above referenced Notice of Consultation (“the NC”) by allowing parties to pose interrogatories to those incumbent local exchange carriers that did not file second round submissions in this proceeding.  SaskTel is also in receipt of a 2 November 2009 process-related email from Commission staff requesting Comments regarding TSI’s request by 2 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, 3 November 2009.  The following comprises SaskTel’s Comments in this matter.
Document: 1314380.doc – 70KB

2009-11-03 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of a letter from Teksavvy Solutions Inc. (Teksavvy), dated 2 November 2009, in which Teksavvy seeks amendments to the procedure associated with TNC 2009-261.
Document: 1314494.doc– 99KB

2009-11-03 – TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) is in receipt of a letter from TSI dated November 2, 2009 in which TSI wishes for yet another change to the procedure for the proceeding initiated by Notice 2009-261.
Document: 1314497.pdf - 31KB

2009-11-02 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)
Description: CISP is in receipt of a letter dated today from TSI requesting that the procedures of this proceeding allow for the posing of additional interrogatories to the ILECs by November 6th. CISP fully supports this TSI Request.
Document: 1314355.pdf– 47KB

2009-10-13 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff process letter of 7 October 2009, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby submitting its reply to comments on MTS Allstream's request for clarification of the scope of the TNC 2009-261 proceeding, in light of the Commission's having neglected to order Bell Aliant, Bell Canada and Télébec (collectively Bell) and TELUS Communications Company (TELUS) to respond in full to questions asked of them by MTS Allstream, regarding alternative solutions to enable competitive Internet service providers to offer alternatives to all of the end-customers that the incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) are able to serve with their retail Internet service offerings.
Document: 1292684.pdf - 57KB

2009-10-09 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) hereby provide notice of their intention to participate in the oral hearing.
Document: 1288060.pdf - 98KB

2009-10-09 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraphs 28 of TNC 2009-261 and 31 of TNC 2009-261-1, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby notifying the Commission of its intention to appear at the oral hearing scheduled to commence on 11 January 2010.
Document: 1287996.pdf - 57KB

2009-10-09 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of TNC 2009-261-1, Cybersurf Corp. hereby submits notice of its intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence 11 January 2010.
Document: 1287989.doc - 50KB

2009-10-09 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of TNC 2009-261-1, Distributel Communications Limited hereby submits notice of its intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence 11 January 2010.
Document: 1287984.pdf - 29KB

2009-10-09 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of a letter, dated 6 October 2009, submitted by MTS Allstream Inc. (“MTS Allstream”) requesting that the Commission clarify the scope of Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (“TNC 2009-261”) and to direct Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada (together, “Bell”), and TELUS Communications Inc. (“TELUS”) to respond in full to an interrogatory, dated 17 July 2009, posed to them by MTS Allstream. Pursuant to the procedure set out in the Commission's 7 October 2009 letter, Primus hereby submits its comments.
Document: 1288364.pdf - 25KB

2009-10-09 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the Commission in Notice 2009-261, TELUS Communications Company files its notice of intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence on January 11, 2010.
Document: 1288022.pdf - 21KB

2009-10-09 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to a Commission letter, dated 7 October 2009, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are providing comments on a letter dated 6 October 2009, from MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) seeking clarification on the scope of TNC 2009-261, and requesting that the Companies and TELUS Communications Company (TELUS) be directed to provide responses to interrogatories posed by MTS Allstream concerning the latter's proposed non CO-based alternate services.
Document: 1292646.doc - 99KB

2009-10-09 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt of a letter from the Commission staff, dated October 7, 2009. In the letter, Commission staff request comments regarding a letter from MTS Allstream Inc. (“MTS Allstream”), dated October 6, 2009, where MTS Allstream sought “clarification” on the scope Notice 2009-261, and requested that TELUS, Bell Canada, Bell Aliant and Telebec be directed to provide full responses to interrogatory ____(MTS Allstream)17July09-2 (the “interrogatory”).1
Document: 1292622.pdf - 26KB

2009-10-09 - Bell Aliant Regional Communi ca tions, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communi ca tions, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of a letter dated 8  October 2009 from the Cable Carriers (Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc. (on behalf of its affiliate Vidéotron Ltd.)), which makes two requests related to the requirement to submit further responses to interrogatories by 9 October 2009, as contemplated in TNC 2009-261-5.   The following are the Companies' comments on those requests.
Document: 1288350.doc - 88KB

2009-10-09 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is in receipt of a letter, dated 8 October 2009, from Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, “the Cable Carriers”) seeking an extension of the October 9, 2009 date for filing responses to the directives contained in the Commission staff letter dated October 2, 2009
Document: 1287853.doc - 67KB

2009-10-09 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, CISP hereby provides the Commission with its notice to participate in the oral hearing.
Document: 1287575.doc - 26KB

2009-10-09 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP)
Description: In compliance with the Commission Staff process letter dated October 7 th 2009 inviting comments on the proposal of MTS Allstream to clarify the scope of the proceeding with regards to the possibility of regionally aggregated unbundled DSL services, find enclosed in the attachment, the comments of CISP.
Document: 1287550.doc - 117KB

2009-10-08 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) seek an extension of the October 9, 2009 date for filing responses to the directives contained in the Commission staff letter dated October 2, 2009 regarding disclosure and further responses to interrogatories (the Disclosure Letter).
Document: 1287909.pdf - 134KB

2009-10-08 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) is in receipt of a letter from Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc,, Shaw Communications Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., (the “Cable Carriers”) dated October 8, 2009, in relation to the Commission staff letter, dated October 2, 2009, regarding the disclosure and further responses to interrogatories in the above mentioned proceeding. In their letter, the Cable Carriers requested, among other things, the following
Document: 1287684.pdf - 25KB

2009-10-08 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) hereby provide notice of their intention to participate in the oral hearing.
Document: 1286587.doc - 83KB

2009-10-07 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to TNC 2009-261 parties are required to advise the Commission by October 9, 2009 if they request to appear at the hearing. At the present time, key staff are not available to determine whether we will seek attendance at the hearing. As such, we request that the Commission treat this correspondence as a tentative request to appear and we will follow up with the Commission on October 16, 2009 to confirm our intention to appear.
Document: 1286542.html - 3KB

2009-10-07 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) is in receipt of a letter from MTS Allstream, dated 6 October 2009 requesting clarification of the scope of TNC 2009-261. Distributel supports MTS Allstream's request for clarification of the scope of this proceeding.
Document: 1283508.pdf - 30KB

2009-10-06 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is in receipt of the Commission's 2 October 2009 letter addressing parties' requests for disclosure of information for which confidentiality was claimed and for further responses to interrogatories filed in the proceeding initiated by TNC 2009-261.
Document: 1283102.pdf - 66KB

2009-09-03 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) seek clarification of TNC CRTC 2009-261-4, issued on September 2, 2009.
Document: 1266357.pdf - 100KB

2009-08-01 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP)
Description: CISP is in receipt of a letter from Teksavvy dated July 26, as well as a reply letter from Teksavvy dated July 29 following interventions by several parties.
Document: 1250901.doc - 30KB

2009-07-30 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) is in receipt of the 24 July 2009 letter filed by TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (TekSavvay) requesting extensive amendments to the procedures set out in TNC 2009-261. Cogeco is also in receipt on the interventions made by the Consumer Groups, the Canadian Association of Internet Providers, MTS Allstream inc., Execulink Telecom inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI), on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., with respect to this request.
Document: 1250490.pdf - 19KB

2009-07-30 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) is in receipt of a letter from Teksavvy requesting certain amendment to the process set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 (TN 2009-261). Shaw is also in receipt of letters from Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) and Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI) opposing Teksavvy's request.
Document: 1250168.pdf - 77KB

2009-07-29 - Quebecor Media inc. (QMI), for Videotron Ltd.
Description: QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., is in receipt of a letter from Teksavvy requesting extensive amendments to the procedures set out in NC 2009-261.   We are also in receipt of a letter from Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) opposing Teksavvy's procedural requests.
Document: 1250098.doc - 150KB

2009-07-29 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (“MTS Allstream”) is in receipt of a letter from TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TekSavvy”) dated July 24, 2009, requesting that the Commission modify the procedure set out in TNC 2009-261, as well as clarifying that participants will have a right of cross-examination, together with responses thereto from Execulink Telecom Inc. (“Execulink”), Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) and Public Interest Advocacy Centre (“PIAC”).
Document: 1250012.pdf - 69KB

2009-07-28 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) is in receipt of correspondence to the Commission from TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (Teksavvy) dated July 24, 2009 requesting extensive amendments to the procedures set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261;
Document: 1249700.pdf - 51KB

2009-07-23 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is in receipt of a letter from Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) requesting that the Commission extend the deadline for responding to the interrogatories submitted pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (TNC 2009-261) until 11 September 2009.
Document: 1248027.pdf - 61KB

2009-07-23 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec, Société en commandite and TELUS Communications Company (the ILECs)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec, Société en commandite and TELUS Communications Company (collectively the ILECs) are seeking a one month extension to provide responses to interrogatories until 11 September 2009, an extension which they propose should apply equally to all parties to this proceeding. 
Document: 1247958.doc - 114KB

2009-07-23 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) is in receipt of correspondence to the Commission filed by Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) on July 22, 2009 requesting an extension to the timeframe for filing interrogatory responses set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261. Rogers is also in receipt of a letter filed on July 23, 2009 by Bragg Communications Inc. (Bragg) in support of the Shaw request.
Document: 1247956.pdf - 44KB

2009-07-23 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) is in receipt of the 22 July 2009 letter filed by
Shaw Communications Inc. with the Commission requesting an extension of the
filing date for the responses to the interrogatories issued in the above-noted
proceeding. Cogeco is also in receipt of a letter from Bragg Communications
Inc. supporting this extension request.
Document: 1247948.pdf - 19KB

2009-07-23 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Bragg Communications Inc. is in receipt of correspondence to the Commission filed by Shaw Communications Inc. on July 22, 2009 requesting an extension to the timeframe for filing interrogatories issued in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261; Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (TN 2009-261).
Document: 1247635.pdf - 144KB

2009-07-22 - Quebecor Media inc. (QMI), for Videotron Ltd.
Description: Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI), on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (Videotron), is in receipt of a letter from Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) requesting that the Commission extend from 10 August to 11 September 2009 the deadline for responding to interrogatories in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1247945.doc - 150KB

2009-07-22 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: In Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, the Commission has undertaken a review to consider mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services provided by incumbent local exchange carriers and cable carriers. On 17 July 2009, the Commission and interested parties to the proceeding submitted interrogatories.
Document: 1247577.pdf - 86KB

2009-06-11 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., operating as EastLink, (EastLink) is in receipt of a letter filed by Bell Aliant Regional Communications LP, (Bell Aliant) dated June 8, 2009 in relation to the above-noted proceeding. In that letter Bell Aliant is seeking clarification that the determinations in that proceeding will apply to Bragg Communications Inc., carrying on business as EastLink (including the cable systems owned formerly by Persona Communications Corp.)
Document: 1223796.pdf - 118KB

2009-06-10 - Bell Canada
Description: Bell Canada (or the Company) is in receipt of a Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) letter dated 8 June 2009 seeking clarification on a matter of confusion arising from a Commission letter dated 3 June 2009 in the above proceeding. 
Document: 1221735.doc - 49KB

2009-06-08 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) is writing to seek clarification on a matter of confusion arising from a Commission letter dated 3 June 2009 in the above proceeding.  That letter responded to a request from Saskatchewan Telecommunications that Access Cable be made a party to the proceeding. 
Document: 1219974.doc - 50KB

2009-05-22 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is writing to the Commission to seek clarification regarding the scope of the proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, 8 May 2009 (Notice 2009-261).
Document: 1148514.pdf - 265KB

2009-05-14 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is writing in response to paragraphs 14 to 16 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (NC2009-261 or the Notice).
Document: 1129286.pdf - 29KB


Section 2b) Submissions

2010-02-09 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: After filing its submission pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, Expansion of proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, 23 December 2009, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) noticed a problem with the footnotes to Annex 3 contained in the report prepared by Towerhouse Consulting LLP (the "Towerhouse Report"), which was included as Appendix 1 to MTS Allstream's 8 February 2010 submission. MTS Allstream is hereby filing a revision to the pages in question.
Document: 1356699.zip - 939KB

2010-02-08 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. hereby respectfully submit these comments in response to paragraph 15 of Expansion of the proceeding initiated by Telecom
Notice of Consultation 2009-261, Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261-7
Document: 1356584.zip - 128KB

2010-02-08 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Cybersurf Cop. and Alberta 1356382 Ltd. (Cybersurf) hereby files the attached supplemental submissions in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1356457.zip - 77KB

2010-02-08 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 15 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (TNC 2009-261-7), Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are providing, in the attachment hereto, their initial submission with respect to the additional matters raised in TNC 2009-261-7.
Document: 1356424.zip - 109KB

2010-02-08 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 15 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, Expansion of proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, 23 December 2009, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) hereby submits its comments on the matters arising from Order in Council P.C. 2009-2007.
Document: 1356400.zip - 1854KB

2010-02-08 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the directions provided by the Commission in Notice 2009-261-7, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) files its attached Submission in relation to the proceeding initiated by Notice 2009-261-7. TELUS’ Submission includes three Appendices. Appendix 1 contains Comments from Dr. Robert W. Crandall on certain issues raised in Notice 2009-261-7. Appendix 2 contains a White Paper1 that was filed as part of TELUS’ petition to the Governor in Council requesting the variance of Telecom Decision CRTC 2008-117 and the rescission of Telecom Order CRTC 2009-111. Appendix 3 contains Dr. Crandall’s curriculum vitae.
Document: 1356240.zip - 912KB

2010-02-08 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: In accordance with the procedure outlined in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, Expansion of proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits the following Comments.
Document: 1356157.zip - 4588KB

2010-02-08 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Distributel's Comments on Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261 - Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services.
Document: 1356194.pdf - 108KB

2010-02-08 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Please find attached the Comments of Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively the “Cable Carriers”) filed pursuant to TNC CRTC 2009-261-7.
Document: 1356209.zip - 301KB

2009-10-30 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in the Commission’s letter dated 23 October 2009 and Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-6, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (“TNC 2009-261”), Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) hereby submits its comments.
Document: 1314105.pdf – 48KB

2009-10-30 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)
Description: Find enclosed the following second round submission of the Coalition of Internet Service Providers.
Document: 1314323.zip– 3715KB

2009-10-30 - Cybersurf Corp. and Alberta 1356382 Ltd.
Description: Cybersurf Cop. and Alberta 1356382 Ltd. (Cybersurf) hereby file the attached supplemental submissions in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1314339.zip– 581KB

2009-10-30 – MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 27 of TNC 2009-261-1 dated 4 August 2009, as amended by TNC 2009-261-6, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby submitting its additional submission in the merged unbundling proceeding initiated by TNC 2009-261.
Document: 1311924.pdf – 1123KB

2009-10-30 – Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 2 of TNC 2009-261-6, concerning changes to procedure and Commission staff letter dated 23 October 2009, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) hereby submits its second comments concerning TNC 2009-261.
Document: 1312076.pdf –  52KB

2009-10-30 – Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Please find attached the Joint Supplemental Comments of Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively the “Cable Carriers”) filed pursuant to TNC CRTC 2009-261 as amended.
Document: 1312182.zip – 433KB

2009-06-22 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Please find attached the Initial Comments of Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) filed pursuant to paragraphs 19 and 21 of the above-noted Telecom Notice of Consultation. Please note that Rogers’ response to Appendix 2, part c) of the notice is being filed under separate cover jointly with Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd.
Document: 1231943.zip - 147KB

2009-06-22 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Please find attached the Joint Comments of Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively the “Cable Carriers”) filed in response to the questions posed by the Commission in Appendix 2, part c) in the above-noted public proceeding.
Document: 1231772.zip - 169KB

2009-06-22 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 19 and Appendix 1 of TNC 2009-261 dated 8 May 2009, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits in the attached its initial submission in the above-noted proceeding.

Document: 1231747.zip - 244KB

2009-06-22 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)
Description: Please find in the enclosed attachment, the initial submission & comments of the Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. in the above captioned proceedings.   Further please find enclosed in Appendix 1 to the attachment a copy of the evidence, which CISP will rely upon, in support of its rationale in this proceeding.   The evidence was prepared by Dr. Stephen Barnes, Adjunct Professor, Interdisciplinary Telecommunications Program, College of Engineering , University of Colorado ( Boulder , CO ).   This evidence was prepared on behalf of Quebec Coalition of Internet Service Providers (CISP) and originally filed with the Commission in March 2007
Document: 1231641.zip (revised) - 623KB

2009-06-22 - Cybersurf Corp. and Alberta 1356382 Ltd.
Description: Cybersurf Cop. and Alberta 1356382 Ltd. (Cybersurf) hereby file the attached initial submissions in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1231611.zip - 82KB

2009-06-22 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 19 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services , please find attached the submission of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies).
Document: 1231386.zip - 7332KB

2009-06-22 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: In accordance with the procedure outlined in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services , Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits the following Comments.
Document: 1231292.zip - 126KB

2009-06-22 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 19 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009- 261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Bragg Communications Inc., (“Bragg”) hereby submits its initial submission.
Document: 1231268.zip - 477KB

2009-06-22 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) hereby provides its initial comments concerning Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (TNC 2009-261).
Document: 1231254.pdf - 72KB

2009-06-22 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation 209-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriatness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (TNC 2009-261), Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus) hereby files its initial comments.
Document: 1231126.pdf - 33KB

2009-06-22 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 19 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) herein files its initial comments.
Document: 1231116.zip - 282 KB

2009-06-22 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the directions provided by the Commission in Notice 2009-261, TELUS Communications Company files its attached Submission.
Document: 1230985.zip - 114KB

2009-06-22 - Quebecor Media inc. (QMI), for Videotron Ltd.
Description: QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (Videotron), is pleased to provide the enclosed initial submission on the issues raised in NC 2009-261.
Document: 1230614.pdf - 171KB

2009-06-22 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 19 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby submits on behalf of its subsidiary Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. its initial submission.
Document: 1230618.pdf - 148KB


Section 2c) - Interrogatories

2010-03-01 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc.
Description: Find enclosed in appendix 1 to this letter, additional interrogatories as per the procedures set in TNC2009-261-7 issued by CISP to Incumbent local exchange and cable carriers.
Document: 1365378.doc - 39KB

2010-03-01 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 16 of TNC 2009-261-7, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. is addressing the interrogatories in the attached appendices to the following corresponding parties:
Document: 1365362.zip - 84KB

2010-03-01 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedure established by the Commission in the above-noted
proceeding, Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. hereby files its interrogatories
addressed to other parties in this proceeding.
Document: 1365352.zip - 69KB

2010-03-01 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the Commission in Notice 2009-261-7, please find attached interrogatories from TELUS Communications Company addressed to the following parties:
Document: 1365349.pdf - 38KB

2010-03-01 - Bell Aliant Telecommunications Regional, Limited Patnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 16 of TNC 2009-261-7, please find attached interrogatories addressed by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies.
Document: 1365344.zip - 62KB

2010-03-01 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 16 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the following interrogatories:
Document: 1365338.zip - 94KB

2010-03-01 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 16 of TNC 2009-261, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) hereby submits the attached interrogatories to the following parties:
Attachment 1: Cable Carriers; Cogeco Cable Inc (Cogeco), Rogers Communications
Inc (Rogers), Eastlink, Shaw Communications (Shaw) and Vidéotron Ltée (Vidéotron) Attachment 2: Bell Attachment 3: Telus
Document: 1365332.zip - 113KB

2010-03-01 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Companies)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) submit the attached interrogatories addressed to various parties as listed below, pursuant to paragraph 16 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7.
Document: 1365309.zip - 92KB

2009-11-06 – Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 28 of TNC 2009-261, as amended, please find attached interrogatories addressed by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies).
Document: 1318350.zip – 53KB

2009-11-06 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Companies)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Companies) submit the attached second round interrogatories addressed to various parties as listed below, pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, as amended.
Document: 1318438.zip – 125KB

2009-11-06 – Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 28 of TNC 2009-261, as amended, please find attached interrogatories of Cybersurf Corp.
Document: 1318462.zip – 44KB

2009-11-06 – The Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP)
Description: Find enclosed the following 2nd round interrogatories to the Cable Carriers.
Document: 1318521.zip – 104KB

2009-07-17 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)
Description: Please find in the enclosed attachment, the interrogatories of the Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc.
Document: 1244833.zip - 16KB

2009-07-17 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the Commission in Notice 2009-0261, please find attached interrogatories from TELUS addressed tothe following parties.

Document: 1244826.pdf - 111KB

2009-07-17 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 17 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Cybersurf Corp. submits the attached interrogatories to each of Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc. (on behalf of its affiliate, Videotron Ltd.), Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc.
Document: 1244812.zip - 49KB

2009-07-17 - Bell Aliant Telecommunications Regional, Limited Patnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 22 of TNC 2009-261, please find attached interrogatories addressed by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively the Companies).
Document: 1244792.zip - 89KB

2009-07-17 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in the above-noted proceeding, Primus hereby files its interrogatories addressed to other parties in this proceeding.
Document: 1244771.zip - 36KB

2009-07-17 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Companies)
Description: Bragg Communications, Cogeco Cable, Rogers Communications, Shaw Communications and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Companies) submit the attached interrogatories addressed to various parties as listed below, pursuant to paragraph 22 of Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261.

Document: 1244756.zip - 144KB

2009-07-17 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 22 of TCN 2009-261, Distributel hereby submits the attached interrogatories to the following parties:
Document: 1244748.pdf - 106KB

2009-07-17 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  In accordance with paragraph 22 of Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261, MTS Allstream submits the following interrogatories
Document: 1244733.pdf - 157KB


Section 2d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure

2010-04-09 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedure established by the Commission in Notice 2009-261-8, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) files the following request for further responses to interrogatories posed to British Columbia Broadband Association (“BCBA”), on March 1, 2010.
Document: 1379423.pdf - 21KB

2009-11-27 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP)
Description: Find enclosed the following deficiency requests for the 2nd round interrogatories of CISP.
Document: 1327321.zip - 128KB

2009-09-15 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 24 of TNC 2009-261, Cybersurf Corp. (Cybersurf) hereby submits the following requests for public disclosure of information filed in confidence and for further responses to interrogatories.
Document: 1271691.doc - 78KB

2009-09-15 - Distributel Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out at paragraph 24 of Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261-4, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) is hereby filing its requests for further responses to its 17 July 2009 interrogatories. Distributel has identified three areas where further responses are required:
Document: 1271477.pdf - 37KB

2009-09-15 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)
Description: Please find in the enclosed attachment, the following deficiency requests of the Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc.
Document: 1271340.zip - 16KB

2009-09-15 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively the Companies) are requesting a number of further responses to the interrogatories the Companies addressed on 17 July 2009.
Document: 1271413.pdf - 107KB

2009-09-15 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Companies)
Description: Pursuant to TNC 2009-261 as amended, Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Companies) submit requests, as set out in the attachments, for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed.
Document: 1271487.zip - 82KB

2009-09-15 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedure established by the Commission in Notice 2009-261, as amended, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) files the following requests for further responses to the interrogatories posed to parties on July 17, 2009.
Document: 1271497.pdf - 33KB

2009-09-15 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures identified at paragraph 24 of TNC 2009-261, as modified by TNC 2009-261-4, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the following requests for further responses to certain interrogatories identified in the Attachment.
Document: 1271666.pdf - 59KB


Section 2e) Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure

(see Section 5)


Section 2f) Request to appear

2010-04-09 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 22 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) hereby provide notice of their intention to participate in the oral hearing.
Document: 1379132.pdf - 98KB

2010-04-08 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 22, of TNC 2009-261-7 & in follow-up to its original intent to participate in the oral hearing, dated October 9, 2009, CISP hereby reaffirms its intent to participate in the oral hearing commencing May 31, 2010.
Document: 1379096.doc - 26KB

2010-04-08 - Quebecor Media Inc. for Videotron
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 22 of NC 2009-261-7, Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., hereby provides notice of its intention to participate at the oral hearing scheduled to commence on 31 May 2010.
Document: 1379075.pdf - 24KB

2010-04-08 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 22 of TNC 2009-261-7, Cogeco Cable Inc. hereby provides notice of its intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence on 31 May 2010.
Document: 1379055.pdf - 17KB

2010-04-08 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 22 of TNC 2009-261-7, Distributel Communications Limited hereby submits notice of its intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence 31 May 2010.
Document: 1379041.pdf - 29KB

2010-04-08 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out by the Commission in paragraph 22 of
Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, Expansion of proceeding
initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261, Primus Telecommunications
Canada Inc. hereby files notice of its intention to appear and participate in the oral
hearing scheduled to commence on 31 May 2010.
Document: 1379028.doc - 21KB

2010-04-08 - SaskTel Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: In accordance with procedure outlined in paragraph 22 of Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, 23 December 2009, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) hereby provides notice of its intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence on 31 May 2010.
Document: 1379016.doc - 65KB

2010-04-08 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 22 of Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261-7, Shaw Communications Inc (Shaw) hereby provides notification of its intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence on May 31, 2010.
Document: 1378998.pdf - 65KB

2010-04-08 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 22 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) hereby provide notice of their intention to participate in the oral hearing.
Document: 1378980.doc - 82KB

2010-04-07 - MST Allstream Inc.
Description: In its 22 June 2009 submission, MTS Allstream made a proposal for a workable solution that will enable competitive Internet service providers to offer alternatives to the retail Internet services offered by the incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs), to all of the end-users that the ILECs are able to serve, in an efficient and effective manner. This same solution would also ensure that there would be sufficient competition to protect the interests of the users. Consequently, MTS Allstream wishes to have the opportunity to provide greater insights into its proposals.
Document: 1379140.html - 3KB

2010-04-07 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the Commission in Notice 2009-261-7, TELUS Communications Company files its notice of intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence on May 31, 2010.
Document: 1378954.pdf - 21KB

2010-02-08 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Cybersurf Cop. and Alberta 1356382 Ltd. (Cybersurf) hereby files the attached supplemental submissions in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1380030.doc - 43KB


Section 2g) Comments regarding Usage-based billing

2010-05-25 - Cybersurf Corp and Alberta 1356382 LTD.
Description: Cybersurf Corp and Alberta 1356382 LTD. (Cybersurf) is in receipt of a May 13th Letter from the Commission calling for comments on the application of Decision 2010-255 Usage Based Billing (UBB) on ISPs utilizing cable company provided Third Party Access (TPIA).
Document: 1397570.doc - 56KB

2010-05-25 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff letter dated 13 May 2010, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are providing their comments on the issue identified in the Commission's letter:  whether the cable companies' Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) service should be subject to the same measures regarding equivalent treatment as were found to be appropriate with respect to the Companies' Internet traffic management practice (ITMP) in Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-255, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada – Applications to introduce usage-based billing and other changes to Gateway Access Services (Decision 2010-255) dated 6 May 2010.
Document: 1397565.doc - 107KB

2010-05-25 – Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: In accordance with procedure outlined in the Commission staff letter of 13 May, 2010, regarding Usage-based billing on Third Party Internet Access Service, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits the following Comments.
Document: 1397447.doc – 94KB

2010-05-25 – Distributel Communications Limited
Description: In accordance with Commission staff's letter dated 13 May 2010, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) is filing these comments on whether the cable companies’ Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) service should be subject to the same measures regarding equivalent treatment as were found to be appropriate with respect to the Bell companies’ Internet Traffic Management Practices (ITMPs) in Decision 2010-255.
Document: 1397449.pdf – 36KB

2010-05-25 – MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: On 6 May 2010, the Commission issued a decision1 approving applications by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, Bell) to introduce usage-based billing (UBB) for Bell's wholesale Residence Gateway Access Service (GAS), subject to a number of conditions. On 13 May 2010, Commission staff issued a letter requesting that parties to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, 8 May 2009 (TNC 2009-261), comment on whether the cable incumbents’ Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) services should be subject to the same measures approved in the Bell UBB Decision. The following constitutes the comments of MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) on this matter.
Document: 1397451.pdf – 59KB

2010-05-25 – Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) hereby file their comments in response to the Commission’s letter of May 13, 2010 regarding Usage-based Billing (UBB) on Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) service.
Document: 1397453.pdf – 137KB

2010-05-25 – TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) files these Comments in response to a Commission staff letter dated May 13, 2010. In that letter, parties were asked to file comments regarding whether the cable companies’ TPIA service should be subject to the same measures regarding equivalent treatment for customers as the Commission required Bell Canada and Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (“Bell”) to implement for their wholesale and retail ADSL services in Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada – Applications to introduce usage-based billing and other changes to Gateway Access Services, Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-255 (“Decision 2010-255”).
Document: 1397455.pdf – 106KB


Section 2h - Final Submissions and comments

 

2010-06-21 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) provides the following correction to its Final Submission filed on June 21, 2010.
Document: 1412508.pdf - 82KB

2010-06-21 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: These final comments are submitted by Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) in accordance with the procedures set out in TNC 2009-261-7.
Document: 1411301.pdf - 88KB

2010-06-21 - Cybersurf Corp. and Alberta 1356382 Ltd.
Description: Cybersurf Cop. and Alberta 1356382 Ltd. (Cybersurf) hereby file the attached Final Argument in the above-noted proceeding
Document: 1411287.doc - 201KB

2010-06-21 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) hereby provide their Final Comments in the High-Speed Access Proceeding.
Document: 1411240.zip - 767KB

2010-06-21 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  In accordance with the directions provided by the Commission in Notice 2009-261, TELUS Communications Company (TELUS or the Company) files its attached Final Submission.
Document: 1411113.zip - 145KB

2010-06-21 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) submit the attached Final Argument pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 as amended
Document: 1411077.zip - 440KB

2010-06-21 - Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)
Description: Find enclosed a copy of the final submissions and comments of the CISP in the present proceeding
Document: 1410862.zip - 40KB

2010-06-21 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in the above noted proceeding, Primus
Telecommunications Canada Inc. hereby files its final submission
Document: 1410815.zip - 99KB

2010-06-21 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 23 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261-7, 23 December 2009 (The Expanded TNC), MTS Allstream is hereby submitting its final comments in the proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261.
Document: 1410788.zip - 941KB

2010-06-21 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: In accordance with the procedure outlined in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-8, Expansion of proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits the following Comments
Document: 1410758.zip - 74KB

2010-06-18 - Electronicbox
Electronic Box is an independent provider located in the province of Quebec that offer Voice and Data services through Cable facilities (TPIA), DSL facilities or metropolitan Fiber Optic networks. Our userbase consist of business customers, home offices and residential customers.
Document: 1410995.pdf - 276KB


Section 4a) Correspondence to the Commission

2010-06-04 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Oral rebuttal argument
Document: 1402793.doc - 47KB

2010-06-03 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Oral rebuttal argument
Document: 1402790.doc - 62KB

2010-06-03 - Vaxination Informatique
Description : Oral rebuttal argument
Document : 1402145.pdf - 3610KB

2010-06-03 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description : Oral rebuttal argument
Document : 1402143.pdf - 350KB

2010-06-03 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description : Oral rebuttal argument
Document : 1402142.pdf - 646KB

2010-06-01 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description : Oral presentation
Document : 1400726.pdf - 1670KB

2010-06-01 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description : Oral presentation
Document : 1400848.pdf - 1048KB

2010-06-01 - Vaxination Informatique
Description : Oral presentation
Document : 1400889.pdf - 136KB

2010-05-31 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), as counsel for the Consumer Groups
hereby withdraws its request dated May 28, 2010 to change the date of its presentation
to Thursday, June 3, 2010. Therefore we request a return to our originally scheduled
presentation time on June 2, 2010
Document: 1402056.pdf - 175KB

2010-05-31 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1397857.pdf - 788KB

2010-05-31 -Teksavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Oral presentation
Document: 1397871.pdf - 554KB

2010-05-31 - Teksavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Attached is the CV of Dr. Annemijn van Gorp, who will be appearing on behalf
of Teksavvy Solutions Inc. at the public consultation being held in this proceeding.
Document: 1402576.zip - 64KB

2010-05-28 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: In its directions on procedure in the above-referenced proceeding issued on April 21, 2010, the Commission requested participants in the upcoming hearing to provide a record of appearance, including the names and positions of the representatives who will appear on their behalf.
Document: 1402629.doc - 26KB

2010-05-26 - Teksavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: In the course of reviewing the record of this proceeding in advance of the hearing, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) discovered some minor errors in some of its prior materials. By way of this submission, TSI is filing corrections to the pages containing and affected by those errors as follows:
Document: 1397820.zip - 389KB

2010-05-25 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is filing this letter to request a modification to the procedure set out in TNC 2009-261-7. More specifically, TSI is requesting that the Commission reinstitute a written reply submission stage as originally contemplated in TNC 2009-261.
Document: 1397416.pdf - 19KB

2010-03-11 - Open Source Solutions (OSS)
Description: Open Source Solutions (OSS) is in receipt of a letter dated 04 March 2010 filed by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec, Société en commandite and TELUS Telecommunications Company (collectively, the ILECs) seeking a 10-day extension to provide responses to interrogatories until 1 April 2010, an extension which they propose should apply equally to all parties to this proceeding.
Document: 1369100.pdf - 212KB

2009-12-15 - RipNET Limited
Description: Be advised that RipNET LImited hereby withdraws its request to appear the the Public Hearing.  Please confirm receipt of this email.
Document: 1336179.doc - 46KB

2009-11-03 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf of itself and Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Managed Network Systems Inc., and Telnet Communications (the Competitors)
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009, this letter is submitted by the Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf of itself and Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Managed Network Systems Inc., and Telnet Communications (collectively, the “Competitors”).
Document: 1314371.pdf - 121KB

2009-11-02 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is making these representations in order to ask the Commission for the right to pose interrogatories to those incumbent local exchange carriers that did not file any second round submissions in this proceeding.
Document: 1314349.pdf - 21KB

2009-11-02 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (Execulink) is in receipt of a letter from TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (TekSavvy), dated 2 November 2009 requesting the right to pose interrogatories to those incumbent local exchange carriers that did not file any second round submissions in this proceeding.
Document: 1314368.pdf - 23KB

2009-10-15 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, this is to confirm that the Consumer Groups wishes to participate in the oral hearing.
Document: 1296466.doc - 75KB

2009-10-09 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the CRTC in Notice 2009-261, the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) files its notice of intention to participate in the oral hearing.
Document: 1288077.pdf - 117KB

2009-10-09 - RipNet Limited
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of TNC 2009-261-1, RipNET Limited hereby submits notice of its intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence 11 January 2010.
Document: 1288069.pdf - 1567KB

2009-10-09 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of TNC 2009-261-1, Execulink Telecom Inc. hereby submits notice of its intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to
commence 11 January 2010.
Document: 1288027.pdf - 21KB

2009-10-09 - Open Source Solutions (OSS)
Description: Open Source Solutions (OSS) is in receipt of a letter from the CRTC, reference number 8663-C12-200907321, dated 02-October-2009 which addresses requests for disclosure of information for which confidentiality was claimed and for further responses to interrogatories to interested parties filed in the proceeding are to be filed with the Commission, and served on all interested parties, by 9 October 2009.
Document: 1293045.pdf - 245KB

2009-10-09 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of
mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. hereby provide notice of its intention to participate in the oral hearing.
Document: 1288017.pdf - 16KB

2009-10-09 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: TekSavvy Solutions Inc. ("TSI") is in receipt of a submission dated 6 October 2009 from MTS Allstream Inc. ("MTSA") regarding the scope of the above-cited proceeding.
Document: 1288356.pdf - 20KB

2009-10-09 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: The Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) is in receipt of a letter from MTS Allstream, dated 6 October 2009 seeking clarification of the scope of TNC 2009-261.
Document: 1287965.pdf - 120KB

2009-10-09 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (Execulink) is in receipt of is in receipt of a letter from MTS Allstream, dated 6 October 2009 requesting clarification of the scope of TNC 2009-261.
Document: 1287880.pdf - 76KB

2009-10-09 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is in receipt of a letter dated October 8, 2009 from Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the “Cable Carriers”).
Document: 1287864.pdf - 60KB

2009-07-30 - Accelerated Connections Inc., egate Networks, Managed Networks Services, Telnet Communications (the Competitors)
Description: This submission is being filed by Accelerated Connections Inc., Managed Networks Services, Inc., and Telnet Communications (the “Competitors”).
Document: 1250192.pdf - 161KB

2009-07-29 - RipNET Limited
Description: RipNET Limited (RipNET) is in receipt of a letter from Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) requesting an extension to September 11, 2009 for the filing of responses to interrogatories posed by the Commission and other parties on July 17, 2009.
Document: 1249685.pdf - 1450KB

2009-07-29 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TekSavvy”) is in receipt of a letter from Rogers
Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) dated July 28, 2009 opposing TekSavvy's request for changes to the procedure of this proceeding.
Document: 1249666.pdf - 194KB

2009-07-29 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: The Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) is in receipt of a letter from Shaw Communications Inc. (“Shaw”) requesting an extension of (to September 11, 2009) for the filing of responses to interrogatories posed by the Commission and other parties on July 17, 2009.
Document: 1248595.pdf - 532KB

2009-07-27 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Consumer Groups are in receipt of a letter, issued 24 July 2009, from counsel for TekSavvy Solutions Inc. ("TekSavvy") requests that the Commission alter the process in this proceeding by: (1) adding a second round of submissions; (2) adding a second round of interrogatories and, (3) permitting cross-examination by parties and the Commission of witnesses under oath at the oral hearing.
Document: 1248578.doc - 124KB

2009-07-27 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. ("Execulink") is in receipt of a letter from Shaw Communications Inc. ("Shaw") requesting a one month extension (to September 11, 2009) to the time that parties have for filing and serving responses to interrogatories posed by the Commission and other parties on July 17, 2009.
Document: 1248454.doc - 48KB

2009-07-24 - Teksavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TekSavvy”) is in receipt of a letter from Shaw Communications Inc. (“Shaw”) requesting a one month extension (to September 11, 2009) to the time that parties have for filing and serving responses to interrogatories posed by the Commission and other parties on July 17, 2009.
Document: 1248491.pdf - 209KB

2009-07-24 - Open Internet Solutions (OSS)
Description: Open Source Solutions (OSS) is in receipt of the 22 July 2009 letter filed by Shaw Communications Inc. with the Commission requesting extension of the filing date for the responses to the interrogatories issued in this proceeding. OSS is also in receipt of letters from both Bragg Communications Inc. and Cogeco Cable Inc. supporting this extension request.
Document: 1249662.pdf - 87KB


Section 4b) Submissions

2010-05-26 - Teksavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: In the course of reviewing the record of this proceeding in advance of the hearing, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) discovered some minor errors in some of its prior materials. By way of this submission, TSI is filing corrections to the pages containing and affected by those errors as follows:
Document: 1397820.zip - 389KB

2010-02-08 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: With this submission, Vaxination Informatique joins 2009-261 public consultation process due to its wider mandate which will help shape the whole ISP industry.
Document: 1356660.pdf - 666KB

2010-02-08 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: Further to the Commission’s directions on procedure set out in Expansion of proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261, issued 23 December 2009 (TNC 2009-261-7), the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (“PIAC”) on behalf of the Consumers’ Association of Canada and Canada Without Poverty (formerly the National Anti-Poverty Organization) (“the Consumer Groups”) is pleased to provide the Commission with the following comments on the issues raised in TNC 2009-261-7.
Document: 1356649.pdf - 191KB

2010-02-08 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 15 of TNC 2009-261-7, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is hereby filing the following submissions with the Commission:
Document: 1356611.zip - 4476KB

2010-02-08 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf of itself and Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Managed Network Systems Inc., and Telnet Communications (the Competitors)
Description: This submission is filed by the Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections, EGATE Networks Inc., Managed Network Systems Inc. and Telnet Communications (collectively, the “Competitors”)
Document: 1356541.pdf - 235KB

2010-02-08 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (“Execulink”) is in receipt of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7 which expanded the proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 to include consideration of matters arising from Order in Council P.C. 2009-2007.
Document: 1356415.pdf - 107KB

2009-02-08 - British Columbia Broadband Association
Description: The BC Broadband Association (legal registered name is BCBA Broadband Association of British Columbia) is a group of telecommunications service providers, equipment suppliers and infrastructure constructors committed to building and delivering advanced networking services and infrastructure throughout all regions of British Columbia.
Document: 1356217.doc - 99KB

2009-10-30 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf of itself and Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Managed Network Systems Inc., and Telnet Communications (the Competitors)
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009, this letter is submitted by the Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf of itself and Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Managed Network Systems Inc., and Telnet Communications (collectively, the “Competitors”).
Document: 1314204.pdf– 304KB

2009-10-30 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 27 of TNC 2009-261, as amended, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is hereby filing the following submissions with the Commission:
Document: 1314164.zip – 513KB

2009-10-30 – Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description:  Further to the Commission’s directions on procedure set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-5, issued 2 October 2009, and in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-6, dated 27 October 2009 at para. 2, the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (“PIAC”), the Consumers’ Association of Canada and Canada Without Poverty (formerly the National Anti-Poverty Organization) (“the Consumer Groups”) are pleased to provide the Commission with the following second-round comments on the issues raised by TNC 2009-261.
Document: 1312100.pdf – 233KB

2009-10-30 – Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (“Execulink”) is in receipt of a CRTC Staff letter dated 23 October 2009 which changed the deadline for filing comments to 30 October 2009.
Document: 1312135.pdf – 78KB

2009-06-22 - Open Source Solutions (OSS)
Description: Open Source Solutions (OSS) is a corporation registered in 2002 in the province of British Columbia and was founded to provide regional Internet Service Providers (ISP) in British Columbia a common voice. OSS primary area of business is providing IP connectivity to various government locations through its shareholders and subcontractors.
Document: 1232479.doc - 197KB

2009-06-22 - ABC Communications
Description: ABC Communications (ABC) has been involved in the Canadian telecommunication industry for 20 Years.  We have built our network using wholesale services from the incumbent British Columbia ILEC, TELUS Communications.   We have found TELUS to be a fair and reliable partner in providing us with the necessary access to provide service to our urban and rural customers.  
Document: 1231980.doc - 46KB

2009-06-22 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: This submission is filed by the Canadian Association of Internet Providers1 on behalf Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections (collectively, the “Competitors”) in connection with the above-noted proceeding which was initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 (“TNC 2009-261”), dated 8 May 2009.
Document: 1232737.pdf (revised) - 188KB

2009-06-22 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti- Poverty Organization (the "Consumer Groups") are pleased to enclose their comments on the above-noted matter.
Document: 1230609.zip - 601KB

Section 4c) Interrogatories

2010-03-02 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Notice of Consultation 2009-261 Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services
Document: 1365385.pdf - 166KB

2010-03-01 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: In accordance with the Commission’s directions on procedure in TNC 2009-261-7, the Consumer Groups are pleased to attach the following interrogatory.
Document: 1365293.pdf - 27KB

2009-11-06 – TekSavvy Solutions inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 28 of TNC 2009-261, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. is addressing the interrogatories in the attached appendices to the following corresponding parties:
Document: 1318619.zip – 36KB

2009-08-12 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: On July 17, 2009 interrogatories were filed on behalf of the Consumer Groups re: the above-noted Notice of Consultation.  It has just been brought to our attention that for interrogatory no 1 we anadvertently omitted a date on both the question and on the table.
Document: 1259114.pdf - 48KB

2009-07-17 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description:  With respect to the above-noted Telecom Notice of Consultation, please find attached interrogatories addressed to interested parties, as specified therein, on behalf of Consumer Groups.
Document: 1244886.pdf - 278KB

2009-07-17 - Teksavvy Solutions Inc.
Description:  The attached interrogatories are being filed with the Commission in the proceeding conducted pursuant to TNC 2009-261 on behalf of the Teksavvy Solutions Inc.
Document: 1244857.zip - 896KB

2009-07-17 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) for the Competitors
Description:  In accordance with paragraph 22 of the above-referenced Notice, CAIP, on behalf of Acana Inc., Accelered Connection, eagle.ca, egate Networks, Execulink Telecom, MNSi Internet and Telnet Communications (Collectively the Competitors) submits the following interrogatories.
Document: 1244828.pdf - 239KB


Section 4d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure

2010-04-09 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Pursuant to TNC 2009-261, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is filing its requests for disclosure of information filed in confidence and for further responses to certain interrogatories.
Document: 1379529.pdf - 46KB

2009-11-27 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Pursuant to TNC 2009-261, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is filing its requests for disclosure of information filed in confidence and for further responses to certain interrogatories.
Document: 1327341.pdf - 39KB

2009-09-15 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre(PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization (the “Consumer Groups”) are pleased to enclose their Requests for Further Responses to Interrogatories in the above-noted matter.
Document: 1271360.zip - 34KB

2009-09-15 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 24 of TNC 2009-261, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TekSavvy”) is filing its requests for disclosure of information filed in confidence and for further responses to certain interrogatories
Document: 1271680.pdf - 111KB

2009-09-15 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) for Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Execulink Telecom, Managed Network Systems Inc., and Telnet Communications (the Competitors)
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 (as amended), the following requests for disclosure and further responses to interrogatories are submitted by the Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf of itself as well as Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Execulink Telecom, Managed Network Systems Inc., and Telnet Communications (collectively, the “Competitors”).
Document: 1271719.pdf - 551KB


Section 4e) Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure

(see section 5)


Section 4f) Comments

Comments received electronically


Section 4g) Final Submissions and Comments

2010-06-22 - The Internet Centre Inc.
Description:  The Internet Centre provides comments within this hearing regarding access to unloaded copper.
Document: 1411545.pdf - 123KB

2010-06-21 - Open Source Solutions (OSS)
Description:  Pursuant to the procedures set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, the Open Source Solutions (OSS) hereby files our final submission
Document: 1411499.pdf - 281KB

2010-06-21 - ABC Communications
Description:  Pursuant to the procedures set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, A.B.C. Allen Business Communications (ABC Communications) hereby files our final submission.
Document: 1411489.pdf - 195KB

2010-06-21 - British Columbia Broadband Association
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, the British Columbia Broadband Association (BCBA) hereby files our final submission.
Document: 1410151.pdf - 179KB

2010-06-21 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Vaxination Informatique's final reply for the 2009-261 final process.
Document: 1411308.pdf - 1562KB

2010-06-21 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 23 of TNC 2009-261-7, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is
hereby filing its Final Submissions in this proceeding with the Commission.
Document: 1411304.zip - 915KB

2010-06-21 - Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections INc., Advanced Knowledge Network, Canadian Association of Internet Providers, EGATE Networks Inc., Managed Networks Systems INc., Pathway Communications, Sentex Communications Corp. Skyway West Business Internet Services and Telnet Communications (CAIP et al.)
Description:  Pursuant to the procedures outlinedin NC 2009-261-7, enclosed please find the Final Comments of Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections INc., Advanced Knowledge Network, Canadian Association of Internet Providers, EGATE Networks Inc., Managed Networks Systems INc., Pathway Communications, Sentex Communications Corp. Skyway West Business Internet Services and Telnet Communications (CAIP et al.)
Document: 1411187.zip - 580KB

2010-06-21 - Execulink Telecom
Description: These are the final comments of Execulink Telecom Inc. (Execulink)
regarding Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 as expanded by Order in Council P.C. 2009-2007 (OIC 2009-2007).
Document: 1410832.pdf - 102KB

2010-06-21 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: Further to the Commission's directions on procedure set out in Notice of Consultation 2009-261, issued 23 December 2009, the Consumer Groups are pleased to provide the Commission with the following reply comments on the issues raised in the above referenced Telecom Notice of Consultation, as modified by the Commission.
Document: 1410700.pdf - 1964KB


Section 4h) Request to appear

2010-04-09 - Public Advocacy Interest Centre (PIAC)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 22 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, this is to confirm that the Consumer Groups wish to participate in the oral hearing.
Document: 1379392.pdf - 22KB

2010-04-08 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 22 of TNC 2009-261-7, Execulink Telecom Inc. hereby
submits notice of its intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence 31 May 2010.
Document: 1379152.pdf - 21KB

2010-04-08 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Selon la procédure établie dans le processus 2009-261-7, je signale mon intention de participer à l’audience publique 2009-261 qui se tiendra à partir du 31 mai 2010.
Document: 1379113.pdf - 541KB

2010-04-08 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the CRTC in Notice 2009-261, the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) files its notice of intention to participate in the oral hearing.
Document: 1379068.pdf - 117KB

2010-04-08 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 22 Expansion of proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, 23 December 2009, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. hereby provide notice of its intention to participate in the oral hearing.
Document: 1379020.pdf - 16KB


Section 4i) Comments regarding Usage-based billing

2010-05-25 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Pursuant to the Commission’s letter dated 13 May 2010, please find below the comments from Vaxination Informatique.
Document: 1397584.doc - 561KB

2010-05-25 – Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (“Execulink”) is in receipt of Commission letter dated 13 May 2010 requesting comments on Usage Based Billing (UBB) on Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) services.
Document: 1397459.pdf – 74KB

2010-05-25 – TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission’s letter dated 13 May 2010, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is filing these comments with respect to whether the cable companies’ Third Party Internet Access (“TPIA”) service should be subject to the same measures regarding equivalent treatment as were found to be appropriate with respect to the Internet traffic management practices (“ITMPs”) of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, “Bell companies”) in Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-255 (“Decision 2010-255”).
Document: 1397436.pdf – 32KB

2010-05-25 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of a Commission letter, dated 13 May 2010, requesting comments on whether the Cable Companies’ Third Party Internet Service (“TPIA”) should be subject to the same equivalent treatment obligations as those placed upon Bell Canada and Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (together, “Bell”) in Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-255, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada – Applications to introduce usage-based billing and other changes to Gateway Access Services (“Decision 2010-255”). Primus hereby files its comments on the questions set out by the Commission.
Document: 1397457.pdf – 27KB

2010-05-25 - The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: In a letter issued 13 May 2010, Commission staff invited parties to the above referenced proceeding to file comments on the issue "whether the cable companies' Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) service should be subject to the same measures regarding equivalent treatment as were found to be appropriate with respect to the Bell companies' ITMP in Decision 2010-255." Commission staff also stated that parties should be prepared to address this matter at the upcoming oral hearing in the TNC 2009-261 proceeding.
Document: 1397428.pdf - 2450KB


Section 5 - Responses to interrogatories

2010-05-26 - Teksavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: In the course of reviewing the record of this proceeding in advance of the hearing, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) discovered some minor errors in some of its prior materials. By way of this submission, TSI is filing corrections to the pages containing and affected by those errors as follows:
Document: 1397820.zip - 389KB

2010-05-25 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: In response to TekSavvy(Consumer Groups)1Mar 10-1, TSI accidentally filed
“Connecting America” The National Broadband Plan” instead of “Next Generation
Connectivity: A review of broadband Internet transitions and policy from around the
world” Final Version, February 2010. Accordingly, TSI is now filing a copy of this latter
report.
Document: 1397412.zip - 3875KB

2010-05-11 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) is in receipt of
a Commission staff letter dated April 23, 2010, posing additional interrogatories
to certain parties. TELUS submits its responses to the interrogatories addressed
to the Company.
Document: 1392278.zip - 132KB

2010-05-11 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits the attached responses to additional interrogatories received from the CRTC on April 23, 2010.
Document: 1392182.zip - 66KB

2010-05-10 - QMI for Videotron
Description: In accordance with the procedures established in the Commission’s letter of 23 April 2010, QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby provides its responses to additional interrogatories received in the above-mentioned proceeding.
Document: 1392149.pdf - 68KB

2010-05-10 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is filing the enclosed responses to interrogatories pursuant to the procedure established in the above noted notice of consultation, as amended by the Commission staff letter of 23 April 2009.
Document: 1392099.zip - 65KB

2010-05-10 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Please find attached responses to additional interrogatories requested by
Commission letter 23 April 2010 of Execulink Telecom Inc. (Execulink) in the
above referenced proceeding.
Document: 1392067.pdf - 44KB

2010-05-10 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with the process set out in the Commission staff letter issued 23 April 2010 in regards to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services – Request for disclosure of information filed in confidence and for further responses, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits its responses to the additional interrogatories posed by the Commission in Attachment 3.
Document: 1391996.zip - 116KB

2010-05-10 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, and the Commission’s directive in its 23 April 2010 letter, Cogeco Cable Inc. hereby submits its additional responses to interrogatories ____(CRTC)23Apr10-1 and 2.
Document: 1391976.zip - 56KB

2010-05-10 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to Commission letter of 23 April 2010, Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) herein attaches responses to the additional interrogatories set out in the letter.
Document: 1391969.zip - 114KB

2010-05-10 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission’s letter dated 23 April 2010 in the above-cited
proceeding, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is hereby filing its response to the
interrogatory posed to it by the Commission on that day.
Document: 1391921.zip - 30KB

2010-05-10 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to Lynne Fancy’s letter of 23 April 2010, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are providing their responses to the additional Commission interrogatories.  A revised confidential version of The Companies(CRTC)1Mar10-101 TNC 2009-261 is also provided here to the Commission.
Document: 1391896.zip - 82KB

2010-05-10 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission’s letter dated 23 April 2010, Primus
Telecommunications Canada. Inc. (“Primus”) hereby files its responses to the two
additional interrogatories posed by the Commission.
Document: 1391825.zip - 62KB

2010-05-03 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to Commission Staff Letter dated April 23, 2010, Rogers hereby files an ABRIDGED Further Response to Rogers(CRTC)1Mar10-204.
Document: 1388574.doc - 47KB

2010-05-03 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261; Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, and Commission letter dated 23 April 2010, Shaw Communications Inc., herein provides its supplemental response to Shaw(Teksavvy)1Mar10-1.
Document: 1388559.pdf - 120KB

2010-05-03 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt of a Commission
staff letter dated April 23, 2010, requesting, among other things, that TELUS
provide a further response to interrogatory TELUS ILECs(CRTC)01March10-204
f). TELUS submits its revised response to the noted interrogatory.
Document: 1388441.zip - 112KB

2010-05-03 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, and the Commission’s directive in its 23 April 2010 letter, Cogeco Cable Inc. hereby submits its supplementary response to interrogatory ____(TekSavvy)1Mar10-1.
Document: 1388392.zip - 20KB

2010-05-03 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to Lynne Fancy’s letter of 23 April 2010, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are providing certain additional interrogatory responses.  Additional interrogatory responses, reflecting the Commission’s disclosure decision, are provided with respect to The Companies(CRTC)1Mar10-201, 202 and 204.  An additional confidential version of The Companies(TekSavvy)1Mar10-5 is provided here to the Commission and to TekSavvy directly.
Document: 1388245.zip - 91KB

2010-05-03 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., (“Bragg”) hereby files disclosure of information for which confidentiality was claimed and further responses to the Commission’s interrogatories, received on April 23, 2009, related to the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1388234.zip - 184KB

2010-05-03 - Quebecor Media Inc. for Videotron
Description: In accordance with the procedures established in the Commission’s letter of 23 April 2010, QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby provides its further response to an interrogatory received in the above-mentioned proceeding.
Document: 1388222.pdf - 70KB

2010-04-16 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedure established by the Commission staff for the above-noted proceeding, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) files the following responses to requests for disclosure and further responses to the interrogatories.
Document: 1382908.pdf - 142KB

2010-04-16 - The BC Broadband Association
Description: The BC Broadband Association (BCBA) is in receipt of a letter dated 09-April-2010 filed by TELUS requesting for further responses to interrogatories posed to British Columbia Broadband Association (“BCBA”), on March 1, 2010.
Document: 1382910.pdf - 228KB

2010-04-16 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-8 (TNC 2009-261-8), Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) submit a joint response in the Attachment to a request from Teksavvy for a further response to an interrogatory.
Document: 1382713.zip - 93KB

2010-04-16 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-8 (TNC 2009-261-8), Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits its responses in the Attachment to requests from Teksavvy for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information. Please note that a response to another Teksavvy request for further response is being filed under separate cover jointly with Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Cable Carriers).
Document: 1382727.zip - 56KB

2010-04-16 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to TNC 2009-261, Bragg hereby responds to the requests for disclosure of information and for further responses to interrogatories filed by Teksavvy Solutions Inc. (Teksavvy) on April 9, 2010.
Document: 1382736.zip - 167KB

2010-04-16 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in paragraph 19 of TNC 2009-261-8, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are filing their responses to the requests for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information.
Document: 1382755.zip - 69KB

2010-04-09 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) provides its response to interrogatory TELUS ILECs(CRTC)01Mar10-201 in relation to the above noted proceeding.
Document: 1379411.zip - 44KB

2010-04-07 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) hereby files revisions to its response to Primus(CRTC)1Mar10-104.
Document: 1379162.zip - 35KB

2010-04-07 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: In its filing on the public record of the above-noted proceeding, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) inadvertently omitted to include the abridged version of its response to Cogeco(The Companies)01Mar10-1. Please find enclosed this response.
Document: 1378758.zip - 27KB

2010-04-07 - Primus Communications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) hereby files revisions to
certain interrogatory responses it filed on 1 April 2010.
Document: 1378725.doc - 58KB

2010-04-06 - Quebecor Media Inc. on behalf of Videotron Ltd.
Description: In accordance with the procedures established in NC 2009-261, as amended by NC 2009- 261-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby provides two additional third round interrogatory responses.
Document: 1378699.pdf - 130KB

2010-04-06 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits the attached responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC regarding Rogers Non-Cable Territory. Rogers inadvertently omitted these responses from its April 1, 2010 submission. Rogers apologizes for the oversight.
Document: 1378500.zip - 76KB

2010-04-05 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Further to our correspondence dated April 1, 2010, Bragg Communications Inc., (“Bragg”) hereby provides the balance of the interrogatory responses relating to the above noted proceeding. This includes responses to the following interrogatories: CRTC # 101,102, 105, 201 and 202.
Document: 1378451.zip - 156KB

2010-04-01 - The BC Broadband Association (BCBA)
Description: The BC Broadband Association (BCBA) is in receipt of a letter from TELUS dated 1-March-2010 citing interrogatories addressed to BCBA.
Document: 1379024.doc - 196KB

2010-04-01 - Open Source Solutions
Description: The Open Source Solutions (OSS) is in receipt of a letter from the CRTC, reference number 8663-C12-200907321, dated 1-March-2010 citing interrogatories addressed to OSS.
Document: 1379009.doc - 358KB

2010-04-01 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 17 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-8, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) hereby submits the following responses to interrogatories:
Document: 1377021.zip - 175KB

2010-04-01 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the directions provided by Commission staff in relation to Notice 2009-261-8, TELUS Communications Company files its attached responses to interrogatories.
Document: 1378074.zip - 880KB

2010-04-01 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) hereby submit responses to the Commission's interrogatories of 1 March 2010, pursuant to paragraph 17 of TNC 2009-261-7, as amended.
Document: 1377943.zip - 891KB

2010-04-01 - Cybersurf Corp and Alberta 1256382 LTD. (Cybersurf)
Description: Attached are the interrogatory responses of Cybersurf to the CRTC.
Document: 1377889.zip - 45KB

2010-04-01 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of
interrogatories from the Commission, Bell Aliant Regional Communications,
Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Société en commandite Télébec (together,
“The Companies”) and TELUS Communications Company dated 1 March 2010.
Pursuant to the procedure set out in above referenced proceeding, Primus hereby
files its interrogatory responses.
Document: 1377874.zip - 51KB

2010-04-01 - Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI) for Videotron
Description: In accordance with the procedures established in NC 2009-261, as amended by NC 2009- 261-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby provides the enclosed third round interrogatory responses.
Document: 1377764.pdf - 290KB

2010-04-01 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits the attached responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC and parties pursuant to the procedure established in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 as amended. Please note that responses to certain interrogatories are being filed under separate cover jointly with Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Cable Carriers). These joint responses are referenced, and in certain cases expanded upon, in Rogers’ responses herein.
Document: 1377600.zip - 468KB

2010-04-01 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) is in receipt of interrogatories from the CRTC, the Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP), the Companies (Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec, Société en commandite and TELUS Communications Company), Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel), MTS Allstream Inc., Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus), TekSavvy Solutions Inc., Vaxination Informatique and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre on behalf of the Consumer Groups, filed in the above-noted proceeding and mainly addressed to the Cable Carriers.
Document: 1377580.zip - 196KB

2010-04-01 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description:  Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is filing the enclosed responses to interrogatories pursuant to the procedure established in the above noted notice of consultation, as amended by subsequent notices of consultation and Commission letters.
Document: 1377475.zip - 777KB

2010-04-01 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 17 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, 23 December 2009 (TNC 2009-261-7), as revised in TNC 2009-261-8, 12 March 2010, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits its responses to the interrogatories addressed to MTS Allstream by the Commission and by each of the following parties:
Document: 1377364.zip - 707KB

2010-04-01 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Pursuant to TNC 2009-261, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is hereby filing its responses to the interrogatories posed to it on 1 March 2010.
Document: 1377238.zip - 9616KB

2010-04-01 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) is in receipt of interrogatories dated 1 March 2010 from the CRTC, the Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc., Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies), Distributel Communications Limited, MTS Allstream Inc., Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc., TekSavvy Solutions Inc. and Vaxination Informatique.
Document: 1377119.zip - 663KB

2010-04-01 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Please find attached the interrogatory responses of Execulink Telecom Inc. (Execulink) in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 1377069.zip - 118KB

2010-04-01 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., (“Bragg”) is in receipt of interrogatories from the CRTC, the Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP), the Companies, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel), MTS Allstream Inc., Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus), TekSavvy Solutions Inc. and Vaxination
Informatique.
Document: 1376831.zip - 255KB

2010-04-01 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: Further to the Commission’s directives in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-8 Expansion of proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261 issued 12 March 2010, please find enclosed the Consumer groups’ response to an interrogatory received from TEKSAVVY SOLUTIONS Inc.
Document: 1376826.zip - 28KB

2010-04-01 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) submit the attached joint responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC and parties pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 as amended.
Document: 1376806.zip - 462KB

2010-03-31 - Oricom Internet Inc.
Description: Vous trouverez  avec cet envoi les renseignements demandés  à Oricom Internet Inc., en tant que membre de la Coalition Québécoise des Fournisseurs d’Accès Internet, par le conseil aux concurrents ayant déposé des mémoires initiaux à l’annexe 2 de l’avis de consultation CRTC 2009-261-7.
 Document: 1378602.zip - 125KB

2010-03-01 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: Please find enclosed:
a) a revised version of Attachment 1 to the Consumer Groups’ 30 October 2009
submission; b) a revised version of Attachment 2 to Consumer Groups(Cable Companies)06Nov09-1 TNC 2009-261; and c) a revised version of Consumer Groups(Cable Companies)06Nov09-2 TNC 2009-261.
Document: 1365298.zip - 550KB

2010-02-08 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits the attached response to Rogers Non-Cable(CRTC)6Nov09-10 pursuant to Commission staff letter dated January 20, 2010 requesting public disclosure of the response.
Document: 1356225.zip - 51KB

2010-02-03 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Inadvertently, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) indicated at page 3 of its supplemental response to interrogatory Cogeco(ConsumerGroups)17Jul09-1, filed on 16 October 2009, that its “Ultimate” High Speed Internet service allows a download speed up to 16 rather than 50 Mbps.
Document: 1354422.zip - 103KB

2010-01-28 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In its 23 November 2009 covering letter for the filing of its second round interrogatory responses in the proceeding initiated by TNC 2009-261, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) indicated that it would file the response to MTS Allstream(CRTC)6Nov09-2 TNC 2009-261 on 15 December 2009, at the same time as its supplemental responses pursuant to the Commission's determination regarding parties' requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure.
Document: 1349926.zip - 53KB

2010-01-28 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) hereby submit supplemental responses to the following interrogatories, pursuant to the Commission's letter of 20 January 2010
Document: 1349793.zip - 179KB

2010-01-28 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the direction provided by Commission staff in its letter dated January 20, 2010, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) files its updated response to interrogatory TELUS(CRTC)06Nov09-4 placing on the public record the list of central offices for which high-speed Internet DSL-capable is available.
Document: 1349624.zip - 73KB

2010-01-28 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission’s correspondence dated January 20, 2010, Bragg Communications Inc. is hereby providing the Commission with the public disclosure requested with regard to Bragg (TekSavvy) 06Nov09-2.
Document: 1349545.zip - 148KB

2009-12-03 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: In its 23 November 2009 interrogatory responses, Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) advised that it would submit revised interrogatory responses to Primus(CRTC)6Nov09-2 and Primus(CRTC)6Nov09-5 when the responses were complete.
Document: 1329677.zip - 41KB

2009-12-03 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale highspeed access services, Bragg Communications Inc. is hereby filing a revised response to Bragg (TekSavvy)06Nov09-1 for the public record.
Document: 1329104.zip - 153KB

2009-12-02 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedure established by the Commission in Notice 2009-261, as amended, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) files the following responses to requests for disclosure and further responses to the interrogatories.
Document: 1329059.zip - 138KB

2009-12-02 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure established in paragraph 31 of TNC 2009-261, as modified, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) hereby file their response to requests for pubic disclosure of information.
Document: 1329032.zip - 281KB

2009-12-02 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure established in the above noted Notice of Consultation, as amended, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits its responses to requests for public disclosure of information filed in confidence and for additional responses with respect to SaskTel’s 23 November interrogatory responses.
Document: 1328995.doc - 71KB

2009-12-02 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009- 261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale highspeed access services, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) is hereby filing a revised response to Cogeco(TekSavvy)06Nov09-2.
Document: 1328984.zip - 23KB

2009-12-02 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI) for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 (TNC 2009-261) as amended, Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) submit joint responses in the Attachment to requests for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed.
Document: 1328968.zip - 106KB

2009-12-02 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 (TNC 2009-261) as amended, Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits its responses in the Attachment to requests for further responses to second round interrogatories and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed. Please note that responses to certain requests for further responses and disclosure are being filed under separate cover jointly with Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Cable Carriers).
Document: 1328949.zip - 52KB

2009-12-02 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) received requests for public disclosure, dated 27 November 2009, from the Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP) and TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (TekSavvy). In accordance with the procedures identified at paragraph 31 of TNC 2009-261-6, MTS Allstream hereby submits its response to CISP's and TekSavvy's requests.
Document: 1328831.zip - 70KB

2009-11-27 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., (“Bragg”) is hereby re-filing its response to the CRTC’s interrogatory number 3 that was filed on November 23, 2009. Please replace the earlier document with the attached interrogatory response.
Document: 1326900.zip - 156KB

2009-11-26 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: On November 23, 2009, the Consumer Groups' filed responses to interrogatories received, respectively, from TekSavvy Solutions Inc. and The Cable Companies with respect to the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1326755.pdf - 751KB

2009-11-24 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) inadvertently filed the confidential version of its response to MTS Allstream OOT(CRTC)6Nov09-2 TNC 2009-261 on the public record. MTS Allstream is hereby requesting parties to the proceeding to replace the originally filed version of this response with the attached document.
Document: 1326039.zip - 51KB

2009-11-23 - Open Source Solutions (OSS)
Description: Open Source Solutions (OSS) is in receipt of a letter from the CRTC, reference number 8663-C12-200907321, dated 06-Noveber-2009 which request to respond to additional interrogatories. Responses are to be filed with the Commission, serving copy on all other parties, by 23 November 2009.
Document: 1327610.pdf - 400KB

2009-11-23 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)
Description: Find enclosed the following interrogatory responses from the Coalition of Internet Service Providers to the 2nd round interrogatories.
Document: 1325995.zip - 1076KB

2009-11-23 - Cybersurf Corp. and Alberta  1356382 Ltd.
Description: Attached are the interrogatory responses of Cybersurf to the CRTC and Cable Companies.
Document: 1325875.zip - 64KB

2009-11-23 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of interrogatories from the Commission dated 6 November 2009. Pursuant to the procedure set out in above referenced proceeding, Primus hereby files its interrogatory responses
Document: 1325858.zip - 61KB

2009-11-23 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits the attached responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC and TekSavvy pursuant to the procedure established in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 as amended. Please note that responses to all other interrogatories are being filed under separate cover jointly with Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Cable Carriers).
Document: 1325810.zip - 88KB

2009-11-23 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) submit the attached joint responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC and parties pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 as amended.
Document: 1325681.zip - 801KB

2009-11-23 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) herein files its responses to the second round of interrogatories received in Notice of Consultation 2009-261 – Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (NC 2009-261). Interrogatory responses that are not included in this filing or that were addressed to the Cable Carriers are filed as a joint response under separate cover.
Document: 1325666.zip - 372KB

2009-11-23 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with procedures set out at paragraph 29 of TNC 2009-261-1, as amended by TNC 2009-261-6, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) hereby submits its responses to the interrogatories asked by the Commission and TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (TekSavvy), with the exception of MTS Allstream(CRTC)6Nov09-2 TNC 2009-261.
Document: 1325620.zip - 221KB

2009-11-23 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the directions provided by Commission staff in its letter dated November 6, 2009, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) files its attached responses to the Commission’s interrogatories in relation to this proceeding.
Document: 1325541.zip - 223KB

2009-11-23 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale highspeed access services, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby submits its responses to interrogatories 1, 2 and 3 addressed to each cable carrier by TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Document: 1325516.zip - 21KB

2009-11-23 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Please find attached the interrogatory responses of Execulink Telecom Inc. (Execulink) in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 1325486.zip - 238KB

2009-11-23 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: Le 8 mai 2009, le Conseil de la radiodiffusion et des télécommunications canadiennes ("le Conseil") publiait l’Avis de consultation de télécom CRTC 2009-261 (« Avis 2009-261 ») intitulé Instance visant à étudier le bien-fondé de prescrire certains services d'accès à Internet à haute vitesse disponibles dans le commerce de gros.
Document: 1325438.zip - 40KB

2009-11-23 - Quebecor Media inc. (QMI) for Videotron Ltd.
Description: In accordance with the procedures established in NC 2009-261, as amended by NC 2009-261-1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, and the Commission’s letter of 06 November 2009, QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby provides the enclosed second round interrogatory responses.
Document: 1325414.pdf - 238KB

2009-11-23 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 29 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-6, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Bragg Communications Inc. hereby submits the responses to interrogatories filed by Teksavvy, CISP and the Commission that require a specific company response from Bragg. Interrogatory responses to interrogatories directed to the Cable Carriers that are not included in this filing are being filed under separate cover by the Cable Carriers.
Document: 1325395.zip - 203KB

2009-11-23 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) hereby submit responses to the Commission's interrogatories of 6 November 2009, pursuant to paragraph 29 of TNC 2009-261, as modified.
Document: 1325304.zip - 368KB

2009-11-23 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to Commission staff’s letter of 6 November 2009, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) provides the attached responses to interrogatories.
Document: 1325238.zip - 280KB

2009-11-23 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 29 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-6, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) hereby submits the following responses to interrogatories:
Document: 1325115.pdf - 123KB

2009-11-23 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Pursuant to TNC 2009-261, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is hereby filing its responses to the interrogatories posed to it on 6 November 2009.
Document: 1325050.zip - 2575KB

2009-11-23 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: Further to the Commission's directives on procedure in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-6, please find enclosed the Consumer Groups' responses to interrogatories received, respectively, from TekSavvy Solutions Inc. and The Cable Companies.  We have also attached an Appendix which consists of a copy of the Consumer Groups comments in a Cabinet appeal initiated by the telcos earlier this year.
Document: 1324818.pdf - 1946KB

2009-11-04 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are filing revised Attachments for the Supplemental response to The Companies(CRTC)17Jul09-3 TNC 2009-261.
Document: 1316677.zip - 61KB

2009-10-27 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter dated 2 October 2009, as modified by its ruling dated 23 October 2009, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are filing their further response to The Companies(TekSavvy)17Jul09-3 TNC 2009-261.
Document: 1307527.zip - 56KB

2009-10-23 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., (“Bragg”) hereby provides follow-up information relating to the information sought by the Commission in its letter dated October 7, 2009 as further amended by its correspondence to parties dated October 13, 2009. When Bragg filed its further responses on October 16, 2009, we advised the Commission that information required for the public record in relation to Bragg (CRTC) 17July09-1(d) was not readily available as further review revealed that the initial information filed was not accurate.  We have since reviewed the information to obtain a more accurate estimate of the number of high speed Internet capable subscribers and on today’s date Bragg is filing for the public record its response to this interrogatory.
Document: 1305055.zip - 151KB

2009-10-20 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: On 19 October 2009, Shaw filed its supplemental responses and further disclosure pursuant to NC 2009-261.  It has since come to our attention that the table referenced in response to Shaw(Companies)17July2009-16 was inadvertently not included in the responses filed with the Commission and distributed to the Interested Parties.
Document: 1302143.zip - 69KB

2009-10-16 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) hereby submit supplemental responses to the following interrogatories, pursuant to the Commission's letter of 2 October 2009 and the Commission's directions on procedure provided on 13 October 2009 .
Document: 1300497.zip - 227KB

2009-10-16 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, and the Commission's directives in its 2 and 13 October 2009 letters, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby submits its supplementary responses to interrogatories.
Document: 1300495.zip - 246KB

2009-10-16 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: Pursuant to Commission staff's determinations, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) files its revised interrogatory responses in relation to Notice 2009-261. TELUS provides disclosure of information designated as confidential, as requested in Attachment 1 of the Commission staff letter dated October 2, 2009.
Document: 1299295.zip - 701KB

2009-10-16 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the process established under NC 2009-261 and the Commission staff letter of 13 October 2009, Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) herein files its supplemental responses and disclosures.
Document: 1299187.zip - 711KB

2009-10-16 - Quebecor Media inc. (QMI) for Videotron Ltd.
Description: In accordance with the procedures established in NC 2009-261, as amended by NC 2009-261-1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, and the Commission staff letters of 2 and 13 October 2009, QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (Videotron), hereby provides the enclosed further interrogatory responses and disclosures.
Document: 1298921.pdf - 1017KB

2009-10-16 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: As directed in the Commission's October 2nd letter as amended by the Commission's October 13th letter, Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits further responses to interrogatories and disclosures.
Document: 1298885.zip - 126KB

2009-10-16 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., ("Bragg") hereby files its reply to the Commission's request for further information of disclosure pursuant to its letter dated October 7, 20009, as further amended by its correspondence to parties dated October 13, 2009.
Document: 1298605.pdf - 147KB

2009-10-16 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., (“Bragg”) hereby files its reply to the Commission's request for further information of disclosure pursuant to its letter dated October 7, 2009, as further amended by its correspondence to parties dated October 13, 2009.
Document: 1298574.zip - 222KB

2009-10-16 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: Le 8 mai 2009 , le Conseil de la radiodiffusion et des télécommunications canadiennes ("le Conseil") publiait l'Avis de consultation de télécom CRTC 2009-261 (Avis 2009-261) intitulé Instance visant à étudier le bien-fondé de prescrire certains services d'accès à Internet à haute vitesse disponibles dans le commerce de gros.
Document: 1298243.zip - 91KB

2009-10-16 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure established in the above noted Notice of Consultation, as amended, the Commission's disclosure rulings of 2 October 2009 and Commission Staff's process letter of 13 October 2009 , Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits the attached supplemental interrogatory responses.
Document: 1298047.zip - 90KB

2009-10-09 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with procedures set out at paragraph 26 of TNC 2009-261, as amended by TNC 2009-261-5, and pursuant to the Commission's letter of 2 October 2009, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the following supplemental responses to interrogatories:
Document: 1292591.zip - 81KB

2009-10-09 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Pursuant to the procedures specified in paragraph 26 of TNC 2009-261-5 and Commission staff letter 2 October 2009, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) hereby submits its revised interrogatory response, Distributel(Cable Carriers)17Jul09-7(b).

Document: 1288277.pdf - 48KB

2009-09-22 - Open Source Solutions (OSS)
Description: Open Source Solutions (OSS) is in receipt of a letter from TELUS dated 15-September-2009 citing requests for further responses to interrogatories.
Document: 1293036.pdf - 243KB

2009-09-22 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure established in the above noted Notice of Consultation, as amended, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits its responses to requests for public disclosure of information filed in confidence and for additional responses with respect to SaskTel's 31 August interrogatory responses
Document: 1275559.zip - 85KB

2009-09-22 - Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)
Description: Please find in the enclosed attachment, the following responses to deficiency requests of TELUS to the the Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc.
Document: 1275557.zip - 12KB

2009-09-22 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink is in receipt of the following request made by Telus for additional information.
Document: 1275555.pdf - 25KB

2009-09-22 - Accelerated Connections Inc. (ACI)
Description: Accelerated Connections is in receipt of a letter from TELUS Communications, dated 15 September 2009, requesting a further response to an interrogatory _____(Telus)17July09-3 TCN 2009-261.
Document: 1275548.pdf - 30KB

2009-09-22 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI) for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: The Cable Carriers submit joint responses in Attachment 1-6 requests for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed.
Document:  1275510.zip - 156KB

2009-09-22 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to Notice of Consultation 2009-261, as amended, Rogers submits its responses in Attachments 1-6 to requests for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimes.
Document: 1275488.zip - 150KB

2009-09-22 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream received requests for further responses and/or public disclosure, dated 16 September 2009, from the Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP) and TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Document:  1275468.zip - 2194KB

2009-09-22 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description:  Primus is hereby filing revised responses to two interrogatories dated 17 July 2009
Document: 1275423.zip - 69KB

2009-09-22 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus is in receipt of a request, dated 15 September 2009 , for further response to an interrogatory from TELUS Communications Company. Primus hereby submits its response to this request.
Document: 1275297.zip - 56KB

2009-09-22 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Shaw is in receipt of requests from Cybersurf, Distributed, PIAC, CISP, Teksavvy and the Companies for furtehr interrogatory responses and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed addressed in Notice of Consultation 2009-261.
Document: 1275231.pdf - 120KB

2009-09-22 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures of NC 2009-261, Cogeco hereby provides its answer to requests for further interrogatory responses and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed addressed to Cogeco specifically or as a cable carrier.
Document: 1275218.zip - 204KB

2009-09-22 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the procedure established by the Commission in Notice 2009-261, as amended, TELUS files the following responses to requests for disclosure and further responses to interrogatories.
Document: 1275206.pdf - 60KB

2009-09-22 - Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI) for Videotron Ltd.
Description: In accordance with the procedures established in NC 2009-261, as amended by NC 2009-261-1, 2 and 3, QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby provides the following responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure received on 15 September 2009.
Document: 1275194.pdf - 41KB

2009-09-22 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in paragraph 25 of TNC 2009-261, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are filing their responses to the requests for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information
Document: 1275169.zip - 168KB (revised)

2009-09-22 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the Notice of Consultation, Bragg Communications is filing its written responses to the requests for the further disclosure or public disclosure of intermation supplied by Bragg in response to the various interrogatories filed by parties to this proceeding.
Document:  1275135.zip - 189KB

2009-09-16 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby filing its response to MTS Allstream OOT(CRTC)17Jul09-2 TNC 2009-261.
Document: 1272004.pdf - 74KB

2009-09-10 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: It has been brought to MTS Allstream's attention that it inadvertently overlooked certain Commission interrogatories. The responses to these are attached, with the exception of the response to MTS Allstream OOT(CRTC)17Jul09-2 TNC 2009-261, which will be provided as soon as possible. MTS Allstream apologies for any inconvenience that the delay in responding to these interrogatories has caused.
Document: 1270012.zip - 119KB

2009-09-08 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the directions provided by the Commission in Notice 2009-261, TELUS Communications Company files its attached responses to certain interrogatories.
Document: 1266364.zip - 92KB

2009-09-08 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: It is just been brought to our attention that the responses to the interrogatories of the Consumer Groups have not be filed.
Document: 1266260.pdf - 654KB

2009-09-01 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) files interrogatories TELUS_ILECs(CRTC)17July09-3 and TELUS_ILECs(CRTC)17July09-5. These interrogatories should have been included in yesterday's submission. TELUS apologies for any inconvenience.
Document: 1265222.zip - 34KB

2009-09-01 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the Commission's letter dated 17 July 2009, as modified in its letter of 4 August 2009, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are attaching the following revised responses to:
Document: 1265190.zip - 88KB

2009-09-01 - Télébec, Société en commandite
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the Commission's letter dated 17 July 2009, as modified in its letter of 4 August 2009, Télébec, Société en commandite (Télébec or the Company) herein attaches the following additional response it inadvertently omitted from the filing of 31 August 2009:
Document: 1264953.zip - 29KB

2009-08-31 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the Commission's letter dated 17 July 2009, as modified in its letter of 4 August 2009, the attached responses to interrogatories are submitted by Bell Aliant Regional Communi ca tions, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies).
Document: 1264326.zip - 27285KB

2009-08-31 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the directions provided by Commission staff in relation to Notice 2009-261, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) files its attached answers to certain interrogatories.
Document: 1262955.zip - 392KB

2009-08-31 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Pursuant to TNC 2009-261, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TekSavvy”) is hereby providing its responses to the first round of interrogatories in this proceeding.
Document: 1263146.zip - 624KB

2009-08-31 - Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi)
Description: Please find attached the interrogatory responses of Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi) in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 1263284.zip - 135KB

2009-08-31 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the directions specified in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services , as modified by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) provides the attached responses to interrogatories.
Document: 1263695.zip - 700KB

2009-08-31 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 23 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) hereby submits the following responses to interrogatories:
Document: 1264184.zip - 399KB

2009-08-31 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits the attached responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC and parties pursuant to the procedure established in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 as amended. Please note that responses to certain interrogatories are being filed under separate cover jointly with Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Cable Carriers).
Document: 1264205.zip - 527KB

2009-08-31 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) submit the attached joint responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC and parties pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 as amended.
Document: 1264225.zip - 320KB

2009-08-31 - Execulink Telecom
Description: Please find attached the interrogatory responses of Execulink Telecom Inc.
(Execulink) in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 1264232.zip - 384KB

2009-08-31 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) herein files its responses to interrogatories received in Notice of Consultation 2009-261 - Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (NC 2009-261).
Document: 1264243.zip - 952KB

2009-08-31 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 23 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, as revised in TNC 2009-261-1, 4 August 2009, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits its responses to the interrogatories addressed to MTS Allstream by the Commission and by each of the following parties:
Document: 1264250.zip - 557KB

2009-08-31 - Quebecor Media Inc. for Videotron Ltd.
Description: In accordance with the procedures established in NC 2009-261, as amended by NC 2009- 261-1, 2 and 3, QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (Videotron), hereby provides the enclosed responses to interrogatories received on 17 July 2009.
Document: 1264278.zip - 612KB

2009-08-31 - Accelerated Connections Inc. (ACI)
Description: Please find attached the interrogatory responses of Accelerated Connections Inc. (“ACI”) in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 1264272.zip - 83KB

2009-08-31 - EGATE Networks Inc.
Description: Please find attached the interrogatory responses of EGATE Networks Inc.
(“EGATE”) in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 1264555.zip - 106KB

2009-08-31 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 23 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Cybersurf hereby submits the attached   responses to interrogatories from The Companies (Bell et al ), The Cable Companies, TELUS, MTS and Distributel.
Document: 1264535.zip - 82KB

2009-08-31 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., (“Bragg”) hereby files responses to the Commission's interrogatories, received on July 17, 2009, related to the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1267596.zip - 1037KB

2009-08-31 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Responses to Interrogatories.
Document: 1264587.pdf - 18KB

2009-08-31 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of interrogatories from the Commission, MTS Allstream Inc., TELUS Communications Company and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre for Consumer Groups. Primus hereby files its interrogatory responses.
Document: 1264916.zip - 22KB

2009-08-31 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby submits on behalf of its subsidiary Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. its responses to interrogatories.
Document: 126935.zip - 449KB

2009-08-31 - Télébec, Société en commandite
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the Commission's letter dated 7 July 2009, as modified in its letter of 4 August 2009, Télébec, Société en commandite (or Télébec) herein attaches the responses to interrogatories it is submitting individually. Télébec's other responses are submitted as part of the Companies' responses.
Document: 1264943.zip - 211KB

2009-08-31 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)
Description: Find enclosed the following interrogatory responses from the Coalition of Internet Service Providers.
Document: 1264958.zip - 3081KB

2009-08-31 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: Please find attached interrogatory responses submitted in the above-referenced proceeding by the Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf of itself and Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Execulink Telecom, Managed Network Systems Inc., TekSavvy Solutions Inc. and Telnet Communications (collectively, the “Competitors”).
Document: 1264965.zip - 366KB

2009-08-31 - Acanac Inc.
Description: Responses to interrogatories.
Document: 1264991.pdf - 67KB

2009-08-31 - Eagle.ca
Description: Please find attached the interrogatory responses of eagle.ca in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 1265015.zip - 80KB

2009-08-31 - ABC Communications
Description: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services. – Reply to Interrogatories
Document: 1265305.zip - 136KB


Section 6 - Responses to undertakings

2010-06-29 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description:  Further to the request of Commissioner Molnar, Cybersurf is providing the attached business plan to the Commission in the strictest confidence, pursuant to section 19 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure and section 39 of the Telecommunications Act
Document: 1411773.doc - 55KB

2010-09-22 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Attached are the responses to the undertakings taken by MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) on days 4 and 5 of the oral hearing for the proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261
Document: 1411409.zip - 150KB

2010-06-21 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In addition, TELUS files its response to an undertaking taken by the Company at the oral hearing, which undertaking can be found at paragraphs 7578-7580 of the hearing transcript, Volume 5.
Document: 1411124.zip - 68KB

2010-06-11 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) is providing its response to the undertaking at paragraph 6166 of Volume 4 of the TN 2009-261 oral hearing transcripts.
Document: 1406008.zip - 304KB

2010-06-08 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and QuebecorMedia Inc., on behalf of Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) hereby submit responses to undertakings made during their appearance before the Commission at the Oral Hearing.
Document: 1404825.zip - 92KB

2010-06-07 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) is providing a revised response to undertaking CRTC-5 that was filed with the Commission on 2 June 2010.
Document : 1492930.zip - 57KB

2010-06-04 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In response to a request from Commissioner Katz, MTS Allstream undertook to provide evidence to support the contention that "wholesale services internationally have resulted in lower prices to end users".
Document: 1402560.zip - 5044KB

2010-06-03 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: Attached are the responses to the undertakings for Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel).  For ease of identification, SaskTel has included the Commission's reference in the heading of the response.  The response to undertaking SaskTel(CRTC)31MAY2010-1 NC 2009-261 is provided to the Commission in confidence pursuant to section 39 of the Telecommunications Act for the reasons set out in that response.  An abridged version is not being provided for the public record as it would be meaningless.
Document: 1402669.doc - 67KB

2010-06-02 - Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)
Description: Find enclosed a copy of the response to the Undertaking #1 of CISP in this proceeeding.
Document: 1402649.zip - 235KB

2010-06-02 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company files its response to the undertaking from
Commissioner Katz in the above-mentioned proceeding.
Document: 1402662.zip - 222KB

2010-06-02 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are providing their responses to the undertakings accepted during the oral hearing on Monday, 31 May 2010, in the High-Speed Access Proceeding.
Document: 1402936.zip - 961KB


Section 8a) Costs

2011-04-05 - Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI) for Videotron Ltd.
Description: Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI), on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P., is in receipt of a 04 April 2011 letter on the above noted subject by Rogers Communications (Rogers).
Document: 1578192.pdf - 22KB

2011-04-05 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) is in receipt of the 4 April 2011 letter by Rogers Communications (Rogers) regarding the above-noted subject. Cogeco is also in receipt of a letter filed today by Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI), on behalf of its affiliate Videotron G.P, supporting Rogers’ intervention.
Document: 1578185.pdf - 40KB

2011-04-05 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) is in receipt of the correspondence from Rogers Communications dated April 4, 2011.
Document: 1578179.pdf - 1871KB

2011-04-04 - Rogers Communications
Description: In Order 2011-179, Rogers Communications (Rogers) was directed to pay 30%, or $35, 070.87, on behalf of itself and four other cable companies of the total cost award of $116,902.91.
Document: 1578144.pdf - 40KB

2010-09-23 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (“PIAC”) as counsel for the Consumers’
Association of Canada and Canada Without Poverty (formerly the National Anti-Poverty
Organization) (collectively “the Consumer Groups”) are pleased to enclose a
recalculation of our costs claim to correct mathematical errors, in response to
Commission legal counsel letter to PIAC dated 16 September 2010.
Document: 1442889.pdf - 395KB

2010-08-06 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (“PIAC”) as counsel for the Consumers’
Association of Canada and Canada Without Poverty (formerly the National Anti-Poverty
Organization) (collectively “the Consumer Groups”) are in receipt of comments filed 30
July 2010 by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada
and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Bell companies) further to the
application for costs submitted by the Consumer groups in the above referenced
proceeding.
Document: 1424574.pdf - 70KB

2010-08-03 – TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt of an application for costs filed on behalf of the Consumer Groups1 by the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (“PIAC”) in relation to the proceeding initiated by Notice 2009-261. Pursuant to Rule 44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure (the “Rules”), TELUS responds to the Consumer Groups’ application for costs.
Document: 1423376.pdf – 89KB

2010-07-30 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of an application for costs in the above-noted proceeding from PIAC dated 22 July 2010.  The Companies do not object to PIAC's eligibility for costs.  They do, however, have grave concerns with respect to the costs claimed by PIAC.
Document: 1422077.doc - 87KB

2010-07-30 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications, Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications, Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) are in receipt of an application for costs from PIAC, dated July 22, 2010 (the Cost Application). The Cable Carriers are also in receipt of the response to the Cost Application filed by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies), dated July 30, 2010.
Document: 1422069.pdf - 90KB

2010-07-22 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: This is an application for costs and taxation thereof, made on behalf of the Consumer Groups in respect to their participation in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1419835.pdf - 863KB

2010-07-09 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt of an application for costs from Jean François Mezei, on behalf of Vaxination Informatique, dated June 30, 2010, in relation to his participation at the oral hearing for the proceeding initiated by Notice 2009-261. Pursuant to Rule 44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure (the “Rules”), TELUS responds to Mr. Mezei’s application for costs.
Document: 1415738.pdf - 71KB

2010-07-09 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of an application for costs dated 30 June 2010 from Vaxination Informatique.  The Companies do not object to the claimant's entitlement to costs or the amount claimed.
Document: 1415530.doc - 50KB

2010-06-30 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: This application for costs and taxation is made under section 44 of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure as a result of Jean-François Mezei’s participation in the 5 day long 2009-261 public hearing.
Document: 1412515.pdf - 2948KB


Section 8b) Others

2012-05-07 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) hereby issue revised tariff pages reflecting increases in speeds for certain Gateway Access Service - Fibre to the Node (GAS-FTTN) residential access services.
Document: 1714339.zip - 74KB

2010-04-16 - Report prepared by Wall Communications Inc.
Description: Price Comparisons of Wireline, Wireless and Internet Services in Canada and with Foreign Jurisdictions
Document: 1398110.doc - 838KB